Elsewhere (288)
James Kirkup on modern policing and the case of Harry Miller:
The cop said he was in possession of 30 Tweets by me. I asked if any contained criminal material. He said…. No. I asked if any came close to being criminal… and he read me a limerick. Honestly. A limerick. A cop read me a limerick over the phone. I said, I didn’t write that. He said, “Ah. But you liked it and promoted it.” I asked why he was wasting his time on a non-crime. He said, “It’s not a crime, but it will be recorded as a hate incident”… The cop repeatedly called the complainant “the victim.” I asked how there could be a victim if, as he’d established, there was no crime. He said, that’s just how it works.
Allen Farrington on when accusations of “white privilege” are revealed for what they are:
When challenged to defend her accusation [of “white privilege”], but before she was informed by [David] Webb that he is black, [CNN analyst, Areva] Martin retorted that “this is a whole long conversation I don’t have time to get into.” But if she were confident in her position, she would be able to explain it in plain English. Instead, she assumed that by simply invoking this concept, the discussion would be resolved in her favour. Because she was using the term as an ideological cudgel and not an argument, she didn’t want to explain at all, and was noticeably annoyed when asked to do so. “By virtue of being a white male, you have white privilege” has the appearance of an explanation, but she was really just rephrasing her previous assertion using more words.
As Farrington notes, Ms Martin seems to have assumed Mr Webb’s skin colour based solely on his reference to personal responsibility, which no non-white person would ever invoke, you see. So, no racism there, clearly.
Somewhat related, the second item here.
And Katherine Birbalsingh on the fallout of pretentious racial guilt:
There is a lot of white guilt in the school system… The powers-that-be look at statistics and jump to conclusions. When there are more black boys in detention at a school, it is interpreted as a sign of racism. But maybe those boys deserved that detention? And if they don’t have any discipline they could spin out of control, they could fail their GCSEs and then they’re not going to be contenders for Oxbridge. All these things are connected… The people pushing the racism discourse don’t mean any harm, but they don’t realise how harmful it is for black kids to be constantly told “the world is racist, you’re never going to get ahead.” It gives children an excuse.
Ms Birbalsingh strikes me as a formidable woman, resourceful and tenacious, and for an educator, unusually honest. But when she says, “The people pushing the racism discourse don’t mean any harm,” I think we can raise an eyebrow. If the often-paranoid racial worldview being pushed has such predictably, reliably, damaging effects, and is often difficult to distinguish from active malice – an attempt to cow white students and render them neurotic, while degrading the life-chances of their minority peers – then the motives of those propagating this discourse may warrant a second look.
Update, via the comments:
MC quotes Ms Birbalsingh’s claim that “the people pushing the racism discourse don’t mean any harm,” and adds, “I find this hard to believe… I wonder how they square the contradictions?” Well, personally, I tend to imagine lots of screeching mental feedback and the odd random sobbing fit. Though if you tell yourself continually how righteous you are, and if you surround yourself with people doing the same, and if you’re all reinforcing each other’s vanities, daily, then I suppose it’s easier to ignore certain practicalities.
And so we get Professor Melina Abdullah, who insists that calling the police is a racist and privileged act if the criminal in question happens to be black. Whereas, being granted a license to commit crime with no fear of police involvement, on account of being black, is in no way racist or a sign of privilege. Apparently, those so indulged will flourish as responsible citizens. Or Salon’s Scott Eric Kaufman, who told his readers, emphatically, that young black men “shouldn’t have to” comply with lawful instructions from the police. Mr Kaufman, who is white, dismissed any cooperation with the police as being “servile,” presumably on grounds that being combative and violent will improve the situation no end.
Examples of similarly twisted advice are not hard to come by, at least among educators and the severely educated. And so, the obvious question: If you wanted to degrade or ruin the life-chances of minorities, what would you do differently?
Oh, and we mustn’t forget this eye-widening feat of progressive education.
You see, the way to reduce disruption and violence in the classroom is to not punish the perpetrators when the perpetrators are black, thereby encouraging a sense of impunity. And when things inevitably escalate, resulting in actual riots, with students’ hair being set on fire and female teachers being punched in the face, the thing to do, obviously, is to berate the injured teachers for their insensitivity. And then hand out panic whistles. Again, the results of this policy, implemented repeatedly, were precisely what you’d expect, what any fool could anticipate, and pretty much what you’d hope for if you were trying to wreak havoc.
As usual, feel free to share your own links and snippets, on any subject, in the comments.
Katherine used to be quite a prodigious blogger at To Miss With Love, got outed and spoke at a Tory conference which put a big black mark against her career. She still blogs occaisionally.
She was on the Rubin Report just before Christmas, worth a listen.
She was on the Rubin Report just before Christmas, worth a listen.
Video here.
I asked why he was wasting his time on a non-crime.
It’s less dangerous than chasing stabby scum and he gets to sit in a warm office.
James Kirkup on modern policing and the case of Harry Miller:
My BTL contribution to the article was:
A poor lad once came a cropper
When questioned by a daft Yorkshire copper;
The plod said “It’s true
That a thing you can’t do
Is make fun of a lass with a chopper”.
When the flatfeet turn up you haven’t seen me for, oh, two or three weeks, all right?
Bonfire of the ‘journalists’: social justice clickbait faces its Waterloo.
We can but hope.
Bonfire of the ‘journalists’: social justice clickbait faces its Waterloo.
I hesitate to gloat, but given the relentless conformity of their output – eerily uniform politics with every intersectional tic – they made themselves interchangeable, generic, and therefore disposable.
… they made themselves interchangeable, generic, and therefore disposable.
To paraphrase the sage of our time, Syndrome, when everyone’s special, no one is.
Without wanting to fall down the quotemine I can’t say that “You’d need a heart of stone not to laugh.” hasn’t been in my mind during this ‘journalism’ (snort) catastrophe.
Harry Miller.
You’re no longer able to face your accuser in England? That’s troubling…
“Down south” is a bit ambiguous.
…they made themselves interchangeable, generic, and therefore disposable.
One journalist lamented how she was sacked while writing an article about a federal worker who, by merely missing two paychecks, could no longer afford tampons.
I laughed out loud.
Women and children, hardest hit. Washington DC was becoming Dickens’ London.
If you’re passing off such preposterous anti-Trump sob stories as “journalism” just like everybody else, then yeah, maybe it’s time to get started on that novel.
Bonfire of the ‘journalists’: social justice clickbait faces its Waterloo.
I think it’s safe to say their influence on the culture has not been entirely positive.
when she says, “The people pushing the racism discourse don’t mean any harm,” I think we can raise an eyebrow.
1) T.S. Eliott above; I think I’d change “Half the harm…” to “most of the harm…”.
2) It may be a BFO, but the harm does not interest them, because it does not affect them, and are thus generally blind to it and, as has been noted, in willful ignorance and/or denial of their part in it.
When there are more black boys in detention at a school, it is interpreted as a sign of racism.
Headmistress Birbalsingh needs to have a conversation with the local Constabulary. More black kids in detention is not interpreted as racism, it is racism.
If someone “of minority” complains about their kid being detained that proves a racial hatred motive in detention. It might not be a crime. Maybe the kid deserved detention, but the fact that he (or she, or they..or xe) is (or are) black, or “Asian”, or Muslim, or whatever, puts the detention under the purview of the ever-vigilant police force.
I expect Ms Birbalsingh will soon issue an abject apology for her offensive speech and then resign her post.
Meanwhile, over at Slate:

Via Ace.
Via Ace.
Hmmmph.
Hmmmph.
Heh. Missed that one. I swear I read most of the comments. I do, I do.
You cannot begin to imagine how triggered I was. A Campari and Night Nurse would put things right. No eggs, though, my therapy armadillo would eat it and it is ovo-intolerant and a vegan.
A Campari and Night Nurse would put things right.

As a bonus, I’ll even throw in some party food.
No, don’t thank me.
No, don’t thank me.
What the hell is that?
What the hell is that?
It’s party food, obviously.
[ Peers closely. ]
I think those are… peas.
The Felonious Tweets would make a good name for a band.
Nice warm office, no wrestling with drunks…I bet the cops fight each other to get on Tweet Patrol!
Re the cheetah picture: I saw it earlier, read the description, and still don’t get it.
It’s party food, obviously.
Not just any generic “party food”, it is SuperValu™ party food, the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha party food of choice. Humbled as we are by your magnanimity by this new Epicurean treat, truly we are not worthy.
truly we are not worthy.
Oh, come on. It’s got peas.
It’s practically salad.
Oh, come on. It’s got peas.
Yes, but they are hand grown by blind nuns in the Andes using only the finest llama manure compost, in a fine ragout of Yangtze river dolphin and Assam Hare.
I can’t believe it is only 25 Euros for a half hogshead.
“Good for 10 people”
FWIW: Beto O’Rourke has been outed as a Furry
Re the cheetah picture: I saw it earlier, read the description, and still don’t get it.
I get the feeling Pogonip isn’t familiar with the world of furries. I’ll leave that conversation to someone else.
“Bonfire of the ‘journalists’: social justice clickbait faces its Waterloo.”
Rumors abound on Twitter that the quondam ‘journalists’ are now being hired by NGO activist organizations, albeit I suppose at a pay decrease (although I don’t know; some of those George Soros-funded organizations pay nice coin to the Kulturekampfers).
So, now they are OFFICIALLY ‘activists’, instead of just ‘activists masquerading as journalists’
Which has been one of my abiding beefs; not only do journos give the left in the outside world a pass due to a feeling of common cause, they want to avoid becoming unemployable if they need another job.
They can beat up on Republicans all day, because they don’t have a resume in with them. Democrats, not so much.
I believe I would prefer that food before it’s been through the party.
I believe I would prefer that food before it’s been through the party.
[ Makes agitated shushing noise. ]
Chef will be furious. And she’s a big woman. Broad-backed.
And she’s a big woman. Broad-backed.
Strong like bull, smart like tractor, swift like fence post.
Former NKVD.
“Good for 10 people”
Bad for everyone else?
FWIW: Beto O’Rourke has been outed as a Furry
Link?
Why am I not surprised? Seriously, I would not be surprised at all.
Bonfire of the ‘journalists’: social justice clickbait faces its Waterloo.
Well, Jack Dorsey and his Twitter moderator-minions are fighting the good fight on their behalf: anyone even jokingly telling these activists with bylines to “learn to code” are being suspended or banned for “targeted harassment”.
“Good for 10 people” refers to the size of a Soylent Green container.
Meanwhile, over at Slate:
I hate to bring traumatic psychology into it again[1] but I see an awful lot of similarities between the self-destructive coping mechanisms of people with Complex PTSD and this kind of foolishness. In the same way that drugs, cutting or risky and violent sex don’t actually do anything to resolve the underlying PTSD, reading someone’s bad Rule 34 furry porn isn’t going to do squat to resist a Presidential political agenda. But both groups will absolutely insist it does, because they’re emotionally invested and dealing with the real issues would mean acknowledging how badly damaged they truly are.
[1] No I don’t
“Good for 10 people”
The question is, which 10 people is it good for? Oh and where might one find them?
Seems to be a rather random way to market a food product.
…refers to the size of a Soylent Green container.
What is the secret of Soylent Green?
What is the secret of Soylent Green?
Oregano and Worchestershire sauce.
dealing with the real issues would mean acknowledging how badly damaged they truly are.
As a genre – and they’ve pretty much become one – these acts-of-resistance pieces aren’t exactly indicative of mental health.
[ Added: ]
And we mustn’t forget this compendium of sanity.
Strong like bull, smart like tractor, swift like fence post.
Your peasant roots are showing kulak. To the urban cognoscenti it’s “smart like streetcar.” 😉
In my town Saturday night the police caught two fellows driving stolen trucks (firearms were stolen in one incident), an armed robber, and dealt with several assaults as well as an overdose. Along with an average of 15 files each officer had on their plate made up of thefts, frauds, and many missing people I don’t think any of them had time to check Twitter for thought crimes.
Hmmmph.
No refunds; credit note only.
The harrumphing about the Slate tweet would have more emotional impact if the screen grab didn’t include the original date of its publication.
OK, I looked up Furry. Why all the snickering about cartoon animals? Did I not read enough?
Pogonip,
Let me see if I can help…When a “man” who likes to dress up like an aardvark, with long ears and a tail and such, and a “woman” who likes to dress up like a llama (I understand this involves a lot of spitting…don’t ask) like each other very, very much…or maybe just a little …ah, sorry. I just can’t.
OK…maybe this video will help…
https://youtu.be/eN-bFqO6hpQ
Well played, Pnip. Next time, make sure you flutter your eyelashes all sweet and innocent-like.
There is a lot of white guilt in the school system… The powers-that-be look at statistics and jump to conclusions. When there are more black boys in detention at a school, it is interpreted as a sign of racism. But maybe those boys deserved that detention?
As a life-long, bleeding heart-liberal, friend of mine (she serves on a school board in New Jersey) told me…teachers discipline at different thresholds of patience, so it’s not fair because the ones regularly disruptive get called out at the slightest misbehavior, while behaving students who rarely act out are given a break. And since it’s near-impossible to fire teachers, you can’t discipline teachers into doing their job, so there’s no consistency in classroom decorum and expected behavior–and that’s not fair! Also, they (she) has completely bought into “higher rates of discipline/detention is racism” assertion–I think because the board members are exasperated by the blow-back that occurs when explaining that differences are due to differences in conduct. They just want that conversation to go away.
The Bonfire of the Journalists article at the Spectator has a photo atop it–I thought it was Hillary Clinton, until I read the caption. Good lord, a Hillary Doppelganger…