Remember that thing, the thing that never happens?
Well, by now you know the drill:
⚠️GRAPHIC⚠️
Man pretending to be a woman caught m*sturbating in the women’s bathroom with women present
“I’m allowed to be in here… I’m a transgender.” https://t.co/gBdrwePPGd
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) January 5, 2026
Or, How dare you bigots object to his incongruous masturbation in the women’s bathroom?
The young lady unnerved by this exercise in suspiciously vigorous towelling recounts her experience here:
One might think this would be an uncontroversial point. A statement of the obvious, or formerly obvious. Readers will, however, note the inertness of the staff, at a Planet Fitness gym in Concord, California, and the young lady’s air of resignation, of futility, as if her experience were merely something to which she, and by extension all women, are expected to become accustomed.
In this thrilling age of progress.
Readers may recall our previous adventures in the super-inclusive bathrooms of Planet Fitness, where a “climate of understanding” and being “judgement-free” are the highest conceivable goals, and where perverts gleefully expose themselves to fifteen-year-old girls:
You see, in the progressive pecking order, the fantasies of sexually dysmorphic men – and the preferences of male sex offenders – are of much greater importance than any “discomfort” felt by the women and girls on whom the former groups choose to impose themselves.
Women and girls whose role, it seems, is merely to understand and tacitly affirm. To be reluctant accessories to some strange man’s psychodrama, while remaining free of judgement. Which is frowned upon.
“Staff,” we’re told, “also promised to warn him not to expose himself to other people.”
Because the modern, not-at-all-insane response to repeated acts of indecency and sexual intimidation – by a predatory man in the women’s changing rooms – is to ask him not to keep waving his erection at women and children. On grounds that what he’s waving could somehow be a lady’s penis. Such is the sophistication of our times.
So, ladies. Or actual ladies, I should say. Are you feeling all that sensitivity and progress, that rush towards utopia?
Update, via the comments, which you’re reading, of course:
Mags adds, not unreasonably,
Prompting this from Dicentra,
To which Daniel Ream replies:
Quite.
If an illustration is needed, let’s not forget the saga of Mr David “Sasha” Yates, a cross-dressing high-school sports coach with an interest in schoolgirls’ panties. And his immensely loud and righteous defenders, who were indeed overwhelmingly progressive women:
The same progressive ladies who denounced as “hate” and “transphobia” any expression of concern, and who elevated themselves with the airing of modish views, their ostentatious displays of inclusivity, while screwing over the schoolgirls being harassed by a cross-dressing creep. Because in the Progressive Pecking Order, expressing discomfort with sexual boundary violations is terribly low-status when the culprit is a man pretending to be a woman.
Readers will note the TV news interview linked in the post and its eye-widening implications:
That these sentiments were expressed with great confidence – by a woman – and were left entirely unchallenged by the reporter – also a woman – is quite a thing. It does, I think, tell us something about progressive priorities and which groups are deemed of much less importance.
It’s hard to see any alternative reading of that exchange, or of the saga generally.
Our bewigged pervert, who boasts of an “exposure fetish,” was eventually, belatedly, obliged to seek employment elsewhere, following some further, shall we say, indiscretions:
And so,
Again, words that every parent longs to hear.
Whether the schoolgirls whose underwear so intrigued Mr Yates, or their parents, are likely to receive an apology from the school district, or from any of the progressive ladies who dismissed their concerns and accused them of bigotry, remains unclear.
Though readers are welcome to speculate.
Oh, and should a visual aid be helpful, I have just the thing:
Captures something, I think.
Update 2:
Commenter Svh adds,
There is something about it. Its fundamental ludicrousness. The gushing, the genteel throat clutching, the massive hands.
A snapshot for our times.
And all of that is before you learn the context. What it is that’s being applauded.
Note that Mr Yates refused to use the bathroom and changing facilities provided for his own exclusive use and instead insisted on parading his grotesqueness in front of the captive schoolgirls. As one of the girls put it, his being “fully a man.” That’s what he wanted – to harass and intimidate girls. Children. To make them feel unnerved and dominated.
And the progressive ladies applauded him. For his bravery.
Recent Comments