The Bollocks Is Bolted On
Further to this, and also via Charlotte Gill, let’s visit the world of politically radical tableware. Specifically,
Because this is what you need to know when taking a class in ceramics:
We funded this.
But remember, universities need more money 😉 pic.twitter.com/gKEbweQsVG
— Charlotte Gill (@CharlotteCGill) July 29, 2024
For those deeply intrigued:
Well, obviously, you can’t just learn how to make plates.
And hey, who wouldn’t want some of that lovely racial awareness? Or, less coyly, practised question-begging and pretentious racial guilt. Or unearned racial resentment, depending on how brown you happen to be. I mean, you can’t just go through life interacting with people as individuals. You have to cultivate a neurotic habit of seeing people as avatars of some supposedly put-upon racial group. Or conversely, as oppressors, as proven by their pallor, their deplorable whiteness.
And a fragrant utopia will surely follow.
The creative titan behind the project – named, inevitably, Working With Whiteness – is Victoria Burgher, a self-styled “artist from a colonising country,” for whom pretentious, and rather invidious, racial agonising has been a path to many grants and awards. Ms Burgher, we’re told,
You see,
And,
Strained metaphors are very in, it seems. Along with teetering piles of assumptions. Also, Bad Whitey. It’s all terribly original. Very daring. Not at all conformist.
It occurs to me, however, that Ms Burgher’s contrived, modish waffle may make a kind of sense if you think of it as an attempt to add social heft to the otherwise pedestrian art that she actually produces.
For instance:
“From The River To The Sea… #2 (2023). Porcelain, cobalt, gold lustre and glaze, 27cm.”
And,
“White But Working On It (2022). Glazed porcelain ceramic badges, 5-6 cm.”
And,
“Whiteness (2018). Ink on bagasse (sugar cane fibre), fabric, pins, 14 x 14 cm.”
It would, I think, explain a few things. As it often does.
Update, via the comments:
Regarding the unattractive objects shown above, and others very much like them, Martin D adds,
A fair question. One worth pondering.
Ms Burgher approvingly cites Ms Robin DiAngelo, the peddler of neurosis mentioned here, the L Ron Hubbard of wokeness, and whose devotees, as we’ve seen, are often wildly unhinged and nakedly malevolent. Which probably tells us much of what we need to know about Ms Burgher and her racial affectations. The mindset she wishes to inflict on others. And by extension, those who succumb.
And so, Ms Burgher makes her unattractive tat, and calls it art, and treads on ceramic eggshells, and calls it performance art, while listing the hallucinatory evils of having pale skin. And while telling those sufficiently credulous that “whiteness is oppression,” the source of all that is wrong, a basis for eternal shame, and that white people should “not behave white.”
You see, we will purge the world of bigotry by embracing wholesale the mental habits of the bigot.
So, yes. Someone quite fucked up.
Consider this an open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
Can this really be true?
Is there such a thing as an ‘E-list’ celebrity?
I felt vaguely uneasy about Takei even many years ago, but this is far beyond what I expected to ever hear. So I remain unsure although a google search did return a few hits about some sort of on-the-air bachelor party. Not paying attention to celebrities makes for a more pleasant life.
A perfect choice of cartoon to mock liberal B.S.
Instantly recognizable R. Crumb style, although I’ve seen very little of his cartoons. (The grotesquely portrayed dysfunctions were just too disturbing.)
Also: I thought liberals disapproved of saying anyone was “genetically predisposed”.
Reversing the thought bubbles there would probably be closer to the modern meaning of ‘normal’.
A disturbingly asymmetric face declares nobody will prevent him from using women’s restrooms.
I’m bitter and childless (no wine), but the difference is that as far as I know, I don’t have a Cluster B personality disorder.
Y’all would tell me if I did, right?
No doctor I, but isn’t that Bell’s palsy? Only it seems like his entire right side is affected, like he has a traumatic brain injury that didn’t fully heal.
Geez … how long has this Gentle Mommy been unironically engaging in this equine excrement?
I think one can dismiss prattle about some allegedly omnipresent yet oddly intangible “white supremacy,” much as one can dismiss a self-styled artist who has little discernible skill, and no discernible interest in aesthetics.
I just see two facets of the same pretence.
The main thing Ayn Rand got right was how tyranny is the revenge of a critical mass of envious mediocrities.
I’ve recently realized that DEI is powered by the belief that anyone can be trained to perform any task, that there’s no such thing as talent or inherent ability, and so all inequalities must be the work of bigotry and malice. Look at how they talk about Elon Musk — they insist he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, so of course he’s a billionaire. Exactly zero understanding of how his hypercompetence creates valuable things that simply didn’t exist before he willed them into being.
These mediocrities can’t detect how they fall short of more competent folks, so they figure life owes them and it’s time to take down the unfairly privileged.
These are the ones to be terrified of. They’ll take us out by sheer force of numbers.
[ Compiles Friday’s Ephemera. Checks horizon for signs of Stephanie. ]
Bitterly clinging to the Blank Slate. The accumulating evidence discrediting the Blank Slate has driven them mad.
They assume that to be true, and then use the existence of inequality as proof that it is true.
[ Compiles Friday’s Ephemera. Checks horizon for signs of Stephanie. ]
[Returns RPG to shelf]
She’s a violent drunk, you know.
[ Slides mineral water to Stephanie. ]
I appreciate it’s unusual to comment on your own comment, and likely no one else particularly cares, but I made an error in that post.
Yip did take the unprecedented step of revealing the identities of Ghey’s murderers despite the fact that both were under 18.
But she did not do it until after the conclusion of the trial – which for the 17 year-old in the Southport case will not apply for quite some time yet, a year or more.
@JuliaM They probably won’t even bother to trot out an excuse
The error I made aside, that is quite probable.
Certainly with the collusion of the Fourth Estate.
In a nutshell, that.
Not a huge fan of Atlas Shrugged, but she does make some palpable hits in it including this you mentioned here.
There is a similar idea on the libertarian-ish right that anyone can be anything that they want to be. The DEI variant uses power to force the square pegs into round holes. What comes of the inevitable inequalities of life is a very complex, complicated thing that most people can’t begin to recognize even by those few that try to. It can also be quite frightening if you dive too deep into it. A tabula rasa philosophy has great appeal to both extremes. Eliminates the Higher Power from informing talent/ability. Where souls come from. That sort of stuff. Making man his own creator has broad appeal.
I’ve recently realized that DEI is powered by the belief that anyone can be trained to perform any task, that there’s no such thing as talent or inherent ability, and so all inequalities must be the work of bigotry and malice
Over at Huffinpaint Post* where the bollocks is welded on, the possible present outcome of past DEI (by other names) is lost on one writer:
Probably demonstrating the point about believing anyone can be trained, the writer comes up with this remarkable conclusion:
DEI leads to meritocracy. Right, sure. There is also this fun fact:
Men are 30% of the population. OK, then. It is a mystery why people might look askance at DEI types.
*(Wade into that at your own risk – DO NOT read the comments if you value your sanity)
Yeah. If they were held to the same standards little miss Gentle Mommy would have gotten her ass kicked at a much younger age and this whole post wouldn’t exist. But enough about fantasy worlds. These people exist because our friends, neighbors, and relatives support these ideas and these people. A normal, healthy society does not tolerate this crap nor the kinds of people who tolerate/excuse it. Which is why we are not a normal, healthy society. It’s not about elections, it’s about culture. It’s no accident nor coincidence that 99.4% of Hollywood and the book publishing ‘industry’ are hard leftists. The people who buy the movie tickets and the books, etc. are supporting it.
Botox or baseball bat?
My money’s on the latter.
Maybe white men are 30%.
She is the embodiment of nails on a chalkboard.
That’s what I call the ‘MBA fallacy’ – the notion that anyone with an MBA, lacking other qualifications or experience, can take over and run a company as well or better than those with years of experience in the industry. It predates the advent of MBAs but they seem to be the most recent avatars.
Boeing is the most prominent example to hand.
Remember the liberal mantra, “everyone is creative”? In reality few are.
[ Peers into glass ]
Given the potables on offer it seems more likely she’s violent because of what she’s drunk.
Here, let me freshen that for you.
Let’s see. I’ll need egg whites and cucumber…
Going by the photo here, Mr. Burgher has only been a “she” fairly recently:
https://www.gold.ac.uk/our-people/profile-hub/politics-and-international-relations/pg/victoria-burgher/
Don’t forget the ipecacuanha.
White supremacy: sure, that explains the complete melt-down happiness over the US olympic women’s gymnasts. Everyone loves Simone Biles. Because we are racist. huh
MBA fallacy–that is what has happened with Boeing. It has recently been run by MBA types who tried to save money by outsourcing thousands of parts. They also strong-armed the FAA into letting them upgrade their planes (more complicated controls for example) without giving new training to pilots, with 2 crashed planes the result.
The “anyone can do anything” fallacy is based on the recognition that nepotism just gives a job to your nephew, who has no qualifications, thus all jobs givem to whites are just nepotism–a huge logical gap but there it is.
Art = not art.
‘Anti-racism’ = racism.
It’s progressivism. You often have to rotate things 180 degrees.
Agreed 100%. The “Professional” managers’ buzzword-and-trend cult that too often leave disasters in their wakes.
It’s a pity we can’t rotate all those wankers in the Correction Booth.
If an illustration is needed, see, for instance, this:
Needless to say, many, many others can be found in the archives.
Is that one of those Mexican dogs that throws up a lot?
Man = woman
It’s a brave, new world boomer. These things have ways of resolving themselves, though! Praise God.
One small miracle–the Olympics only lets trans compete if they went through transition before puberty.
I’ve recently realized that DEI is powered by the belief that anyone can be trained to perform any task,
Recently test marketed in the Venezuelan oil industry. Apparently DEI, like Socialism, must be done just right to work.
One small miracle–the Olympics only lets trans compete if they went through transition before puberty.
Except for these guys who weren’t prepubescent last year but by some miracle are now.
Oh, Paris based. I guess they have time travel capability.
More psychologically marginal educators.
I’m just going to leave this here, for no reason whatsoever.
Yes. That part really annoyed me. I had seen the earlier “rule” but watching that Algerian boxer I couldn’t believe he had transitioned at all, let alone pre-puberty. Plus…Algerian. Everything is a bloody lie anymore. Even the lies. Would not surprise me if he wasn’t even Algerian. Algeria is just an idea, you know…
Also no M.D., but it looks like the right side of his *skull* is smaller. My bet’s on congenital deformity. I can only imagine the shit he got as a kid and still gets.
Vegan water.
Is ‘praxis’ the plural of ‘prat’?
When the inevitable backlash comes, remember that it is you and me who are the anti-intellectuals.
It’s not these twats.
Indigenous ways of knowing in New Zealand: I would love to see an actual curriculum. What is their “way of knowing” with respect to optics, organic chemistry, nuclear physics, computing, and linguistics? The epistemology of the native Maori, if you could even reconstruct it, would be utterly simple and often wrong. It is virtue run amok to think you can undo the wrongs of the past with “decolonization”.