But Can You Not See How Fascinating I Am?
From Montreal, via the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, another feat of unrelenting pretension:
The proud author, Ms Julia Wright, a student at McGill University, is, we learn, a them – a paranormally ungendered being. And all is not well:
As one might, all things considered.
Well, as possibilities, the words neurotic and aggravating come to mind. And we could perhaps throw in hysterical, as a bonus, what with the whole hyperventilating-and-vomiting thing.
As for rudeness, pressuring others to pretend things on demand, despite the reality right in front of them, is not the most obvious recipe for civility and mutual respect. Some, for instance, will have come to realise that The Pronoun Game, so very much in fashion, is often a way to exert power over others, by making them say things, publicly and repeatedly, that they don’t for a minute believe to be true. There is, after all, the issue of probity.
And once you start playing The Pronoun Game, a game of pretend, it’s by no means clear how you might stop pretending before things veer into farce. Which, as we’ve seen, they very often do.
And then of course there’s the fact that the Pronoun Game is by definition a game all about you, but which others are expected to play, or are coerced to play, albeit in small, supporting roles. Not an altogether thrilling prospect.
However, Ms Wright appears unconcerned by such details – which affect other people, people who aren’t her. Instead, she returns to a much more engaging subject – namely, herself and her extensive list of feelings:
Again, as so often, one has to ask – exactly which player in this drama is doing the misgendering? The unnamed presenter who sees a young woman named Julia and refers to her as she; or the young woman named Julia who expects to be perceived as something other than she is? Indeed, as something that doesn’t exist. The kind of young woman who tells us, with an air of triumph, “I had been thinking about my pronouns daily for over two years.” As one does, when one’s mental wellbeing is not at all in question.
But ours is an age in which self-preoccupied young women are encouraged to boast, in print, of their unhappy compulsions, and to bemoan the fact that they appear to be what they are – no more, no less – and consequently struggle to seem complicated and fascinating. Specifically, a miraculously sexless being, “neither a man nor a woman.”
Probably. Not everyone wants to play.
Perhaps the word fad would be less offensive. Or tedious status-game played by the pretentious and insufferable. I’m open to suggestions.
It occurs to me that being surrounded by students and professors, for whom faddishness and contrivance are often the stuff of status, may not be entirely helpful on the mental health front. If everyone around you is playing the same game, and pretending the same things, and doing it competitively, you could easily lose your bearings.
Ah yes, the woe of not being immediately and telepathically perceived as “non-binary,” and thus being denied the status of terribly interesting. As agonies go, it’s pretty niche. But given Ms Wright’s apparent lack of interest in how her Game Of Self may impose upon others, I’m tempted to suggest that respect, a reciprocal virtue, may not be the most apt card to play.
Update, via the comments, which you’re reading of course:
Regarding this tearful pronouncement,
EmC adds,
Well, quite.
I suppose the drama above – all that time on the verge of vomiting – is what happens when you spend your formative years steeped in the Progressive Identity Hierarchy, in which straight white woman is somewhere near the bottom, barely above the universally disdained straight white man. Inventing some modish gender nonsense – and then publicly complaining about other, less sophisticated people failing to defer to it – may boost your social standing a little. And that does seem to be what these things are very often about.
Says Ms Wright,
Thing is, what we’re seeing looks more like a trendy paintjob on an old, familiar vice. The same old self-absorption and self-flattery. The same old desperation to be special, but without the bother of any actual achievement, which takes time and effort, and often rare ability. And so, identity, or pretend-identity, is the fashionable shortcut.
And here we are. All swollen with progress.
Heavens, buttons. I wonder what they do.
But . . . which came first?
Canada. The Great White North.
https://youtu.be/pNRlcjz3acU
For those who weren’t aware these characters were allegedly introduced in response to government pressure for more Canadian content. On SCTV with its all-Canadian cast FFS.
A few decades later and the Trudeau administration allegedly (again) requires similar compliance on the internet. Bound to work out well.
As if an ability to enforce the law, physically, would never, under any circumstances, be part of the job.
“fit for “non-confrontational duties” only”
https://www.irishtimes.com/crime-law/2023/07/06/garda-awarded-50000-after-taking-disability-discrimination-claim-against-force/
…… and to non-ones surprise she got the money.
Liontheys?
In the Lysenkoist’s little rant, he admits that the lionesses he deems “liontheys” are infertile females due to elevated testosterone (an anomaly).
The binary is affirmed. Heh.
It do indeed sum it up.
“It do indeed sum it up.”
So, do that mean what I think it do?
Same in the US.
I still find this bit from the Canadian Bacon movie funny.
Have to say, the rave scene has really gone downhill.
We’re gonna need more, hungrier badgers.
Are we all ready for neopronouns and that nounself sparkle to add to our conversations?
Andrew continues, “For someone who uses the nounself pronoun “leaf,” that may look like: “I hope leaf knows how proud we are that leaf is getting to know leafself better!” or “Leaf arrived at the coffee shop before me; I was mortified to have been late to meet leaf.”
If this all sounds ridiculous, CNN says to get over it.
Have to say, the rave scene has really gone downhill.
Alternatively, liturgical services have gone severely downhill lately.
Just use American badgers.
It’s all ‘the knights who say “Ni”‘ with added silliness.
I’m not going to put up with it. It. It. It.
I think we should call them “idiopronouns” as in “idiosyncratic”. Definitely not as in “idiot”. Absolutely. Never entered my mind. Really.
Or “ideopronouns” as in “ideological”.
“Leaf arrived at the coffee shop before me; I was mortified to have been late to meet leaf.”
At this point, it’s just using the person’s name instead of a pronoun. In the third person you might use the name first, then a pronoun to avoid repetition. But these days – safer to stick with the name, or “that person”.
Or as Tim Newman put it
UK policing appears to have become a bizarre confluence of 21 Jump Street and Police Academy.
(Fun fact: 21 Jump Street, filmed in Canada, was based on an actual contemporary police program. While I was attending high school a Grade 13 student was outed as an embedded police informant).
“If they don’t respect my pronouns, does that mean they think being non-binary isn’t valid?”
Shouldn’t that be “our pronouns”? Sounds like she doesn’t believe it either.