But Can You Not See How Fascinating I Am?
From Montreal, via the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, another feat of unrelenting pretension:
The proud author, Ms Julia Wright, a student at McGill University, is, we learn, a them – a paranormally ungendered being. And all is not well:
As one might, all things considered.
Well, as possibilities, the words neurotic and aggravating come to mind. And we could perhaps throw in hysterical, as a bonus, what with the whole hyperventilating-and-vomiting thing.
As for rudeness, pressuring others to pretend things on demand, despite the reality right in front of them, is not the most obvious recipe for civility and mutual respect. Some, for instance, will have come to realise that The Pronoun Game, so very much in fashion, is often a way to exert power over others, by making them say things, publicly and repeatedly, that they don’t for a minute believe to be true. There is, after all, the issue of probity.
And once you start playing The Pronoun Game, a game of pretend, it’s by no means clear how you might stop pretending before things veer into farce. Which, as we’ve seen, they very often do.
And then of course there’s the fact that the Pronoun Game is by definition a game all about you, but which others are expected to play, or are coerced to play, albeit in small, supporting roles. Not an altogether thrilling prospect.
However, Ms Wright appears unconcerned by such details – which affect other people, people who aren’t her. Instead, she returns to a much more engaging subject – namely, herself and her extensive list of feelings:
Again, as so often, one has to ask – exactly which player in this drama is doing the misgendering? The unnamed presenter who sees a young woman named Julia and refers to her as she; or the young woman named Julia who expects to be perceived as something other than she is? Indeed, as something that doesn’t exist. The kind of young woman who tells us, with an air of triumph, “I had been thinking about my pronouns daily for over two years.” As one does, when one’s mental wellbeing is not at all in question.
But ours is an age in which self-preoccupied young women are encouraged to boast, in print, of their unhappy compulsions, and to bemoan the fact that they appear to be what they are – no more, no less – and consequently struggle to seem complicated and fascinating. Specifically, a miraculously sexless being, “neither a man nor a woman.”
Probably. Not everyone wants to play.
Perhaps the word fad would be less offensive. Or tedious status-game played by the pretentious and insufferable. I’m open to suggestions.
It occurs to me that being surrounded by students and professors, for whom faddishness and contrivance are often the stuff of status, may not be entirely helpful on the mental health front. If everyone around you is playing the same game, and pretending the same things, and doing it competitively, you could easily lose your bearings.
Ah yes, the woe of not being immediately and telepathically perceived as “non-binary,” and thus being denied the status of terribly interesting. As agonies go, it’s pretty niche. But given Ms Wright’s apparent lack of interest in how her Game Of Self may impose upon others, I’m tempted to suggest that respect, a reciprocal virtue, may not be the most apt card to play.
Update, via the comments, which you’re reading of course:
Regarding this tearful pronouncement,
EmC adds,
Well, quite.
I suppose the drama above – all that time on the verge of vomiting – is what happens when you spend your formative years steeped in the Progressive Identity Hierarchy, in which straight white woman is somewhere near the bottom, barely above the universally disdained straight white man. Inventing some modish gender nonsense – and then publicly complaining about other, less sophisticated people failing to defer to it – may boost your social standing a little. And that does seem to be what these things are very often about.
Says Ms Wright,
Thing is, what we’re seeing looks more like a trendy paintjob on an old, familiar vice. The same old self-absorption and self-flattery. The same old desperation to be special, but without the bother of any actual achievement, which takes time and effort, and often rare ability. And so, identity, or pretend-identity, is the fashionable shortcut.
And here we are. All swollen with progress.
Heavens, buttons. I wonder what they do.
Nice to see that crime is at a such a low level in the UK, that seven officers can be spared to arrest a 16 y/o for saying something “homophobic” in her own home.
Again, I laughed and I’m not sorry.
Goodness, that’s a big one.
‘In Britain, everything is policed except crime.’ — Mark Steyn
“We aren’t going to repeat the failures of Iraq; we are going to TAKE THE OIL.”
Darleen
Numerous photos of the moody lady police officer complete with Megan Rapinoe haircut suggest a possible catalyst for this completely avoidable PR disaster.
“The Canadian “capital” of Ottawa is right along the border with Quebec. It will remain the capital of the Republic of Canada of which Jordan Peterson will be made Dictator in Perpetuum.”
Suggested flag for the new Republic:
Heh. That old 54-40 thing always seemed rather unambitiously weak to me. This time we take the head, the tail, the whole damned thing.
Though for all of that guy’s detailed planning, he seems to have mixed up the 1870 plan with the more recent one from the 1920’s…
Apparently, unmarried women never have to cook or clean.
“We aren’t going to repeat the failures of Iraq; we are going to TAKE THE OIL.”
I haven’t laughed that hard and that long in, well, forever. I had literal tears. Reminds me of P.J. O’Rourke’s writing. Thank you so much!
Apparently, unmarried women never have to cook or clean.
well, if you’re still living at home with a rich mommy and daddy …
Remember: Tik Tok is a Chinese psyops platform.
And take their maple syrup.
At which point, this came to mind:
What Laurie Penny is… I leave to the reader.
The image (which I didn’t reproduce here) looks very similar to what I was able to see, including it being masked by the tasteful black bar at the top of the page.
The real problem is not that people don’t understand. The problem, which is of course a huge crisis demanding governmental intervention in every facet of life, is that people don’t care.
And here’s the nasty little secret: by demanding that we care, most assuredly we shall. But it won’t be the way you want. If I ever begin to really care about your self imposed drama, you will yearn for the days when I was indifferent.
“We aren’t going to repeat the failures of Iraq; we are going to TAKE THE OIL.”
…don’t threaten me with a good time.
Taking this seriously for a moment, the Canadian military has been so degraded by the current government that the entire country could probably be taken without a shot by a light recon force. Cripple the transport capabilities of the few CFB bases we have with long-range strikes, control the three largest cities with an armed occupation force, seize the capital and demand unconditional surrender. The country would fall within a week.
And it’s not as far-fetched as you might think. Readers here may not be aware, but an absolute unit of a patriot in CSIS has been leaking information to the media indicating that at least eleven sitting MPs are known to be owned by China, and that the current Liberal government was installed by the CCP via covert funding, voter intimidation and propaganda.
If the US ever has an actual President in the White House again, having a CCP puppet state on its doorstep whose “citizens” enjoy unprecedented access to US soil is something he might want to address.
Oppressions of marriage: the least likely of all groups to be murdered is a married woman. They live longer than men. A married woman is the most likely to be able to stay home and not work (and not just for babies). Men in a marriage do virtually all the tasks that involve strength or are difficult (fixing anything, yard work, moving furniture). Sure, oppressed. Of course, if you define reciprocal care as oppression, then sure, oppression.
Which reminds me of the Very Smart Progressive Person who felt highly qualified to dispense advice on all sorts of public policy questions, but who was overwhelmed into virtual paralysis by the variety of products available at her local supermarket: Three or four major brands of soups, plus limited selections of higher end brands. In regular and low-fat and low-calorie and low-salt versions. Four different brands of the same kind of soup. Condensed non-condensed. “Help me, Comrade Bernie Sanders! Save me from this Hell of choice!”
Sick, starving, radiation burned survivors of Hiroshima, staggering through the rubble worrying about their gender fluid pronouns… 0
Self obsessed, self serving, “victims” of a western post-scarcity society with too much of everything too easily obtained, demanding their neurotic obsessions become everyone else’s neurotic obsessions… umptyzillion
Hmm…
From my reading of Mark Steyn and other Canadian writers the degradation of the military has been a multi-generational project.
More on the low level of crime in the UK.
I have a Dremel. I rarely use it. And yet I did use it just yesterday, though not for anything art-y.
A Dremel is one of those tools that’s rarely used, until it’s really needed. Art not required.
Bring this to America, please.
Seen at Ace’s, at Concordia University in Portland (of course) they held a Ted talk so students could learn how to use paper towels. It is unclear that this was linked to the schools demise.
Pray that the offense isn’t the previously posted British arrest.
LOL. You’re over the target.
Well, it does seem a distinct possibility – indeed, a recurring theme. And the whiff of uncorrected narcissism is hard to miss.
It’s interesting how the label “queer” – an in-group marker of status – is claimed despite no mention of lesbian inclinations. (Given the nature of the article, I’m pretty sure any such interest would have cropped up, most likely several times.) And so the claim of queerness – and thereby escaping the low-status category of straight white woman – seems to hinge on a pretence of being “non-binary.” And on theatrical complaints about those who fail to deduce this elevated state of being, and who, instead, register the physical evidence right in front of them.
And remember, this is a young woman who wanted to “interrupt” a guest speaker’s presentation in order to make the moment all about her. To make the speaker stop, mid-presentation, and publicly defer to her claim of being a miraculously sexless being. “Neither a man nor a woman.”
This young woman here.
https://youtu.be/DeSs-NQpS64
Invading Canada. I knew I’d seen something along those lines before.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/08/01/west-yorkshire-police-young-recruits-trolls-look-12/
“Bring your kids in to work” day?
Nope.
As much as anything, what catches the eye is how unimposing all four of them look. As if an ability to enforce the law, physically, would never, under any circumstances, be part of the job.
About as threatening as the Milky Bar Kid.
Prepare the hungry badgers and fetch the stakes and rope.
And the article was written as if it presented the author in a favourable light. And was published by the CBC as if Ms Wright were someone for whom we should feel sympathy, or by whom we might feel inspired.
It would be “ageist” and “uninclusive” to point out that police officers need to not not just be big and strong but also look it–an unimposing appearance encourages criminals to fight. But maybe that’s part of what our “progressive” thinkers want.
Well, a fairly obvious way to minimise the likelihood of physical altercations is to look like, should there be one, you will most likely prevail.
Given that the criminal demographic is not generally known for respecting the physically unimposing, or for respecting women, the “progressive” trajectory of our police force seems not only wrong, but bizarrely and laughably so.
It all makes sense when you realize that the left sees itself as our deadly enemy.
See also this by Niall Gooch:
Needless to say, other, less law-abiding parties have also noticed.
As noted in an earlier thread, these are not signs of empowerment or progress, or a basis for feeling affirmed. These are signs of ideology trumping reality.
Or as Tim Newman put it,
And the only people affirmed and emboldened by such scenes are criminals and thugs.
Conquest’s 2nd Law of Politics seems to generally lead to the 3rd law.
2. Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing.
3.The simplest way to explain the behavior of any bureaucratic organization is to assume that it is controlled by a cabal of its enemies.
“Force” wouldn’t be required. IMO, the Chinese government could show up en mass around DC, and any number of officialdom would gladly raise the red banner and swap out portraits of… whoever claims to be in charge, whilst hundreds of eager and willing brownsh… er, idiots would gather and burn any “American history” they could find.
Egg salad is still chicken salad, when you think about it.
Force and criminals: it isn’t just thugs. Quite normal people who have had too much to drink can be very hard to subdue. Someone on meth may need 3 big men to subdue. Some having a psychotic episode likewise. It has also been found that if two officers respond to a call, the odds of violence go way down–because obviously two look more intimidating than one.
You may not be interested in reality, but reality is interested in you.
Gratuitous reminder:
To register with the blog and thereby enable extra commenting options – including @username mentions and live notifications – scroll down to the black ‘Meta’ box at the very bottom of the page.
It’s free and quite painless.
Further to recent rumblings on the subject, a few more data points.
No refunds. Credit note only.
Canada’s too cold.
Smallish cops…
A couple days ago there was a video making the rounds. Side-by-side of four cops bodycams, showing an attempt to arrest a single difficult man. There was persuasion, which failed, followed by an attempt by a modest size woman cop to physically control the guy (why she was the only one doing that I don’t know). That failed, with the expected silly dance.
However, while this was going on, there was enough time for a bystander to get annoyed, haul out a pistol, and point it at the cops. He got shot by the cops.
This whole exercise took roughly one minute. (Oakland CA, I think.)
So…THAT situation got ESCALATED by the cops inability to quickly and quietly subdue the first guy.
But . . . which came first?
Canada. The Great White North.
https://youtu.be/pNRlcjz3acU
For those who weren’t aware these characters were allegedly introduced in response to government pressure for more Canadian content. On SCTV with its all-Canadian cast FFS.
A few decades later and the Trudeau administration allegedly (again) requires similar compliance on the internet. Bound to work out well.
As if an ability to enforce the law, physically, would never, under any circumstances, be part of the job.
“fit for “non-confrontational duties” only”
https://www.irishtimes.com/crime-law/2023/07/06/garda-awarded-50000-after-taking-disability-discrimination-claim-against-force/
…… and to non-ones surprise she got the money.
Liontheys?
In the Lysenkoist’s little rant, he admits that the lionesses he deems “liontheys” are infertile females due to elevated testosterone (an anomaly).
The binary is affirmed. Heh.
It do indeed sum it up.
“It do indeed sum it up.”
So, do that mean what I think it do?
Same in the US.
I still find this bit from the Canadian Bacon movie funny.
Have to say, the rave scene has really gone downhill.
We’re gonna need more, hungrier badgers.
Are we all ready for neopronouns and that nounself sparkle to add to our conversations?
Andrew continues, “For someone who uses the nounself pronoun “leaf,” that may look like: “I hope leaf knows how proud we are that leaf is getting to know leafself better!” or “Leaf arrived at the coffee shop before me; I was mortified to have been late to meet leaf.”
If this all sounds ridiculous, CNN says to get over it.
Have to say, the rave scene has really gone downhill.
Alternatively, liturgical services have gone severely downhill lately.
Just use American badgers.
It’s all ‘the knights who say “Ni”‘ with added silliness.
I’m not going to put up with it. It. It. It.
I think we should call them “idiopronouns” as in “idiosyncratic”. Definitely not as in “idiot”. Absolutely. Never entered my mind. Really.
Or “ideopronouns” as in “ideological”.
“Leaf arrived at the coffee shop before me; I was mortified to have been late to meet leaf.”
At this point, it’s just using the person’s name instead of a pronoun. In the third person you might use the name first, then a pronoun to avoid repetition. But these days – safer to stick with the name, or “that person”.
Or as Tim Newman put it
UK policing appears to have become a bizarre confluence of 21 Jump Street and Police Academy.
(Fun fact: 21 Jump Street, filmed in Canada, was based on an actual contemporary police program. While I was attending high school a Grade 13 student was outed as an embedded police informant).
“If they don’t respect my pronouns, does that mean they think being non-binary isn’t valid?”
Shouldn’t that be “our pronouns”? Sounds like she doesn’t believe it either.