Playtime Is Never Over
Speaking of schooling, and lifted from the comments:
A message, indeed. I’m assuming the campy paper fan is a fundamental aspect of his “full authentic self.”
Evidently, our fearless educator has determined that any gay kids in his class – or rather, kids who may turn out to be gay on hitting puberty – need aspirational role-models. Like a grown man with painted nails, wearing tinselled Deeley Boppers, and flapping a paper fan. Because hey, what else could they possibly aspire to?
See also this:
You see, authenticity requires fancy dress and elaborate accessorising. And it’s just “so important” to parade around the classroom, looking “cute,” in painted nails and make-up.
What’s that you say? A one-off, an aberration? Oh, you sweet innocent thing.
I get a distinct young David Walliams vibe from this bloke except without DW’s undeniable good points, just the creepy ones.
That.
Not entirely unconnected I think.
The process as I see it begins thusly:
1) An idealistic but dim-witted and rather gullible cohort of student teachers educated into accepting authoritative pronouncements.
2) A cult, stuffed with authoritative pronouncements, none of which are amenable to reasoned analysis.
3) In joining this cult, their fundamental duty of care to protect children and the vulnerable is superseded by an ideological fervour for “bringing about a more equitable future“, or “being on the right side of history”, or acting “for the greater good” or some similar evil.
Enter the paedophile. He spies an opportunity. These “educators” are no longer paying attention and he can join their ranks mouthing their shibboleths, but with minor modifications indistinguishable from their existing un-reason. Thus he can parasitize their cult:
– “Freeing children from their sexual bondage will bring about a more equitable future”
– “Children made more comfortable around others’ conspicuous sexuality will put us on the right side of history”
– “Persuading young children of the acceptability of pornography and deviant sexual practices is for the greater good”
Eh voilá. Schools are become cynosures for perverts, groomers and child molesters of all kinds, and the teaching profession as a whole now (probably) comprises more paedophiles than pedagogues.
As I said following this clown show:
But it seems that being gay automatically means that you must feel some deep affinity with the self-absorbed and psychologically marginal. It’s the way of the woke.
Also.
The built-in comment list “feature” fucking hates me.
You could start a rival blog with Muldoon, endlessly bitching about the comment box toolbar on this blog.
Hey, I’d read it.
What. More than you read my blog now?
Cooking is way too general interest. You need to go really niche. Bickering about my comment box toolbar should do it.
“toolbar“?
“foolbar” more like. Grumble.
See? You’re obviously inspired.
Yes, but imagine how much more exciting and self-flattering it is to regard yourself as a “change agent,” an activist, a radical; rather than just someone who competently propagates the basics of grammar or geometry. What’s an incorrigible narcissist supposed to do?
I’ll just leave this here for Karl.
Well, I think they’re supposed to be kept away from children, for one thing.
There’s nothing new or surprising about predators wanting access to vulnerable victims. Just ask the Catholic Church. What is surprising is the eagerness which those charged with caring for the vulnerable will hand them over to perverts for a supposed good cause.
Or maybe it’s not so surprising. I have been to university.
Get thee behind me, Stan!
Well, as the links above illustrate, the new super-woke way to make gay kids feel comfortable is to give the impression that all gay people are absurd, somewhat creepy, and utterly self-involved. And almost certainly into transvestism.
Apparently, that will help.
#teachersoftiktok #gaybear #cashapp13plus
You know, for kids.
Call me old-fashioned but I’m convinced that the best way to make gay kids feel comfortable is the same way you make any school kid feel comfortable – teach them how to read, write and reckon and leave their sexuality out of it.
If their parents want them sexualised then they should do it themselves. Or send them to church.
When I was in grade school, I knew virtually nothing about the private lives of nearly all my teachers. Not even if they were married.
Never heard of him. Seems like he needed more than a punch in the face.
…endlessly bitching…
More like perpetually.
What’s an incorrigible narcissist supposed to do?
Flash your fake tits on the White House lawn, as decorum and protocol demand during Transamadan.
It starts with this kind of thing.
You might think, oh it’s just well-meaning do-gooders wanting to improve our world. Like the article says – a “new kind of education”.
But once you allow “educators” to treat your school children as little warriors in their cultural battles, you invite in paedophiles and deviants to recruit them too. Why wouldn’t they? You’ve already made them available.
Yeah Muldoon. That toolbar though, amiright?
And you’re telling me the world no longer respects America? How did that happen?
That toolbar though, amiright?
Orale, vato, we need a splinter insurgent group for all blogs, perhaps the “Comintern Uninstalling Needless Toolbar Systems”.
As noted regarding this chap and his attempts to conscript middle-school children into his cross-dressing kinks, you have to ask how the school somehow didn’t notice that something might be awry:
I mean, exactly how many red lights need to be flashing?
Avē amicus, instrumentūrī tē salūtant
“Better Assisted Systems Technologies And Regrooving Device Standards”?
…you have to ask how the school somehow didn’t notice that something might be awry…
1) They noticed but were too woke and/or chickenshit to say anything;
2) They were essentially looking in a mirror.
As I opined, one strongly suspects those in the teaching profession interested in accessing your children for recognisably unpalatable reasons are already in the majority. It’s otherwise difficult to explain schools’ pathological fear of having their curricula, their lesson-plans or their classroom texts revealed to the children’s parents.
That does seem all too plausible. And despite the fact that a sexually dysmorphic man is much more likely to have an unhappy interest in children. But of course that’s one of the many statistical realities to which one mustn’t refer.
I have no serious comfplaint here, as the comment toolbars on other blogs are also less than perfect and the screwups are usually due to my own clumsiness.
Be that as it may, if you advertise the fact that you tolerate, or even encourage, those with flamboyant sexualities fiddling with the kiddies, you’re going to attract a lot of kiddy-fiddlers with flamboyant sexualities.
Is it because such people are naturally inclined to interfere with children, or is it because paedophiles are strongly motivated to any behaviour that provides them access to your children?
Ask at your local library.
The entire point is that they are sexualizing children. Would it be ok for a hetero male to come in to teach in a muscle shirt and with bike shorts that show his dick and talking about how he likes to bonk the wife every night? No? Or a female teacher to come in with a see-through blouse? In almost every job one is supposed to hide the sexy because it disrupts getting things done. This is doubly so for stuff around kids. Leave them the hell alone. Before puberty it is disturbing to them and they can’t understand. During puberty they are confused enough.
Given a different context, say an insurance office, would it not be disruptive and disturbing for this guy to prance around all the time showing his true self? The rest of us don’t want to know. We have work to do.
Slightly OT, “trans people never cause harm”, and certainly not with pharmaceutical grade HRT.
Is it the narcissism that makes them behave as caricatures?
Speaking of flashing red lights, this may be somewhat related: When your identity niche is a shield from glaring concerns.
Flamboyant sexuality in school: encourages gay=transvestite view, which is one of the worst stereotypes of bigots. Naturally.
We have two lesbians at work. Aside from the haircut, you would never know. They are there to work. Novel concept, I know.
It seems to me that transvestite-ism is performative. You can be gay in private but dressing up like that needs an audience. What better audience that captive kiddies? It also plays into the Woke need to indoctrinate.
I would also note that kids love rainbows. Hijacking that to get them to “love” kink is sick.
Especially considering those so charged are certain to be among those denouncing the Catholic Church. Would it be cynical of me to think they’re envious?
They do have nice hats. And pretty dresses.
There’s something fundamentally risible about those who have jumped out of the gene pool complaining about genocide.
Speaking of which, remember when in the 70’s there was something of a trend for young men to get vasectomies? I sometimes wonder how many of them later regretted it.
It is also fundamentally risible when those who go to great lengths to be transgressive are upset that people feel transgressed against and push back. The whole point is to tweak people’s noses, to make them upset.
…complaining about genocide…
Related – tedious, self-absorbed degenerate is still tedious and self-absorbed.
In the immortal words of our esteemed blog host, “No refunds, credit note only.”
Meow.
Related – tedious, self-absorbed degenerate is still tedious and self-absorbed.
Ignoring that this dolt and his pals should never have been invited in the first place, oopsie.
Speaking of degenerates, why did this killer only get probation?
Pervy sexual dysmorphics and the people who coddle them are only one small part of what is wrong with our culture.
More degenerates: “Why da po-leece ‘rest him? He din do nuffin! Just a little murder!”
ZOMG, it is literally genocide.
You can not imagine my utter shock and surprise.
I really have to wonder what constitutes ‘good behaviour’.
We have entered month one of “Pride Season.” Please update your files and lifestyles accordingly.
I’m not generally a fan of vandalism, even mild vandalism – i.e., tearing down posters – but the broader dynamic is… interesting.
One might, for instance, marvel at the idea that the way to make pupils “feel safe” is to tell them they all ought to be wearing “rainbow-coloured shirts” and are expected to visibly participate in some weird collective theatre with unsavoury moral and political connotations. And to then invoke bigotry and a need for punishment, and some kind of mental realignment, when some of those pupils say that, actually, they’d rather not be annexed in this way.
And note the standard, sly conflation – that an objection to compelled groupthink and coerced deference to a highly contestable political ideology is somehow indistinguishable from “homophobia” and a “hatred” of gay people. (In much the same way that a dislike of BLM, an obnoxious and disreputable political entity, would doubtless be construed by the same educators as damning evidence of seething racism.)
And so, the school announces that it believes in “individual dignity,” while trying quite hard to suppress it.
Upon observing the ongoing doubling down of Pride BS in the face of (finally) some limited pushback, I was considering making a sarcastic comment here about a “Pride Year”. I thought it might come across as a bit over the top so I didn’t quite have the proper context/wording in my head. So I came here to read the latest comments first. Yes, “Pride Year” would have come across as rather silly when one is competing against professional farcists like Justin Trudeau and company.
I particularly liked this Twat thread response:
“It seems straight people are obsessed with Pride season.“
Is there a bag limit?
Have you seen the compilations of lawyer jokes and economist jokes which include hunting rules? I’m sure a version for leftists and amoral SPLC grifters could be easily made.
Putting the “ass” back into “class”