Discourse Was Attempted
Being educated, a graduate, she didn’t understand the question:
Woke reporter SHUTS DOWN my Interview when I expose her as a racist.
She says it is not possible to be racist toward white people. When I show her that simple logic disproves everything she is saying, she is forced to get up & end the conversation. pic.twitter.com/MC3CaCRhzf
— Warren Smith (@WTSmith17) August 10, 2026
“You can’t be racist against white people,” says she, confidently, having just demonstrated precisely the opposite, and then doing it again.
The facial dynamics may also be of interest.
Note madam’s insistence that racism only exists if it’s backed by “power,” the particulars of which remain somewhat unclear – a claim designed to give license to racial minorities and especially black people – pre-emptively and on an indefinite basis – when indulging in racist sentiment or behaviour.
When asked how she came to this perverse and non-reciprocal redefinition, she looks surprised, indeed incredulous. “I went to school,” says she. “I went to university.”
And so, we have an enthusiast of “equity,” a credentialled being, who’s “making sure the standards are the same” by making those standards wildly different, depending on the colour of your skin and therefore how oppressed you must be. Or conversely, how inclined you must be to crush others underfoot, on account of your pallor.
She’s a reporter, you know. Bodes well.
My own definition of “equity,” illustrated many, many times, would be something like equality of outcome regardless of inputs. Inputs including diligence, effort and ability. Which doesn’t sound fair at all.
But as we’ve seen, the church of “equity” requires elaborate mental contortion, via which, “granting access” entails denying access – say, by shutting down advanced courses for gifted pupils – and among devotees, “whiteness” is the go-to pejorative, a thing to be corrected, and for which the sinfully pale are expected to atone.
There’s a through-the-looking-glass quality.
A fun-house mirror malevolence that’s illustrated here.
Should further, real-world illustrations of “equity” be required, a compendium can be found here, including the outlawing of even basic tests of teacher competence, on grounds of “disparate impact,” and firefighters who cannot read the instructions on their own safety equipment.
[ Expanded via the comments, which you’re reading, of course. ]Consider this an open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
You can’t be progressive without learning doublethink.
There is, I think, a remarkable tolerance of dishonesty and contradiction, an imperviousness.
DEI, we’re told, is all about “making sure the standards are the same” – i.e., by making them wildly different according to race – and seconds later, “DEI has nothing to do with standards.” Which is a lie.
But amid the contradictions, churned out at a rate of knots, what lingers is how you can see that she’s losing patience with Warren. Because he won’t pretend.
Like she does.