Further to recent rumblings on assumptions of racism, this caught my eye:
Today’s word is mindset.
Mr Dettlaff – sorry, Professor Dettlaff – has a PhD in social work and “formerly served as Dean of the University of Houston Graduate College of Social Work.” He uses the term “white supremacist” quite freely, and entirely without irony.
Apparently, the professor was removed from his position as Dean for demanding the “abolition” of policing and incarceration, and demanding a “new, liberated society… free from violence and oppression.” And in which habitual criminals and assorted sociopaths roam freely and unimpeded.
In Professor Dettlaff’s imaginings, a world without physical consequences for robbery and predation would mean “individuals have everything they need to thrive.” Except, of course, any third-party protection from the aforementioned habitual criminals and assorted sociopaths. This “new, liberated society,” in which policing has been “firmly disavowed,” will, he insists, “truly keep us safe.”
It seems that Professor Dettlaff was deemed too ideologically deranged even for a modern university. Which is quite the feat.
He’s a “thought leader,” you know.
Also, this:
Ms Kimberg, above, is all about “compassion, healing, justice and equity.” She likes to announce her pronouns to random passers-by.
Update, via the comments, which you’re reading, of course:
Regarding Ms Kimberg, pst314 notes,
The customary solution is for one leftist to publish lies which other leftists cite in their footnotes. This is how all the academic journals of grievance studies are run.
Pretty much. It has, in fact, been referred to as a laundering operation. But it seems that even this minimal requirement is far too strenuous and distracting when there’s a “new society” to invent. One in which everyone has everything they need, in which the concept of law-enforcement is a distant memory, and in which carjackers gambol about like newborn lambs.
And it’s quite something to have a supposed educator demanding that the editors of supposedly academic journals stop even the most basic attempts to ensure that key assertions in their publications are not just made-up or wildly delusional. But this, it seems, is where we are.
Update 2:
Somewhat related, on prison and recidivism.
Also, open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
Recent Comments