Some Big Boys Made Me Do It
Apparently, and this may be news to you, littering isn’t a moral shortcoming of the people actually dropping the litter:
Which seems awfully convenient, for a certain kind of person, if not entirely convincing.
Litter – and its inegalitarian distribution – is a topic we’ve touched on before. From which, this came to mind:
But neither he nor the authors of said report explore an obvious factor. The words “drop” and “littering” simply don’t appear anywhere in the report, thereby suggesting that the food-smeared detritus and other unsightly objects just fall from the clouds mysteriously when the locals are asleep.
The report that Mr Matthews cites, supposedly as evidence of unfairness, actually states that council cleaning resources are “skewed towards deprived neighbourhoods” – with councils spending up to five times more on those areas than they spend on cleaning more respectable neighbourhoods. And yet even this is insufficient to overcome the locals’ antisocial behaviour.
A regular visit by a council cleaning team, even one equipped with military hardware, won’t compensate for a dysfunctional attitude towards littering among both children and their parents. And fretting about inequalities in litter density is a little odd if you don’t consider how the litter gets there in the first place. Yet this detail isn’t investigated and the report can “neither confirm nor reject the idea that resident attitudes and behaviours are significant drivers of environmental problems.”
And Mr Matthews, our Urban Studies lecturer, is educating teenagers. Telling them how it is.
Also, open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
Litter-related drama.
Well, er, good. No point being coy or unclear about this.
For reasons that should be obvious.
I believe the term is damaged goods. Though other terms may come to mind.
Per Theodore Dalrymple, the natives don’t slack in doing their bit.
Oh no. Anyway.
A confused message from a confused messenger.
“They/them” a “future elementary art teacher”.
Meanwhile, somewhere north of Hadrian’s Wall…
“You’re a loony.” — Arthur, King of the Britons
As I said here, the abandonment by schools of even basic safeguarding measures, in the name of being inclusive and affirming, and fashionable, is quite a thing. A grotesque thing, but a thing nonetheless.
See also this, from which:
Because a cross-dressing man with glaringly obvious mental health issues, including a compulsion to discuss his sexual fetishes with eleven-year-olds, somehow didn’t ring any alarm bells.
Not quite making the case she thinks she is.
Cue the No True Scotsman jokes. I’ll start…things like this, real or not, happen because no true scotsman is proud of being a scotsman. Or something…
Which reminds me of this…
Best response:
Wait, you don’t find her a “safe space”…?
I recently attended a a three credit professional training called “The Impact of Donald Trump on America- A Cultic Studies Perspective”, which instructed therapists to hate their Trump supporting patients. The course was held online on August 7, 2025. I was “taught” that if you voted for Trump, you are a part of a “cult on a national scale” that “presents an image of bringing the country back to a white majority and white power”.
via Scott Adams. A thread of discussion simultaneously amusing, scary, and yet totally predictable. That’s something of an accomplishment. Kinda.
She lost me at “I’m going to hold your hand”. It worked better as a Beatles song.
Define ‘safe’.
Mascara.
Now you can’t unsee it.
Mascara.
Spiders. However, filters or enough Botox to float an aircraft carrier?
Related to nothing yet, they said we’d have flying cars, instead we get automatic power adjustable cupholders, because if there is one thing modern cars lack, it is electric frippery.
I’m now feeling an urge to watch an old episode of Top Gear or The Grand Tour.
Not sorry.
Also related to not a damn thing yet, this one is for all the scifi nerds.
Question asked, answered.
Look away now.
Related.
And comment of note.
Amazing how even the idea of personal responsibility is now some horrible oppression.
To boast of living indefinitely, forcibly, at others’ expense.
“dream taken away”–one man’s dream is another child’s nightmare…
Saucing ganders or something.
Degenerate. Noun. An immoral or corrupt person.
Which does much to explain why cars depreciate in value so rapidly.
Prospects.
File under ‘Things I did not know’, they’ve futzed around with the alphabet song.
They come for the pre-built civilisation, and free stuff. That’s it
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tv/article-15016875/Good-Morning-Britain-guest-St-Georges-Flag-racism.html
Windrushistan isn’t a speculative future, it’s now and it’s official. On Good Morning Windrushistan, we have a member of the Windrush tribe arguing with a member of the -istan tribe about the St George’s Flag. Both men working from the premise that the moral validity of Yookay is determined by how well it provides a home for the flourishing of his own tribe.
The Windrushian: against the flag because it represents a racial claim by group of people claiming to be “English”, claiming that “England” is their people’s ancestral home, and therefore it can’t be the equal home of the Windrush or the -istan peoples. He’s got a correct grasp of the situation and knows what side he’s on.
The -istanian: thinks that the flag can be rescued from that illegitimate use if the non-British adopt it to celebrate the true GBNews anti-woke British bulldog values that if you come … the British can’t make you go away.
Presumably a representative of the so-called “English” people was invited. Maybe he had a prior appointment on Pakistani TV to discuss whether the crescent on their flag represents that nation’s particular devotion to Islam, or whether, looked at through a less exclusionary lens, its true meaning all along was that Anglicans and Shintos and Hindus should all come and worship.
Richard Stans was unavailable for comment.
As so often, it’s hard to ignore the default rudeness, the sheer presumption. Yet so many seem determined to try.
Again,
Or indeed to badmouth my hosts, proudly, on video, as disgusting, a population best gone. All while expecting, and receiving, their ongoing indulgence.
As I said here,
Yet here we are.
[ Schedules tomorrow’s Ephemera. ]
Cross-dressing man, a nipple-clamp fetishist, boasts of getting a bra fitting in M&S.
He doesn’t actually need a bra, of course, but I’m guessing he really enjoyed making a female sales assistant participate in his psychodrama.
A problem presents itself.
Safety über alles.
Julia went rogue and used scissors. Mind you, she’s always been a bad girl.
I suggested telekinesis.
Question asked, answered.
His family has been in the country for 60 years so now you must change this racist flag, says a “professor” (because of course he is).
Again, it’s worth imagining moving to, say, Denmark or South Korea and then, having been indulged with an intellectual status that you have not earned, spending your adult life badmouthing the locals – on TV and in error-strewn, uninformed, poorly argued books – as inherently racist and collectively psychotic, and demanding that their national flags be removed or altered to accommodate your own improbable sensitivities.
Arrogant fucker would scarcely cover it.
It does raise the question as to why he insists on living amongst the unenlightened racists he so evidently deplores. Surely he can name a more . . . congenial . . . country he would prefer.
Actually it doesn’t raise any such question. It’s a grift. He leeches off those who, for some unfathomable reason, have decided their lives should be spent atoning for being part of a culture that had done more in two centuries to advance the well-being of mankind than had occurred in the preceding two millennia.
And he doesn’t want to leave because he knows any place he could name as free of the racism he finds so objectionable is a place he’d be beating his clothes on rocks to get clean.
Art thou not enriched?
[ Caution, graphic. ]
And with lots of the kind of racism Prof. Andrews should be more than comfortable with, to judge from his earlier utterances.
His enslaved-my-ancestors trope echoes that dear old hippo-bloody-crite Charles Roach, who declined to give the standard loyal oath on being called to the Ontario bar, on the ground that one L. Windsor of Buck House was responsible for his forebears being shipped in chains to the Caribbean.
I noticed at the time that Roach was routinely attired in a dress shirt, cotton or cotton-poly blend. He charged for his legal (or paralegal) services, so he clearly had no comparable objection to either cotton or money, both of which had a great deal more to do with the African Trade than the monarchy did.
Dunno whether he took sugar in his tea/coffee. Bets?
The proffered enrichment seems to have been 86d.
It’s still there for me. But because the footage is quite graphic, it may not be shown unless you log in to an X account.
All I see is some weirdo holding up a bag with a bra in it. He got a “fitting”? Yeah, sure. I’ll take things that never happened for $100, Alex.
[ Agitated squirrel noises. ]
[ Neighbour’s cat sashays across lawn. ]
Because, one way or another, he gets paid for doing so. Additionally he can live better than he could back in his shithole country. His decisions are perfectly rational. Those making decisions that make his decisions perfectly rational are…well even those work out for them, short term anyway. Eventually you get back to the people making the truly irrational decisions but they’re too lazy to think or care too much about it.
Added: Ah, but your second and third paragraphs say as much. Just call me Quick Draw. Though I do stand by my other addendum.