Shower Scenes
And in can-anyone-else-smell-paedophilia? news:
Pictures of mentally ill, self-mutilating men. In kindergarten settings. To facilitate discussions. With pre-school children.
Strange is a good start. Other descriptors are available.
Should any readers be trying to think of reasons not to raise an eyebrow, it should be pointed out that roughly half of sexually dysmorphic male prisoners – so-called trans women – are there for sexual offences, including, quite often, offences against children – a rate that is much higher than that for the male prison population in general, whether for adult sexual offences or paedophilia.
Likewise, dysmorphic men and women report severe childhood abuse, often childhood sexual abuse, at rates far higher than is found in the wider population. Adults who have been violated as children are in turn much more likely to have, shall we say, issues regarding normal boundaries, and to act inappropriately with minors.
The consequences of which aren’t exactly hard to find. To say nothing of child abusers who invoke some sudden-onset transgenderism once their activities have been discovered and interrupted.
In light of which, encouraging small children to “accept others as they are” – a euphemism for not being wary of sexually dysmorphic men, a demographic among which paedophilia is much more common – seems rather unwise. For reasons we’ve seen many times. Yet this pre-emptive dulling of any wariness is the stated goal of the poster’s creator, illustrator and activist Tyler Feder.
However, this is the bedlamite timeline, and so,
And,
At which point, the words foxes and henhouse spring to mind.
And it has to be said, “Your Four-Year-Old Children Will Look At Our Pictures Of Weird, Naked Men” is an odd flex. A peculiar hill to die on.
If you read the full Reduxx article, linked above, it doesn’t get any more reassuring. The smell does seem to persist.
Update, via the comments:
As someone who isn’t by temperament easily scandalised or particularly prudish, I nonetheless find myself in the position of having to say, “Er, are you sure about this? This seems all kinds of weird and inappropriate.”
And it seems to be happening more often than I’d expected.
Sharp-eyed readers may also note the assumption that exposure to, and familiarity with, the subject of transgenderism – and by extension, autogynephilia, and drag queens, and cross-dressing more generally – will invariably make one feel great warmth towards these phenomena – and the things that often go with them.
When in fact, the opposite may be true. And not infrequently.
Update 2:
In the comments, Aelfheld adds,
Well, even if we assume implausibly benign motives, which may be a bit of an ask, premature exposure to sexuality, even in its more humdrum forms, isn’t generally regarded as beneficial. And it seems to me that transgender people would have an easier ride, and a less contentious group reputation, if they observed the obvious courtesy and stayed the hell away from children.
And yet, as we’ve seen repeatedly, many schools seem to be actively recruiting the psychologically marginal – say, attention-craving men in painted nails and make-up who think “looking cute” is the highest function of those employed as a primary-school educator.
And then there’s the peddling of dysmorphic cartoon pornography to middle-school children, without parents’ knowledge or consent, via which eleven-year-olds are introduced to “vagina slime,” fellatio, and “strap-on hotness,” and the joys of masturbating while driving.
Or middle-school librarians who seem convinced that eleven-year-olds need to know how to whore themselves – and to know that whoring is both valid and empowering. Because they may be transgender and may have to pay for hormones and surgical mutilations.
If this all sounds rather lurid and improbable, do follow the links.
Oh, and frottage-seeking drag queens.
And this hiring of the inapt, the incongruous and inadequate, is done as if it were a way for schools to display their own sophistication and fashionable status. As if this “queering” of children’s minds, this erosion of reality, of probity, of normal boundaries, could have no downsides, no dubious effects.
And of course we’ve encountered things of this kind:
You see, exhibitionist displays of fetishes – say, transvestism, sadomasochism, nipple clamps and cock rings – constitute a “justice space” and “kids and youth voices are vital to justice movements.” “Kids,” we learn, “are a vulnerable and marginalised group” and must therefore – yes, therefore – be exposed to narcissistic psychodrama and the penises of creepy, damaged men.
It’s all about those “intersecting identities and oppressions.”
Again, at risk of sounding stuffy, these feats of posturing and perversity do not strike me as wholesome, or a path to brighter, more fragrant tomorrow.
Yes, I can definitely smell paedophilia.
Again, “Your Four-Year-Old Children Will Look At Our Pictures Of Weird, Naked Men” is an odd flex. A peculiar hill to die on.
Yet here we are.
I wasn’t having any trouble on that front.
The posters, we’re assured, are “fostering diversity.” Apparently, it’s all about “acceptance.”
Thing is, some kinds of acceptance are quite perilous. Not least for small, trusting children.
And while there are certainly sexually dysmorphic people who have no interest in children at all, and who just wish to get on with their lives, unobtrusively, this doesn’t alter the realities, the statistical dangers, of the broader demographic. In this matter, expecting children – and their parents – to suspend their critical faculties, their intuitions, and the evidence of their own eyes, is simply not on. And never can be.
And yet, again, this is where we are.
And yet, the authors of the Reduxx piece didn’t put a link here.
Yeah; the TTTT “community” doesn’t want to accept that most people want to be left the hell alone.
As a practicing Catholic, there are some issues at which I am at odds with my faith, such as whether it is proper for me to donate my mortal remains to the University of Tennessee’s Body Farm.
Capital punishment is one as well. Well, to be fair, I am less at odds with the catechism as I am with the current Pope. Imprisonment in lieu of the death penalty does not promise the innocent are kept safe as there are still murders being arrange from prisons and certainly within them – and since that safety cannot be guaranteed, such people should be removed, permanently.
And as it is with pedophiles. Do they remain a constant threat? Are they ever cured? If not, and they engage in such behavior then, well, their removal is nevessary. There are just some sins that cry out to Heaven for retribution and for which some smiting is called.
As someone who isn’t by temperament easily scandalised or particularly prudish, I nonetheless find myself in the position of having to say, “Er, are you sure about this? This seems all kinds of weird and inappropriate.”
And it seems to be happening more often than I’d expected.
At least not until someone fails to compliment you on your hair….
[ Checks self in mirror. ]
As so often, there’s an implied and unconvincing conceit that if you don’t have any particular animus towards trans people – if, say, you can have civilised discussions with a trans person – you must therefore defer to any demand that any trans person might make. That you will never have cause to set any boundaries on their behaviour. Any areas that must remain off-limits.
Likewise, there’s an assumption that exposure to, and familiarity with, the subjects of transgenderism, and autogynephilia, and drag queens, and cross-dressing more generally, will invariably make one feel great warmth towards these phenomena – and the things that often go with them. When in fact, the opposite may be true. And not infrequently.
Surely reporting to the police and/or child services would be the next step? There are clear safeguarding issues at that organisation.
Carelessness or what?
Here are links to the newspaper’s website and twitter account. I have not as yet found a relevant article.
I’ve been wearing a dosimeter ever since David began describing himself as radiant. No alarming readings so far….
Radiant and glorious. Actually.
Reduxx is just making it up which is why it is not reported anywhere else.
Handle irony carefully around here, Farnsworth…
Wonder if Caplin is going to have an attack of sudden-onset transgenderism.
“Transgenderism is the first refuge of paedophiles.” — Samuel Johnson, probably
Wonder if Caplin is going to have an attack of sudden-onset transgenderism.
I also wonder* if the reason he was arrested and the arrest so public is to show** that Old Yte Men are the real pedo culprits, and not gangs of “Asians”.
*(not really)
**(gaslight)
If the parents want to be arrested for criminal non-affirmation or whatever other insanity has been legislated.
Is today’s word ‘irony’?
There is, I think, a certain through-the-looking-glass quality.
Not the first time the Germans have jumped through the looking glass: There was a destructive fad of “children need sex and sex education” back in the 60’s and 70’s. If I recall correctly, it originated among pervy intellectuals but was readily embraced by most of the “smart” people.
Rather than copy & paste a pile of links, I’ll just link to Steyn.
Mr. Webb has thoughts.
Why is it only the little kids?
Austria was ground zero for that sort of activism.
I’m not even trying to think of reasons to not have the pre-school proprietors and staff publicly executed.
What kind of an idiotic parent would not withdraw their children from that kindergarten the very moment they discovered those pictures? Having my kids blacklisted from that place and all places associated with it would be like discovering my kids had been blacklisted from NAMBLA meetings: “Well, great, I guess.”
If sexual orientation is merely another category of human like ethnic group, and your highest virtue is “tolerance”, then it seems necessary to enforce “tolerance” at a young age. This is where the car crash happens. They want children to know what these categories are so they can be overtly “tolerant”. Children cannot imagine adult sexual activity, and thus do not know what “gay” or “trans” mean. So they must be shown. But doing so is very disruptive to their development.
I think it also is a flex by groomers and paedos who are empowered by all this, since they are pushing to be “tolerated” and even celebrated too.
I’ve found it cuts through the complexities to simply cultivate a strong animus toward all trans people.
Also, frottage.
Well, we have seen the ubiquity of ‘Pride’ emboldening all manner of creep and misfit. Cross-dressing piss fetishists, for instance.
Have to say, I didn’t see that one coming.
Remember Wilhelm Reich’s nutty Orgone Energy?
Visibility limited: this Post may violate X’s rules against Hateful Conduct.
I miss the days of ‘ask your parents’.
Baby steps.
They’re trying to inure children to sexual abuse, plain & simple.
There is much question-begging, of course.
Under what set of circumstances do these foolish people envisage an infant encountering either a naked sexually dysmorphic man, or a woman who has had her breasts surgically removed?
Kids might catch glimpses of mummy and/or daddy’s “ugly bits” in the normal course of domestic life, but that’s it, surely? This is yet another example of a concatenation of leftie stupidity, sinister manifestations of sexual depravity and malign authoritarianism.
I look forward to reading about Gerold-Siegl’s inevitable Fritzl-like arrest.
I look forward to reading about Gerold-Siegl’s inevitable Fritzl-like arrest.
Given he works for the Austrian version of the BBC or PBS, and given the allegedly conservative Kronen Zeitung describes the “offspring disturbed” event as only a “huge fuss”, – it is the parents who are out of step,apparently.
I hope this is true — that most people are scandalized — but all too many headlines coming out of Europe indicate that rape of women and children isn’t such a big deal to the elite. Not when a rape victim is sentenced to more time in prison than her rapists for insulting Islam.
The unfortunate tendency of every civilization is for the psychopaths and other Cluster Bs to elbow their way to the top echelons of power, and once there to inflict Cluster B abuse on the populace. Power-hungry psychos enjoy preying on children because they get a thrill out of destroying innocence. Raping young girls is the same idea: destroy innocence, making sure the victim will never be the same, if she survives.
Same with the L.A. fires — leadership don’t give a rip that people suffer, and they might even thrill to it. Being diligent with fire-prevention measures requires a soul, wherein you’re worried that people will be hurt, killed, or traumatized.
If you’re not worried about others’ welfare, you can slash budgets and divert funds and fail to build reservoirs and drain others while losing zero sleep over it.
What the hell has happened to us?
Austrian kindergarten trans propaganda?
Member of Congress says, “Hold my Bud Lite”
Ethical non-monogamy sounds like a THRILL.
Tucker interviews Shellenberger. Pretty interesting.
Even if we assume benign motives, which may be a bit of an ask, premature exposure to sexuality, even in its more humdrum forms, isn’t generally beneficial. And it seems to me that transgender people would have an easier ride, and a less contentious group reputation, if they observed the obvious courtesy and stayed the hell away from children.
And yet, as we’ve seen many times, schools seem to be actively recruiting the psychologically marginal – say, attention-craving men in painted nails and make-up who think “looking cute” is the primary function of those entrusted to educate small children.
And this hiring of the inapt, the incongruous and inadequate, is done as if it were a way for schools to display their own sophistication and fashionable status. As if this “queering” of children’s minds, this erosion of reality, of probity, of normal boundaries, could have no downsides, no dubious effects.
And of course we’ve encountered things of this kind:
Again, at risk of sounding stuffy and old-hat, these attitudes do not strike me as wholesome, or a path to brighter, more fragrant tomorrow.
[ Post updated again, substantially. ]
I think we’re at the point where neither of those things is a problem.
We need more stuffiness and old hats.
Well, yes, and it would, in context, seem almost radical. Saying, “Perhaps the bearded man in the glittery eye shadow and stiletto heels, the one who likes vamping about in front of small children, isn’t an ideal candidate for the job of primary-school teacher,” would, I suspect, elicit some gasping.
Being so problematic and all.
And while compiling the update and revisiting the examples, and any number of others I could have included, it occurred to me that some newcomers might assume I must be making this shit up.
Oh, and that Thing That Never Happens…?
Well, you know.
It is Tuesday, after all.