Reheated (99)
For newcomers, some items from the archives:
Romantic complications of a very modern kind.
To which, Mags adds, “He she didn’t use her his pronouns.” Indeed. A notable omission. One that results in finger-wagging from fellow Reddit forum regulars: “You do have to respect that SHE is the expert on her own gender, not you.”
It’s a bold claim. Despite which, the person being scolded – a woman who expects to be taken seriously as a man – can’t bring herself to take seriously as a woman her own male partner. There’s no she or her, just a grudging them. Which does rather cast some doubt on the broader enterprise.
It’s Trivial When The Victim Is Someone Who Isn’t Me.
Habitual car theft is a “victimless” crime, says Nora the socialist.
Assistant professor wants to censor the “violent” language of astronomy.
It’s all terribly oppressive – for the implausibly faint of heart, I mean. And should a colleague carelessly refer to a planet being stripped of its ozone layer by a catastrophic gamma-ray burst, this is obviously “misogynistic language” and a basis for the sternest of hands-on-hips chiding.
At which point, readers may wish to ponder whether the best people to be doing astronomy, or teaching astronomy, or to be making workplace rules for astronomers, are the kinds of people who mouth dogmatic assertions without any trace of supporting logic, and who are distracted, even distressed, by hearing the word collision being used to describe a collision.
Consider this an open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
‘Modern’ as in ‘totally cuckoo’?
Well, simply holding up a mirror, literally and figuratively, does seem to cause an awful lot of bother. And if initiates, those on the inside, can’t follow the rules, what chance do the rest of us have?
Still chuckling at the claim that “drag queen is a look,” a valid ambition, and viable romantic bait.
Can’t say I’m getting a tingle.
Boss title.
Thank you. It does, I think, tickle the nub of it.
I think someone should check his hard drive.
Dr Madrid does seem oddly animated by these things, breathlessly so. To a degree one might find eyebrow-raising. And then there’s his urge to exert control over people and what they may say, to infantilise grown adults and make them submit to his own weird preoccupations. There is, I think, some unhappy psychology in play.
As I said in the original thread, I’ve seen umpteen astronomy documentaries in which a white dwarf star cannibalises its neighbour, or in which reference is made to a gamma-ray burst stripping away the ozone layers of any habitable planets in its path; but any lurid sexual connotations – and thus a pretext for the word “misogynistic” – have not been foremost in my mind.
But hey, maybe that’s just me.
You may have found a bouncer for this place.
If anyone’s getting aroused by this thread, I’m upping the price of the drinks.
[ Starts compiling Friday’s Ephemera. ]
Speaking of Ms. “Go ahead and steal cars,” she’d like to see the manager:
I would guess Dear Nora is annoyed by many unremarkable things. As opposed to habitual thieving, of course, which she merrily dismisses as of no importance.
Because, again, it’s being done to someone else.