Don’t Let Them See The Stubble
Lifted from the comments, via Mr Muldoon, a rather coy omission:
Roxanne Tickle has won her discrimination case against the social media app ‘Giggle for Girls’, which blocked her from joining on the basis of being male. This is a step forward in ensuring transgender women are not discriminated against on the basis of their gender identity. pic.twitter.com/552Qq6r2KJ
— Amnesty International (@amnesty) August 23, 2024
A less pretentious, and rather more frank, account of the above can be found here. Note that Mr Tickle – Roxy Tickle – was enabled in his mission by the University of New South Wales, via a $50,000 grant, and that his methods of persuasion included equating insufficiently compliant women with the Ku Klux Klan, and making phone calls to the site’s owner at her home.
When not suing women who would rather not participate in his fantasies of sudden-onset womanhood, Mr Tickle spends his time sharing Instagram photographs of his underwear and neck hair, and cartoon sex toys.
Readers are invited to imagine the mindset of Amnesty International and their fellow enthusiasts of transgression. A mindset in which you have to pointedly not share an obviously relevant piece of information in order to maintain the pretence of righteousness:
Or, “If we let them see the reality of the situation, they won’t comply. So we mustn’t let them see the reality of the situation.”
Imagine that’s your thought process, consciously or otherwise.
A more honest and realistic report might say, “Weirdly vindictive cross-dressing man launches three-year-long harassment campaign against women who object to the imposition of his compulsions – namely, making women and girls uncomfortable for his own gratification.”
Or, “Weirdly vindictive cross-dressing men who exult in violating the normal boundaries of women and girls are an obvious danger, and should be regarded accordingly.”
Update, via the comments,
Mags asks,
Once registered, it is an oddly common phenomenon.
Pst314 adds,
Well, the blunting of normal, quite rational discernment does seem to be the goal. As Ms Grover put it,
I would suggest that compelling people, with the force of law, to pretend that men are actually women, and compelling them to deny the reality that, as a group, cross-dressing men pose a significant statistical threat, is itself unjust. To impose unrealism in this way, to suppress discernment of the obvious, is hardly benign. To compel people to pretend that, as the judge put it, “sex is changeable.”
And so, in the name of protecting women, and as a result of amending laws intended to protect women, women must now welcome intrusions and dangers that would previously have been recognised, but which now, it seems, no longer can be, at least not lawfully. Not only in terms of a social media app used by women to find roommates and travel companions, but also with implications for changing rooms, toilets, sports, prisons, and even rape shelters.
But, ah, smell the progress.
“Good news”
Hasn’t Amnesty International always been strangely biased in who it supports and who it condemns?
He wants to be a woman but he doesn’t like women.
Mr Tickle…
[ Slides bowl of ostensibly toenail-free peanuts to Rafi. ]
Marcus Dib, “The Offensive Tranny,” has some thoughts on the story.
Tranny Tickle is a living reminder that some people should be discriminated against.
Marcus Dib, “The Offensive Tranny,” has some thoughts on the story.
Germany says Nicht so schnell, Mac, halt mein Bier.
Fines? Gender Stalag fünf for you.
I am almost beginning to think this lot might be extremists.
Or, “You will participate in the psychological abuse of your own children.”
Next week: anorexia and cutting!
I’m just going to leave this here, again.
Or, “You will participate in the psychological abuse of your own children.”
Indeed, they are doing the meme.
And because things haven’t gotten quite odd enough.
I’m assuming it’s a wind-up, but… well.
I’m assuming it’s a wind-up, but… well.
If it is, it won’t be the way things are going, but if it isn’t another reason for cremation. I can’t imagine how embarrassing it would be to be dug up like Richard III and be wearing a frilly thong.
I suppose we could exhume your remains to check that isn’t the case.
For a fee, obviously.
Ooh. Thai food.
I suppose we could exhume your remains to check that isn’t the case.
Not mine, I am planning on a Viking funeral. You might want to rethink the velour leopard skin blogging thong, though.
[ Scraps plans for digging-up-the-dead-and-checking-their-underwear business. ]
[Scraps plans for digging-up-the-dead-and-checking-their-underwear business.]
I suppose instead you could take a page from chastity belts and go into lockable steel boxers business – LoK-BoX™ “Don’t Be Caught Dead In A Frilly Thong”.
Have you noticed the trannies who loudly proclaim that they are more woman than the real women who object to their presence in women’s toilets and locker rooms?
“Roxy Tickle.” Why do they always have porn names?
Oh, and in This Never Happens news.
Madam, you must stop noticing things.
his fantasies of sudden-onset womanhood
That. Lol!
Darn. I was all set to invest. (I found $2.35 under the sofa yesterday.)
A bit off-topic but, before we laugh too much at hapless bobbies . . .
Why assume that?
It’s ‘wax my balls’ all over again.
For those who missed the reference.
And from the subsequent comments, this:
And,
Rinse and repeat.
Haven’t heard much about Johnathan Yaniv (alias Jessica Yaniv, alias Jessica Simpson) since his assault conviction
In many cases, I would guess that the vexatiousness and the sexual dysmorphia are two facets of the same underlying issue.
Remember Cartman’s “suck my balls”? Cartman was less objectionable.
An interview, from four months ago, with Sall Grover, owner of the Giggle app, can be found here.
Oh, I’m sure they’ve been very, very active defending J6 defendants. They certainly don’t have a problem classifying cop killers as political prisoners.
In other Amnesty International news, they have recently decreed that Afghan girls & women are oppressed by the Taliban because they “identify as girls”. With the rather unpleasant implication that women and girls are complicity identifying into their own oppression. Silly women, don’t they know that if they just identify as boys, the Taliban will surely leave them alone?
“Weirdly” vindictive? “Gee, this asylum sure has a lot of crazy people in it, and they’re weirdly vindictive, too!”
I’ve read half a dozen Guardian articles and watched half a dozen Youtube videos (*), and I still don’t understand what legal point the court was adjudicating. This video is as clear as I can make out on the legal issues – that the enumerated powers of the Australian federal legislature include management of interstate commerce (how many gills in a pint), and implementation of international treaties (how many miles away from your continental shelf your territorial waters are), and that it maybe turns out that the framers of the Australian constitution intended those enumerated powers to commit Australians for ever to accepting autogynephiles in female spaces.
The Giggle side, if I understand correctly, was relying on a legal concession (and a female privilege under chivalry) that though discrimination is the worst thing in the world, women have a temporary right to sex discrimination against men until such a time as (i) men cease to have a physical advantage over women, and/or (ii) there exist men who might take advantage of this physical difference. So did the judge say that it would be ok to sexually discriminate against Mr Tickle, but that Tickle is a officially a Miss, and therefore your right to sexual discrimination doesn’t apply? Or did the judge say that your eyeballing Tickle as a Mr makes you guilty of gender discrimination?
(*) From Youtuber “Known Heretic”, the story of Brenda is a Wolf is interesting.
A small oddity about that x/twitter thread. At some point between earlier today and the first posting of the x/twitter thread here (where I saw it), the url was not to the Guardian, but to a Spectator article.
I posted a couple more details at the x/twitter thread itself.
Presumably Twitter’s Community Notes can change when more participants post different corrections. I’ve never seen that happen before.
So . . . if an official document can be found declaring Mr Justice Bromwich the North end of a South-bound horse then he must be legally recognised as such?
As Ms Grover put it,
I would suggest that compelling people, with the force of law, to pretend that men are actually women, and compelling them to deny the reality that as a group cross-dressing men pose a significant statistical threat, is itself unjust. To impose unrealism in this way, to suppress discernment of the obvious, is hardly benign. To compel people to pretend that, as the judge put it, “sex is changeable.”
And so, in the name of protecting women, and using laws intended to protect women, women must now welcome intrusions and dangers that would previously have been recognised, but which now, it seems, no longer can be, at least not lawfully. Not only in terms of a social media app used by women to find roommates and travel companions, but also with implications for changing rooms, toilets, sports, prisons, and even rape shelters.
[ Post updated. ]
Just remembered it’s a bank holiday. Wondered why it was quiet.
Justice would be treating these people as enemies of civilization.
The destabilization of society is the goal: The pervs want to tear down barriers to their depraved desires. The leftists want to tear down society by any means available.
[ Looks up UK bank holidays. ]
A bank holiday called Summer Bank Holiday. What a curiously generic name.
“We really ought to have a holiday around the end of summer.”
“What occasion should it celebrate? We’ve got centuries of history to choose from.”
“We’ll never get everyone to agree.”
“Well, ‘it’s summer’ is sufficient reason to celebrate.”
And that’s why the outrage against these “trans” women puts the cart before the horse. When you claim a “temporary right” to discrimination – the discrimination is never going to be temporary, and is not going to stop when convenient for you.
The trans are merely exploiting a few basic tenets of western society: no biological differences, rejection of single sex spaces, elevation of “feelings” or hurty words over genuine offences, subverting the legal – academic system to support the above.
Of course, for decades, it’s WOMEN who have driven these for their benefit, exploiting the basic chivalry of Western society and it’s men. And they are complaining now because a few sick perverts are using their tactics and rules against THEM.
Problem is, society is too far gone. The time to stop men getting into female bathrooms was, to take but one example , when the boy scouts were forced to accept girls….
And that, David, is the reason why (as a recent comment here pointed out) the gap between “progressive” and “others” is not gender, but marriage.
You need to be a father of a young girl like me, or a prospective parent, to be absolutely disgusted and terrified by stuff like this, or the prospect of mentally ill men entering her bathroom.
If you are a 40 year old cat lady, on the other hand….
True. There was one argument which I was somewhat sympathetic to, which was that there were “men only spaces” which were important for business networking so that excluding women disadvantaged them. But the malevolent nature of the feminist program was proved when the attack was carried against the Boy Scouts etc.
Still, I never anticipated that trannies would exploit what feminists did, and would have laughed if anyone predicted it.
40 year old cat men also seem to be a problem. And childless couples.
But feminists seemed passionately hostile to any argument even for “balancing” such conflicting concerns: It seemed clear that they wanted to eliminate all men-only spaces regardless of whether access for women was important. Only malevolence could explain what they did.