Yes, But Where Are My Novelty Breasts?
Time for something grotesque, I think. Grotesque, but very of our times:
I’ll spare you the grim details, but what Mr Sonia did to the victim, a thirteen-year-old girl, over several months, was sufficiently vile to repel over a dozen jurors, who said they would be unable to sit on a case so disturbing. Suffice it to say, Mr Sonia was found guilty and incarcerated for a minimum of 22 years. During which time,
Or, convicted paedophile demands pampering, women’s undies.
As I said, it’s very now.
Because that’s what we do now with male child-rapists. And obviously, it can only go well. No bizarre complications could possibly ensue.
Despite this seemingly intermittent maleness, Mr Sonia has launched a lawsuit against staff at both the Washington Department of Corrections and his previous male prison, citing “cruel and unusual punishment.” Specifically, a failure to provide, at taxpayer expense, “breast augmentation” and “hair removal of the face, neck and jaw,” which is, we’re told, of “paramount importance.” And a lack of which allegedly results in “severe emotional anguish.”
Depending, one assumes, on whether Mr Sonia claims to be a man or a woman on any given day.
At which point, readers may wonder whether Mr Sonia’s mental health shortcomings predate their supposed causes.
Update, via the comments, where Mags suggests,
It does seem – shall we say, possible – that Mr Sonia is so irredeemably broken and malevolent, so committed to antagonism, that, having been obstructed from further child-raping, he now channels his antisocial urges into nuisance lawsuits and the feigning of victimhood.
I mean, it wouldn’t be surprising.
Jen adds,
Well, we’ve already seen the scrupulously intersectional priorities of, for instance, Canadian women’s shelters, in which a deranged dysmorphic man roaming the halls wearing only a bra and brandishing his genitals, along with several stolen kitchen knives, is deemed of much less importance than the fact that a female resident had dared to “misgender” him.
Can you not feel the progress…?
Consider this an open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
Men who rape children shouldn’t get to complain about anything.
From the linked article:
Mr Lotusflower, formerly Nathan Goninan – pictured here in all his loveliness – is, since you ask, serving a ten-year sentence for the brutal murder of a teenage girl.
At which point, I’m just going to leave this here. For no reason whatsoever.
Well, it does seem – shall we say, possible – that Mr Sonia is so irredeemably broken and malevolent, so committed to antagonism, that, having been obstructed from further child-raping, he now channels his antisocial urges into nuisance lawsuits and feigning victimhood.
I mean, it wouldn’t be surprising.
Why can’t these people be incarcerated in the nearest caldera?
Call me old-fashioned, but I thought serving time in prison was supposed to be some kind of punishment?
And during those movements between multiple male facilities he was likely kept out of general population and secluded with other pedos. Which is a shame because perhaps he could have benefited from some male guidance and bonding with other inmates, especially given his crime. You know, they could help him get in touch with his feelings, show him some brotherhood.
Found this story unintentionally funny…
Other stories report that early on they ran out of wine and brownies. They emailed the governor from their cell phones. Went straight to the top! I mean, 22 whole hours. Imagine! In a blizzard, they ran out of water. National news. They survived!
My liberal pseudo-friends all said that such “care” really was a “human right” which we all were obligated to pay for through our taxes. None of them said otherwise. The cultural rot runs deep.
The liberal fantasy of incarceration as therapy. Please ignore the extremely high recidivism rates.
Given rates of recidivism among serious and violent offenders – around 70% – and given what it takes to actually end up in prison – in the UK, the average number of prisoners’ previous (known) offences is, I believe, 10 or thereabouts – expectations of redemptive or therapeutic properties seem somewhat misplaced.
Somewhat related:
See also this and this.
From the links above, one more time:
I don’t recall any definite numbers–or at least not with any confidence–but I seem to recall reading that the chances of reform are relatively good if someone is caught for their actual first offense, but that the odds rapidly get worse (geometrically? or even faster?) with each additional offense.
And, of course, the chances of reform are greatly worsened if the offender lives in a “community” with high rates of criminality.
The history of the last 100 years shows that the most dangerous people are leftists. Far more dangerous than ordinary thugs.
Why didn’t the inmates at that first facility do what they are supposed to with suchlike?
So we’re actually putting male rapists in women’s prisons and acting like that’s totally normal… Isn’t the meteor overdue?
Well, we’ve already seen the scrupulously intersectional priorities of Canadian women’s shelters, where a deranged dysmorphic man roaming the halls wearing only a bra and brandishing his genitals, along with several stolen kitchen knives, was deemed of much less importance than the fact that a female resident had dared to “misgender” him.
Can you not feel the progress…?
No, because you can still find far more than ten righteous men and women.
In 2022, Sonia was finally moved into a women’s prison in Washington state.
Well, the good news is he won’t have any trouble finding a lawyer.
You’d think that competent members of the favoured minority groups might object to the cheapening of their hard-won credentials and professional reputation. Which, thanks to progressives, may consequently be called into question.
I hear being burned at the stake removes unwanted hair permanently.
A tad old-fashioned, perhaps, but not, I think, unfair.
Not racist. No racism in the least. Now George Floyd otoh…
Some social problems require permanent removal from society.
But even to notice there is a problem makes you evil in the eyes of liberals.
Sort of related.
I would think the chances of reform would be nearly as good if the punishment for the first conviction isn’t derisory.
And here I was thinking it nausea.
That was supposed to be implicit in my comment. Without punishment, the chances of reform are virtually zero…which is what the left wants.
[ Holds up bottle of Professor Dibbler’s Universal Homeopathic Cure. ]
File under Cures: disease, worse than
The composition of the Washington State Supreme Court is interesting (see photo in link). Out of eight justices only two are definitely male (of the other six, one is difficult to tell M or F. The blonde looks a trifle…err. .young to have enough experience for a supreme court). To me that seems like an unusual balance at that level and doesn’t speak well for the quality of legal services in WA.
Some social problems require permanent removal from society.
The Bezmenovites want a race war, and it’s looking like they’re going to get one. If Trump against all odds manages to win in November the US is going to tear itself apart. If he doesn’t win, I think the chances are only slightly less.
Found this story unintentionally funny…
Sounds like they were moments away from cannibalism when the chips and cookies ran out.
Can you not feel the progress…?
It burns like a thousand suns.
This might help.
This might help.
A different kind of ‘roid rage.
I have been saying this since Jan 6, 2021. The Biden administration has turned out as bad as I expected. The only question I have is how well the gaslighting is working. I do see some things just beginning to sink into some of the less thick heads that I know but I doubt that their egos will ever permit them to see how wrong they have been. So long as there are enough celebrities, ‘smart’ people, community ‘leaders’ and such who continue to navigate the status quo, even if they are not 100% in with the Narrative, it’s going to get extremely ugly. Yet those people don’t surprise me as much as those who acknowledge that we’re headed for serious trouble yet seem to think that they can whistle past the graveyard without consequences.
Funny you should mention cannibalism. One commenter said that if it had been 50 men, they would have resorted to cannibalism. As if men are unfamiliar with such situations. The real funny thing is that in spite of how the gist of the story goes, the story even acknowledges that they were not isolated, the bus was able to make progress, the bus company resupplied them:
They were never in any serious danger and in contact with the rest of the world the whole time. If there had been a real medical emergency it could have been addressed. The drama was mostly manufactured.
As usual.
A good retweet by our own Dicentra.
The left has been working for a long time to create “safe spaces” for predators of all sorts.
If you live in NY, the police are not your friends. Other places as well.
https://abc7ny.com/amp/squatters-standoff-queens-new-york-city/14540298/
Who thought this was appropriate for a train station?
I thought that the other inmates at the males facilities took a very dim view of offences like his and tended to inflict their own forms of justice, or was our anti-hero protected from this?
Someone likely to find Bible verses wholly inappropriate.
The problem is really with the leftwing a**holes that give squatters the right to claim to be tenants.
There is actually a way around it … the owner could have had a friend or even her daughter sign a real lease to the house and when the cops show up, that person is the legal tenant and the squatters, if there is no lease, be taken away.
If the owner showing up with a legitimate deed and the alleged tenant being completely unable to provide any documentary proof of a lease in a city with a epidemic squatting problem wasn’t enough, I don’t see how another lease was going to help.
The police were given their orders. Simple as.
What are the chances you reckon that the driver of the maintenance truck, operating his vehicle in a blizzard and just getting on with an actually tough job without drama, is a man?
[ Post updated. ]
Progressives, and by extension much of the media, tend to shy from the fact that the vast majority of crime is committed by a small number of habitual and unrelenting offenders. In Sweden, something like 1% of the population is responsible for close to 70% of all violent crime. This is a typical pattern, seen repeatedly with fairly minor variations.
And yet our betters seem to believe that our safety – and the obvious benefits of a high-trust society – are much less important than giving a fifteenth chance to violent and incorrigible criminals who will not alter their predatory and sociopathic behaviour. At least, not until they become too old to mug people or to climb over walls and break into someone’s home.
Crime figures – and quality of life – could be dramatically improved by being a little less concerned about seeming nice or sophisticated at gatherings of progressives and the terminally pretentious.
More evidence that the Left can’t meme . . .
A former classmate from my high school posted this and I just laiughed. Perhaps one might have thought that a picture where Biden looks less dazed and confused would have been used.
And they say that Trump voters are in a cult. Scott Adams, and I see others now as well, keeps a list of the hoaxes the media has perpetrated on the public. He has missed several. The thing with the majority of them is that they are so absurd, one would have to be…in a cult to believe such things.
The only way any of this ends without significant bloodshed or a destruction of our liberal (in the proper sense) society is by confronting these people hard. Shoving these absurdities in their faces and forcing them to think, forcing them to process, out loud, in front of God and everyone (as Radar O’Reilly would say) the most ridiculous and absurd ones. The ones with hard, concrete evidence contrary to teh Narrative. This needs to be done on a broad scale by October at the latest. They will need at least a month for it to sink in before even the best of them are willing to modify their thinking.
For the last week or so, I’ve been attempting to train the squirrels in the garden. I wave at them, and they come bounding across the lawn, expecting to be fed.
#NowKingOfSquirrels
Hey, I’m just sharing my day.
And what are the next steps in the training regimen, oh Dark Lord of the Lair of Evil?
I wasn’t expecting it to work, frankly, so I don’t yet have a plan. I sort of caught myself off guard. What pleases me is that the wave is quite small, just a discreet wobbling of one hand. No big arm movements.
That, and the sight of seven squirrels bounding across the lawn.
[ Orders bigger bag of nuts. ]
Prescient.
The cats would think I’d called DoorDash.
I have fond memories of the escalating ‘snowman’ gags.
“They did run out of water at one point, “ while surrounded by snow.
@ the link:-
That. Every time.
It’s interesting just how often leftist arguments – and by extension, leftists themselves – side with the habitual criminal, not the victimised and law-abiding, the people whose environment is being degraded and whose businesses are put in peril. And so, the object of sympathy, or pretend-sympathy, is the feral creature assaulting the shop worker and waving a machete. Not the person being assaulted and whose life is being made a misery by the prospect of a repeat performance.
And we’ve seen this pattern over and over and over again.
And should a leftist be the victim of feral behaviour, bizarre contortions will ensue.
“If you go where the huskies go, don’t you eat that yellow snow.”
confronting these people hard. Shoving these absurdities in their faces and forcing them to think, forcing them to process, out loud
Don’t hold your breath.
Given the recently re-iterated case of the Haitian aid worker who was violently raped and then excused her rapist, I doubt even the military boot will do it.
So we’re actually putting male rapists in women’s prisons and acting like that’s totally normal
No one cares when men get raped in prison by violent predators. Why should we care if women do? Equality, don’cha know.
It’s “Watch out where the huskies go, and don’t you eat that yellow snow”
Because deed v lease puts it in the “landlord/tenant” realm. Lease v no lease puts it back in trespass territory. As the article puts out, you get your legit lessor to occupy the house when the squatters are gone just as they tried, lock ’em out and if they try breaking in, call the cops.
Many of these squatters are there to be “paid to leave”. It is their living. I wish landlords would organize and try and get legislation to criminalize the behavior.
[ Tries to summon squirrels telepathically. ]
[ Nothing happens. ]
Squatters: it is the same “compassion” flaw. The law meant to protect a few people down on their luck from unfair eviction also protects squatters in an insane twist. It is the same thing with legit renters who simply refuse to pay rent. In Minneapolis there was a big scam going on where Somalis would rent a house, pay one month, and then live there for 6 months or a year before finally being kicked out. The law these days also makes it illegal to “discriminate” against potential renters. The result is people getting out of the landlord business, so fewer rental units.
You just summarized any random issue of The Skeptic. 😀
I think the problem is, for it to work, I need some sort of costume.
[ Orders fur coat, goggles. ]
[ Tries to summon squirrels telepathically. ]
[ Notices unusual squirrel behaviour in back yard. ]
Historic morality: mostly refraining from things like crime, taboos, exhortation to goodness, charitable works, original sin was disobedience of God. Forgiveness? yes
Modern morality: mostly performative (espousing the right views), ends justify the means (ok to deface world’s greatest art, block roads), original sin is being white/male. Forgiveness? No.
There’s a herd / pack of them at my window, too. And they look hungry. And mean.
What has David done?!
[ From the cellar, demented cackling. ]
[ Notices unusual lack of squirrel activity. ]
At the risk of seeming repetitive,
Is this some previously unknown to me definition of ‘legit?’
As much as signing a piece of paper adds legitimacy, willfully failing to uphold one’s own end of the bargain explicated within renders one less legitimate than the one who doesn’t sign in the first place.
Historic morality: mostly refraining from things like crime, taboos, exhortation to goodness, charitable works, original sin was disobedience of God.
The irony of Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson complaining that the 1st amendment was stopping the government from doing things. They may as well make Jackson Browne a supreme court justice.
All to say, that most people have forgotten that the rights of man put forth in the Bill of Rights come from God. Many seem to think they come from the government.
There’s a herd / pack of them at my window, too. And they look hungry. And mean.
What has David done?!
…and my radio has played nothing but Michael Jackson’s song Ben since David posted.
[ Struts around in fur coat, goggles. ]
[ Struts around in fur coat, goggles. ]
I imagine something like this.
while this is true on an individual basis, in regard to the specific individual you may be engaged with, the greater impact, especially when done as a concerted effort, is upon the larger number of people still on the fence. Especially those who are persuaded (though they likely don’t realize it) only because they think *everyone* else believes the Narrative.
The law, composed most entirely of lawyers has failed them once. So of course more law and more lawyers is the solution lawyers suggest. I mean, it’s the landlords’ own fault when you think about it.
I’ve never thought highly of the legal profession, but after this last lawsuit where my community got sued over…NOTHING…I am spitting nails. The lawfare heaped upon Trump has not surprised me at all. Our court system is a f*****g disgrace. It is running rogue and I fear we may not have enough lampposts to properly fix it.
Squirrels…
I just restarted my solar birdbath fountain. Birds are frolicking. I’m thinking of filling the feeder with birdseed despite the risk of attracting squirrels.
Maybe I’ll refill my BB pistol, also. Show those bastards who’s boss.
Maybe I’ll refill my BB pistol, also. Show those bastards who’s boss.
I tried that too. Little buggers just laughed at me.
A cone shaped baffle on the pole seems to have done the trick. The BB gun was way more fun.
I used rocks. My sister-in-law, who was complaining about the squirrels getting into her bird feeder was not appreciative of the idea. Seemed rather sporting to me given the alternatives. Hell, I only hit one. OK, maybe two if it wasn’t the same squirrel.
She screwed up:
Lee: What unfair advantages do white people have in your force?
Knox: None.
Lee: Then how can it be institutionally racist?
Knox: Um…sorry…I might need to get back to you.
I maintain that they don’t give a rip about giving people chances. Allowing predators to terrorize the populace is the point of the exercise, just as Chávez did in Venezuela and other dictators have also done,
Sadism, straight up. Because Soro is a psychopath and he knows how to find like-minded DAs who are cool with the same sadism.
If you melt it in your mouth, you drain considerable heat from your system, which is probably not wise when you’re stuck in the snow for an indefinite period.
Also, I looked up the squatter’s laws in my state, and a squatter gets “rights” to the property only after living there continually for 7 years and paying all the property taxes during that time.
Phew!
What’s interesting is that Councillor Knox evidently didn’t expect to be asked about the particulars of her own, rather dubious assertion – any particulars at all. As if simply invoking “institutional racism” would shut down any further enquiry or testing of assumptions.
As if those within earshot should automatically defer.
[ Compiles tomorrow’s Ephemera. ]
What, you think there were any scientists amongst them?
“My novelty breasts make me a better spy” – OK, paraphrased a bit but still…
More like…
“So my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods.”
In case you were wondering – yes, this is the Supreme Court Diversity Hire who was unable to define what a woman is. Despite ironically being appointed solely on the basis of her being one.
Well, that and being black. And being worried that the peasantry’s pesky rights might hinder the governments ability to tyrannise them.
[ Splutters with indignation. ]
If you look carefully you can see one of your well-trained squirrels in there!
BUT I DON’T HAVE A MOUSTACHE.
and
This supports my impression, voiced in earlier threads, that a large fraction of “African Americans” are ready to go Nazi.