Into Himself
Time for a spot of downtrodden-minority news:
The Vancouver Police Department, quoted above, are referring, rather coyly, to this chap here:
The assault occurred on Thursday, May 9, at approximately 2:15PM, when the mother, her husband, their baby boy, and one other family member were sitting in their vehicle on Commercial Drive. A strange man opened the door of the car and attempted to grab the mother and her nursing four-month-old infant from the back of the car.
Happily, passers-by assisted the alarmed mother, and Mr Beekmeyer, who was shirtless at the time, was overpowered and arrested shortly afterwards, before being charged with assault. Unlike the police and several news outlets, including the Vancouver Sun and the CBC, witnesses to the crime were quite comfortable using the words he and man when referring to Mr Beekmeyer.
Apparently, it’s the kind of euphoria that results in one attacking random women and their four-month-old babies. Until a crowd of passers-by pin one to the ground.
If the above isn’t sufficiently Silence of the Lambs, there is more.
He’s going to his happy place. Where the good vibes are:
He continues: “Now I’m thinking, how can I kill you? I could have killed you in a different video… Yeah, I’m a serial killer. Do you hate women? I hate women. They don’t take enough oestrogen.”
So nothing of concern there.
Readers with an interest in self-expression and interior décor will find much to ponder in the video below:
🚨A man in Vancouver, Canada, was charged yesterday after assaulting a mother while she was breastfeeding her baby.
Nathaniel “Millie” Beekmeyer, 26, identifies as transgender and made videos about taking estrogen so he could masturbate to himself. pic.twitter.com/W03mw5gpN8
— REDUXX (@ReduxxMag) May 11, 2024
When not sharing his thoughts on how “super cute” he is, and therefore how sexually aroused he is, Mr Beekmeyer declares himself a saviour who will “fix the world.” Specifically, by transforming men into women. However – and this is perhaps something of a catch – “all women have to be destroyed.”
Mr Beekmeyer adds, “I’m a beautiful person.”
For reference purposes.
Still, at least the public were spared getting what might laughingly be referred to as the wrong idea, thanks to the police and media misleading said public about the identity of a dangerously deranged criminal.
Though it occurs to me that, for the passers-by who intervened and overpowered Mr Beekmeyer, it must have been quite strange to see subsequent reports in which this shirtless man was referred to by the police and the media as a woman. As if their own, first-hand perceptions, from mere inches away, were somehow wildly and implausibly inaccurate.
And as noted by Genevieve Gluck, author of the piece quoted above,
But hey. This is where we are now. Feel the progress.
Update, via the comments:
As noted previously, you have to wonder whether the absurdity above will continue indefinitely, a sort of routine surrealism, or whether it will it just peter out, like any fad, and then be remembered with some embarrassment. As if it were on a par with wearing flares.
And if it does become unfashionable, I wonder how the players below will feel:
It must be quite surreal, and presumably upsetting, to hear lawyers and officials pretending that a 6’5” man – the 6’5” man who recently molested your child in a supermarket toilet – is somehow, magically, a woman. One would hope that lawyers, judges, and the other occupants of a courtroom – and possibly, at a stretch, even journalists – were interested in reality, in establishing facts. Not affirming some unhinged and misleading fantasy.
I wonder how those journalists, lawyers, and court officials will retrospectively process their very public participation in our current, ongoing clown show. In which, as above, the child molester is flattered and indulged, his pretence affirmed, while his victims are repeatedly insulted. Will they still like to think of themselves as beings of high probity?
Among the things we are not supposed to talk about:
Bring back asylums. Do it now.
Bring back routine execution of murderers and habitual violent felons.
And while we’re at it, bring back intolerance of leftists.
Cluster Bs can be exceptionally hard to defend against because they have nothing better to do than antagonize people, and they have boundless energy to do it.
They’ve taken the issue to an extreme before the normies can muster the forces to put a stop to it. The only effective way to deal with Cluster Bs is a firm NO with no ifs, ands, or buts.
And a lawsuit, as necessary.
“Though it occurs to me that, for the passers-by who intervened and overpowered Mr Beekmeyer, it must have been quite strange to see subsequent reports in which this shirtless man was referred to by the police and the media as a woman. As if their own, first-hand perceptions, from mere inches away, were somehow wildly and implausibly inaccurate.“
This is a good thing. The more of this that happens, the more ordinary people understand how much this insanity has spread, the quicker they will stop it.
But if I don’t want him in women’s toilets, I’m the bad person?
Taking elementary precautions against obvious threats – threats understood by previous generations – is wickedness itself, apparently.
Because these things – these things here – never, ever happen.
By the way, readers with an interest in Mr Beekmeyer’s cosmic wisdom can find more of it here.
For instance.
It’s quite strange to encounter someone whose fundamental motivation seems to be to aggress you, to be needlessly obnoxious, in any way they can devise, and at seemingly any cost.
As I’ve said before, on a related topic:
Many illustrative links in the original.
Another thing that never happens.
So I Married An Autogynephile.
Some people are hard to please.
Even the police are gaslighting. Some days it feels like every institution has been corrupted.
As noted previously, you have to wonder whether the absurdity will continue indefinitely, a sort of routine farce – or whether it will just peter out, like any fad, and then be remembered with some embarrassment. As if it were on a par with wearing flares.
And if it does become unfashionable, I wonder how the players below will feel:
I wonder how those journalists, lawyers, and court officials will feel about their very public participation in our current, ongoing clown show. In which, as above, the child molester is flattered and indulged, his pretence affirmed, while his victims are repeatedly insulted. Will they still like to think of themselves as beings of high probity?
[ Post updated. ]
from the link:
I’m surprised that the psychiatrists were not fooled. They so often are, after all.
Even prison and institutionalization may not be sufficient. See, for example, ex-professor Deborah Frisch’s harassment campaign against Protein Wisdom blogger Jeff Goldstein and others.
These are people entrusted with special powers in order to protect and preserve our civilization. Every time they betray that trust they weaken our society and erode the necessary public trust in our necessary institutions. Is it any wonder that we encounter with increasing frequency talk about vigilante action to deal with criminals? And characterization of such officials as betrayers and traitors?
Perhaps on the general topic, if not the immediate point of the post: I was dismayed yesterday, reading a dad’s group that I frequent, by some of the comments on a post by a father. He related a conversation with his daughter in her early teens, who said she was struggling with her ‘identity’ and ‘identified’ as ‘bisexual’ and ‘demisexual’. (‘Demisexual’, as best as I can make out, is bisexual, in fancier, longer words.) Several commenters directed the father to trans pages/trans resources, though neither of these ‘identifications’ had anything to do with transgenderism! (Further, there wasn’t really any comment to the effect that, well, early puberty *is* confusing).
I do believe the ‘trans’ trend has peaked, but clearly this is in spite of the ongoing efforts of some.
(For mine, I stayed out of the conversation as I didn’t feel it was quite my place; my daughter is far below the age where that stuff is talked about. And a father’s page where the father wants to know how best to help his daughter is not the best place for arguments over this sort of thing).
That is, pretty much, a defining attribute of puberty. You don’t know, from one week to another, how long your legs are going to be.
Hence “growing pains”, chiefly in joints as I recall, when kids wake up from overnight growth spurts. But that is happening long before puberty.
True. But again, how much of our modern problems of dealing with children going through what every human being in history has experienced and, for the most part, survived…how much of this is a result of literally shoving excessively introspective literature, especially fiction, at children and virtually demanding that they “open up” about the details of such feelings? Whatever psychological BS the sociologists (pretend to) have been trying to resolve over the last 70 years or so has only been made worse by their “cures”.
Here’s an example…completely outside the realm of sexuality, well mostly, from personal experience. 8th grade, mid-1970’s we were loaded into busses and taken to a theater to watch a movie about Anne Frank. When we got back, we had to spend an hour or so (it felt like a year) discussing how we felt about it. Everyone had to say something and it was apparent that the more histrionics employed, the more approval you received. It was bloody awkward. Especially being somewhat introverted. Puzzled I asked a buddy later what all his (I was sure) BS was about and he said that he figured the more he spit out, the sooner he thought it would be over. Which really didn’t make much sense yet I kinda understood.
Two suggestions. Firstly, single sex schools. There is no advantage in pretending to be a girl in a boys school. Secondly, any lady concerned about mad trannies should simply use the gents. She will find that the gentlemen therein will politely point out she is in the wrong facility, and, on hearing her explanation, will not only refrain from waving a penis in her face but will deal roughly with any nutter that attempts it.
A metaphor for liberalism.
Wrestling with criminals is a waste of time and very dangerous. But that’s the way liberals want things to be.
Slightly off, or perhaps orthogonal, to the main thread.
One of the things I find most genuinely dismaying about the last 20 years or so has been the almost complete abandonment of the police and justice system’s responsibilities to the wider, law-abiding public.
Worse, it shows no signs of reversing despite multiple tragedies.
Take Jordan McSweeney.
Despite being in his 20s, he had been charged with 69 offences, including for interpersonal violence, had been convicted of 28 of these – that’s not a typo, 28 convictions – and had been set free from prison on licence just nine days before he savagely murdered Zara Aleena who had been walking home.
What possible excuse can exist for letting such an obvious savage with 28 convictions including for robbery and violence to wander around the streets of London?
And what about Ashley Simbarashe Maparura?
A Zimbabwean who entered the UK as an asylum seeker in 2017 and of whom a judge recently said “You have a dreadful record for using weapons” – 68 convictions across multiple countries, apparently, including drugs, robbery and assault.
Naturally, he has not only been granted asylum but the judge who convicted him is reported to have said that he was “glad” Maparura had been granted leave to remain in the UK.
I just … I don’t even know what to say to that.
And the list goes on. Sabina Nessa murdered by an Albanian illegal immigrant who smuggled his way into the UK in the back of a lorry after having apparently already committed crimes in Greece along the way.
Alice Gross, a fourteen year-old almost certainly murdered by Latvian Arnis Zalkalns, who had come to the UK after being released from prison in his home country for stabbing his wife to death in a forest.
Apologies for a long message, but in short – sometimes you really do have to wonder whose side are they are actually on? And why isn’t the side that pays taxes?
But… but he was giving it vibes.
There are sufficient examples for a much longer one. Not that that’s a comfort.
Analysis: True.
Because they are willing to shut up and take it.
Dumpster-diving has never been high on my list.
It’s perhaps worth noting that the British judiciary is routinely denounced – at least in the Guardian and similar publications – as being terribly white and male, and therefore – supposedly by definition – biased against the poor and vulnerable, the misunderstood, and the heroically brown and downtrodden.
And yet, I would guess that it’s safe to say that the judgements of those pale, male, and supposedly conservative judges are far more lenient than would be preferred by the public, taken as a whole. Especially members of the public whose experience of crime is rather more direct.
Were you not intrigued?
And this is perhaps apposite:
It also occurs to me that people in high-status professions, including legal professions, are more likely to have internalised high-status opinions, mouthed as a kind of social jewellery. Say, the view that those who repeatedly prey upon the law-abiding are somehow vulnerable and unacknowledged victims, and therefore, with much squinting and tilting of the head, the ones most deserving of our sympathy.
And repeated indulgence.
Not quite the word I would have chosen.
Regarding those high-status opinions mentioned above – the ones being mouthed as a kind of social jewellery, this comes to mind. If you haven’t read it, it’s quite a telling, and fairly typical, example of the thing I’m talking about.
Note that Ms Spargo-Ryan, our Guardian columnist, is effectively selling out her law-abiding neighbours, the neighbours being robbed in the night, in order to signal her own status and to win the approval of her equally vain and pretentious peers. Her fellow progressives. The ones who refer to her as “a beautiful person” for being farcically unrealistic, and for wanting habitual burglars to scamper about the streets freely and unmolested.
It’s a reprehensible position. And yet, by mouthing it, she seeks – and finds – applause.
The list could be extended in other ways.
While I admit I haven’t followed the Jordan Neely / Daniel Penny case very closely so may be missing some important details, to my knowledge the treatment of Penny seems outrageous.
Also in Spain, a now 80 year-old man is on trial for shooting an intruder who broke into his remote farm house in the middle of the night with a chainsaw three years ago.
Apparently, the prosecution have asked for a 25-year sentence.
Even taking into account the press trying to sensationalise the story to stoke outrage and get more clicks, if you try to rob a 77 year-old’s house in the middle of the night and threaten him with a chainsaw, frankly you get everything you deserve if the old boy turns out to be armed and dangerous.
Norfolk’s Tony Martin comes to mind.
The West in general has inexplicably latched on to the notion of ‘proportionality’ when responding to criminality.
Meeting an intruder with a shotgun when he only (only!) has a knife is now construed as a criminal act.
Fundamentally, this is delusional, perhaps even more so than thinking a 6’5” man can become a woman by saying so.
Given that, how likely is it those passers-by who assisted in restraining Beekmeyer are going to be given the Daniel Penny treatment?
That.
Didn’t think it was possible to add yet more water to your drinks, David.
(Picks nervously at nailed down beermat and keeps wary eye on nearest henchlesbian chucker-out.)
If only all they did was chuck us out.
[ Directs significant glance at Correction Booth. ]
[ Distracts Old Glyn, adds water to drink. ]
[ Whistles nonchalantly, wipes bar. ]
[ many posts lamenting that civic institutions seem to be On The Other Side ]
[ posts querying whether such people will ever be held to account, or even feel shame ]
If a public trust scandal is large enough, no one involved will ever see justice done. A single corrupt cop will be dealt with harshly; an entire police force, plus the judiciary, plus the Crown/District Attorney’s office will never be held to account for their corruption because the notion that the entire edifice is hostile to the people is so frightening that the public will reject it out of hand. No matter how much blatant evidence there is.
The SRA scandal of the 1980s is merely one example. The COVID lockdowns, invocations of martial law and coerced medical experimentation are the most recent. As David has been chronicling, it is no longer a question whether the civic institutions of the West are hostile to their own native citizenry. Yet we still have people here questioning the evidence of their own lying eyes.
That needs saying more often.
Agreed.
Also needs saying more often: These are traitors.
As noted in the update to the post, Ms Spargo-Ryan’s calls for unearned leniency are utterly selfish. She is tying herself in knots – and misleading her readers – in order to elevate herself in the eyes of her peers. Other AWFULs. The other victims of the burglars, people living nearby – and the future victims of those burglars, which there will doubtless be – are seemingly of no importance.
Pretentious leniency is merely a sign that one doesn’t take the lives of the preyed-upon seriously. The victims’ lives can, it seems, be degraded and put in mortal danger – by nocturnal gangs of burglars armed with carving knives – while the perpetrators are to be excused and cooed over as if they were somehow the victims of the drama, the only ones deserving of empathy.
An empathy that, as their actions vividly demonstrate, will not be reciprocated.
Yes, but: Never forget the old communist slogan, “the worse, the better”: This is the Guardian we’re talking about, and commies have always sought to bring down societies by destroying the social fabric by any means available.
What should be done with creatures like this?
Fishes need to eat.
I caught this livestream from Genspect featuring Mia Hughes, author of the WPATH Files. It covers a previous medical insanity beginning in the early 1800s of excising healthy ovaries to treat mental illness.
It lasted about 30 years. Lobotomies lasted about 30 years. Nobody is held to account, even though the practices are obviously bad (or they are now).
They figure that the trans insanity is not going to last that long because it’s so egregiously wrong, and furthermore the data on the poor outcomes has been collected faster.
Even so…