Reheated (78)
For newcomers and the nostalgic, some items from the archives:
Wherever Possible, Avoid Mad People.
Students “negatively impacted” by insufficiently sensitive buffet.
On the arithmetical shortcomings of the Guardian’s Polly Toynbee.
When not curing inner-city classroom delinquency with the thrill of modern tap, Polly tells her readers that obesity isn’t chiefly a matter of inactivity and overeating, but instead has a more pernicious cause, i.e., a lack of socialism: “It is inequality and disrespect that makes people fat.” To bolster this radical insight Ms Toynbee made a number of further claims regarding economic inequality and expanded waistlines, each of which proved to be either misleading or untrue. And chunkier readers should note that waiting for a socialist revolution probably isn’t the best way to lose those extra pounds.
Chewing The Scenery For Social Justice.
Performative meltdowns and pithy symbolism.
“TRIGGER WARNING: Violent language regarding an extremely dismissive response from a professor. This is an email exchange I had with my professor this evening… We are obviously not preaching to the choir. Professors and administration at Oberlin need to be held accountable for their words and actions and have a responsibility to their students.”
The violent and triggering language used by her professor, for which he and the entire college must be held accountable? One word: “No.”
Also, open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
Methinks the word allowed is doing some heavy lifting.
The first Charles might have thoughts on that, if his head was still attached, but I get your point.
Meanwhile…heh.
Alas that thing is real, and her occupation is “certified bad bitch“.
It’s a lifestyle and a mindset. So there’s that.
Hospitals. Huh. What are they good for? Via Tim Newman. Some of the responses are quite stunning. We’re gonna need another wall.
[ Scatters flour on bar, fetches dough, rolling pin. ]
So – what were you making? A savory meat pie? A fruit pie? Cookies – er – biscuits?
Or was it a new addition to the line of semi-ambulatory furry bar snacks?
I was wondering how long it would take someone to ask.
[ Resumes dough-rolling, exudes air of mystery. ]
“certified bad bitch”: these people have embraced being a loser, as if that were an accomplishment. It is one thing to accept that one is short or not good at sports or something. To embrace being Jabba…words fail me. Likewise embracing being a whiny, helpless dweeb. Laziness as the highest virtue I guess.
Hilarious that he talks about blacks not being allowed to be descendants of white royals.
Big Gay Baby and others speak out at a Louisiana hearing. Having spent more than a little time in Louisiana, I am guessing by the voices these are imported specimens.
Lawmakers debating changing a law. Stunning…
What the bloody hell? Yes. Let’s let the lawyers make the laws. Because of course. The best scenario would be to let them just makeup the laws as they go along. Save everyone a lot of trouble. Idiots.
Over-the-top narcissism. Grounds for “behave like an adult or be ostracized”.
Ostracized with extra ostracon.
I would say the term public office is being abused.
How many layers of pretending is somebody at to be able to say that trans women don’t owe anyone “feminine” features, so you’re a transphobe if you have a problem with your MtF brother showing up to your wedding bearded but in a dress.
It’s the well-tested path of minorities which had previously been liberally accommodated with “let them in, they just want to be left alone to do their own thing in private”, and later on spit that generosity back in their hosts’ faces: you only approve of us on condition that we hide who we are, you’re a hater and a -phobe, but this territory is as much ours to mark as yours. Unless minarets are as prominent as church towers you’re all Islamophobic, unless your bridesmaids have beards you’re all transphobic.
Or is it appropriating the feminine indignation of a woman who’s been told that she’d be quite pretty if she made more of an effort. I’m sure MtFs get told that all the time, probably by the same people who can’t resist touching the hair of black women.
I’m probably going to look stupid for asking this and I’m certainly not watching any more of it to find out but is that Jabba creature a man or a woman?
The totalitarians aren’t even trying to hide anymore.
Minnesota liberals are almost as fascistic as California liberals.
Well at least it was the brother. I was afraid to check thinking it was the groom.
Considering current trends, it could be both.
…I’m certainly not watching any more of it to find out but is that Jabba creature a man or a woman?
I got your back, ese.
I waded into the cesspool, skipped around and those are moobs on that self professed “fat ‘f’ing 10”. TBF, though, passes for any the non-ersatz types like the “gimme three seats” gal featured here recently.
Well, you would.
Odd…On the home page, Reheated (78) says there are 70 comments, but when you click Continue Reading, it says there are 52 comments, and the comment bubble says 52 as well.
As to the Alabama Sweet 16 shooting, it’s getting memory-holed for the much same reason the Nashville Christian School shooting is getting memory-holed: inconvenient shooter identities, who-cares victim identities (non-cop black lives don’t matter if they are taken by other non-cop black lives), and Christians are evil that must be exterminated). We’ll never see that trans shooter’s manifesto either, as it does not serve the poor vulnerable oppressed trans narrative.
They all read correctly for me. Are you travelling backwards in time?
Or wearing a lot of nylon. That sometimes does it.
The usual clues:
Mugshots can be found elsewhere, if the names are not enough.
We don’t have a gun problem, we have a culture problem.
Change name to Billy Pilgrim?
They read correctly for me, too.
Using the Vivaldi browser I see 75 COMMENTS on the main page and 75 COMMENTS as well as 75 over the comment bubble on the Reheated (78) page. Ditto with the Iron browser.
By the way, pst314, does the comment bubble live notification work for you now? I vaguely recall you had trouble with it a while ago. When new comments have been posted, the maroon bubble, bottom left, should change colour and a smaller, secondary bubble should show the number of new comments since you last refreshed the page. (It updates every 60 seconds. It won’t work, however, if you’re browsing in private/incognito mode. And it doesn’t include your own comments.)
76 and 76 using Silk on a Kindle
Wait! Now it’s 78 and 78! Oh no!
Anyway…
If people will post some comments, I will watch and see.
Like this?
I’m just going to leave this here, I think.
No, doesn’t work. If people will keep posting comments, I will watch on all three portals (Firefox + NoScript on desktop, MS Edge on desktop, and Safari on iPhone.)
Wow. So close…
It’s a look that not just any man could pull off.
No, doesn’t work. If people will keep posting comments, I will watch on all three portals (Firefox + NoScript on desktop, MS Edge on desktop, and Safari on iPhone.)
Still nothing.
And I configured NoScript to whitelist all the URL’s used by David’s blog.
And I configured both Firefox and Edge to whitelist David’s blog with regard to popups.
Sigh.
Have you tried not wearing viscose trousers?
#DaveDoesTechSupport
100% cotton with an Hawaiian shirt. #DavidDoesSpyware
Just for the record, I see no such feature functionality with the comment bubble thingy. But then I’m nearly 100% using Chrome on an iPad. I’ve kinda made my peace with it but any attempts at tweeking would be appreciated.
What I haven’t made peace with is the Browser wars in general. Glad I am out of the business as it was getting more and more absurd. Especially knowing a little about those wars from the battlefield, what little time I spent in it. A part of the reason I stopping being interested in UI development/design. But lots of smart people, smaaaaart, knew just how to address the problem. 75 different ways. With ever more browsers. And platforms. Written in Python. Curious what version of Java the world is up to now. OK, not. Or Eclipse. Or not. Or linux. Or not. If any of that’s still a thing. But damn the browsers. I’m sure this artificial intelligence thingy will get right on those problems. But which one?
I can see it now: I type David’s URL into my browser, but it tells me that it cannot do that because David is “toxic” and a “transphobic white supremacist”, and that it will take me to the Guardian instead.
I don’t have a religious subscription, but this discussion was not uninteresting.
This poor fellow is a lesbian, attractive, and smart*, but being killed because other lesbians don’t want his shenis.
Somewhere else, this chap informs us of being trigender, the three most common genders of which are male, female, and (checks notes) genderless which leaves two, but I have no degrees in gender studies.
As a palate cleanser, a new supermodel.
OK, that was off base, my apologies.
*(Evidence of these assertions not apparent)
The Spanish Inquisition ate the comfy chair.
Ostracism
Beware the cutting edge…
Here is a genuine palate cleanser.
And another to make up for David’s “apology”.
[ Directs challenging stare at Our Host. ]