Discourse Was Attempted
Being educated, a graduate, she didn’t understand the question:
Woke reporter SHUTS DOWN my Interview when I expose her as a racist.
She says it is not possible to be racist toward white people. When I show her that simple logic disproves everything she is saying, she is forced to get up & end the conversation. pic.twitter.com/MC3CaCRhzf
— Warren Smith (@WTSmith17) August 10, 2026
“You can’t be racist against white people,” says she, confidently, having just demonstrated precisely the opposite, and then doing it again.
The facial dynamics may also be of interest.
My own definition of “equity,” illustrated many, many times, would be something like equality of outcome regardless of inputs. Inputs including diligence, effort and ability. Which doesn’t sound fair at all.
But as we’ve seen, the church of “equity” requires elaborate mental contortion, via which, “granting access” entails denying access – say, by shutting down advanced courses for gifted pupils – and among whose devotees “whiteness” is the go-to pejorative, a thing to be corrected, and for which the sinfully pale are expected to atone.
There’s a through-the-looking-glass quality. A fun-house mirror malevolence.
Should further, real-world illustrations of “equity” be required, a compendium can be found here, including the outlawing of even basic tests of teacher competence, on grounds of “disparate impact,” and firefighters who cannot read the instructions on their own safety equipment.
Consider this an open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
“Where did I learn that?”
[ Laughs incredulously. ]
“I went to school. I went to university.”
And the hands.
She’s “making sure the standards are the same” by making them different, depending on what colour your skin is, and therefore how oppressed you must be.
In my more sympathetic moments*, I wonder how it must feel to have your piety and status, your sense of being A Good Person, based on glaring contradictions, feigned incomprehension, and a perverse redefinition of basic terms. It must be quite stressful, doing that elaborate mental dance. As evidenced, I’d suggest, by the hand-wringing and facial theatre.
*No, they don’t last. Can’t think why.
Something when first said by stupid people decades ago and laughed off by those of us who grasp logic and reason is now something firmly believed by some of the highest credentialed minds and repeated in our best educational institutions. Not because of logic and reason but due to simple repetition.
This equity thing as well. Equity in a business sense, stock holder/owner equity is proportional to the input, be it capital or owner’s labor, invested. This BS about turning the word equity into a politicized tool of wealth distribution regardless of input, especially quality of input, is a power grab that I don’t see conservatives pushing backon. Leftists don’t have to change any laws if they can just change the meaning of the words those laws are written in. This is done primarily through repetition and volume.
It’s the juxtaposition of her struggle to comprehend fairly simple questions, basic logic, with her assertions of how immensely educated she is.
Assuming she watches the video, I wonder what she’ll make of it. I somehow doubt she’ll be asking for a refund on that statusful education. Though I’m tempted to say she should.
Screenshots or it didn’t happen.