Appetites
Via Pst314 and Aelf, more adventures in super-niche identities:
The queer rainbow. How terribly jolly. All sparkles and ponies.
He has all of the badges. See how they catch the light.
Not children, just beings. And no, he doesn’t mean seventeen-and-a-bit. Eight and upwards, since you ask.
These being Very Modern Times, victimhood is invoked:
Ah, the new downtrodden. Nonce rights now.
Mr Kotetsu’s Beyond the Plus website also forbids any disapproval of interspecies sexual attraction. Because hey, what’s paedophilia without a dash of bestiality? And so, members “must make all reasonable efforts to respect” the unsavoury appetites and professed identities of other participants. And of course any and all fabulist pronouns.
Needless to say, the site features many claims that are both bold and unconvincing:
One might, I think, call that a lie. Paedophiles do want to molest children, thereby doing harm. They desire it. It’s the very definition of what they are.
Indeed, as the linked Reduxx article reveals, Mr Kotetsu and his publishing associates, all trans-identified males, have an extensive history of lively, one might say titillated, online discussions regarding child molestation and its various sub-genres, including sadomasochism and incestuous necrophilia, along with pointers as to how to circumvent normal online proprieties and legal restrictions when sharing… content.
One of Mr Kotetsu’s associates, a cross-dressing man named Violet Rose, enthuses about “hurtcore,” a form of sadomasochism involving minors. Mr Rose chides critics of the phenomenon, i.e., critics within their own bedlamite community – those who find it a little too much – instructing them to “stop being ageist.”
Because, you know, downtrodden.
In light of which, Mr Kotetsu’s claim that “MAPs… don’t want to harm anyone any more than non-MAPs do” may strike readers as unpersuasive.
Not unlike saying,
Something along those lines.
Remember when South Park told us that there was nothing suspicious about a gay man wanting to take young boys camping?
I’ve mentioned before how my own state comprehensive school employed several such creatures. My friend’s younger sister – aged, I think, 12 or 13 – had attracted unwelcome hands-on attention from a predatory teacher, a man in his late thirties. I remember the commotion the following afternoon as said friend’s father gave the teacher in question a vigorous beating in front of his class.
I still have a vivid memory of peering out of a second-floor window and seeing my friend’s dad striding purposefully across the car park towards the teacher’s usual classroom. I briefly wondered why he was there. Maybe a couple of minutes later, following some muffled commotion, he emerged and headed homewards. Later in the afternoon, I heard what had happened, and why.
The teacher was never seen again – at least not by us. Perhaps he became someone else’s problem.
Enjoying the company of children in some other school.
‘Passing the trash’ is a long-standing practice in many U.S. school districts.
That’s what cloaking devices are made of.
I’ve long wondered if that became a widespread practice only due to the power and ubiquity of teachers unions…and shysters.
Note how employers in all fields routinely refuse to comment on ex-employees due to legal liability issues.
I believe it was done, quietly of course, before teacher’s unions were the behemoths they have become.
The weaponisation of shysters has been a problem ever since they were allowed a hand in the making of laws.
By the way, you might want to … adjust … that link before the rozzers notice.
On the subject of defending children . . .
Somewhere the ‘no’ seems to have been dropped from the injunction to ‘do no harm’.
Thank you.
I’ve had my morning coffee and I’m not wearing polyester, so that error is inexplicable. Cannot possibly be due to sloppy keyboarding or anything else that reflects badly on me. Must look for scapegoats.
Moar Freedom for you.
In that link Darleen asked:
Not letting people be happy is indeed the point.
As David comments, these people are broken and un-fixable.
:Here is the slippery slope we are on: once you throw out God, then any code of conduct/laws is simply an agreement that people make. Agreements can be adjusted, lobbied, altered. We can all decide that men are women and it is ok for them to be in women’s spaces. We can decide that pedos are just another way of feeling. We can decide that murder is really no big deal and not worthy of incarceration. And here we are.
“[…] like the Special Olympics just without the athletes … or the disabilities.”
News you can use.
Don’t stand too close to her, you’ll get brain damage.
They’ll put us in camps, or we’ll put them in camps. There will be no sidelines to stand on.
Mad delusions.
“That” being noted fictional hero Buffalo Bill.
I’m so relieved that we’re ditching the old stereotype that the FBI had on file that cross-dressing was overrepresented in the ranks of psychotic killers.
So relieved.
There were (at least) two at my school. Other teachers must have known.
Re the incident mentioned above, I recall thinking how odd it was that, beyond the inevitable schoolboy gossip, no adults at school acknowledged what had happened – or what had happened beforehand. The teacher in question simply disappeared. It was only because I knew one of the parties involved that the vigorous beating became explicable, and entirely justified.
Another teacher was obviously interested in such intergenerational possibilities, albeit with boys, though he was never seen quite crossing the line, merely spending a lot of time very, very close to it. And another teacher was happy to let his fifth- and sixth-form students know about his sexual relationship with a teenage girl, a former pupil, who’d left the same school only a few months earlier. Our knowledge of his impropriety presumably adding to the titillation.
And I very much doubt my school was some outlier in this regard.
When I’ve mentioned the incident above, I’ve heard plenty of similar accounts. In light of which, Dr Wilson’s belief that paedophiles “could enjoy the company of children without plotting abuse” by working in schools or as social workers seems unpersuasive to say the least.
I mean, going where the temptation is concentrated, seeking it out, is hardly evidence of being able or inclined to resist that temptation. It doesn’t exactly signal the best of intentions or a basis for trust.
Those were normal background stabbings.
Just a head’s up, in non-Olympics sporting news, for the second year in a row, this weekend the East Tennessee mountains won the Barkley Marathons. No one was able to complete the 5 loops of 20 miles each bushwhacking through unforgiving terrain and weather in the requisite 60 hours. The first three loops must be completed in 36 hours but if you can’t do that, you have 40 hours to do so and be able to say you at least completed its “fun run.” By the third loop, only two men remained, a Frenchman and a Brit – the Brit tapped out and the Frenchman got a fun run.
If you have no idea what I am talking about . . .
“Ditching stereotypes” in criminology is a passion on the left: Note the demand that police departments shut down and destroy databases of gang members and their associates on the spurious grounds that they are “stereotyping”.
This conversation is having the effect of transforming me into a MAP—by which I mean, a murder-attracted person.
(By the bye, I survived my action-packed, kidney stone ordeal. Would not recommend, 0/5 stars.)
Did you take the object home, as a pendant or keepsake?
I’m just going to leave this here, for no reason whatsoever.
Well, which would you prefer? it’ll be in in your mailbox in about a week.
I’m literally squirming with discomfort now. thank you for that
All part of the service.
[ Slides bowl of pork rinds along bar. ]
Careful, they’re salty.
So … it’s not a mental disorder when it involves naughty bits but is when it doesn’t?
Are pork rinds supposed to have so many legs?
No extra charge. Because our host is generous that way.
[ Nudges bowl of pork rinds closer to Aelf. ]
So … it’s not a mental disorder when it involves naughty bits but is when it doesn’t?
This. The biggest mistake the anorexics and the people who want limbs chopped off made is they never made it about sex and joined the Sacred Rainbow Coalition. No free liposuctions, stomach staplings, or amputations for them. No love bombing for them. No power tripping on controlling other people’s speech and behavior, either.
Very much related to the OP – this is why the pedos have joined the Sacred Rainbow Coalition, and why that stupid flag keeps growing as they all jostle for position on the backs of the rest of us. They saw how well it worked for the trans, how much power could be gained, the forced acceptance and celebration, the twisting of language and preying upon people’s desire to be “nice” to override common sense.
I forget who posted the link to the CBC special on boy in drag – it was so blatantly sexual, but because the boys are “trans” it’s not kiddie pr0n and it’s OK??
Not entirely unrelated:
Mia Hughes.
Slightly related, ignoring the grovelling apology, if she thinks she is, and cosplays as, a man, why is she competing with women?
Has the word “pervert” gone completely out of use?
As Dicentra asked in the previous thread, regarding those allegedly “harmful misconceptions”:
I’m not at all sure that greater visibility is going to work in their favour.
Abagail Shrier covered this phenomenon quite well in her book “Irreversible Damage” five years ago — and was savaged by the usual suspects for writing it.
She’s a natal female competing on the women’s team, she’s had no hormones nor surgery but she “identifies” as a man so everyone has to submit to her occasional fantasy?
What?
No. This nonsense has to stop.
Anniversaries.
It’s an odd feeling, being part of the Old Guard.
[ Awaits gushing respect from all young people. ]
I hope they bring snacks, too.
But not during nap time.
Just going to leave this here for the Old Timers.
[ Turns up heating. ]
“acceptance”: there is a remarkable surge of “disabilities” (mostly behavioral like ADHD, anxiety, etc) among college students, because, you see, you can get special dorm rooms, extra time on tests, tutoring help, ad nauseum, as well as bonus social status points. Grifters gonna grift.
When I was in college 50 yrs ago (state school) there was no one I encountered who had a behavioral disability (oh, maybe that one goth girl…). Drinking problems? yes. Lazy butts? yes. Horndogs? yes. But not anxiety or adhd or the rest. Pop psych has not done us any favors.
What I don’t understand about this rather troubling topic, which unfortunately has been in the news of late with the 3 million-plus pages of Jeffrey Epstein secrets coming to light, is why the Left is hitching their wagon to this particular stallion in mare’s clothing. it will never be popular. people will always hate this. it arouses everyone’s protective instincts in a way that practically nothing else does. so why this?
surely they don’t want to lose power, but this seems like an absolute power-losing move.
(incidentally, voice-to-text suddenly doesn’t capitalize sentences, so I guess that’s just the way things are now. and if I have to edit every sentence, what’s the point in this new technology? I might as well carve my message on rocks and throw it at you.)