Appetites
Via Pst314 and Aelf, more adventures in super-niche identities:
The queer rainbow. How terribly jolly. All sparkles and ponies.
He has all of the badges. See how they catch the light.
Not children, just beings. And no, he doesn’t mean seventeen-and-a-bit. Eight and upwards, since you ask.
These being Very Modern Times, victimhood is invoked:
Ah, the new downtrodden. Nonce rights now.
Mr Kotetsu’s Beyond the Plus website also forbids any disapproval of interspecies sexual attraction. Because hey, what’s paedophilia without a dash of bestiality? And so, members “must make all reasonable efforts to respect” the unsavoury appetites and professed identities of other participants. And of course any and all fabulist pronouns.
Needless to say, the site features many claims that are both bold and unconvincing:
One might, I think, call that a lie. Paedophiles do want to molest children, thereby doing harm. They desire it. It’s the very definition of what they are.
Indeed, as the linked Reduxx article reveals, Mr Kotetsu and his publishing associates, all trans-identified males, have an extensive history of lively, one might say titillated, online discussions regarding child molestation and its various sub-genres, including sadomasochism and incestuous necrophilia, along with pointers as to how to circumvent normal online proprieties and legal restrictions when sharing… content.
One of Mr Kotetsu’s associates, a cross-dressing man named Violet Rose, enthuses about “hurtcore,” a form of sadomasochism involving minors. Mr Rose chides critics of the phenomenon, i.e., critics within their own bedlamite community – those who find it a little too much – instructing them to “stop being ageist.”
Because, you know, downtrodden.
In light of which, Mr Kotetsu’s claim that “MAPs… don’t want to harm anyone any more than non-MAPs do” may strike readers as unpersuasive.
Not unlike saying,
Something along those lines.
Remember when South Park told us that there was nothing suspicious about a gay man wanting to take young boys camping?
I’ve mentioned before how my own state comprehensive school employed several such creatures. My friend’s younger sister – aged, I think, 12 or 13 – had attracted unwelcome hands-on attention from a predatory teacher, a man in his late thirties. I remember the commotion the following afternoon as said friend’s father gave the teacher in question a vigorous beating in front of his class.
I still have a vivid memory of peering out of a second-floor window and seeing my friend’s dad striding purposefully across the car park towards the teacher’s usual classroom. I briefly wondered why he was there. Maybe a couple of minutes later, following some muffled commotion, he emerged and headed homewards. Later in the afternoon, I heard what had happened, and why.
The teacher was never seen again – at least not by us. Perhaps he became someone else’s problem.
Enjoying the company of children in some other school.
‘Passing the trash’ is a long-standing practice in many U.S. school districts.
That’s what cloaking devices are made of.
I’ve long wondered if that became a widespread practice only due to the power and ubiquity of teachers unions…and shysters.
Note how employers in all fields routinely refuse to comment on ex-employees due to legal liability issues.
I believe it was done, quietly of course, before teacher’s unions were the behemoths they have become.
The weaponisation of shysters has been a problem ever since they were allowed a hand in the making of laws.
By the way, you might want to … adjust … that link before the rozzers notice.
On the subject of defending children . . .
Somewhere the ‘no’ seems to have been dropped from the injunction to ‘do no harm’.
Thank you.
I’ve had my morning coffee and I’m not wearing polyester, so that error is inexplicable. Cannot possibly be due to sloppy keyboarding or anything else that reflects badly on me. Must look for scapegoats.