Appetites
Via Pst314 and Aelf, more adventures in super-niche identities:
The queer rainbow. How terribly jolly. All sparkles and ponies.
He has all of the badges. See how they catch the light.
Not children, just beings. And no, he doesn’t mean seventeen-and-a-bit. Eight and upwards, since you ask.
These being Very Modern Times, victimhood is invoked:
Ah, the new downtrodden. Nonce rights now.
Mr Kotetsu’s Beyond the Plus website also forbids any disapproval of interspecies sexual attraction. Because hey, what’s paedophilia without a dash of bestiality? And so, members “must make all reasonable efforts to respect” the unsavoury appetites and professed identities of other participants. And of course any and all fabulist pronouns.
Needless to say, the site features many claims that are both bold and unconvincing:
One might, I think, call that a lie. Paedophiles do want to molest children, thereby doing harm. They desire it. It’s the very definition of what they are.
Indeed, as the linked Reduxx article reveals, Mr Kotetsu and his publishing associates, all trans-identified males, have an extensive history of lively, one might say titillated, online discussions regarding child molestation and its various sub-genres, including sadomasochism and incestuous necrophilia, along with pointers as to how to circumvent normal online proprieties and legal restrictions when sharing… content.
One of Mr Kotetsu’s associates, a cross-dressing man named Violet Rose, enthuses about “hurtcore,” a form of sadomasochism involving minors. Mr Rose chides critics of the phenomenon, i.e., critics within their own bedlamite community – those who find it a little too much – instructing them to “stop being ageist.”
Because, you know, downtrodden.
In light of which, Mr Kotetsu’s claim that “MAPs… don’t want to harm anyone any more than non-MAPs do” may strike readers as unpersuasive.
Not unlike saying,
Something along those lines.
I’ve recently been thinking that the trans group is soon going to be dumped for the pedo group, and they won’t much like not being at the top of the leftist caste anymore. But hey, progress is progress. It’ll be fun watching the left defend child molesters.
Previously in the world of not-doing-harm, this and this.
And of course this. And this.
I’m so shocked.
There, there. Take a minute to steady yourself. I’ll fetch the brandy.
WHUP-WHUP-WHUP-WHUP . . .
That? It’s just my helicopter, warming up for a short flight.
What’s interesting is just how readily the nonces, these creatures who deceive, will use the language of inclusion and sensitivity. While often, as seen in the links above, being enabled by self-styled champions of touchy-feely niceness.
No sane person believes the occasional claims that indulging in such fantasies gives them a “healthy outlet”. On the contrary.
That is, indeed, the chief weapon of our civilization’s enemies.
Make Intolerance Great Again.
No more room in Hell at this rate!
As noted here, the claims of harmlessness, as aired by psychologist Glenn Wilson in the pages of the Independent, don’t sit well with the conceit – also aired by Dr Wilson – that paedophiles “could enjoy the company of children without plotting abuse” by working in schools or as social workers.
As I said in reply,
And hey, every parent wants their child to have a teacher who harbours fantasies of molesting them.
Not marginalised enough by a long shot.
I’m less & less in favour of helicopter rides. It’s expensive, uses up unrenewable resources (not like I much care about that), increases greenhouses (not as if I care at all about that), and requires highly-trained, highly-skilled pilots and crew.
Trebuchets, on the other hand . . .
You’re a PAP–Pinochet Attracted Person.
And just because you think about giving helicopter rides to dangerous pervs does not mean you would actually do it. Therefore there is NO reason for the pervs and their leftist protectors to object to your speech.
Just drove past an unglamorous hardware store that also sells jewellery.
I’m now trying to imagine who buys their jewellery from a hardware store.
Husbands who just remembered…
It’s like the time The Other Half offered to take care of Sunday lunch and we ended up eating something he’d ordered from a bowling alley.
You laugh now, but they got Canada to criminalize misgendering and prisons to house convicted rapists in with women. In the year 2000, you’d have laughed at that.
The left won’t just defend these freaks, they’ll celebrate them. They have no reason NOT to. They will attempt to get the age of consent lowered to 8. They will make headway.
Maybe THIS time the sane majority fights back? They haven’t fought back against the full-press grooming in elementary schools. They’ll get pretty far. I don’t know that they’ll be stopped. There’s something about moral degeneracy that generates its own momentum, because once you permit THIS, you have a hard time drawing the line at THAT.
We are going to need a bigger woodchipper.
Oh, dear. Sometimes a glass of milk is just a glass of milk.
Well, they d—-d well don’t defend children. Just the opposite.
Everything Dicentra just said, and more. Italicized. Bold, Sans serif 20 point font. Underlined.
[ Watches Goldfinger. ]
Oh, dear. Sometimes a glass of milk is just a glass of milk.
So, Professor Caplan, you’re telling us that when these bland whitebread-mayo deplorables use what we thought was just benign food vocabulary, they’re actually renewing an ingroup’s racial self-awareness and normalizing contempt for a racial outgroup?
Now do gay marriage. And “bullying”.
I avoid this topic because I don’t want to be disrespectful to our host But the camel’s nose under the tent was a long time ago. Much like mass immigration from the third world, there’s no way to fix the problem without also reverting a lot of things we’ve agreed to pretend are Just Fine.
A few summers back, the family was driving home from a visit to Niagara Falls. You have to pass through a small city named Ste. Catharines, a place that’s grown a little dodgy and sketchy around the edges. As we were passing a ubiquitous strip plaza, viewable from the highway, for fun I called out “Oh look, a family restaurant and strip bar.” My wife took the bait and swallowed the hook. She was very upset. “I can’t believe they’re allowed to operate.”
My boys erupted in laughter in the back seat and my wife gave me a good smack.
I don’t know how many summers ago that was, but it’s a lot more than a little dodgy and and it’s a lot more than the edges. There are Pakistani grooming gangs operating openly there now, and much of the city is no longer safe to walk at night.
from the link:
“Discouraged” is a curious euphemism for “prohibited by Obama’s USDA”.
Not soon enough.
Fixed it for you. Have we forgotten Big Mike’s school lunch program?
Plagiarist.
Not forgotten at all. Obama signed the bill which authorized the USDA to create rules for school nutrition, whereupon the USDA required schools to stop serving whole milk–which is what Obama and his salt monster spouse wanted.
Speaking of Obama, I never did find out if there was any solid evidence behind the “Bathhouse Barry” nickname.
Some things are worth repeating. Such as jokes about polyester pants.
Yikes, sorry, Muldoon. Missed your initial post on the subject. Here, let me dust off the bowl of bar snacks and pass them your way. You may have the whole thing.
The left: “How do we normalise this stuff, but still complain when pretty young adult women get the men who should be with us now we’ve finished having fun.”
Palate cleanser…or 12 seconds of F-18 sounds of freedom for you poor bastards behind the Rainbow Curtain.
A couple places in Ireland I have encountered, and patronized, a bar inside a hardware store. Dingle was one. I forget the other.
No worries about missing the first, easy to lose something amongst the link fest, but copying word for word, why I haven’t been subjected to such abuse since the last time I was subjected to such abuse.
I do, however, appreciate the bar snacks but I fear I have developed an allergy to lint and hamster litter so I’ll slide them down to PST.
I think this can be
postedplagiarized in every thread.I’m trying to blend in with our British friends by cleverly using understatement. Alas I have been too successful.
When I started working in IT back in 1997 we had blacklists and whitelists, and there were setups where you had master units running slave units.
Now we have blocklists and allowlists, and controller / worker relationships.
All thanks to the Inclusive Naming Initiative that plowed through in 2018 or so.
I asked Grok what effect the terminology change has, and it said
Me, I think it’s pretty neurotic to worry about etymologies in computer contexts, but there’s no fighting it.
“Hamburger comes with a dose of misogyny.”
They’re laughing, but she’s serious.
Well, we’ve arrived at a point where supposedly respectable newspapers publish articles by statusful and supposedly respectable academics, Fellows of the British Psychological Society, in which they assert, unchallenged, that if a wannabe child molester seeks out employment among children, with authority over those children, this is somehow a “social good,” a basis for applause.
Not, you know, a warning sign.
Suggesting that “occupations such as schoolteacher or social worker” allow paedophiles to “enjoy the company of children” in a supposedly benign and harmless way is, shall we say, a curious way of putting it.
It’s quite the contrivance. I mean, you have to wonder how your head gets there without a dozen alarms going off.
dicentra:
1 A large factor in that inaction comes from the unraveling of the family – the absence or impotence of fathers, and the attitudes of way too many mothers…. Most of the statistics that break it down place a single-parent family high on the list of risk factors.
2 My guess is that many middle-aged tut-tutters – including many here – do not embrace a religious view of themselves as children of God, and did not exactly demur or oppose the various anti-religious fashions of our postwar era… Non-practicing people of vaguely Judeo-Christian extraction cannot now clutch their pearls after participating in The Great Watering Down of Western morality… In my own tribe (New York Jewish) the grandchildren of Vietnam-era hippies are now nihilo-Marxists – why shouldn’t they be? Did our generation give over Judeo-Christian values, or teach them otherwise?
What you’re seeing isn’t so much a political position as an expression of a psychological issue. She’s not just wrong, she’s broken.
I very much doubt that her positions are amenable to normal correction.
Aw, you shouldn’t have.
It’s not even original.
Nothing to see here, move along, move along.
Think nothing of it, a mere bagatelle, the least I could do,
Got any more brandy, David?
@dicentra: Thank you for linking to this old John Cleese video on the psychological appeal of extremism.
Phrasing.