Some Big Boys Made Me Do It
Apparently, and this may be news to you, littering isn’t a moral shortcoming of the people actually dropping the litter:
Which seems awfully convenient, for a certain kind of person, if not entirely convincing.
Litter – and its inegalitarian distribution – is a topic we’ve touched on before. From which, this came to mind:
But neither he nor the authors of said report explore an obvious factor. The words “drop” and “littering” simply don’t appear anywhere in the report, thereby suggesting that the food-smeared detritus and other unsightly objects just fall from the clouds mysteriously when the locals are asleep.
The report that Mr Matthews cites, supposedly as evidence of unfairness, actually states that council cleaning resources are “skewed towards deprived neighbourhoods” – with councils spending up to five times more on those areas than they spend on cleaning more respectable neighbourhoods. And yet even this is insufficient to overcome the locals’ antisocial behaviour.
A regular visit by a council cleaning team, even one equipped with military hardware, won’t compensate for a dysfunctional attitude towards littering among both children and their parents. And fretting about inequalities in litter density is a little odd if you don’t consider how the litter gets there in the first place. Yet this detail isn’t investigated and the report can “neither confirm nor reject the idea that resident attitudes and behaviours are significant drivers of environmental problems.”
And Mr Matthews, our Urban Studies lecturer, is educating teenagers. Telling them how it is.
Also, open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
They’re literally retarded. Part of the reason the DSM threshold for “mental retardation” was lowered from 85 to 70 was that under the original definition, 50% of the blacks in America would have been so categorized.
Corporate needs you to find the differences between this picture and this picture.
Because they need to make stuff up to justify their alleged status. I’ve spoken here before about the pedagogy racket in Ontario, where the praxis cycles about every ten years (basically long enough for any given family not to notice that they’re doing this). Pedagogical theories are intentionally not falsifiable.
because the footage is quite graphic, it may not be shown unless you log in to an X account.
https://unrollnow.com/status/1958241602897375608
https://www.todayinbc.com/news/surrey-bus-stabber-convicted-in-terrorist-attack-8104225
Prosecutor says this isn’t a whodunnit but a whydunnit.
In normal detective work, crime reporting, or immigration policy, it isn’t a whydunnit in the slightest, because the attacker said out loud before and after the attack that he was doing it for Islam, in Ramadan, the month of attacks of conquests, and if you don’t want it to happen, those in the dar-al-harb need to either convert or pay jizya. That kind of detail is normally suppressed in the media, coming out through rumor or in later court cases.
The whydunnit is the search for a non-Islam reason , in this case that the algorithm was feeding extremist content to his phone, which is why we need to crack down on extremist content online, for example extremist Canadians asking why this man or his family were let in.
Problematic food.