A List Had Been Prepared
I am a polyamorous, pansexual, lesbian and nonbinary transwoman. I’m also a furry.
As someone quips in reply to this, “When you give yourself all the roles in the Discord server.”
When not discussing his mental health issues – a go-to and seemingly inexhaustible topic – or deploying niche hashtags by the dozen, or modelling his assorted looks, from “hot girl summer” to “basic bitch autumn,” Mr Wildcat, quoted above, likes to remind viewers of how startlingly original he – sorry, e/er – is:
I realise my neo-pronouns are a little unique, mostly because… I came up with them.
Readers will note that Mr Wildcat apparently finds it bewildering that someone – specifically, a female colleague – might not be entirely convinced by his supposedly unassailable womanly status:
She struggled with identifying my gender and it’s like… what? I wear low-cut tops to work.
“It was confusing. It confuses me.”
Update, via the comments:
Note that the one doing the misgendering can only ever be you. Other possibilities being inconceivable.
Which raises an obvious question - who’s gaslighting whom?
This, I think, is what makes trans activism different from that of other groups with which transgender people are often equated. Someone being gay, for instance, doesn’t generally entail a demand that everyone else either hallucinate or pretend to hallucinate. Which is to say, trans activism often includes a belief that the rest of us should pretend that the physical reality we can see is somehow not the case. And unsurprisingly, people may object to being told that they should lie on demand.
As noted in the post linked above,
If someone is at odds with themselves, with their physical being, then making demands of others, expecting them to lie, and then complaining that said lies are insufficiently convincing and therefore “even more violent” – none of this seems likely to alter the basic dissonance. Though it does seem likely to test the patience of anyone inclined to be indulgent. Goodwill being a finite resource and all.
And so, there are self-styled activists who are outraged that efforts to oblige them, however politely and in keeping with current fashion, are still insufficiently convincing and can’t quite overcome the outraged person’s own doubts as to what it is they are.
Oh, and apparently, trans people can’t fart. Hey, I’m just writing down what I’m being told.
Also, open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
Mr Wildcat likes to remind viewers of how startlingly original he – sorry, e/er – is
If you have to *tell* people how original you are…
Pro tip for Mr. Wildcat – if you can afford to buy implants, you can afford laser depilation or a decent razor.
Meanwhile, come for the arglebargle,
stay for the comments.
if you can afford to buy implants, you can afford laser depilation or a decent razor.
“She struggled with identifying my gender and it’s like… what?”
By the way, the Telegraph is now emailing me almost daily reminders that my life will be dramatically improved if I subscribe.
Not a good look, frankly.
She struggled with identifying my gender…
Truth be told, it sounds like she got it right from the get go, which goes to show that if a real woman looks at an ersatz woman and sees a man it might suggest Mr. Ersatz needs to rethink his notions of what an actual woman looks like.
Not a good look, frankly.
But enough of a half neon pink half shaved head and Dame Edna glasses…
“Prose this bad can only occur when the author is trying to hide something.”
And I’m beginning to think there may have been more casualties from intellectual whiplash over the last year or so than from the Flu Manchu.
Truth be told, it sounds like she got it right from the get go,
But the bewilderment, or feigned bewilderment, does give one a glimpse into the nature of the phenomenon.
“Prose this bad can only occur when the author is trying to hide something.”
That, or they are all just actual incarnations of Oswald Bates.
‘Related’…
https://twitter.com/DamCou/status/1442072403576823812
“When you give yourself all the roles in the Discord server.”
What is that?.
Pro tip for Mr. Wildcat – if you can afford to buy implants, you can afford laser depilation
Frontal cortex needs that laser most of all.
‘Related’…
“Tallahassee police said Mia Williams, a 32-year-old Tallahassee woman, set a woman ablaze at a Taco Bell…”.
By the way, the Telegraph is now emailing me almost daily reminders that my life will be dramatically improved if I subscribe.
the Spectator, on the other hand, offers a guaranteed improvement: free gin.
“Tallahassee police said Mia Williams, a 32-year-old Tallahassee woman, set a woman ablaze at a Taco Bell…”.
“identifies as female”: Judging by his mugshot, maybe he got tired of being laughed at when he told people he was female. 😀
Speaking of pronouns, the Isle of Wight hoosegow has your back.
So to speak.
What is that?
A messageboard and instant messaging platform used chiefly by gamers, for gameplay co-ordination, etc., and on which roles can be assigned. E.g., various levels of admin, or particular game preferences, skill levels, available mods, etc. With the result that hardcore enthusiasts can have a boggling list of roles.
What is that?
A lack of concord or harmony between persons or things. But that’s not important right now.
A messageboard and instant messaging platform used chiefly by gamers
Sounds innocuous, at least until leftists and borderline personalities enter the picture.
But that’s not important right now.
I picked a bad week to give up drinking.
Sounds innocuous, at least until leftists and borderline personalities enter the picture.
My experience is fairly limited – I use it for one game that I’ve been playing for a couple of years, and for which it’s very useful, even fun. So far, it’s been much less prone to unhinged spite than, say, Twitter. But again, I dip a toe only in a small corner of it.
Mr. pink hair and others like him have a bizarre idea of what women look and act like. He is made up like a sort of drag-queen lesbian. I bet he never gets the genitals removed.
It will work so well to shame people who cannot guess your personal made-up pronouns. That would be 9.5 billion people.
Didn’t guess his gender right? Heck, hard to guess the species.
Gonna start insisting that my wife call me “Cortes” from now on.
Killer or Conquistador?
The World Wonders…
American liberals embrace eco-terrorism.
Liberals have always insisted that the New Yorker and the New Republic are solid, respectable, mainstream liberal magazines. Every year, every month, every day makes it increasingly clear that liberalism inclines towards tyranny.
American liberals embrace eco-terrorism.
Which, of course, would damage them far more than anyone else. Thinking ain’t their strong suit.
Thinking ain’t their strong suit.
I forget who first said it, but American liberals are like puppets: They have very few original thoughts but merely repeat, in some form or other, whatever garbage the far left comes up with. Think of a liberal as someone with a Marxist’s hand stuck far up his ass manipulating his jaw and larynx.
Every day, in every way, they demonstrate the limitations of solipsism.
It’s limbic system all the way down, no frontal cortex involvement at all.
They need one reading ‘Dear / God’.
come for the arglebargle
I sometimes have a difficult time distinguishing “arglebargle” from “gibberish” and “gobbledygook”.
I sometimes have a difficult time distinguishing “arglebargle” from “gibberish” and “gobbledygook”
Arglebargle often leads to jiggery-pokery, gibberish leads to balderdash, gobbledygook leads to poppycock, and they all lead to tenure.
“Speaking of pronouns, the Isle of Wight hoosegow has your back.”
“#unitedforinclusion”. Yeah, Sam Goldwyn was ahead of his time: include me out.
liberalism inclines towards tyranny
As our own surly domestic eco-fascist explained recently on Good Morning Britain, once you’ve given people an opportunity to agree with you and they don’t take it, violent terrorism is the only reasonable response.
As our own surly domestic eco-fascist explained recently on Good Morning Britain, once you’ve given people an opportunity to agree with you and they don’t take it, violent terrorism is the only reasonable response.
It is increasingly difficult to find a sound reason to not return the favor.
It was “interesting” to learn that the surly domestic eco-fascist has not insulated his own home. It would be good to see somebody do a deep investigation of these fascists and their organizations: Where does their funding come from? Who does the organizing? Who are their associates? What are their histories, criminal backgrounds, etc?
Liberals have always insisted that the New Yorker and the New Republic are solid, respectable, mainstream liberal magazines.
In the late 80’s/mid 90’s TNR was moderate left. I subscribed to TNR and National Review for a time back then. Dropped NR after a while as it was just too damn snooty. The final straw for me was some article ranting about juke boxes, all of them supposedly, being owned by the mafia and thus putting money in a juke box, in addition to being an anti-capitalist move because you were paying money for nothing material, was also as much supporting organized crime as buying drugs. Blah, blah, blah. Well my TNR subscription didn’t last too much longer. It was a couple years after that that they started publishing absurd, things-that-never-happened articles by Stephen Glass. I was astounded that no one questioned those. After he did one fabulist piece playing to all the leftist stereotypes regarding young Republicans and I didn’t see a peep in response, I dropped my subscription. I really could not believe that no one saw through that. It wasn’t until maybe 10 years later that I hear him being interviewed by Terry Gross on NPR regarding the Shattered Glass film that was coming out that I heard that he had been exposed. I think that was the point where I really started to lose trust in anyone at all on the left. During the Clinton years that TNR was regarded as the “in-flight magazine of Air Force One”. It was stunning to me that those articles got that much exposure and no one questioned them for so long.
Every day, in every way, they demonstrate the limitations of solipsism.
It’s the highest form of argument these days. Winner-winner, chicken-dinner every time. Your get-out-of-reality-free card. Even Scott Adams repeats this “we live in a simulation” nonsense. I have long jokingly engaged in it myself to explain the absurdities of this world.
Similarly, they don’t even have to have an argument anymore. They just say stuff and you’re supposed to accept it and shut up. A cousin-in-law, former professor of architecture at a HBCU is always answering these silly FB math quizzes that basically are variations of PEMDAS order of operations processing. It’s a joke with my wife and I that he gets them wrong. Every. Damn. Time. It’s sad how consistently wrong he is on these things. Then recently he posted a meme stating “Churches take in $72 billion. If that was taxed the rest of us would only have to pay 3% income tax”. I says to him “You’re not very good at math are you?” Oooh…”That’s the problem with you engineers. Taking everything so literally. It’s the point that’s important”. His father was a fairly well respected and well known architect in Italy and New York state. Fortunately I don’t think cousin-in-law ever actually built anything. Never left the academic world. But I fear for what has become of his students of many decades. One more reason to stay away from any building built in the last 20 years or so.
It was “interesting” to learn that the surly domestic eco-fascist has not insulated his own home.
Also “interesting” was his irritated dismissal of that criticism, since he’s far too self-importantly busy saving the world by limiting other people’s lives than to waste time modifying his own.
“Taking everything so literally. It’s the point that’s important.”
To which I would reply, “And what is the point?”
By my rough back-of-a-smartphone calculations, all the churches’ combined annual income, assuming the $72bn figure is correct, equates to 1.2% of the 2022 federal budget request of $6tn. (Or, as I like to visualise these things, enough to keep the government going for about four days.) If it were added to the estimated revenue for that fiscal year ($4.2tn), all else being equal*, it would reduce the deficit by very nearly 4%.
The point of that is that governments spend un-im-ag-inable amounts of money, and nobody else has enough to meaningfully reduce everyone’s contribution.
*Hah!
It’s a joke with my wife and I that he gets them wrong. Every. Damn. Time.
There’s always some snooty Karen of a middle-school maths teacher who lectures everyone on order of operations on those, and I delight in pointing out that in many ambiguous cases the order of operations is not universal – there’s a standard used by the major Physics journals, and a different one used by Mathematics journals.
order of operations on those”
“But I don’t want to identify as a subtraction! That’s rayciss!”
*snort*
Killer or Conquistador?
According to Shakey, Killer
It was “interesting” to learn that the surly domestic eco-fascist has not insulated his own home.
I also thought it interesting that in his mind his trump argument was the ‘millions of people in fuel poverty, and freezing to death in their homes’ (my paraphrase…). The amusement comes from his lack of understanding that the whole ‘fuel poverty’ issue is a creation of the green energy policies that I suspect he otherwise supports.
What an odious little toad, by the way.
Applause would surely follow.
Seen on Twitter: “he identifies as a meme”
“How did I end up on TikTok…?” LOL
“How did I end up on TikTok…?”
It’s the mystery of our time.
if you can afford to buy implants, you can afford laser depilation or a decent razor.
It is, I think, rather funny that this person can devote considerable time and effort to publicly and repeatedly declaring his sexual novelty, his anomalous status, complete with TikTok videos, invented pronouns, endless hashtags, announcements of fetishes, and ostentatiously awful haircuts – and can then be miffed and surprised, or feign surprise, when that Theatre Of Self-Conscious Weirdness isn’t acknowledged, albeit inadvertently.
Apparently, the low-cut tops should have clinched the deal.
Well, of course – low-cut tops define a woman.
The trans movement is firmly rooted in misogyny.
“I am a polyamorous, pansexual, lesbian and nonbinary transwoman. I’m also a furry.”
You have to feel for kids these days. Back when I was a teen, if you wanted attention but weren’t at all interesting, all you had to do was make sure everyone knew you were bisexual. Optionally, with an eating disorder
Back when I was a teen, if you wanted attention but weren’t at all interesting, all you had to do was make sure everyone knew you were bisexual.
Even easier when I was a kid: Don’t say anything; just wear ragged jeans, sandals, and tie-dyed t-shirts.
… if you wanted attention but weren’t at all interesting…
An “anorexic in recovery” weighs in.
Genuine LOL.
“I am a polyamorous, pansexual, lesbian and nonbinary transwoman. I’m also a furry.”
I guess when you look like that you’ve got to cover every possible angle in order to get some lovin.
It left out severe onanism, necrophilia and bestiality.
Which are probably closer to being “its” true sexual outlets.