A List Had Been Prepared
I am a polyamorous, pansexual, lesbian and nonbinary transwoman. I’m also a furry.
As someone quips in reply to this, “When you give yourself all the roles in the Discord server.”
When not discussing his mental health issues – a go-to and seemingly inexhaustible topic – or deploying niche hashtags by the dozen, or modelling his assorted looks, from “hot girl summer” to “basic bitch autumn,” Mr Wildcat, quoted above, likes to remind viewers of how startlingly original he – sorry, e/er – is:
I realise my neo-pronouns are a little unique, mostly because… I came up with them.
Readers will note that Mr Wildcat apparently finds it bewildering that someone – specifically, a female colleague – might not be entirely convinced by his supposedly unassailable womanly status:
She struggled with identifying my gender and it’s like… what? I wear low-cut tops to work.
“It was confusing. It confuses me.”
Update, via the comments:
Note that the one doing the misgendering can only ever be you. Other possibilities being inconceivable.
Which raises an obvious question - who’s gaslighting whom?
This, I think, is what makes trans activism different from that of other groups with which transgender people are often equated. Someone being gay, for instance, doesn’t generally entail a demand that everyone else either hallucinate or pretend to hallucinate. Which is to say, trans activism often includes a belief that the rest of us should pretend that the physical reality we can see is somehow not the case. And unsurprisingly, people may object to being told that they should lie on demand.
As noted in the post linked above,
If someone is at odds with themselves, with their physical being, then making demands of others, expecting them to lie, and then complaining that said lies are insufficiently convincing and therefore “even more violent” – none of this seems likely to alter the basic dissonance. Though it does seem likely to test the patience of anyone inclined to be indulgent. Goodwill being a finite resource and all.
And so, there are self-styled activists who are outraged that efforts to oblige them, however politely and in keeping with current fashion, are still insufficiently convincing and can’t quite overcome the outraged person’s own doubts as to what it is they are.
Oh, and apparently, trans people can’t fart. Hey, I’m just writing down what I’m being told.
Also, open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
Genuine LOL.
She can’t get the bishop yet.
Russia. Got to keep the price of Russian oil and gas up.
In the Soviet Union’s day, it was for the benefit of the Soviet Union. I don’t suppose the funded Greenham Common or Scargill because of love or affection.
“pansexual”
*looks over at kitchen. Say what again?*
So after sitting here reading about the general demise of our civilization, my wife says to me, “The Rapture Rendezvous is going to be at Brasstown Bald (which happens to be the highest elevation point in the state of Georgia) in two weeks you know?” And I’m sitting here like…WTF you just say? She repeats it again, in all seriousness saying, “We’re going, right?” And I’m like…come again? “The Rapture Rendezvous”…like we had discussed this before. WHAT? Wash, rinse, repeat for two more cycles before, with exhausted frustration in her voice, she literally, slowly reads it directly off of her iPad and says “The Raptor Rendezvous…”. Raptor. Like the bird. Which 2-3 weeks ago we had discussed going to. Just so y’all understand why I drink.
my wife says to me, “The Rapture Rendezvous is going to be at Brasstown Bald (which happens to be the highest elevation point in the state of Georgia) in two weeks, you know?”
Heh. Have you been for a hearing test lately?
I’m just saying, we’re only getting your side of the story.
I can’t speak for him, but I know very well that my hearing is bad.
Oftentimes, it bothers me that I can’t hear what people are saying.
Other times – like after checking the link in the OP – I’m a little relieved.
Vote Labour!
https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1442471274924675074
To which I would reply, “And what is the point?”
Yeah. I read his reply while waiting in loooong line at football concession stand, thought up a witty retort but by the time we got home he had deleted his post. Sad.
order of operations is not universal – there’s a standard used by the major Physics journals, and a different one used by Mathematics journals.
Do you refer to the loooong division line symbol where it is intuitive that the result from all operations above the line are to be performed on the result of all the operations below the line, or something else? Either way, I generally have some sympathy with people who get such things wrong. Especially in software. The point is to communicate and an extra set of parenthesis or whatever can clarify most of these issues. Also doing the operation in more than one step using an intermediary variable. The harrumphing is silly. Which is why I never bother with them myself. What is amusing though, as I said, is how consistently wrong this college professor is. One answering simple algebra questions that any reasonably educated 8th grader would answer correctly
Heh. Have you been for a hearing test lately?
Heh. Yes, being something of an “engineer” I must consider all possibilities. The lady is a queen of malapropisms. I used to tease her that she might be a Bush. One of her things regarding what we’re having for dinner is to finish with “…and a slice of my infamous cheesecake!” Sometimes I just gotta let it go…sometimes.
The problem with wearing all white: How Test cricketers are managing anxiety around their periods
Who on earth is telling female cricketers that they can’t have period breaks? Put it up on the scoreboard, raise a flag for it, invent an umpire’s signal for it, add it to the stat sheets, have a nice cup of tea while you’re at it. Does anyone care?
The sequence seems to be: Harrumphing traditionalists delicately suggest that a five day match might be a bit long for the young ladies who need breaks to attend to female needs, feminists say women can do anything men can do, and how dare you try to control our bodies. They get the test matches they nagged for, and soon afterwards they turn around and pretend that the traditionalists have always been forcing women to play five day cricket matches (a format notoriously invented by men), and silencing women who delicately suggest that they might need breaks to attend to female needs.
They have a separate sport, a young sport without many traditions, so they can wear any colour they like. But “could the kit be modernised for Test cricket” isn’t answered by yeah sure, just give the manufacturer the Pantone code when you’re putting in the order for the women’s uniforms. In a passive aggressive way, it proposes that now that women have been granted the status of test cricketers, can we change the traditional uniforms that male test cricketers wear?
It seems to be a dressup issue. If they look different from the men, then they decouple themselves from the statusful male tradition, and then it’s just a bunch of women in novel uniforms throwing a ball around a field, and what was the point?
Nothing to add, Spatulate, except a quiet round of applause as might greet a well-timed sweep-shot to the boundary. Spot-on there.
Women’s cricket is being strongly pushed by the bbc et al. They recently trumpeted a world record crowd of over 17,000 for the final of the women’s “hundred” and over 250k attending the entire tournament.
A small problem is that the final and I believe all group matches were played on the same days and at the same grounds as a corresponding match in the men’s tournament.
Farnsworth, Piper,
Check out the game in progress at the AnarchyChess subreddit.
A recent move: a white pawn tested positive for Covid and is quarantined.
( It all went downhill after 4. White buys a hotel on E5…)
Women’s cricket is being strongly pushed by the bbc et al.
I suppose that explains the recent quasi-viral video of the doggie running on to the pitch(?) chasing after the ball? The “Oops! My dog pulled the leash out of my hand while I am standing on the field of a match where a televised game is being played! Whatever am I to do but chase after it almost, but not quite, comically!” Wonder how much time they spent rehearsing that one?
…AnarchyChess subreddit…
That is painful, a visual blow by blow of the game that is easier to follow.
The lady is a queen of malapropisms.
Has she read any of the Aubrey-Maturin novels? Jack Aubrey’s many malapropisms are very funny.
just a bunch of women in novel uniforms throwing a ball around a field
1. Identify a respected institution.
2. kill it.
3. gut it.
4. wear its carcass as a skin suit, while demanding respect.
Pacé David Burge
The lady is a queen of malapropisms.
And yet, were we to ask your beloved and long-suffering, I suspect we might hear mutterings of “deaf old duffer” and “never bloody listens.”
And yet, were we to ask your beloved and long-suffering, I suspect we might hear mutterings of “deaf old duffer” and “never bloody listens.”
Do you speak from experience? [ checks distance to door ]
Do you speak from experience?
[ Reaches under bar, a button is pushed. ]
It hurts less if you don’t struggle.
I’ll take that as a ‘yes’. [ puts on boots with heavy electrically insulating soles ]
I’ll take that as a ‘yes’.
I was once regaling The Other Half with a particularly long and complicated piece of gossip and was about halfway through the saga when I realised he was wearing wireless earbuds and was in fact listening to, and chuckling at, something else entirely.
Has she read any of the Aubrey-Maturin novels? Jack Aubrey’s many malapropisms are very funny.
Heh. You’re assuming it’s intentional…thanks, but there’s enough confusion as is. 😉
And yet, were we to ask your beloved and long-suffering…
Well if that Rapture Rendezvous was some sort of Freudian slip, she won’t be suffering for long…presumably…
…I suspect we might hear mutterings of “deaf old duffer” and “never bloody listens.”
What goes around comes around, IYKWIM…
…and I now see that you do…
It will work so well to shame people who cannot guess your personal made-up pronouns. That would be 9.5 billion people.
Since the global population is 7.9 billion people at present, I’m not sure how that’s possible. Even if you count all of the dead and imaginary people who voted for Joe Biden, I don’t think that will get you to 9.5 billion.
The point is to communicate and an extra set of parenthesis or whatever can clarify most of these issues.
Exactly! That’s my response to any order-of-operations puzzle: you can avoid that whole mess by adding some parentheses. And if you can’t be bothered to do that, you must want to be misunderstood.
Dr. Chaotica: I guess I’m just anticipating 9.5 billion at some point in the future, but my point stands. 7.9 billion cannot guess your personal made-up pronouns.
Heh. You’re assuming it’s intentional…
? Jack Aubrey’s malapropisms are clearly unintentional, as I assume hers are with the possible exception of “infamous cheesecake”.
Also doing the operation in more than one step using an intermediary variable.
But that might slow execution, say some programmers, ignoring the fact that the loss is trivially small. An autism-level lack of interest in making code unambiguous and easy to maintain is a not-uncommon failing: “I’m real smart, so everyone else should adjust to my brilliance!” Never mind that Mr. Brilliant cannot remember it all two years later.
Catch it while it’s hot.
Vote Labour!
Same circular energy
But that might slow execution, say some programmers, ignoring the fact that the loss is trivially small.
Premature Optimization Is The Root Of All Evil…ok not all, but…
Well if that Rapture Rendezvous was some sort of Freudian slip, she won’t be suffering for long…presumably…
If you go, don’t drink the Kool-Aid and avoid men on horseback.
…as I assume hers are with the possible exception of “infamous cheesecake”.
Infamous Cheesecake is, of course, a band name, but no one has asked about why it was the last thing the three previous husbands who passed away unexpectedly had for dinner, or why it smells strangely of bitter almonds.
WTP, pst314,
When I paid Cubic Dollars for a compiler with good optimization, I expected to get value for money.
In source code, the optimization that counts the most is Lack of Ambiguity, followed closely by Human Readability.
In source code, the optimization that counts the most is Lack of Ambiguity, followed closely by Human Readability.
Agreed: I have seen programs so badly written (and without useful comments) that they were simply scrapped and replaced as being too expensive to maintain. But don’t forget choice of proper algorithm: I have seen code that was very slow because of this. Think linear search vs. binary search, and then generalize the idea. 😮
Musicians when they were very young
Agreed: I have seen programs so badly written (and without useful comments) that they were simply scrapped and replaced as being too expensive to maintain.
Years ago, so long ago that it was about the time I found this place, I worked on enhancing a fingerprint matcher SDK. The matcher code itself remained as-is but the different ways of matching (known vs unknown finger, ten-print vs latent) was to be enhanced. Very tight C++ code that was itself very well written back before the significant change to the language around 1996. Thus no IDE to work with (also due to some security restrictions). I was told three younger guys couldn’t figure it out and the lead guy I had to work with was an uber-geek of the marginally autistic nature. A very, very conservative Christian guy who was known as the Human Compiler for his detailed knowledge, off the top of his head knowledge, of several software languages. The underlying data had to be encrypted/de-encrypted on the fly thus extensive use of temporary pointers…and of “template” (forget the specific meaning of ‘template’ right now) pointers. Fortunately the naming convention was followed throughout the code. Unfortunately trying to remember that “temp->” meant “template” and “t->” was consistently used for “temporary” was rather difficult for a guy who spent much of his career debugging junior and weak programmer code to trust the consistency being consistent. The code was full of these extremely terse…but consistent…variable names. “c->” was another one for…something.
AnarchyChess
This is a thing which exists and I own it.
An autism-level lack of interest in making code unambiguous and easy to maintain is a not-uncommon failing
Static code analyzers are getting better all the time at measuring code complexity and readability. Good complexity scores are 10-15. 25-30 indicates overly complex code that needs rewriting. Our code generally scores around 97.
But don’t forget choice of proper algorithm
Realistically, you shouldn’t be coding any well-known algorithm from scratch; that’s what libraries are for.
Very tight C++ code
We’re in the midst of a fascinating time right now, as all the conventional old programming languages are getting replaced (finally) with modern versions that maintain similar syntax but prevent the bad ideas and habits of the originals. Crystal for Ruby, Golang for Python, Kotlin for Java, and Rust for C/C++.
Woke academics explained to Afghan men and women why Marcel Duchamp’s toilet is great art. Hundreds of millions of dollars spent on “gender programs” including child care facilities at police stations as if Afghanistan were just another Minneapolis suburb full of Prairie Home Companion listeners.
Meanwhile, the systematic murder of Classical Studies continues apace, justified with language familiar to anyone who has encountered encomia to “German physics” in the Germany of the 1930s or “socialist science,” as distinct from the bourgeois variety, in the Soviet Union from the same period will know.
These two data points could be used to argue for the destruction of Western Civilization on the grounds that it is incurably decadent and depraved, but an infinitely better case can be made for the rescue of the West through the systematic destruction of the Left and all its works.
Well that’s odd: The spam filter seems to have eaten my comment. Maybe because it contained two links?
Freed.
“She struggled with identifying my gender and it’s like… what?”
Somewhat related:
You see, if you encounter a mentally ill man who pretends to be a woman, and if you’re unprepared for such an encounter, and are insufficiently deferential to his fantasy, even momentarily, then you’re a villain and should be scolded.
Note that the one doing the misgendering can only ever be you. Other possibilities being inconceivable.
His pronouns, by the way, are “she/her/ally.”
Apparently, “cis people should not be having conversations about trans issues.” We should, it seems, be mere objects of discussion, not participants. Or, don’t talk back.
Also, trans people can’t fart.
I am a polyamorous, pansexual, lesbian
I am still confused as to how one can be pansexual and a lesbian.
Don’t get me started on a trans female being a lesbian either.
Note that the one doing the misgendering can only ever be you. Other possibilities being inconceivable.
That.
That.
I suppose the question is, who’s gaslighting whom?
[ Added: ]
I think it’s what makes trans activism different from that of other groups with which transgender people are often equated. Someone being gay, for instance, doesn’t generally entail a demand that everyone else either hallucinate or pretend to hallucinate. Which is to say, trans activism often includes a belief that the rest of us should pretend that the physical reality we can see is somehow not the case. And unsurprisingly, people may object to being told that they should lie on demand.
As noted in the post linked above,
And so, there are self-styled activists who are outraged that efforts to oblige them, however politely and in keeping with current fashion, are still insufficiently convincing and can’t quite overcome the outraged person’s own doubts as to what it is they are.
Which is to say, trans activism often includes a belief that the rest of us should pretend that the physical reality we can see is somehow not the case. And unsurprisingly, people may object to being told that they should lie on demand.
That’s a bit unfair. It’s not just the trannies who feel that others buy into their delusions. There’s the people who believe Trump told people to drink bleach despite clear video evidence to the contrary, similar with his “fine people” statement, that Joe Biden’s behavior is completely normal for a POTUS, similar his son, similar his VP, that burning buildings are simply “peaceful protests”, a new one that $3.5 trillion (or is it $5 trillion now?) is really zero..or close to zero, that George Floyd and Trayvon Martin are heroes, etc. etc. etc.
There’s a lot of demanding that others participate in the psychosis, especially mass psychosis, so why shouldn’t trans people get a piece of the action? Especially when people are afraid to challenge it and they can get away with it so easily.
Freed.
Thank you, David! What else is likely to trigger the spam filter, aside from multiple links?