Land Of The Giants
For those who missed it in the comments, behold Guardian World, where all things are possible:
I’m sensing mixed messages.
And so, on one page we’re reminded of some unhappy realities:
Prof Jamie Waterall, Public Health England’s national lead for cardiovascular disease, said: “It’s worrying that so many people are at risk of dying unnecessarily from heart attack and stroke. [But] I was unsurprised … given that we have a population that’s becoming more obese and we have major problems with things like high blood pressure, high cholesterol, alcohol and physical inactivity.” […] 80% of heart attacks and strokes are preventable, he stressed.
To summarise. Hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, gallbladder disease, stroke, osteoarthritis, joint failure, incontinence, sleep apnea, breathing problems, depression, anxiety, and cancer.
I know. Let’s call it “body positivity.”
However, elsewhere in the Guardian, we’re informed – by “an 18-stone woman who refuses to diet,” a self-styled “feminist killjoy” – of much more pressing matters. Specifically, that obesity tends to limit one’s access to a flattering wardrobe, which is a form of oppression; that taking selfies from above, to minimise double chins, is a form of “fatphobia” and therefore oppression; and that restaurants often fail to provide widened, armless, reinforced chairs in order to accommodate their more girthful customers. Which is, obviously, a form of oppression. The oversized author, Virgie Tovar, helpfully instructs the non-obese in how to change their wicked ways.
Presumably, then, we must avoid becoming heavily overweight while acting as though we’re doing it for no reason whatsoever.
[ Added via the comments: ]I don’t generally care about how big someone is and I manage to get through the day without making gratuitous remarks about other people’s size. But I have noticed a recurring dynamic, whereby someone will get fat and obviously be unhappy about it, while being intensely reactive to even the most cautious acknowledgement of either their size or its effect on their mood and health. And this defensiveness can lead to all kinds of mental contortion and some quite bizarre behaviour. Not least among self-styled “fat activists.”
And so we see endless articles in which activists bemoan their unhappy lot and the seemingly life-ruining difficulties of being obese, while the most practical solution, the one over which they might exert some leverage – losing weight – is either not mentioned at all – as, for instance, here – or is disdained as both a personal affront and a betrayal of The Cause, i.e., of whatever martyrdom drama the activists in question imagine themselves engaged in. As one unhappy lady put it, “Intentional weight loss goes against everything that I stand for.”
And so rather than changing the situation, they choose instead to shout at the rain. And complain about people who take selfies from above so as to avoid double chins. Because the drama must go on.
Via Holborn.
The phrase “useless eaters” takes on a new resonance, I find.
Indeed. A bit of searching reveals that bariatric scooters, which this lot would need, have a top speed of around 3.4 MPH, or slower than a brisk walk, so as a fighting force of extraordinary magnitude, they fall a bit short.
David, it looks like you also got a SmallDeadAnimals-alanche.
Is he taking his doctor’s advice on diet as well? That could be the problem.
He’s seen a number of doctors and dietitians over the years. I’m not privy to the details, nor have I asked. He has mentioned that there’s an issue with insulin response, but that’s all.
I’m inferring that you mean that this could be a manifestation of bad medical dietary advice, but that’s unlikely. As mentioned, the male side of his family tree all have (or had, for those deceased) had similar issues, and numerous doctors have been consulted by various family members. The likelihood that it is bad diet is possible, I imagine, but I think it’s highly unlikely.
Adam, maybe we should form the Pooitical Party!
Notice also the other headline about scallops. So with the great 2018 Scallop War between France and Great Britain where primacy in the English channel is being contested, the Guardian is firmly in the camp of abject surrender with the suggestion that we shouldn’t even be eating them.
“…maybe we should form the Pooitical Party!”
But,by definition, it would be crap…
As one unhappy lady put it, “Intentional weight loss goes against everything that I stand for.”
There’s your problem.
@Farnsworth
They were off date-wise, but not by much
“Intentional weight loss goes against everything that I stand, very briefly, for.”
FIFH(er)
The contradictory headlines regarding obesity remind me of philosophy professor Stephen Hicks’s book Explaining Postmodernism (this very blog introduced me to Hicks). Hicks notes that from Aristotle to the Englightenment the leading thinkers rejected contradictions as a sign of, well, contradiction and a poorly-thought-out argument. In contrast, postmodernsim and the radical left tend to _embrace_ contradictions. Hicks traces this trend centuries back, to Hegel. But one modern day result of this pattern is a radical-left newspaper condemning obesity _and_ condemning anti-obesity — all at the same time, as if there were no contradiction.
Once you see the pattern, it’s everywhere on the left. There are 50 genders vs. there is a gender pay-gap between men and women. Gender is a social construct vs. transgender people have different brain structures from non-trans. and from Hicks’s book: All cultures are equal and deserve respect vs. western culture is uniquely bad.
You’re kinder than I am, Tom. I was thinking something along the lines of, “Intentional weight loss goes against everything that I sit in a motorized scooter for.”
Fascinating what one finds when doing random headline chasing . . .
Military To End Fat Shaming, Embrace Full-Bodied Warriors
Military To End Fat Shaming, Embrace Full-Bodied Warriors
Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: Are you allowed to eat jelly doughnuts, Private Pyle?
Private Gomer Pyle: Sir, no, sir!
Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: And why not, Private Pyle?
Private Gomer Pyle: Sir, because I’m too heavy, sir!
Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: Because you are a disgusting fat body, Private Pyle!
Private Gomer Pyle: Sir, yes, sir!
(Sniff)
https://youtu.be/5NP8y63Ms4o
Fighting anorexia since 2005.
The good fight continues.
http://www.heartattackgrill.com/