Elsewhere (235)
Theodore Dalrymple on the British general election:
Perhaps the most alarming aspect of the election was the recrudescence of the politics of envy and resentment… The Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn radiated dislike of the prosperous, even the modestly prosperous. Corbyn and his party’s solutions to the country’s problems were supposedly to be paid for by higher taxes on the richest 5 percent of the population. This proposal overlooked the fact that the top 1 percent of earners already pay almost three times as much in income tax as the bottom 50 percent combined, and also the fact that wealth is dynamic rather than static, resembling more closely the bloom of a grape than a cake to be sliced. Taxes on capital (in other words, state expropriation) were Corbyn’s obvious next step, with capital flight the equally obvious consequence. None of this worried the young, who had as yet no stake in property, only what are sometimes called ideals. The Labour Party offered them and others the beguiling vision of living perpetually at the expense of others.
Related, a few of the beguiled.
Ben Shapiro on a “toxic masculinity” that feminists rarely mention:
The left routinely speaks about a world run by women and why such a world would create better men. But the most male-free environment in America exists in black communities, where well over half of black children grow up without fathers. This hasn’t made black boys less violent; it’s made them far more prone to criminality than their non-black peers.
Greg Piper on when “affirmative action” means acting out a racial caricature:
Not only did [Princeton] admissions officers refer to Asian-American applicants as all looking the same on paper and having no distinguishing activities, but they seemingly penalised students of other ethnic backgrounds for not acting ethnic enough… “Were there a touch more cultural flavour, I’d be more enthusiastic,” one officer wrote.
Emily Zanotti pokes through Evergreen State College’s course catalogue:
This coming fall, for example, you can take a number of classes that count as biology, but actually aren’t biology at all. They include Reproduction: Gender, Race and Power, but also Dancing Molecules, Dancing Bodies, where you’ll use the art of dance to communicate with your body and understand the chemical processes within.
And via dicentra, when selfishness and dishonesty are hailed as virtues:
No, I don’t have to tell you I’m trans before dating you.
Interesting theory. What could possibly go wrong? As usual, feel free to share your own links and snippets, on any subject, in the comments.
Welcome back David.
Thanks. Did I miss anything?
Dancing Molecules, Dancing Bodies, where you’ll use the art of dance to communicate with your body and understand the chemical processes within.
“No previous experience in dance, biology, or chemistry is required.”
It’s an in-depth course then.
It’s an in-depth course then.
Well, it is generally easier to bullshit people who don’t know anything. The whole thing seems based on an unconvincing metaphor.
Tim Newman on the young Corbyn voter, and the rest of us:
Oh, there’s more.
Apparently, the D.C. ‘gay pride’ parade is “colluding with systems of oppression that further marginalise queer and trans individuals,” and is insufficiently environmentally friendly. Therefore it must be disrupted by people even more pious.
Because “healing and resistance” is where it’s at, cat.
No, I don’t have to tell you I’m trans before dating you.
False advertising is okay now?
Glad you’re back, btw.
False advertising is okay now?

According to the author, transgender people are entitled to deceive potential partners on this rather pivotal matter, and possibly inflict a distressing, even traumatic experience on someone else, in order to get laid. And any demurral equals hate. You see, everyone loves unexpected scrotum. And honesty in relationships just isn’t important.
According to the author, transgender people are entitled to deceive potential partners on this rather pivotal matter,
The cake is a lie.
You see, everyone loves unexpected scrotum. And honesty in relationships just isn’t important.
You will be SHAMED into finding me attractive!
You will be SHAMED into finding me attractive!
Yes, that. Though as a dating strategy, I suspect it’s less than ideal.
And in entirely unrelated news.
“…socialists have long been very good at distancing themselves from real-world examples of socialism.”
Which is a bravura followup, showing examples, to this.
Some deep, deep thoughts on feminism and hair.
Via Damian.
admissions officers refer to Asian-American applicants as all looking the same on paper
I remember the days when the phrase “they all look the same to me” was a definite, 100% identifier that you were a racist.
Without a doubt, the most bizarre notion of current politics is the idea that you can make it legally mandatory for others to like you.
Indeed:
“You cannot decide to have brotherhood; if you start tryng to enforce it, you will before long find youself enforcing something very different, and much worse than the mere absence of brotherhood”.
Kingsley Amis, “Why Lucky Jim Turned Right”, 1967.
That No, I don’t have to tell you I’m trans before dating you piece has a bit that kicks of with a sentence that might involve an editing error or then again might not (“Their argument is that they aren’t not attracted to trans people…”). And as I can’t work out which, I’m not sure how to interpret pretty much everything that follows. So it’s a crappy argument expressed crappily.
The trans piece above calls to mind this item from the archives, in which Caleb Luna, an Everyday Feminism contributor, asks why you aren’t all lusting after “alternative bodies.” By which, he – sorry, they – means ‘non-binary’ beings of enormous girth.

Apparently, if you aren’t aroused by his – sorry, their – camp rotundity, then there’s something wrong with your politics.
And from the comment thread below it, this:
Not being honest about one’s anomalous gender status does seem a very risky dating strategy.
Anyone else remember when feminists, not that long ago, were condemning every “nice guy” who was sad girls didn’t fancy him as an evil misogynist who thought he was entitled to other people’s bodies?
Ah, I see David has returned from his mini-holiday with a list of links demonstrating how buggered Western Civilization really is. Welcome back . . . I guess.
I see David has returned from his mini-holiday with a list of links demonstrating how buggered Western Civilization really is.
I bring tidings of great joy.
No, wait. Not joy, the other thing.
I bring tidings of great joy.
We’d settle for T-shirts.
@Patrick Elliot
Quite true. In fact, that was the driving force behind the outrage directed at Elliot Roger. Evidently, everyone except straight, white males are entitled to sexual gratification on demand.
Whoops. I meant “Patrick Brown.”
None of this worried the young, who had as yet no stake in property
This is why I favor a sales tax (on first-time sales of retail goods, not used good or services). Everyone pays *some* tax, how much depends on one’s spending habits, and there’s no representation without taxation.
What else should I be
All apologies
What else could I say
Everyone is gay
What else could I write
I don’t have the right
What else should I be
All apologies
a few of the beguiled.
Most of the replies to that tweet are a toxic stew of stupid. Small wonder that the Islamists are certain they’ll win.
Small wonder that the Islamists are certain they’ll win.
That our society is seen as decadent and reluctant to defend itself is no great surprise, and in many respects quite true.
“We’d settle for T-shirts”
I’ll do the graphics and set up the store.
“Related, a few of the beguiled.”
Some of the responses to that are terrifying. The total ignorance of history, the oikophobia, and the blind refusal to see Corbyn as anything other than a kindly old gentleman who means well. No, no, he didn’t fraternise with terrorists because so did Tony Blair during the “peace process” and shut up.
Christ, if these morons are representative we’re all screwed…
From the Evergreen catalogue: “Veterans’ Next Mission: Crossing the Bridge Between Military and Academic Life”
Unless they were from the Viet Cong or Taliban, I am finding it hard to believe there are any real veterans at Evergreen. I do not count separated for failure to adapt as a real veteran.
Yeah, that is just the place for it, because it is so normal and calm there.
Some of the responses to that are terrifying. The total ignorance of history, the oikophobia, and the blind refusal to see Corbyn as anything other than a kindly old gentleman who means well. No, no, he didn’t fraternise with terrorists because so did Tony Blair during the “peace process” and shut up.
It’s kind of depressing how many Labour voters I’ve seen complaining about Theresa May seeking support from “terrorist sympathisers”. Either they know precisely FA about their party’s leader, or they just don’t give a toss for logical consistency. Either option is pretty depressing…
According to the author, transgender people are entitled to deceive potential partners on this rather pivotal matter, and possibly inflict a distressing, even traumatic experience on someone else, in order to get laid.
One of the reasons why you should never believed the stories of “My mate went to Thailand and pulled this girl who turned out to be a ladyboy” is because the first thing a ladyboy will ask you is “Do you know this is a ladyboy bar?” Okay, they’re after making money from paying customers not surprising people for fun, but the other reason is they know that such surprises can result in considerable unpleasantness, including physical violence. The person in the above article therefore appears to lack the morals of a Thai ladyboy, which is saying something.
Your taxpayer-funded cultural betters speak.
The person in the above article therefore appears to lack the morals of a Thai ladyboy, which is saying something.
Heh. I’ll have to take your word for that.
The false equivalence between the confidence and supply agreement with the DUP and Corbyn’s pimping for the IRA is quite staggering.
The Tories have been forced to agree a fairly loose agreement with a legitimate, if unpleasant, political party because it is the only way at present anyone can form a government. Unless everyone has suddenly become an anarchist, this is a necessary thing.
Jeremy Corbyn, as a back-bench MP, provided succour and moral support to an active terrorist organisation. This was of no benefit to his constituents. In the sense that he encouraged the IRA to continue to pretend that their murders were glamorous and justified he actively harmed the interests of the people of this country.
In spite of this obvious difference, the electorate of this formerly great nation is going to vote for the terrorist-supporting prick at the next election, reasoning that the nasty party is consorting with homophobes. If you asked them about the £20,000 Dear Leader received from Press TV (ultimate controller, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei) they’d probably accuse you of racism.
These morons are all representative and we are all screwed.
Your taxpayer-funded cultural betters speak.
Point of order: I thought we Americans had a monopoly on fat asses and old people wearing age-inappropriate clothes. Walmart should sue for cultural appropriation.
Your taxpayer-funded cultural betters speak.
I’d like a refund.
I’d like a refund.
Given the number of public funding bodies keeping the Nottingham Contemporary in the manner to which it’s so obviously accustomed, including the Arts Council, East Midlands Development Agency and Nottingham City Council, I can only assume the roads in Nottingham have no holes in them at all.
Walmart should sue for cultural appropriation.
On the same topic, what is with all those people of pallor playing congas, and the samba background music, they are not allowed to that are they ?
Also, where are there always drumming workshops ?
Re Mr. Luna: with that topknot, he reminds me of a cross between a samurai and pre-weight-loss Chef Paul Prudhomme. I wonder if he cooks?
I just noticed we need a new toilet. With the possible exception of college classes, I can’t think of a more boring thing to spend money on.
Re Mr. Luna: with that topknot,
It’s the bin bag aesthetic.
Thailand’s weird. They’re either completely decadent, e.g. ladyboys, or completely proper, e.g. my aunt, who makes Miss Manners look like a slob. Doesn’t seem to be any middle ground.
“… the bin bag aesthetic…”
*chortle*
I’m sure one of the angry-studies lesbians would be just fine to pick up a butch looking chick in a bar and, after some sweaty petting and kissing, pull down ‘her’ panties to find a rather over stimulated member towering over her.
That would be fine. Sure. No problem at all.
Hi Stuck-record, the one word I would not use to describe most of the male-to-females is “butch.” With the exception of the blonde biker-type at the college that David linked to, they’re usually overly, creepily, Stepford-wife feminine.
Isn’t it odd that behavior that feminists would hate in real women enraptures them in men pretending to be women?
…I can’t think of a more boring thing to spend money on.
Clearly you are not shopping in the right places.
The control unit…

Japanese, Engrish, and Braile – all the bases covered.
blow-drying,
…