Today’s Word Is ‘Dentistry’
Lifted from the comments, which you’re reading of course, Christopher Rufo spies more dolts and liars in dumb academia:
And yet, none of these post-colonial theorists want to “decolonize” electricity, antibiotics, and other oppressive constructs of the Western world, in order to return to the authentic indigenous ways of the darkened teepee and dying from a small scratch on the leg. https://t.co/iL4cwZIqrr
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@christopherrufo) April 17, 2026
Note that the first words uttered by Noah Romero, our Assistant Professor of Native American and Indigenous Studies, are hilariously untrue. Note too his framing of his own efforts – all that “undoing, dislodging, subverting” – as an “eradicative project,” one intended to purge Western civilisation of its, well, civilisation.
And presumably, by implication, to purge it of people like thee and me. Those who might protest. But remember, we’ve been assured that the term decolonise is “misinterpreted” by those who dare to look unimpressed, and that it is, despite appearances, entirely benign, used by higher beings with the most fragrant of intentions.
In entirely unrelated news, Hampshire College, where Mr Romero peddles his claptrap, among his fellow educators – sorry, fellow “activists” – is closing down permanently at the end of this year. Due to debt, accreditation issues, and steeply declining enrolment.
Whether this impending closure will impact Mr Romero’s primitivist fantasies of remaking the world, by dislodging and subverting things, or prompt any reflection on his life choices more generally, is a question I leave to the reader.
Conceivably, the world may soon be denied Mr Romero’s “projects that examine the anti-colonial pedagogies found in minority-led punk, skateboarding, and unschooling subcultures.”
I’ll give you a moment to bite down on your fist in sorrow.
But fear not, very similar noises, mouthed by eerily similar idiots, can be found elsewhere. More easily, and often, than one might wish.
Consider this an open thread. Share ye links and bicker.





Weak, shallow people who are only notable because people who know better, the otherwise strong and productive, won’t stand up and oppose them. Many hide in the weeds, waiting for someone else to take the risk, then take advantage.
I’ll go on somehow.
Is it Delusion Visibility Week again?
I’ll leave these here.
Just in case.
Oh, and speaking of fellating the primitive.
Because those “Western paradigms” – i.e., medicines that actually, you know, work – must be disrupted and decolonised.
Why, it’s almost as if there were a pattern. Of twattery.
Professor Romero has a newly minted PhD, so he’s likely trying to carve out a professional reputation by being controversial, even if it means abandoning all reason. He’s also, according to his website, Filipinix:
https://www.vice.com/en/article/filipino-vs-filipinx-debate-language-philippines-culture-identity/
Joyce Carol Oates is descending further into senility.
Substantiating link.
You had me at “the world may soon be denied Mr Romero”.
Mass-produced books. Written languages. Shelves held up by steel alloy roll-and-form parts. Machine woven cloth. Clean-shaven face from another steel alloy. And odds are he’s wearing polycarbonate contact lenses. Thermostatically controlled HVAC. LED or fluorescent artificial lighting. A video camera. The internet. Government funding. Interstate travel for
victimsstudents. A wanker.There’s lots more, I’m sure, but those leapt to mind. (I’ll concede, in suppose, that indigenous cultures may have had wankers.)
What next? Claiming Charlie Kirk staged his assasination?
From David’s link,
Response: No, you are inherently reactionary. You are inertia.
From The Devil’s Dictionary:
ABORIGINES, n.
Persons of little worth found cumbering the soil of a newly discovered country. They soon cease to cumber; they fertilize.Considerate persons who will not trouble the lexicographer of the future to describe them.
The weaponization of Dunning-Kruger continues…
Tongue in cheek.
Also, he needs to sort out his hair.
Heh. Well one presumably “conservative” on that thread had Joyce Carol Oates confused with Joyce Kilmer. And this will bug me until the day I die…WTF is it that people seems to believe, even 100 years later, that Joyce Kilmer, one tough sob war veteran who died on the fields of France in WWI, was a woman is a huge black mark on our education system. I would understand the woman’s name thing if the poem wasn’t taught in schools or was something rather obscure. We spend so much money on education yet they f*** something like this up.
*’wrong answer’ buzzer*
It’s not entirely obvious to me what does depend on “Indigenous knowledge,” even among those deemed suitably aboriginal.
If nothing else, a sense of belonging, of continuity, of not being just randomly interchangeable with everyone else (the latter a conceit that you’ve often mocked, and correctly so). Deracinated people are, after all, more susceptible to other, pernicious kinds of woo, precisely because they’re looking for some deeper meaning in their lives.
The problem comes when pretending that these aboriginal folkways are more than that, that they represent some kind of universal truths.
FILTHY LIBERALS
Colonization- =Property Rights and Civil Rights.
Rule of Law
Innocent until Proven Guilty
Trial by Jury
Tribal Low IQ Human Cultures are not to be admired or copied. Zero words for Land Ownership in any Indian “History” or language.
Stop the lies.
FILTHY LIBERALS
Sure. Yeah. Right up to the point where a student questions HIM and “indigenous ways of learning” directly.
BTW … conducting a classroom outside is “indigenous”? Socrates would like a word.
Sometimes you gotta wonder if “indigenous ways of knowing” is any worse than so-called “modern science”.
Early 70’s in south Florida, at an elementary school that had no air conditioning, our teachers would often take us outside under the big oak trees for our reading circles or other class activities that didn’t require a blackboard. Maybe I have indigenous ways of knowing too.
Classic Weekend Update. Somehow seems appropriate. But that’s true every day.
Well, it’s a niche business but the scary thing is that there’s a demand.
This is your threadly reminder that the next election (AFAIK) in this country is in Indiana and parts of Ohio on TUESDAY, May 5. There is also ones coming up in Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Oregon and maybe even other states on TUESDAY, May 19.
Pro-tip that is apparently necessary for republicans…If you look at your watch and see that it is a TUESDAY, ask yourself…”Do I need to vote today? If not, what upcoming TUESDAY will I need to vote, who are the candidates, and what are the issues?” Hope this helps!
Some people are deeply ashamed that their ancestors never created anything nearly as impressive as the modern world. Sometimes they respond by retconning history with “we actually invented this and you stole it” or “we waz kangs of Egypt.” And I get it. The modern world has no parallel in world history.
OTOH, when left-wing academics tout decolonization, it’s because they’re deeply resentful that they’re not in power and are exploiting other people’s shame to tear down the current order so they can rule over the ashes.
Bolshevik envy, is what.
A LOT of people on the Left think Trump’s incident was staged. They are willing to believe that two people were flat-out killed to make it look real.
What grates is the expectation that the rest of us should therefore embrace false equivalence and pretend things that are demonstrably untrue.
It’s the conceit that acknowledging obvious and important differences – in matters of science – is somehow catastrophically impolite, even taboo. Something not only to be avoided, but for which ludicrous overcompensation is seemingly mandatory. Not only among Clown Quarter academics, but among newspaper editors, government agencies and makers of supposedly reputable science documentaries.
The rhetorical fellating of aboriginal astronomy, for instance:
And so, in order to be nice, we must become absurd.
I mean, in the Clown Quarter, two-bit grifters will peddle their woo to the credulous until someone runs out of money. Being shameless, that’s what they do. But when the contagion spreads, when government agencies using public funds embrace much the same claptrap, and when makers of formerly reputable science programming do the same, it does rather chafe the cheeks.
Years ago, I mentioned a supposedly serious science documentary, the title of which now escapes me. It opened with a protracted, fawning interview with a group of aboriginal people, supposedly sharing their deep insights into the Milky Way and the nature of the universe. The actual content of the aboriginal mumblings was farcical, tedious and had zero scientific content, yet the tone was hushed and reverential, as if the very secrets of creation were being uttered.
It seemed we were expected to believe that modern astronomy, all of physics, pales in comparison with mumblings about sky emus. Mumblings rather short on detail, usefulness, or explanatory richness.
I suppose you might find ramblings about sky emus interesting as an anthropological footnote, assuming you collect the half-baked creation myths of very primitive cultures. But the hushed and deferential tone of the documentary was comical, as if the blathering on offer were somehow profound, a lost intellectual treasure. It was absurdly indulgent of the aboriginal people and faintly insulting to the viewer.
Apparently, we weren’t supposed to notice the sudden drop in standards.
It’s worth noting that in the Guardian piece about the alleged-yet-unspecified merits of aboriginal medicine, its supposed superiority, the author, Ms Ngaree Blow, seems much more enthused by the prospect of “disrupting” the doings of white devils, and badmouthing whitey, than by actual healthcare outcomes. Such that the word disrupt and its variants are used no fewer than eleven times.
As I said in reply,
And Ms Blow is still employed, quite statusfully, by the University of Melbourne.
Hard to believe the Guardian is a real newspaper not a spoof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hampshire_College
So this isn’t the usual case of a respectable college’s status and capital being redirected to parasites. Hampshire is a sixties experiment that was always intended to be what it was. It did have support from a group of respectable colleges, and also from the Ford Foundation, although it looks like there were finally limits to what the those colleges would put up with from their mooching friend:
Political ad of the year so far.
That is, writ large, something I saw with my own eyes as a child: Young black schoolchildren claiming that their parents were rich, owning boats and jets and helicopters when in reality they were poor.
For those who missed the reference.
David does not respect sky emus!
[ Faints. ]
With, I should add, surprising accuracy, given the tools available in 1610. His methodology was sound and useable, and later refined. I mean, I’m not sure what you can do with the whole sky emu thing. It doesn’t seem to go anywhere.
[ Opens notebook. Writes “admitted raacist”. Phones UK wrongthink hotline. ]
The cargo cult construction projects are always entertaining to look at.
Speaking of “aboriginal ways of knowing“…
One of whom, notably a racist, of course, is not on board with indigenous ways of disrupting.
Make mine a double, barkeep.
Realms of utter twattery hitherto only guessed at.
Beyond anything I would have guessed on my own.
“Noises mouthed by idiots.” “Higher beings with the most fragrant of intentions.” Thank you for your way with words, sir.
Speaking of which, ladies, are you “catching print”*? If you are, it is a sure way to bring back codpieces.
*(“It’s a viral TiKTok Trend, because of course it is)
[ Wheels out rack of ankle-length raincoats with buttons all the way down. ]
[ Adds sign, Men’s Modesty Coats, Daily Rental £80. ]
Dressing like Uncle Fester is not a good look. I’ll pass, thank you.
And in but-you-knew-this-already news:
And,
Oh, and they also did ostentatious piercings:
Numbers, charts and whatnot at the link.