Reheated (125)
On a musical theme, some items from the archives.
Don’t Oppress My People With Your White-Ass Folk Music.
Sheffield academics spend £1.5M to “decolonise” folk singing.
Still, perhaps we can look forward to an academic interrogation of classic car shows in Nottinghamshire as some heinous bastion of “white-centricity.” Another item on the list of Things That Must Be Decolonised And Morally Corrected.
“Our aim,” says Fay Hield, professor of music at the University of Sheffield, “is to break down the barriers for people to get involved in folk music. Opening up the genre to different audiences will help to sustain the nation’s folk music for decades to come.”
Different audiences. Not the audience it actually has, mind, the one it attracts, and which is arrived at via choice and musical inclination. No actual barriers to participation are specified, of course. But the actually existing audience is nonetheless all wrong, apparently.
Having covered quite a few of these “decolonisation” efforts, which generally rely on a fig-leaf of widening access and removing barriers, it’s remarkable just how rarely any meaningful obstacle to access is actually mentioned. Typically, the humdrum is depicted as gruelling and somehow agonising, and motes are inflated to the size of boulders.
We were told, for instance, that racial minorities are being “deterred” from visiting the British countryside “due to deep-rooted, complex barriers.” Barriers such as the fact that rock-climbing instructors are usually white. And apparently this unremarkable state of affairs, in a white-majority country, is something that needs fixing.
Though it occurs to me that if a person with brown skin were being deterred from trying rock climbing by the fact that the instructor is likely to be white, then it seems somewhat unlikely that said person is interested in rock climbing to any significant extent. And a person deterred by such things may also want to reflect on their own racial assumptions. But we’re not supposed to mention those, at least not in an unflattering light.
Decolonise Choir is all about healing and coexistence. No white devils allowed.
As the only racial group being explicitly excluded is Old Whitey, the obvious inference is that the cause of all this alleged misery and “trauma” is the party being excluded. As if the mere proximity of People Of Pallor would inhibit and befoul any creative endeavour, any glimmer of “joy.” Given the minority status of white people in London, it seems a bit much. And ever so slightly ungrateful.
And it is, I think, worth noting that the nation’s capital, where these dramas of “resistance” unfold, has in my lifetime gone from a native white-majority city, over 90%, to a native white-minority one, around 35%. Yet it would seem that even this dramatically downsized white devil population is, for some, still too burdensome and oppressive. A cause of “collective trauma.”
Have You Tried Less Tiresome Music?
On rap, the ‘N’ word, and dumb academia.
I ask because we’re told – by Dr Jeremy McCool and Dr Tyrone Smith, two devotees of “critical race theory” – that a failure to gush with enthusiasm is a result of “systemic bias and inherent prejudice,” and is suppressing such innovation. It is, they say, “the silencing of intellectuals in music.”
It’s perhaps worth noting how one of the most hazardous of words to use – one that may result in a kicking or sudden unemployment, and from which All Decent Non-Racist People are expected to recoil – is simultaneously one to which All Decent Non-Racist People are supposed to be drawn, or at least happy to tolerate. Provided it’s being mouthed, endlessly, by idiots of a certain hue. And failing to have a taste for this experience, over and over again, is, we’re now told, evidence of racism.
For those craving more, this is a pretty good place to start.
Consider this an open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
Oh, and lest you forget, this rickety barge is kept afloat by the buttons below.





Not least because you cannot get it out of the bottle unless you also have a bottle of HP yellow mustard. And even then you can’t get more than 80% out of the bottle.
Finally saw “Hail Mary Project”
★★★★★
“Discrimination has no place here”
How do these people get through the day?
As I said in the original thread, I’m trying to imagine being totally okay with attending a publicly funded recreational event, a supposedly righteous event, that explicitly bans participants of a certain race. While boasting of how inclusive it is. Of how “discrimination has no place here.” I mean, there’s quite a lot of dissonance to somehow not see.
Or as Nikw211 put it,
Sounds about right.
But if the organisers and participants have personalities of a certain type, one found commonly among progressives – high in neuroticism, low in conscientiousness – then any contradictions, any dissonance, would be less of an issue.
In a seedy, broken-down shack, between the porno store and the wino bar with a dirt floor.
OK, so you mean next door?
[ Straightens coasters. ]
Orwell had a word for that.
You know, sir, I don’t think the “deadnaming” is what’s causing the harm.
The signature desire for some ostentatiously – or grotesquely – inapt name does rather suggest that to a very large extent these people are the authors of their own misery. By insisting on something ludicrous, the odds of indulgence will drop significantly.
As someone replies,
And then of course whining ensues.
Hatred and resentment.
You don’t have “girl parts,” sir. You’re a mutilated man.
Let’s build more asylums. And call them “safe spaces”.
Rolling.
…and now, the rest of the story…
Started? Chicken or egg question, I think.
…personalities of a certain type…
You rang?
[ Compiles Friday’s Ephemera. Ponders what to bung in an omelette. ]
Clever.
Impressment looks better & better.
Defiance and joy!
A day of silence for the gang that won’t shut the hell up.
Until they’re all stuffed into burkhas . . .
And wheezing and chafing. And medical bills.
These people suffer no embarrassment or hesitation or confusion of priorities:the moral imperative isn’t abstract humanist liberalism, it’s to serve your group interests by sticking it to whitey. Liberal principles of universal harmony aren’t for nonwhites to live by but to force whitey to live by. It’s like Patton’s saying that you win wars not by dying for your country but by making the other poor bastard die for his. You don’t win by sacrificing your own group’s concrete interests for universalist principles but by forcing whitey to. Make the poor bastards, or their daughters, die, and not even for their own interests but for the interests of foreigners who hate them.
It isn’t one mode of rhetoric with internal contradictions, it’s two modes of rhetoric, the second serving the first. In the first mode, leftists and nonwhites express open hatred towards whites in ways that are quite gleeful and violent even, for example, in respectable Oscar winning films. Then there’s a second mode of getting whitey to jump through universalist hoops when you rub your ingroup bias in his face. This second mode of rhetoric is a humiliation ritual for the amusement of your allies, so the lack of reciprocation, the blatant ingratitude, the moral inversions, these are features rather than bugs. Whites have to recognize the game, stop making clowns of themselves, and looking after their own interests like any other group.
For those who missed it, more from the world of racially neurotic listening:
Imagine being trapped inside a head like that.
Is @pst314 moonlighting?
They weasel here, they weasel there.
Those Frenchies weasel everywhere.
And they still can’t find that Pimpernel.
One more time:
Danger! White people!
Found this, which I’d forgotten about, in the folk music thread.
Still funny.
That’s not real culture: There’s no twerking, no simulated sex acts, no extremely revealing clothing, and no yammering about drugs and crime and killing.
I have more:
Feel the oppression.
Related:
As I’ve said before, it occurs to me that people who use the word decolonise unironically, as if it were an obvious and unassailable virtue, a thing only virtuous people do – and who find the “white-centricity” of British folk music an issue, something in need of correction – probably aren’t the kinds of people whose opinions should be trusted.
On pretty much anything.
I mean, outside of the classical music world, barriers to entry are fairly modest – buy the gear and rent a room in which to make godawful noise. That’s pretty much it. Folk music is hardly famed for its barriers to entry. You won’t need laptops or vast PA systems. As I understand it, that’s generally the point.
Which does rather make Professor Hield’s waffle about decolonisation all the more contrived and absurd. Something close to insulting. And it would be awfully nice if these clowns would work on their weird racial preoccupations on their own time. Possibly with a therapist. Rather than, say, billing the taxpayer.
Even there: there is lots of excellent, famous music for trios and quartets.
Pathological method acting
And of course if you simply want to listen and mingle, and possibly drink ale of some kind, you just have to turn up. Free-admission events are not unheard of.
For a lot of American children, we got our first exposure to classical music watching Looney Tunes on Saturday mornings.
“Our aim is to break down the barriers for people to get involved in folk music,” says Professor Hield. Yet no actual barriers are specified, which strikes me as something of an oversight. Nothing even remotely approaching a lamentable, unjust obstacle.
Nor are we told of any brown-and-therefore-downtrodden people who hunger for folk music but have been denied a ticket, their money not good enough, and then cruelly shooed away by white people.
Instead, we get convoluted waffle about “white-centricity” and the shocking revelation that folk music devotees are slightly more likely to mention guitars than tin whistles. The significance of which escapes me.
Oh, and the implication that folk music events should be made to have “different audiences” – meaning people who aren’t actually interested in folk music.
Academia, ladies and gentlemen.
I just met this woman and I love her.
15 minutes of fame: this guy spoke at my synagogue when he was 1st posted to the Embassy in Washington. Had a good sense of humor then, too…
Neuroticism and conscientiousness: we often take personality traits as given, as genetic, but for these two, I think there is a lot of environmental influence. Neuroticism for example can be cultivated by rich/indulgent parents who never spank, and further by a social milieu which never spanks. conscientiousness is encouraged in a world in which one’s survival depends on getting the crops sown and harvested in a timely manner (etc). So it is perhaps not surprising that the % high in one and low in the other have increased the past 50 years.
Fat acceptance: the star of “my 600 lb life” has sadly died, as if that were a surprise.
Morbidly curious, I re-read this.
There’s no socially acceptable way for me to say it, but I think it’s pretty good.
She’s right on the merits of her argument, she’s just not quite grasped that the NJ Democrats do not care. Passing the laws panders to their low-IQ base, and the cost of litigating patently invalid legislation does not fall on the legislators.
The voting public isn’t going to turf these grifters out, the governor isn’t going to censure the legislature; I do wonder at what point this kind of behaviour falls under the category of failing to provide “a republican form of government” such that the federal government can step in.
What’s interesting about that comic is that it’s not the original. All webcomic.name strips are only three panels. The fourth panel was added to make the meme. And arguably improves it.
Mr. Webb weighs in.
Anytime politicians do something that makes no damn sense, and they do it over and over, it’s not stupidity operating, it’s some kind of corruption.
Somebody is benefitting by passing such laws, and it ain’t the taxpayer.
Gee, maybe the lawyers working all those cases? I wonder who they donate to.
Let the smiting begin.
Dearborn man Audy Mugally Al-Saidi. Very old-established family.
I was reminded of this:
Still rather tickled by the insistence that taking selfies from above, to avoid the appearance of double chins, is a form of “fatphobia” and therefore oppression. I mean, you’d think that this kind of victimhood barrel-scraping might prompt some embarrassment and rethinking of assumptions. But no.
And so, we have people who can’t climb a short flight of stairs without sweating and wheezing blaming restaurants for failing to provide reinforced seats.
A reminder that the naming of things is important:
Ditto misnaming.
Her first four words are untrue.
It’s important to remember that.
“Postmodern mental illness”
“A reminder that the naming of things is important”
ISWYDT
Entirely happenstance, or at least subconscious. But if we aren’t supposed to identify the actual problem, if we can’t state its name, if we must always look away, then solutions will recede ever further.