Dishonesty On Demand
Or, The Wig Is Doing A Lot Of Heavy Lifting.
In the clip below, Calgary trans activist Victoria Bucholtz, aka Karla Marx, has words – deep, manly words – with Jennifer Johnson, a conservative politician.
Ms Johnson had previously upset activists, and much of the Canadian media, by describing the classroom propagation of trans activist ideology – specifically, setting children on a path to mutilation and castration – as a blemish and contaminant, akin to “poop” in cookies.
I think it’s fair to say the exchange that follows is not a triumph of reconciliation. It may, however, prove instructive – indeed, telling – though possibly not in ways that Mr Bucholtz intended.
Trans activism in a nutshell.
An aggressive, bullying man attempts to intimidate a woman into submission, demanding that she say something she knows isn’t true.
And he’s loving every minute of it. pic.twitter.com/CY0Fa3Wp34
— Mia (@_CryMiaRiver) September 17, 2024
Readers will note how “listening to the community” is conceived by Mr Bucholtz as deference and prostration, and regurgitating things that are obviously untrue. If it sounds like a struggle session, hold that thought:
Readers may likewise wish to ponder the chutzpah of a gaslighting bedlamite demanding “respect” while simultaneously demanding that everyone else surrender their probity and become dishonest and absurd, mouthing lies as and when instructed.
Ms Johnson had also expressed concern about the use by activists, in schools, of pornographic material. Concerns that much of the subsequent media coverage sneered at or dismissed as unfounded.
I’m assuming that Ms Johnson was referring to things like this.
Because, apparently, “vagina slime,” fellatio, and “strap-on hotness” are topics of urgent moral importance for middle-school children. Children who need to know about the joys of masturbating while driving.
But ssshh, don’t tell Mom and Dad.
Mr Bucholtz – “(She/Her)” – is an “LGBTQ+ facilitator,” an “activist,” and “currently teaches at Mount Royal University.” His areas of expertise include “the history of emotions.” When not demanding that people tell lies repeatedly and in public, he is “an avid mountaineer,” a drag queen, and a “dog mom.”
Mr Bucholtz’ educational chops can be witnessed here.
One more time:
Because it’s a “basic foundational principle.”
Via Mia Hughes.
Update, via the comments, where Rafi asks, not unreasonably,
Alas, I fear that if we pull at that thread, the whole sweater may come unravelled. I mean, if, as we’ve been told, quite emphatically, women can’t be transwomen, on account of being, you know, women, then surely only a man can be a transwoman. Which sounds like another way of saying, a transwoman can only be a man.
But hey, pile of yarn.
Consider this an open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
This blog is kept afloat by the tip jar buttons below.
[ Shades eyes. ]
You wish you looked this good.
[ Heads for store room, returns with larger mirror. ]
I tend to agree with this. But my even more cynical take is that the pedo problem extends much more broadly into every institution or likewise where children are trusted to others. Especially within families, and while not at all to distract from the far more significant damage being done by certain elements of the Muslim population, I suspect that there’s something of a parallel reverse effect where some other people have become more comfortable speaking up about child sexual abuse in general because the Muslim abuse is in the news*. Not directly following-on, but parallel. I see this subject, news-wise, possessing somewhat of an accordion effect. Significant suppression of the problem followed by over reaction to the problem (McMartin preschool, etc.) followed by overreaction to the overreaction. Rinse, repeat to infinity.
This stuff is especially on my mind today as I had lunch yesterday with a good friend from our youth who was molested by our church youth minister. I don’t think that he knows that I know so occasionally when we get together, an awkward occurs. Yesterday something came up in discussion that I thought I hid until… over breakfast this morning my wife mentioned my reaction to the certain subject coming up. Though I only see him maybe once or twice a year, I get more and more uncomfortable when the conversation starts to wind down and I don’t know what the next subject might be. Which generally is how our conversations go after we have covered the past year or so of info and start reminiscing about random stuff from the past. He can get real quiet at times.
While at an intellectual/reasoning level I get that this is purely coincidence…well, the pedo from our church we later learned was originally chased out of…Michigan. All coincidence, of course, of course. But damn there’s a good number of coincidences that are popping up lately in other regards.
I get a sense, and it’s maybe just…coincidental…that as November approaches a lot of people seem to becoming more and more forthcoming about long ago issues that they have kept quiet about for whatever reasons. Maybe just anecdotal to me.
*Added: I suspect that I sense this because a big element in this go-round in abuse, both by the Muslims in Manchester(?) and the tranny school/drag queen story hour stuff, is the grooming.
Relevant
Fixed it for you.
[ Sympathetically slides jar of pickled eggs down bar toward David. ]
I can get this shabby treatment at home, you know.
Finally. After what? A dozen or so comments and five hours, that shoe finally dropped. I was worried, you know. I started to get itchy and stuff…
Seriously tho…seriously…the gayest video without the karma chameleon guy in it.
Sorry to hear that. I’d assumed you started this blog to get the shabby treatment you couldn’t get at home.
Police shootings: hood rats when confronted by police, instead of obeying commands point their gun at the cops.
Ironically, of encounters of cops with a perp with a gun, white suspects are more likely to get killed and black officers are more likely to shoot black suspects.
You can’t say hood rats. They’re “future doctors and ass-tro-nauts”.
@ccscientist, who said:
The single most racist-towards-blacks that I have ever encountered were black Chicago PD officers. You heard things from those guys that would have had your local head of the KKK looking around in alarm, and saying “Man, you can’t say things like that…”
I heard several of them saying things like the only way to solve the issues of South Side Chicago would be to line up D9 bulldozers blade-to-blade, surround that area with them, and then bulldoze the entire area including people into Lake Michigan. Their only concern for the aftermath? Damaging the fishing.
The white cops who were there at that gathering were looking on at the whole thing in horror; if they’d said something like that, end of career. Period. Even being in the room when it was said was probably a career risk.
Black cops aren’t actually, y’know… Black. They’re cops. After a short period of dealing with their ethnic peers, they usually wind up hating them more than the white cops do, which is kinda bizarre to observe. Not saying it’s right, but it is a “thing”.
[ Heads for store room, returns with larger mirror. ]