Bad Language
From the Telegraph, some healthcare news:
Can you guess the offensive, verboten word?
One might think that the employees having babies and therefore on maternity leave are, in fact, by definition, mothers. One might even think that a hospital, and a maternity hospital in particular, is a place where physical realities of this kind would be difficult to avoid. And yet.
While none of the hospitals’ current staff classified themselves as confused about which of the two sexes they are, it is, I suppose, possible that at some point one of the mothers taking maternity leave may, potentially, be sexually dysmorphic – i.e., mentally ill. But mental illness, even fashionable mental illness, isn’t generally something that one should affirm. Nor should it be a basis for the coercion of others. Farce, after all, soon loses its charm.
And these grifting monomaniacs appear to have their feet firmly under the taxpayer-funded table. Such that, even in hospitals regarded as doing nowhere near enough, rainbow ‘Pride’ lanyards swing freely around countless employee necks, “painted rainbow walkways” already assail the eye, along with innumerable rainbow-adorned posters and rainbow staff badges, and at least one “LGBT+ progress flag” flutters gaily from a dedicated flagpole.
In the same hospitals, unused tampons are abundant in the men’s toilets, and the womanhood of expectant female patients is being dutifully downplayed – one might say marginalised – lest the pretentious and unhinged feel in some way anomalous. Hospital staff are expected to introduce themselves to patients by gratuitously announcing their pronouns. As if their sex might otherwise be difficult to fathom.
The “diversity” assessments also insist that gynaecology services must “take… additional action to support trans and non-binary patients.” Specifically, dysmorphic women – women who wish to be perceived as men – should be spared having to sit in “a busy, gendered waiting room,” where the presence of other women may induce psychological discomfort and feelings of “dysphoria.” Instead, such women should be provided with “an adjoining waiting room that matches their affirmed gender.” In short, a waiting room for men in need of gynaecological attention.
We’re also told that gynaecology departments should remove “gendered names (e.g. ‘Women’s Health’),” as this may also make transgender visitors feel unhappy. The words “mother” and “woman” should, we learn, be replaced with the word “client.” The feelings of other, non-dysmorphic female patients on this matter, or on any of the matters raised, are not explored and are seemingly of zero interest.
Regarding the demanded erasure of the words mother and woman, another complaint is aired by our “diversity” overlords:
A backlog of other “diversity” demands, that is. The ones being churned out at a boggling rate and with manic enthusiasm.
Among which, a demand that the term “heterosexual partnership” be replaced with “opposite-sex partnership,” on grounds that “bisexual people in opposite-sex partnerships” may “not classify themselves as being in a heterosexual partnership.”
Despite actually being in one.
At which point, readers may wish to imagine a bisexual chap, one in a relationship with a woman, arriving at a hospital with a fractured wrist and having the time to complain that his paperwork doesn’t allow him to stipulate that his heterosexual relationship with said woman is merely conditional and doesn’t preclude other, more manly entanglements at some future date.
Because when you’re fixing a chap’s fractured wrist, you obviously need to know about his bisexuality. And hey, priorities.
As part of the “diversity” assessment, feedback from hospital staff is solicited, presumably to determine the exact level of ideological conformity. However, much of this feedback has been denounced as “transphobic,” or “homophobic,” or insufficiently affirming of “pansexual” or “asexual” people. Examples of such inexcusable wickedness are included in the sixty-eight-page assessment report. For instance,
And,
For readers on the verge of hyperventilated gasping, paper bags can be found under your seats.
Other supposedly scandalising staff comments are offered:
And,
The feedback quoted above is of course deemed worthy of a “content warning” and is prominently flagged as both bigoted and a “cause for concern.” One warranting “further investigation” by the employee’s superiors. Apparently, for Stonewall and the LGBT Foundation, and by extension the NHS, these are questions that needn’t be answered – and indeed one mustn’t ask.
Behold the new unsayable.
[ Post expanded via the comments. ]
This blog is powered by the buttons below.
And all this after 13 years of an allegedly “Conservative” government. I despair. I really do.
That.
When I was giving birth to my daughter I wasn’t a “birthing person”. I was a mother.
One hopes that at some point, disgust with this insanity will spill over into violent reprisals.
Mandated celebration of (biological) deviance and the delusions of the cult of 51 genders are now integral to all captured institutions in the west, The long march has been successful if one considers nihilists hollowing out of western civilization in preparation for the next iteration of statist dystopia a success.
What’s the betting staff feedback won’t be reported in future?
That’s just false consciousness from growing up.under patriarchal oppression… And please remember to send zhe in non-gender-conforming clothing on Monday s and Wednesdays… Don’t make us report you….
Well, you can trawl through the other staff comments via the linked assessment document. I didn’t spot anything obviously offensive or outrageous. Most were concerned by the violation of single-sex spaces, and by the question of what should happen if a women asks to be examined by another woman, not a dysmorphic man – i.e., a man who is likely to have all manner of other, terribly exciting mental health issues.
Even politely expressing fatigue with the expected levels of trans affirmation was deemed inexcusable bigotry and a “cause for concern.” And was promptly seized upon as an excuse for even more of the same. Apparently, hospital staff aren’t wearing enough rainbow-patterned pronoun badges and rainbow-patterned pronoun lanyards, while walking past big rainbow posters, on rainbow-painted walkways, in buildings with rainbow flags fluttering outside.
Claiming that 2 + 2 = 5 is proof of one’s commitment to the cause. You are willing to deny reality itself for its sake.
Fold it ’til it’s all corners & get hold of some Tiger Balm.
58
They had to do Heinz one better.
I’m mourning the death of the phrase “is nothing sacred anymore’ because apparently all things “gender” related are now sacred.
The problem here isn’t the insistence on gender fluidity or 100 genders.
The underlying problem is the refusal to merely accept there are two genders, and members of each gender have certain strengths and weaknesses (which happened to be complementary).
Which was considered problematic by certain “important” women, though only in one direction obv, so we had to pretend there really wasn’t anything like biology or sexual differences that might make men better at, say, sports, military or IT.
And here we are now. If women are just the same as men, men are liable to be pregnant.
Recently I needed advice from a nurse via telemed. I was right on the edge of whether or not to call, but I decided to get in line for a call back. But first I needed to fill out the paperwork before getting the call. One of the questions was what are your pronouns. I terminated my call at that point;did not feel like playing silly PC games.
I’d say this is all nuts, but that would likely prohibit my entry into Merry Old…
The underlying problem is the refusal to grow a spine, stand up to these people, and refuse to participate in their mass psychosis. FIFY. Nothing is going to change until rational thinking people drive the change. I see a few women here and there pushing back. A little. With the encouragement of some men. Some. Some of the few that are left. I’m told that once upon a time men were men and women were glad of it.
For two million years, males have had an incentive to take big risks, to fight other men, to raid other tribes, to search out a new territory with more game. The reward is that his family might thrive and he might get an extra wife or two and thus father many children. If he dies in the effort, it was worth it. Women in contrast, have only so many children they can bear and taking big risks does not increase this number. They play it safe, worry about danger. And of course being weaker, a big danger has always been men not their husband/relatives. These differences are baked into our dna. Deeply. Note how the dysmorphic men in dresses still act like men, being aggressive and confrontational. Testosterone, its a hell of a drug.
Note how the dysmorphic men in dresses still act like men, being aggressive and confrontational.
I’m reminded of the drag queen (“Zoey Tur”) who grabbed Ben Shapiro on television and physically threatened him for disagreeing that one could change one’s sex via surgery or hormones.
Also, once again: if you say “there are only two genders”, you’ve already conceded half the argument to the lunatics. There are only two sexes. Gender is a linguistic concept, not a psychological one. The notion that there exists a psychological “gender” distinct from biological sex is a complete fantasy, created out of whole cloth by the p*d*ph*le psychologist John Money.
Spoiler warning: both of the children he based his “study” on eventually committed suicide, and the one he forced to transition never accepted the change.
That.
Before she “transed”, she was Robert Tur, married to Marika Gerrard. His daughter, Katy Tur, wrote of
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoey_Tur
Katy Tur’s book, Rough Draft, doesn’t hold back. Zoey was a wife-beater. IOW, the violent man remained a violent man after transing, even after full surgery.
[ Post updated. ]
Oh, there’s more.
A plethora of random and often-conflicting demands keeps the marks unsettled. Standard practice for shakedowns and grifts…
Indeed. And remember, if you’re an NHS employee and finding your time and energy being increasingly consumed by demands of this kind, and if you dare to express any reservations, however politely, or point out any logical or practical contradictions, you will be deemed “transphobic” and a “cause for concern.”
One warranting “further investigation” by your superiors.
I’m just going to leave this here, for no reason whatsoever.
I’m now trying to picture a bisexual chap, one in a relationship with a woman, arriving at a hospital with a fractured wrist and having the time to complain that his paperwork doesn’t allow him to stipulate that his heterosexual partnership with said woman, which has no bearing on his injury, is merely conditional, and at any moment he could opt instead to shag some other chap. Because everyone must want to know about his bisexuality.
And because, you know, priorities.
Hitting your tip jar because you had to read that f*cking monstrosity. *ping*
Heh. In fairness, I did skim some of it. The human mind can only take so much punishment.
But bless you, sir. When parking, may you always have space to open the car door to a suitable extent, thereby avoiding unseemly contortions.
And I suppose we should bear in mind that costly bureaucracies now exist to process this material – which must be churned out forever, insatiably, if only to justify funding and status – and to act as if such material, and its authors, were in no way feverish or absurd.
Worse, there will be some who actively enjoy scolding employees based on its contents – say, for airing reservations of even the most innocuous or factual kind.
Re John Money… I was vaguely familiar with the story but had forgotten about him. Victoria U. of Wellington, U. of Pittsburgh, Harvard University, Johns Hopkins. All the best medical schools in Western civilization in the post-war era. Could quibble about Pitt being the outlier back then but still a good school. And nobody, none of the “smart” people even back then stopped that monster.
I saw a report, and I cannot verify this, that the brit NHS requires doctors to do a pap test on XY “women” who do not have a cervix, and not do prostate exams on these same people even when they still have a prostate. Likewise, they should do a prostate exam on XX “men” even when there is no prostate. etc.
Certain illnesses are much more common in one sex than the other. For abdominal pain, a woman might have an ectopic pregnancy for example. Women are more prone to self-harm but men more prone to alcoholism. Meds can differ in the effect and effectiveness by sex. So the sex of the patient is VERY relevant to diagnosis and treatment. This is where it is no longer just about words.
The downplaying of motherhood should really really piss women off. Should.
Women seem to like being pissed off. It’s an endless…cycle…that would explain a lot of things if we let it.
The only reasonable explanation for the sad state of our society now that women are in charge of it is that they must quite like being oppressed.
Explains a lot of history, when you come to think about it.
Band name.
They nearly rioted over Brett Kavanaugh. They’ve nearly rioted over abortion rights. Being required to share with biological men locker rooms, bathrooms, sports, etc. and even the very word for themselves? Crickets.
Well, women like being pissed off except when men, the kind of real men who are manly enough to pretend to be women, because damn the consequences, put them in their place. That these men do it while actually in the women’s places is just bonus. Is it any wonder they’re converting to Islam?
Modern policing has its priorities.
Dozens of bird names are now going to be changed because supposedly some people are offended. Or is it people pretending to be offended on behalf of others for profit and status?
I always enjoy the appearance of the red-breasted Bird No. 37 at this season of the year. I sometimes put them on my celebratory Winterval cards.
Without the word “mother” to proceed it, I’m left with only half of my favorite pejorative.