Bravely, I Cope With Rejection
In the comments, John draws attention to this item from Personnel Today, a publication for the inhabitants of HR departments, regarding recruitment criteria for the Royal Air Force:
I’m assuming, perhaps charitably, that the word “useless” was with reference to meeting “diversity” targets. The word in question was deployed by former head of recruitment Elizabeth Nicholl, who resigned in protest at such targets being “impossible” to achieve. But still, an unhappy phrasing.
Much of the article covers ground that may be familiar to regular readers:
Because brownness and womb-having are much more important, obviously.
At which point, I’m tempted to ask how these target percentages relate to any actual expressed interest or aptitude – say, among school-leavers – or to any tactical utility, according to which an unusually high number of women and racial minorities would somehow confer a military advantage. Or are they, as seems to be the case, entirely arbitrary?
The paragraph immediately above was posted as a comment on the Personnel Today website. It was held for moderation, then disappeared.
Update, via the comments:
TomJ notes the proliferation throughout the RAF of pointedly gender-neutral terms, along with the ensuing complications, adding: “These are but annoyances, though they no doubt absorbed a lot of admin effort that could have been better directed… It now seems somewhat indicative.” Indeed. Time and resources better spent on the actual, you know, function of the organisation. Which is not, lest we forget, race-and-sex bean-counting.
Perhaps we’re to hope that such frivolous uses of time and resources will result in mere distraction, a loss of focus, and some inadvertent comedy. As if distractedness and waste, and chasing futility, might be the best available options. As opposed to the more typical effect of such endeavours, and of the mindset they reflect, which is the active and rapid corrosion of almost anything they touch, not least in terms of realism, standards, and competence.
Update 2:
In the comments, Jeff Guinn adds,
Gaining entrance to pilot training requires doing pretty well on a battery of aptitude tests. There is a very strong correlation between performance on the tests and likelihood of successfully completing pilot training… In particular, mechanical reasoning, spatial orientation, and math skills are strongly predictive. Like it or not, statistically speaking, men are far better at those things than women. And very few black college grads scored high enough to be selected. (Plausible offered explanation: the military couldn’t compete with the private sector for them.)
The conclusion? The Navy was choosing student pilots rationally, and the reasons for lack of diversity were far beyond the Navy’s control, unless the Navy lowered performance standards… The RAF’s announcement is a sure sign it prefers pre-determined ratios over performance. Nothing good will come of it. Piloting talent is not uniformly distributed.
And so, the closer the RAF comes to these modish but seemingly arbitrary demographic ratios, the more reason there will be to suppose that standards have been lowered and corners cut, and to question the competence of the supposed beneficiaries. As has been the case in just about every other sphere – from academia to firefighting – where this nudging and fudging has been done.
Needless to say, this policy of supposed fairness seems somewhat unfair to those female and minority pilots who, while few in number, are very competent indeed, and whose credentials and reputation may subsequently be called into question as a result of emerging patterns. But hey, progress.
Update 3:
Depending on mood, one might find humour in the practised dishonesties of the progressive campus, where notions of demographic ‘correction’ are commonplace. But when extended to the realm of firefighting, policing, or the military, or medicine, or pretty much any vital infrastructure, then the funny side of things becomes harder to spot. And it’s perhaps worth noting that the mandatory pretence seen in academia, and all but perfected there, has given leverage to inadequates who do not welcome, and seem unlikely to tolerate, any attempt at realism or putting things right.
Given the vigour with which such demographic targets are pursued, and given the corners that are being cut in order to pursue them, on any number of fronts and at considerable expense… then checking the basic assumptions of those pursuing such goals doesn’t strike me as improper.
And yet, as seen in the pages of Personnel Today, some basic questions are not to be asked.
Also, open thread.
Of course, the unvoiced consequence will be a big increase in accidents, fatal and non-fatal, and a massively increased cost of wrecked expensive aeroplanes.
Very few remember the Amazon Air 767 that crashed east of Houston four years ago, likely due to there being only three people aboard the airplane.
The Black first officer grossly mishandled the airplane after an inadvertent activation of the go-around mode while in holding, causing the throttles to advance to full power.
The first officer had experienced significant training difficulties while getting his 767 type rating. First year pilots have no job protection whatsoever — in my experience, had he been White, he would have been fired due to manifest performance shortcomings:
Damage to the reputation of the police started when their emphasis went from “if you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime” to “lock it or lose it” IMNSHO.
As said here before,
Which is not exactly progress.
“Lock it or lose it”, in itself, seemed like a good “public education” idea: Just locking your house and car can deter thieves.
However, it was inexcusable to combine that with a systematic refusal to arrest and prosecute and imprison thieves. Such a betrayal deserves strong response. Now how will those feckless and ideologically corrupt traitors get back their reputations?
https://youtu.be/wTAdvkh3GgU
Female policing Canadian style. Fast forward to 1.50.
Which, to me, suggests Little Mermaid’s mother was fucking around
Or Neptune’s got a harem. Useful idiots are so mired in their ideology that they cannot see what is plain to the rest of us.
I cannot see it leading anywhere good.
Scott Adams did nothing wrong.
How can people think this is ok, that only some heckling is allowed?
The notion that people ought to be able to say things the majority – or even the elite minority – disagrees with is not only not universal, it is aberrant across the history of human civilization. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution exists precisely because one of the Founding Fathers witnessed people being whipped in the streets for preaching contrary to the state’s official religion. Britain has a long history of the religion in power burning the members of the religion that isn’t, that decade. Even the US has located, hiding in the penumbras and emanations, all manner of exceptions to the principle of free speech.
What we’re seeing now is the reversion to the norm. A republic, madam, if you can keep it.
Jeff is now using three ‘f’s. Seems a bit much, frankly.
This is what happens when the female lays her eggs in a nest after which males just swim by spraying clouds of sperm. [ Shakes head in stern disapproval. ]
Quoting Scott Adams and Robert Heinlein? To the gulag with you! And me.
I’m mildly surprised Disney didn’t feature a male seahorse “giving birth” followed by a jolly song telling the kiddies that human males can do that as well.
Dylan Mulvaney could have provided the voice.
Jeff is now using three ‘f’s. Seems a bit much, frankly.
My proofreading skills are even worse than usual.
Unless, of course, you were a survivor of the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Or object to mentally aberrant males in rape crisis centres.
Maybe. Perhaps. But how often and when? When my locale polices tell me I need to open and close my garage door when working in my backyard on a Saturday morning lest I create “an open invitation to commit crime” the b@stards are flat out wrong. And I have spoken up and told them so in no uncertain terms. Meanwhile my conservative…”conservative” friends got uncomfortable (especially the more managerial types)with such and suggest that po-po may not be too helpful in the future if I do have a crime. Though this specifically was back in 2006/2007. I notice some of those conservatives…”conservatives” lately expressing concerns about the rising crime rate. Not that there’s a connection/correlation there. That they see anyway.
Don’t sweat it. My own proficiency in the usage of ‘f’s has increased far more significantly lately.
Wouldn’t you agree, David?
https://www.peta.org/features/ingrid-newkirks-extraordinary-will/
An ear to King Felipe VI of Spain
Dunno, he may not want to kick off the War of Newkirk’s Ear; Spain fared pretty poorly in the previous one.
In not-unrelated news:
Because in academia, where the clever people are, pretension trumps reality.
Ingrid Newkirk
I’m pretty sure we have reached peak narcissism.
Even after her death and dismemberment this modern-day Ozymandius, Karen of Karen’s, still intends to preach to the great and the good a.k.a. her equals.
Somewhat related, this, by Niall Gooch:
The rest is worth a peek.
The Karsten Braasch anecdote in the otherwise excellent article is incomplete in that immediately before beating Venus Williams 6 – 2 he had also defeated her more talented sister Serena 6 – 1 (he then presumably relaxed with a few more smokes and lagers).
I strongly suspect he gifted Serena the one game to prevent an even more embarrassing bagel although, as the girls had been mouthing off beforehand, it would have been richly deserved.
On the subject of mouthing off the recent pre kick-off verbiage by the captain of the US ladies soccer team before their 12- 0 defeat at the hands of Wrexham Old Boys is evidence that some lessons will never be learned.
Here’s a link that doesn’t actually go to the PUTA website.
Oh, I think Spain could deal pretty effectively with PETA puta narcissists…and who would defend them?
They are working overtime to convince us they are unfit to exercise any power.
“I should sooner live in a society governed by the first two thousand names in the Boston telephone directory than in a society governed by the two thousand faculty members of Harvard University”
–William F. Buckley, Jr.
Spain is short on lions but long on bulls who, with any luck, harbour deep ancestral grievances.
As PETA are presumably opposed to the use of swords it would be a short but entertaining contest. Maybe on Pay per View?
Oh, academia, Instapundit, Patterico, National Review. There are many such places. Added: The irony of Buckley though. As entertaining as he was, he was himself a part of the problem.
What we have here is a failure to understand why we bother to read books. Too much hashing and rehashing of thinking, as is done mostly by books and academics, leads to an inbreeding of ideas. Reality has a very hard time getting a foothold in such an environment. Until the Gods of the Copybook Headings show up.
I stopped paying attention to Patterico many years ago, and am not current on his opinions. But to nit-pick, he is a practicing lawyer rather than an academic.
He was also part of the solution, which is true to varying degrees of most people.
To nit-pick that was part of my point. Now that I think about it, a significant part. The damn lawyers are just academics with direct power over society, not just over young minds.
But since they are not in academia, perhaps we need a better term. Members of the university-educated mandarin class?
I tend to think of practicing lawyers as being more like engineers to academia’s theorists. Somewhat like practicing physicians vs. medical researchers, business owners vs. biz school professors, and so on.
The Mandarins and the Masses is the subtitle of Theodore Dalrymple’s book Our Culture, What’s Left of It.
Well, try to keep it clean. Jefff and I are using up all the f’s.
While that’s an interesting analogy and somewhat useful, well I could see where it would be upsetting to engineers. Mechanics, construction workers, etc. are all nodding their heads in agreement. The problem with the lawyers, and speaking of the 1% who are actually useful, is that so few of them are held accountable for their mistakes. Engineers generally have to pay. Sometimes because lawyers.
That reminds me: Historians Victor Davis Hanson and John Heath has pointed out key breakthroughs in Classical scholarship which were made by amateurs and outsiders:
“They argue that enthusiasts and amateurs, not professional classicists, made the great breakthroughs in our understanding of the ancient world, from Heinrich Schliemann, the discoverer of Troy, to Milman Parry, who established the Homeric oral tradition, and Michael Ventris, who cracked the code of Linear B, the Minoan script.”
—book review by Camille Paglia
I would quote directly from the book, but there is no Kindle edition to quickly search and copy/paste from.
Exactly. As I said, inbreeding ideas. Eventually they can’t think outside the box.
Today’s word is ingratitude.
Saw that, along with the following headline (and I quote):
“… latest developments of the stabbing in the French Alps involving a number of young children.”
So, who’s stabbing whom? I envision herds of young chill’n, dressed in their finest dirndls (ok, German/Swiss/Whatever), roaming the hills whilst stabbing … whatever.
Oh, that’s not what happened? Lede, buried.
By eliminating SAT and ACT tests, these twits are making college degrees worthless. They are destroying their own business model which pretends to produce products of value to employers. Note that many places are now no longer requiring a college degree. IF on the other hand, they keep the rigor of their classes (say MIT) then they are allowing in people who cannot cut it and who will flunk out, mostly minorities –making an existing affirmative action problem even worse. Either way it is not good.
And they prevent people who think differently from joining their “club”.
That article was terrifying. So many times he was passed up the chain because no one wanted to be the one to fail a black pilot, and they desperately needed to keep their DIE numbers up. It was obvious from the get-go he didn’t have a suitable temperament for flying planes. It makes you wonder how many pilots of passenger aircraft are getting the same passed-through treatment because of their skin color, or mental illness – I mean dysmorphia.
Are corporations really that blind to think you can sacrifice standards on the altar of DIE and not have any negative consequences? Or do they think the first major air crash is not going to happen while they are still CEO?
Their “value” to employers was always limited (see Griggs vs Duke Power) – and seemingly any number of companies are returning to the 90’s “contract employee” model, which, of course, limits “educational value”
This means that “contract employment” must be stopped at all costs.
At the risk of sounding like a jerk…and a broken record…where did people think these diversity classes would lead when the became more and more standard 30 or more years ago? I objected. Probably a few others. Maybe. Never actually met many of those others. Most everyone else laughed. Again, the Gods of the Copybook Headings.
Heh. MIT. Heh. Heh…bwahahahaha!
Hanson and Heath discussed this in their 1998 book Who Killed Homer? Some took them seriously, but most scoffed and laughed. And here we are.
Jordan Peterson, in a conversation with Theodore Dalrymple, said that many people don’t actually think much. A thought appears in their heads and they think that’s thinking, but they don’t actually think about it, analyze it, critique it. This might explain why so many supposedly educated liberals embrace “diversity” even though so much evidence shows it to be a foolish dogma leading to harmful policies.
No. Large orgs tend to view “negative” (your death? Ah well) as a cost of doing business (as long as income exceeds outflow)
Absolutely. “kick the can down the road” is taught in business skools seemingly everywhere.
Heh.
Pilots: an egyptian crashed his full plane into the ocean while shouting “alla’u’akbar”–god is great. It was terrorism but was never described as such. A german pilot with well-known depression crashed his plane into a mountain in germany. But sure, let’s ignore all types of warning signs.
The dumbing down of standards is based on the false and perverse idea that white people don’t have to actually meet standards or perform–they are just given jobs and coast. While it is true that a handful of rich kids get such cushy jobs, the rest of us whities have to perform. The consequences of this dumbing down are terrifying.
See “White Like Me” (yes, SNL. So there.)
We’ve gone from the ideal of burly chaps who will apprehend lawbreakers as forcefully as necessary and send them on their way towards the nearest dungeon, to ladies in funny hats…
OK, it is San Francisco, but still.
Well, it’s the kind of conceit one might expect from those whose social experience has been largely confined to other middle-class midwits. The kind of people who think it a good idea to spend several years, and large sums of money, listening to question-begging blather about “white privilege,” and then regurgitating it, as if it were profound.
Today’s word is ingratitude.
Get used to this name, it will be thrown back in your face for decades in any discussion about Muslim anti-Western violence: Abdul Masih – “(lit. servant of the Messiah) … male given name or surname used by Arabic-speaking Christians”. Shouted “in the name of Jesus Christ” in English during the attack. Had in his possession cross, prayer book, images of the Virgin Mary.
If something like a sequence of events can be figured out… 2013: age 22, turned up in Sweden as a refugee. Evidently hung around in Sweden for seven years, because evidently you can do that. 2020: marriage + baby with Swede, but ended in divorce. Nov 2022: having lost hope of permanent residence in Sweden, throws himself on the mercy of the French as an oppressed religious refugee. Apr 2023: Cogs turn in the Swedish bureaucracy, which grants him residence until 2025. June 4 2023: Cogs turn in the French bureaucracy, which taking note of the Swedish decision tells him that his refugee application is cancelled.
Homeless in France, sleeping in church basements, was there a breakdown in communication or lack of mental clarity that he didn’t understand that the Swedes had invited him to play their system for yet another two years? Or was he getting too old and tired and felt that nothing that permanent residence was good enough after so many years of loyal service?
Note that many places are now no longer requiring a college degree.
To be fair, a large number of today’s degrees are useless. In Canada, many young people return to Community College after receiving one or more University degrees because they’re not qualified to do anything that pays well.
The words ‘even more’ are missing.
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. — Mark Twain, Pudd’nhead Wilson’s Calendar
Till,
that is very surprising to read. He appears a complete Outlier (show me another) but regrettably you are correct and his ostensible religion will be referred to ad nauseam whenever future Muslim offences take place.
Many in the UK media and establishment like nothing better than a spot of Christian-bashing.
Hence the PRO Act.
@Steve E:
To be fair, a large number of today’s degrees are useless. In Canada, many young people return to Community College after receiving one or more University degrees because they’re not qualified to do anything that pays well.
James Taranto had some interesting insights that ring just as true 17 years late. The motivation for the article was MIT’s firing the Dean of Admissions — who had performed commendably for 28 years there — because she had lied about graduating college.
Okay, misrepresenting one’s record isn’t good. But that seems solid, if anecdotal, proof that the degree requirement can be completely superfluous.
Further down, Taranto demonstrates how a college degree became a hunting license for so many jobs:
The whole thing is worth reading.
Today’s word is ingratitude.
He’s not the first Christian refugee to be turned down or away. He should have just looked around – claim Magic brownness + Muslim and all the western European countries would have been fighting each other for the privilege of having him. He’s got the name and tan already – your average bureaucrat won’t know it’s an Arabic Christian name. And bonus he could still have gotten his stabby on and no one would have cared. The cops would probably have apologized to him.
Taranto demonstrates how a college degree became a hunting license for so many jobs
That.
The system has become as close to a perpetual motion machine as one can get.
Thanks for the link.
Perpetual motion machine or positive feedback loop?