We Are Objects In Their World
In the comments, pst314 shares an uplifting, utopian spectacle for Portland’s commuters.
What’s striking about such scenes, I think, is the eye-widening selfishness on display. Other passengers, other people, including children, are seemingly of no importance. Except, perhaps, as obstacles, or targets. And yet we’re told, often and at length, that those who repeatedly indulge in antisocial and criminal behaviour are creatures deserving of indulgence, and with whom we should empathise. As if the favour would ever be returned.
If you’ve watched the reality series Cops or Live PD, pathological selfishness is very much a staple, a defining attribute of the assorted misfits and predators. I remember one lengthy pursuit of thieves who’d robbed a store at gunpoint, terrorised its owner, and then fled the scene in a stolen car, and whose bid to escape did costly damage to other people’s property, and caused other road users to veer and crash, resulting in serious injury.
When finally apprehended, the thieves, themselves unharmed, were entirely unconcerned by the horror and destruction left in their wake, or the fact that it was all but miraculous that no-one had been killed. Instead, they were loudly indignant, as if they were the victims of the drama, heatedly objecting to the discomfort of handcuffs, and demanding to know why their phones had been confiscated. While, within earshot, injured children were being rushed to hospital.
It’s curious how those who find endless opportunities to declare their own altruism and compassion, and thereby signal their elevated status, are very often determined to excuse selfishness of a sociopathic kind and to perform remarkable contortions while doing so.
Such that, having been burgled, for instance – in the middle of the night, by people armed with carving knives – one should apparently sympathise with the bipedal vermin breaking into one’s home and driving off with one’s stuff – in one’s own car. And then, via incoherent prose in a national newspaper, fret about their wellbeing. Burglars being so deserving of our forbearance and goodwill, you see.
If readers are left somewhat puzzled by the piece in question, by Guardian contributor Anna Spargo-Ryan, this is understandable. Consistency doesn’t appear to be a priority, or indeed an option. What matters, it seems, is that Ms Spargo-Ryan is hailed by her progressive peers as a “beautiful person,” oozing, as she is, with infinite compassion. Albeit not so much for other local residents, also robbed in the night, most likely by the same criminal gang, and whose expectations of justice are deemed terribly proletarian and unsophisticated.
But then, ostentatious displays of sympathy for criminals – rather than for their numerous victims, and future victims – are much more statusful. And hey, that’s what matters.
As seen in the links above, the mental convolutions can be quite bizarre. If another illustration is needed, see also this stern moral lecture from the pages of Vice, in which we’re told, emphatically, that the people we should dislike and disdain, and indeed fear, are the ones who don’t feel entitled to rob us, or beat us insensible, or burn down our homes.
As for the attorney, he needs to experience the terror of armed robbery, and experience it many times. Preferably forced to kneel or lie on his face while the barrel of the “gun or not a gun” is pressed into his back or the back of his head. If his bowels empty, so much the better, but I want him to experience frequent nightmares and an inability to leave home without getting the shakes.
“The suspect was described as being a five-foot-nine male wearing no shirt, gray sweatpants and black shoes, according to police.”
The suspect was shirtless, and yet the description omits skin color.
Mister “not a real gun” got 9 bullets from one of his robbery victims.
Ms Spargo-Ryan’s conceit that the perpetrators are just tearaway little scamps
Ctrl-F child in the article has 13 matches, one a glancing reference to the fact that her own child was in the house, one about a childhood CD of hers that had been stolen, and the rest about what are called justice-involved youth. The article of course doesn’t have any information to confirm or deny, but any time I hear a white woman laying it on thick about “child” criminals, I take “child” to mean non-white.
… on what basis can you assume that no harm will be done to you, or to your children? Exactly how many boundaries have to be crossed?
Daily News takes the “X gone wrong” formula to new depths
Question to journalist:
Let’s assume that at some point during the home invasion, the resident, armed with a chef’s knife, is in a face-off with the robber, similarly armed.
Who has a duty to retreat, and why?
My own question reminds me of a (mexican?) Spider species, dwelling in groups of individual burrows. Occasionally, an interloper will invade a burrow. In this species, uniquely I believe, the resident immediately abandons, and then **invades a neighbor**, who proceeds to do the same.
This can go on until most of the spiders have moved.
See, folks? That’s civilization. Right?
Same area, possibly same gang. Or one of several such gangs.
An image search for similar crimes in the same area at around the same time does suggest you have reason to do so. Despite the use of facial blurring, you can see an occasional hand.
I think this article has a pretty good explanation for the mindset of the various apologists for ghastly behaviour documented here.
This is a strange one.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-65598748
First thing this morning the story was on the bbc news front page.
Half an hour later I went back to check a few details.
Not on the front page
Not on the UK news page
Not on the England news page
I finally found it nestling in the Dorset section of the South regional news page.
That’s like being relegated 3 times in half an hour.
Could there be something about the perpetrators which concerns the bbc? I wasn’t previously aware of any motorcycle arsonist gangs in Wimborne.
This passage bears some repeating, I think:
Though it seems that such thoughts offend Ms Spargo-Ryan, sufficiently so for her to denounce anyone who entertains them. Darleen was blocked too, for suggesting something along similar lines.
Re the above, and as Mishu pointed out in the original thread, Ms Spargo-Ryan seemed more annoyed with me than with the creatures who broke into her home in the middle of the night and stole her belongings. I can be badmouthed freely, you see, and in fanciful ways, not least for being a man, unlike the actual criminals who left her sleepless and fearful. I suspect there’s some unhappy psychological process taking place there.
Sadly, she’s since deleted the tweet in question.
I think you miss the point. Traditional, conservative people in India are exactly like conservatives in the US or UK or Europe – much more genuinely tolerant, kind and accepting even of people and views they disagree with.
Thus, for instance, the sole British guest invited at my Indian wedding (because of distance, not because I have only one friend!) is gay. My (and my wife’s) traditional families knew, but they still treated him like a king. Just like conservatives in Florida or Yorkshire would.
The key difference between the two societies is rather different. In the West, it’s become impossible to push back and protest against obscenities, attacks on the culture and children, and horrible behaviour done in the name of “progressiveness”. Because of weaponised “tolerance ” and “rights”, you would be attacked for “bigotry ” and “hate”.
Whereas, in India, these idiots are still fringe and can still be mocked and abused for being the contemptible virtue signalling degenerates they are.
“none of this means that Neely deserved to die or that his death isn’t a tragedy or that Daniel Penny shouldn’t face consequences for killing him.”
Good article, except that I disagree with the “should face consequences”: Daniel Penny did the best he could in an extremely difficult situation. Jordan Neely’s death is on Jordan Neely and on the leftists who have made it legally impossible to institutionalize the mentally ill.
I was in college when One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest was released. Overwhelmingly the people who began loudly calling for the closing of asylums were liberals and leftists, while the people who were saying asylums were needed were conservatives.
Somehow…somehow it came up in AP American history class when I was in high school. My teacher was very, very supportive…oddly so…of the idea that we should close them down. Everything that isn’t perfection must be done away with. The practicality of the proposed replacement, when there even is a proposed replacement, is not to be discussed. The thing is, conservatives…”conservatives” may speak of Chesterton’s Fence in lofty terms but they lack the guts to actually take any real world actions to defend it.
Added: If you can follow my point here, I am right now defending the idea that coyotes do not belong in Florida and any in the Cape Canaveral area need to be removed. Pets and children are more important. I look into the fb pages of the people arguing against me…all conservatives. Like castrate-the-pedophile types. Supposedly. Though when confronted with actually taking action to castrate any pedos and I am quite certain these conservatives….”conservatives” would be wetting their pants.
Well, quite. And the competitive dynamic, the ratcheting, is quite important: “It’s just stuff.” “It’s just a phone.” “It’s just a handbag and some credit cards.” “It’s just a car.” “It’s just a gang of sociopaths with carving knives a few feet from your sleeping children…”
As if the result of such pretensions could be anything other than further, more frequent, much bolder predation.
Why it’s almost as if there’s something like a slope things move down and that slope gets more slippery as you go down it. But of course that’s just crazy talk. If you just listen to the smart people, they’ll ’splain to you why that’s crazy.
Semi-related, you knew it was coming.
Could there be something about the perpetrators which concerns the bbc? I wasn’t previously aware of any motorcycle arsonist gangs in Wimborne.
French New Year’s celebration? Swedish youths?
Our lady of infinite compassion subsequently caught sight of one of the perpetrators wearing a pink hoodie
My first impression too. The sentence afterwards (“I went back with gloves to collect what was discarded”) makes it clearer that she caught sight of the hoodie lying in the street among her other stuff and not being worn in the street by a youth.
https://youtu.be/MLu8IuVmW3I
The real Cleopatra.
We can observe the endpoint of chaos in places like Somalia where warlords fill the place of government and bloodshed is constant, or South Africa which is devolving into anarchy. These twits think they will still have electricity and cell phones and Starbucks when everything goes to shit. Hint: they won’t.
Our entire modern level of comfort and technology depends on being able to go about your day without violence and on people doing their job to keep things running. Venezuela shows how fast you can lose it.
For ye have the poor always with you . . . unless you’re Canada.
See also, “It’s just a pronounced upsurge in fare-dodging.” Which, it turns out, you’re not supposed to notice. Because that would be uncool.
Canada
Inviting the third world into their country and paying for them by “suiciding” it’s own poor and elderly citizens.
Note that that story about “Sylvia” is from over a year ago. I verified it in the Guardian (yeah, I know) and the timestamp caught my eye. So it’s not like I live in a cave, I’m a bit of a news junkie (not that I enjoy it but neither do the real junkies…or so I’m told) and I’m just seeing that story now. Odd. Though with everything else going on in this 🤡 🌎 I suppose I may have seen it and my memory got overridden by something worse. God only knows what that could have been.
How to be a bioethicist: Recommend whatever evil policies the ruling class likes.
I did see something about Amir Farsoud, but not about the outpouring of sympathy that saved him.
I am convinced that I would have seen much more about such cases if journalists were seriously worried and outraged. What does one do when most of the ruling classes have embraced evil? Not just the politicians but the “thinkers”?
A satiric Japanese phrase book has these passages for prospective employees (altered for the Peoples Democratic Republic of Canada):
How to be a bioethicist:
Weren’t the first ones called eugenicists?
Once again, the left reveal themselves to be the true nazis.
One of the greatest cons in history was convincing the world Nationalsozialismus isn’t socialist.
“The third greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world socialists are the good guys” – Some Guy
I just saw this…apparently Feminist To The Max Miller Lite Girl did a little Show Us Your Tits but it wasn’t for Mardi Gras. It was for politics. Skip ahead to about 1:32 for the boobehs. They’re censored but, well…thought I’d cut it to the chase if you already know the background story.
The Critical Drinker comments on the Netflix Cleopatra abortion.
Here is the video of the “patriot front” marching in DC. The media fell for it completely and was all breathless and drum-banging. Actual conservatives don’t wear identical uniforms with fancy plastic shields. And what is with the shields? How weird. Are they captain america? There were no old fat men in the march but are plenty in actual conservative marches. And no one wears a mask on the right–totally a Left thing. Identical masks too. All their stuff was brand new. Totally FBI. The news called it 200 but I counted 50. The March For Life which the media never covers has 100,000 and includes women and youth. Oh, and no conservative would use the word “front” as part of their name–sounds all communisty.
But look at what the message is: anyone marching with US flags is dangerous. But people all in black throwing fire bombs and rocks is totally legit.
Stoaty Weasel is applying for British citizenship.
“The only downsides to dual citizenship: I’m not allowed to work for the spooks of either country and if I get kidnapped by Somali pirates, the two countries argue about who has to pay my ransom.”
Anyone here know what Hindi is for “girldick”? Asking for Starbucks.
#ItStartsWithYourName – So if you go into a Starbucks in India can you expect the employees to be Indians who are familiar with Indian names, so that your strange-new-respect gesture of putting in an order for your MtF child under the name of “Arpita” instead of “Arpit” isn’t lost in translation, the cup coming out with “Armpit’ written on it – another hate crime.