Obviously, Inevitably, The White Devil Did It
So, anyway, as you may have heard, at a recent awards ceremony, a black millionaire celebrity slapped another black millionaire celebrity. The root cause, however, has only now been discovered:
This is about a much larger systemic issue rooted in white supremacist culture designed to police the behaviour of Blacks amongst the who’s who in Hollywood and beyond.
Respectability politics suggest that equity and fair treatment require that Black people — both inside and outside of Hollywood — conduct ourselves in a manner deemed acceptable to whites. Furthermore, expressing any emotion other than complacence, apathy, or agreeance directly violates those norms, disqualifying Black people from receiving the same equitable treatment that whites enjoy as a birthright. And sadly, there is a large group of Blacks who have internalised this toxic messaging.
You see, when Mr Will Smith, a black millionaire celebrity, publicly assaults Mr Chris Rock, another black millionaire celebrity, on live television, and is promptly given a prestigious award, for which he is applauded, and is then seen celebrating triumphantly at the award after-party, this is somehow proof of victimhood, of being racially “policed” by “respectability politics” and other works of the White Devil. Mr Smith, we’re told, is “not receiving the same equitable treatment that Whites enjoy as a birthright.”
Readers will note the implication that any black viewers who regard Mr Smith’s behaviour as not entirely optimal are merely parroting views “deemed acceptable to whites,” having somehow “internalised” the “toxic messaging” of “white supremacist culture.” For what it’s worth, I don’t have strong feelings on the incident one way or the other – it all seemed rather farcical – but I doubt my first impulse would be to suggest that black people who disapproved, however much or little, are merely aping whitey and don’t know their own minds. But such is wokeness.
The author of the piece, published in Forbes, is Maia Niguel Hoskin, a “writer, activist, and college professor,” whose areas of supposed expertise include “oppression, difference and mental health,” including “racial battle fatigue,” and who claims, modestly, to “facilitate cultural consciousness.” As a self-styled “speaker of truth,” she is, of course, schooled in “critical race theory.”
And so, Ms Hoskin tells us that she does not condone violence, while insisting that responsibility for violence must be shifted from those who indulge in it, provided they are black, and attributed instead to the insidious, all-pervasive, yet oddly nebulous, power of pallor. The “racist system that was designed to incubate his and so many others’ frustrations.” And which, in ways never quite specified, compels very rich comedians to tell bad jokes, and makes very rich actors slap the people who tell them. This, we’re assured, is “white supremacist culture.”
And the way to be scrupulously “anti-racist” is to erase any agency or expectation of self-possession from people with brown skin.
[ Expanded via the comments. ]
. . . I called it.
SHOTGUN! Just in case we decide to cruise The Strip later.
Would it be awfully white supremacist of me to point out that someone who claims to be a professor should know that unless you’re trying to write cod 18th C. prose, using agreeance in lieu of agreement makes you sound like a weirdo?
Gillies: in fact, insisting on proper spelling and grammar IS white supremist. Did you not get the memo? Goes way back to Ebonics.
7 billion people understand that if an Aussie says summer he means our winter.
The top two ice-breaking banalities on multinational Zoom calls: (a) what time is it there? (b) what’s the weather like there?
“I hear that it rains a lot in England and that English people do not like the rain, is it not so? Here in Gungbungastan it is very hot and dry,so when it rains we are glad….”. If you’re coming in two minutes into a Zoom call when everyone is still gathering, that’s the kind of banality you’re likely to hear. Lots of differences aren’t safe to talk about, but the differences in weather are safe.
Maybe if we were properly trained in cultural sensitivity we’d break the ice with “white people are the cancer of the world”, or “the Muslim call to prayer is one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset”. But we’re stuck in our hidebound prejudices like “don’t talk to strangers about politics or religion”, or “don’t be a smartaleck with foreigners who might not understand your humour” (what’s offensive about those prejudices is that they give an operational definition of an outsider – somebody you can’t discuss religion with and can’t joke with – but white people aren’t allowed to have any reasons to discriminate or “other”).
Two entertainment performers performing an entertaining act live on TeeVee, on a “Plaques for Blaques” program whose viewership has sunk like the Titanic. And so much commentary. So much meaning.
What better way to rescue the ratings decline than a little controversy that gets all the tongues wagging. Good job fellas!
Epicure
“How not to get your ass kicked”
Essential viewing 🙂 His joke in the Oscars was pretty pants, but the nonsense that followed was hilarious. Maybe they could have a mass brawl next year…I think that would be appropriate.
I thought this little video on the subject was fun:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYPBg6w8KJc
In the current era men aren’t allowed to have opinions on anything, and if one is foolish enough to offer his opinion it is automatically wrong if a woman disagrees with it.
Lots of differences aren’t safe to talk about, but the differences in weather are safe.
I routinely had to explain on video conferences the difference between the Canadian system of government and the American. Often for longer than we discussed actual work-related topics.
Also, apparently we don’t have ranch dressing in Canada. According to an American co-worker.
Also, apparently we don’t have ranch dressing in Canada
Well given the way y’all’s heads are hinged in the back like that, it’s a wonder y’all can keep anything down at all. Even pudding. Sorry to hear about your princess.
Henry,re: your link.
“Love meant one thing to you, I see, and something quite different to me.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mHSS3bpAnQ
BTW, the omission of the final “e” is not accidental, I am sort of a mongrel Epicurean
Sorry to hear about your princess
*Sigh* Typical American ignorance. Captain Crunch wasn’t allowed in Canada until 1992 due to the toxic food dyes. “Tradition”, my maple syrup covered ass.
Why is it, that the prominent philosophers of the current era all appear to be wimminzes?
I would not say so. In my opinion, the most prominent philosopher of our time is Jordan Peterson. Other notable thinkers include Thomas Sowell and Victor Davis Hanson.
… a stage punch. You swing to miss, and use your other hand to slap yourself on your collarbone to make an impact noise. Watch the footage. That’s exactly what Will Smith did.
I wonder. Watch frame by frame on Youtube: pause the video, then use “,” and “.” (“lowercase” < and > ). I’m not sure he does go all the way to the collarbone. Also, he appears to connect with Chris a few frames before his left slows down and then reverses.
I distinctly recall Cap’n Crunch served in Labatt Crystal (instead of milk) one morning, circa 1983.
My recollection of the night before is, um, hazier.
That says more about American shrinks than Americans; that statement assumes that I’ve classified your work categorization correctly.
My work categorization is “defecation output port software engineer” just to be clear.
I believe that I’ve mentioned that I worked for BNR (Bell Northern Research/Big Nerd Ranch), Northern Telecom, Nortel, and Nortel Networks from 1995 to very near the end of that company’s existence in the USA. (I honestly don’t remember the various naming permutations of the company.) The Canadian engineers that I dealt with the entire time were top-notch; some of the engineering management were very good as well (certainly no worse than the American engineering management).
Software engineers generally being who they are, discussions of governing systems didn’t come in meetings.
Well, I believe that the girdle of ignominy has both wires and whale bone stays.
Jordan Peterson. Other notable thinkers include Thomas Sowell and Victor Davis Hanson.
Agreed, but mere reeds in the wind, overwhelmed by the feminist ‘social justice’ shouting that comes out of academe and which seems to attract the lion’s share of attention.
That.
Says our queen of woke wisdom and magic blackness.
Again, has anyone noticed a common factor in all of these videos of shoplifting and “smash and grabs?” Or are we not allowed?’
Excusing bad behavior because of the skin color of the perpetrator is as racist as expecting bad behavior because of the skin color of the perpetrator.
And Chris Rock missed a great opportunity when he did not say to Will Smith as the latter returned to his seat, “At least I didn’t f*ck your wife like most of the guys in this room already have.” No doubt hilarity would have ensued.
Says our queen of woke wisdom and magic blackness.
Since these people are so much cleverer and more sophisticated than us plebs, I can’t help wondering why they can’t see the obvious flaw in their approach to educating the lower classes. Surely they must realise that if you want to win someone over with your argument, presenting yourself as a hectoring, whiny, sanctimonious bitch simply isn’t sensible.
As I said, these people are supposedly the sophisticated ones, yet somehow they seem incapable of being even moderately polite and respectful.
these people are supposedly the sophisticated ones, yet somehow they seem incapable of being even moderately polite and respectful.
They are not good people. They do not mean well. And you can’t always hide a thing like that.
“You will not be able to understand.”
“Honk, honk, honk, “ableism”, honk…more SJW boilerplate…”
She admits to shaving her head because of hair loss (occurs in up to 40% of black women, often because of hair treatments), she is no more “disabled” by this than any bald man is, i.e., not at all.
…these people are supposedly the sophisticated ones…
Not totally unrelated, President Elensky couldn’t be reached for comment.
They just never think things through.
Ah, but when I noticed this 20+ years ago and mentioned it, I was “crazy” and “the one politicizing things”…
Sigh, I remember getting that reaction: The liberals insisted that there was no bias, while the fake conservatives and libertarians told me that there might be some bias but it wasn’t important. I first noticed some political bias back in the late 70’s, watched it steadily increase, and dropped my subscription around 1990.
In my opinion, the most prominent philosopher of our time is Jordan Peterson. Other notable thinkers include Thomas Sowell and Victor Davis Hanson.
Don’t forget Roger Scruton (RIP 2020).
Also Leszek Kolakowski.
In the current era men aren’t allowed to have opinions on anything, and if one is foolish enough to offer his opinion it is automatically wrong if a woman disagrees with it.
Until you put on a dress. Then you’re automatically right.
these people are supposedly the sophisticated ones, yet somehow they seem incapable of being even moderately polite and respectful.
We’ve seen so many of these things now, all eerily interchangeable, as if these self-imagined radicals were merely regurgitating the same set of lecture notes. And they are, I think, interesting only for reasons that are presumably unintended.
For instance, one gets the impression that, despite the posturing, the aim isn’t social harmony of some kind, but rather personal status. Which is to say, superiority, a pecking order. And so, there’s the tribalism, the invocation of some magical otherness, and the default tone of scolding, and the signature body language, and the curious absence of any acknowledgement or expectation of reciprocation. (Once you’ve spotted its absence, you may notice that this rather telling detail is practically a default.)
Until you put on a dress. Then you’re automatically right.
Yep, but you don’t even need a dress.
The whole story of this
guy’slady’s* ordeal at the Beeb*(close call, I almost misgendered him).
Surely they must realise that if you want to win someone over with your argument, presenting yourself as a hectoring, whiny, sanctimonious bitch simply isn’t sensible.
Surely you understand that they don’t see themselves that way. They do however see normal society as being that way. Hence the problem persists.
dropped my subscription around 1990.
They were my go-to purchase at airport bookstores before boarding a flight. Finally decided to subscribe early/mid 90’s. Stopped the subscription about two years later, IIRC. I always knew their economics writer was full of s*** but trusted/enjoyed most of the other articles until I started to notice problems with and repetitions of the AGW narrative. And other overtly political and out of place statements slipping in.
NatGeo can’t just have a story about Gypsies, they have to talk about how oppressed they are. Every story about nature ever has to mention extinction or climate change or both. Really tiring.
Think about what it meant in the past to be virtuous. Mother Teresa ministered to the poor. Even the Marvel super heroes spend their time helping and don’t go around bragging about their super powers. In contrast, the Woke super heroes must have someone to criticize, to look down on, to hate (men, ytes, capitalism). It is an inversion of virtue. It is pure status seeking wrapped in the flag of virtue. And of course in a world of billions, to prove you are truly on top, you must get more and more extreme.
Until you put on a dress. Then you’re automatically right.
As long as you are reliably Left.
“You will not be able to understand.”
Puzzled, I am – you see, I watched said clickage, and noticed that she is… well, whiter than I am. Funny, dat is…
…foolish enough to offer his opinion it is automatically wrong if a woman disagrees with it…
For some reason, I keep reading this as ‘anatomically wrong’. Still works, though.
anatomically wrong
Band name.
Don’t forget Roger Scruton (RIP 2020). Also Leszek Kolakowski.
I was speaking of philosophers who are currently active, so I didn’t consider dead ones. That being said, I have to admit that I wasn’t aware of Scruton or Kolakowski. Clearly, I have some reading to do. Thank you for the recommendations.
I really need to make more time for books. Currently, my reading queue also includes books about stoicism (mainly Epictetus, Seneca, Marcus Aurelius) and Eric Hoffer’s The True Believer — all recommended by my son, who is much smarter and better-read than I am.
And Chris Rock missed a great opportunity…
Chris Rock quite deliberately chose to bite his tongue. I’ve no doubt he could have delivered five or six different lines that would absolutely have become the talk of the nation, but he had enough sense of time and place, and enough maturity, to decide that he would just keep the show moving.
I have a lot of admiration for somebody who can leave his weapon in the holster in a moment like that.
By the way, if the term “respectability politics” sounds familiar, you may be thinking of this.
I was speaking of philosophers who are currently active, so I didn’t consider dead ones.
Only a small fraction of Scruton’s journalistic essays have been collected in book form, although many can be found in the online archives of the Spectator and the Salisbury Review, among others.
Kolakowski’s books that I am most familiar with are Main Currents of Marxism, a devastatingly critical 1200 page survey of Marxism, and My Correct Views About Everything (love that title), essays on everything from socialism to God.
“anatomically wrong. Band name.”
Saw Anatomically Wong…
The whole story of this guy’s lady’s* ordeal at the Beeb
*(close call, I almost misgendered him)
Ah, but here’s the thing …
This guy waves the term “trans” like some magical “get out of jail free” card and will continue to “remain the same person”. Kind of like that other male who called himself “queer” but is just another straight “cis”gender male.
This is plain equine excrement.
However, I remain the same person I was yesterday.
https://twitter.com/Holbornlolz/status/1509162574243323920
Not totally unrelated, President Elensky couldn’t be reached for comment….They just never think things through.
I’m puzzled. Elsewhere it’s alleged the Z symbol stands for “zapad” (“west”) and is painted on the T67s and battle-taxis to remind everyone that’s where they’re headed.
But there’s no Z in Cyrillic. The buzzy-zed sound in “zapad” is the character 3. (There are characters for the phonemes “ts” and “zh” too…when I first saw my name transliterated the J was a combination “dzh”. And of course my last name, phonetically “vayt”, came out “Baum” because lower-case y and t are u and m.)
Not sure what buttons must be pried off the keyboard now. All explanations gratefully received.
Saul Kripke is still around, though I don’t know how active he is. Sadly it looks like Nagel passed away in 2014. Agree that Kolakowski should definitely be on the list. I put people like Peterson and Sowell more in the bucket of “public intellectual” rather than philosopher per se, not that that is in any way a slight. Scruton comes closer, though.
Well, it’s functioned as such.
Whoops, posted that before I realized that Kolakowski and Scruton had passed, too. Alas.
…how y’all are so bigtoed.
Sorry…got frostbite, back in the 80s. It swells up in damp weather.
But there’s no Z in Cyrillic. The buzzy-zed sound in “zapad” is the character 3
“West is indeed” Запад, the letter З being “Ze”, oddly enough. The Roman “Z” has nothing to do with going west, just a tactical marking to distinguish Russian equipment from Ukrainian to reduce friendly fire incidents given they are using much the same stuff.
If you look at pictures of allied equipment from Iraq, for instance, there are similar markings to help SPC Baggadonuts in all the excitement tell whether a tank was Challenger or T-72.
There is something very wrong with this woman
I know only a handful of families (including my cousin’s) with multiple offspring where one is gay/lesbian. Yet now there are even Facebook groups with large memberships where people claim to have 2 or more kids are “queer” with any number of the 57 genders. It’s like it’s the new social competition. Parents are no longer bragging about their kid’s actual achievements, but their identity-du-jour.