Danger, Will Robinson
When the topic of gender and genitals came up…
Koe Creation, the rather animated lady above, is, she says, a “second-generation queerspawn” – by which she means the product of a polyamorous household – and is allegedly, via some unspecified process, an expert in “sex-positive parenting” and “non-violent communication,” on which she offers “guidance.” She – or rather they, because pronouns – works within the “polyamorous and kink communities” and holds workshops in bondage and sadomasochism, and is therefore, obviously, spending lots of time with small children and talking about their bodies.
Update:
Ms Creation, also known as Valkyrie Jacobson-Smith, is now upset that “the trolls” have found her public announcements and have not been overly impressed or encouraged by them. Insufficient enthusiasm – and any kind of demurral – apparently warrants the designation troll. Presumably, the wider public – those outside of “polyamorous and kink communities” – should be thrilled to discover that pre-school children are being taught by a self-styled “expert” in bondage and sadomasochism, and being quizzed on their genitals, and being used as a basis for “intergenerational dialogue around relational identities (such as polyamory, sexuality… and kink).”
Because, hey, there’s nothing creepy or concerning about that at all.
Yes, dear reader, it’s terribly unfair when people fail to affirm your radicalism and subversiveness, with children aged three and four – a subversiveness of which you’re so proud – based on “moments when that rhetoric happened to come up in the classroom.”
Also, open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
Looks like polyamory isn’t great for kids.
Ms Koe’s contact page has an interesting image.
the rather animated lady above,
Mental breakdown in 3… 2…
I wonder if she was abused, growing up.
Oh wait, no I don’t.
*backs away slowly*
#ThingsThatNeverHappened
#ThingsThatNeverHappened
In which case, the question would be which option is more comforting – it actually happening, or a teacher of pre-school children pretending that it did on social media in order to attract applause from her peers?
Is one significantly more encouraging than the other?
“talking about consent”
Did the parents consent?
Hmm. Ya think so?
“Historic first test between Australia and Afghanistan likely to be cancelled”.
Presumably the Aussies thought he actually meant this, the naïve, trusting fools:
Yeah. Except for… y’know, any alliances trying to push democracy in, say… oh, I don’t know… off the top of my head, Afghanistan. Or authoritarians who behead people for dancing and playing cricket.
But nasty Tweets questioning the result of totally the most transparent and secure election in world history, or “misgendering” and “islamophobia”? They’re right on that, don’t you worry.
I wonder if polyamorous “families” are like Indian tribes with casinos – run afoul of tribal leaders and notwithstanding your lineage as, say, full-blooded Morongo, you can be cast out and no more casino profit checks for you.
I couldn’t help but think that someone like Koe is the type to be booted from the group because she IS an expert and I could imagine someone like her letting her other partners know, they’re simply doing it wrong and AS THE EXPERT and a “second-generation queerspawn” – as if that gives her some hereditary title of honor – she knows best.
From Koe’s website:
Though a poster child for the alternative Seattle community, Koe yearned for a realization of theirself beyond the “shadow of their tribe.” This drive for a singular identity led Koe to leave the alt-Seattle scene to find the self that no one person or family could make for them.
If searching for a single identity, perhaps she might start by refraining from referring to herself in the third person plural.
According to a 2018 Forbes article:
Since 2001, 2.77 million service members have served on 5.4 million deployments across the world with soldiers from the Army accounting for the bulk of them. Deployed personnel were under 30 years old on average, over half were married and about half had children [ … ] a substantial number of those serving across all services have gone on several deployments. Around 225,000 soldiers who served with the Army deployed at least three times or more.
Some Americans, particularly those in the special forces community, have deployed even more frequently. Delta Force Master Sgt. Joshua L. Wheeler [who] was the first U.S. soldier to die in combat against ISIS [ … ] was a veteran of 14 combat deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan.
While one section of society has quite literally risked, and sometimes lost, life and limb in what has been understood as an existential struggle, yet another section of the very same society has done everything it possibly can to demean, alienate and ostracise the “cissexual” (mostly) white (mostly) males in the former section.
Surely Miss Creation, who astonishingly turns out to be 30, must know someone who’s served or at the very least has a relative who has?
I get vertigo just thinking of the chasm that’s opened up over the same two decades.
If searching for a single identity, perhaps she might start by refraining from referring to herself in the third person plural.
Correct, but I’m sure the irony is lost on her.
To sane eyes, she comes off as an imbecilic illiterate that one must struggle to interpret. But look how proper pronouns raise that excerpt to a more eloquent state:
“Though a poster child for the alternative Seattle community, Koe yearned for a realization of herself beyond the “shadow of her tribe.” This drive for a singular identity led Koe to leave the alt-Seattle scene to find the self that no one person or family could make for her.”
That makes sense to me. When I see that other pronoun jibberish, I just move on.
Looks like polyamory isn’t great for kids.
Are you sure? My Mensa friends assure me that it’s just fine. Just as psychologically and sociologically healthy as monogamy. /sarcasm
…the question would be which option is more comforting – it actually happening, or a teacher of pre-school children pretending that it did…
“So which is it? Are you lying now, or were you lying then?” is a question I find myself asking with increasing frequency.
In other news, academic sacked for racism sues with claim
racismCRT is a legally protected belief.Surely Miss Creation, who astonishingly turns out to be 30, must know someone who’s served or at the very least has a relative who has?
I have seen an article that stated only 30% or so of those <30 knew someone or had an immediate family member who was or had been in the military. Further, only about 0.4% of Americans are in the active component, the reserve component added bumps that up to about 0.6%, about 7% of Americans are veterans.
Despite there being Joint Base Lewis-McChord next door in Tacoma, and all sorts of squids in the general Seattle area, one has to consider the bubbles in which the likes of Miss Creation live (for example, her apparent angst that the "new teacher" might not share the groupthink) and though she may have seen someone in the military or Air Force, actually getting to know one, doubtful.
Surely Miss Creation, who astonishingly turns out to be 30, must know someone who’s served or at the very least has a relative who has?
I have seen an article that stated only 30% or so of those <30 knew someone or had an immediate family member who was or had been in the military.
Self-selection at work: I have far-left relatives who hold the most amazing, hostile opinions about those who serve in the military. Most people quickly learn to avoid those who hate them, so it’s a good bet that veterans and patriots quickly choose to avoid these fools, and so they continue to lack exposure corrective facts and opinions.
I have far-left relatives who hold the most amazing, hostile opinions about those who serve in the military. Most people quickly learn to avoid those who hate them, so it’s a good bet that veterans and patriots quickly choose to avoid these fools, and so they continue to lack exposure corrective facts and opinions.
I quite shamelessly believe that this bears repeating frequently. Often even. Especially to people like your leftist relatives. And even many “conservatives”. Especially those in the DC cocktail set.
Given Ms Creation’s background and social media footprint, readers may wish to imagine the pre-school teacher job interview: “Bondage and sadomasochism, you say? Excellent. Just what we’re looking for. The parents will be thrilled…”
“Historic first test between Australia and Afghanistan likely to be cancelled”.
So, clicked on said link – Ms noted that one “fighter” was shod in… Tevas style sandals???
I chuckled, I did.
…so it’s a good bet that veterans and patriots quickly choose to avoid these fools, and so they continue to lack exposure corrective facts and opinions.
In my travels of late I have of necessity been where I had to work with or along side many of this ilk and the general COA is to fly under the radar until someone says something so head bangingly ignorant that something has to be said. 1-2 SD to the left, they might listen, but the real problem comes from those so hard over they won’t even listen to facts and alternate opinion, or better still, tell you your facts are wrong*.
I rather suspect our “teacher” is of the latter group.
*(My favorite trivial example is a nitwit at a party of academics proclaiming Hueys had two engines, a piston engine to turn the rotor blades, and the jet engine to push it forward.)
academic sacked for racism
On the one hand BWA HA HAAA!
On the other, unless I’m misreading the situation she was sacked for being privately racist. I think people should be perfectly entitled to hold racist views and to make racist comments. I’m uncomfortable with employers policing their employees private lives or beliefs. That applies as much to promoting particular ideologies as to denigrating others.
On the gripping hand BWA HA HAAAA!
until someone says something so head bangingly ignorant that something has to be said. 1-2 SD to the left, they might listen, but the real problem comes from those so hard over they won’t even listen to facts and alternate opinion, or better still, tell you your facts are wrong*.
Sister-in-law, the former nurse, posted some Atlantic article about Texas and Gov. Abbot ranting about ignorance. Now this was the same SIL with whom I had my first argument about 3 years ago regarding the obvious (to me anyway) falsehoods and historical fictions in the “Hidden Figures” movie. I gave her ample opportunity and provided clear evidence about how bad it was. She stubbornly stuck to refusal to acknowledge a single point while condescending to me about how the facts are unimportant. So rather than debate the subjectivity of the Texas/Abbot article, I asked her simply if Trump ever told people to drink bleach. She went away for a while but about a day later came back with the “he said to inject disinfectants, don’t mess with me (former endearing name she used to call me)”. I pointed out that the “disinfectant” was light, that this was quite clear if you watched the video, and to believe otherwise either reflected poorly on you reasoning skills or an indication that you were brainwashed by the media. I saw where she replied to me, apparently sometime between midnight and 5AM. I didn’t get around to reading it until later when I discovered that not only was her post gone, but she had deleted her entire FB account. Because dealing with objective fact is truly too traumatizing.
second-generation queerspawn
No matter what trendy terminology or pronouns used, the plain boring scientific truth is that every human alive on this planet today was formed from the human sperm meets human egg and the resulting fetal human incubated in the uterus of a female human body. And unless test tubes or turkeybasters were involved, that sperm got to the egg via the usual male human reproductive organs in contact with female human reproductive organs.
And this is the Party of Science. Believe in Science! Follow The Science! It’s only “Science” when it suits them.
Because dealing with objective fact is truly too traumatizing.
The common refrain I (and I think most of us) hear is “We’ll have to agree to disagree.” Or in my mother’s case, “I don’t want to argue about this any more.” It’s the supposedly “adult” way of taking your ball and storming off for home because you’re not winning.
Ideally, whatever it was you were arguing over seeps into the consciousness of your counterpart and they slowly start to internalize whatever your argument was. In my mother’s case, this often results in me having the same argument six months later, except that she’s taking my initial position and I have to delicately admit that she’s right and I don’t know what I was thinking when I first argued with her. In the fraught political age in which we live, it’s more often the case that I’m just branded a doubleplus ungoodthinker and coolly excluded from future gatherings.
Which I’m honestly okay with, since I’ve found that life is too short to waste on such pursuits. There’s a very good reason that my retirement plan involves a sailboat with a maximum of 2 or 3 people aboard.
I quite shamelessly believe that this bears repeating frequently.
I agree, although it gets wearying. I’ve been doing it for most of my adult life, and, sadly, I don’t have much energy anymore, particularly with regard to my leftist relatives.
a sailboat with a maximum of 2 or 3 people aboard.
‘Cos of all the room that leaves for knives, right?
Meanwhile, one step closer to the Jackson Pollock flag….
Libs of Tik Tok is basically a blog content generator, huh?
There’s pr0nstars that get off on knowing they’re being…watched. I wonder if these types get off on the attention they know they’re getting.
In my mother’s case, this often results in me having the same argument six months later, except that she’s taking my initial position and I have to delicately admit that she’s right and I don’t know what I was thinking when I first argued with her.
Oh, this…but in the context of what was previously discussed regarding couple’s therapy. My wife can get uptight or upset about certain things beyond our control but that technically she is right about. Over time some of those things, ones that do bother me but I don’t consider worth bothering with, do start to bubble up into my conscience concern radar (see OODA). Back when we went to our first counselor, one of those things came up in discussion and I, for some reason, pursued it a bit. Well! Mr. Counselor gets all gowny-growny-grown-up on me to tell me in no uncertain terms how I am being immature by not just letting such a thing go. So there I sat, all hummana-hummana-hummana, wanting to point our that she obsesses over such things far, far more often than I. But of course, I knew that saying any such thing would only make the situation worse. Again, The Truman Show.
Conservative: “Whatever people get up to in the privacy of their own homes…”
Purple-Haired-Side-Shave: “…should be required to be taught in schools!”
Conservative: “Well, um, no, that’s not…”
Man Wearing Penis Costume: “Too late, it’s law now! Stay in your home and give us your children.”
Conservative: “You know, this positions us well for 2022. Dem’s gonna get shellacked!” [ smiles to self as daughter books double mastectomy on WhatsApp ]
Which I’m honestly okay with, since I’ve found that life is too short to waste on such pursuits.
The only way I have learned to cope is that since coming up here to the mountains, where I know very few people in the immediate area, I have been learning to get comfortable with the idea that I really do not need most of the people who were once rather important people in my life. It seems lately that most of the people that I do care about now are people whom in my younger years were frienemies at best. And regardless of what y’all say, I must thank Facebook for that. In spite of all its problems, it has taught me who my friends are. Well more accurately, who are not truly my friends.
I wonder if these types get off on the attention they know they’re getting.
I think we can assume some strain of narcissism is involved.
Jackson Pollock flag
Maybe the answer is a pointillist colour blindness test chart type flag with Balls or Fuck off as the test element.
Oh, well, I suppose landing on a pad during instead of the roof is hugely different in a panicked bug out, but how does Snopes “know” that while the embassy types were forming their calm and orderly queue (cough) that the Shithook wasn’t really doing an OGE hover waiting for them to get their act together ?

Fact Check: Snopes, mostly guessing and covering for the left since 1994.
Given Ms Creation’s background and social media footprint, readers may wish to imagine the pre-school teacher job interview: “Bondage and sadomasochism, you say? Excellent. Just what we’re looking for. The parents will be thrilled…”
Bet that’s *why* they hired her.
The pandemic isn’t COVID, it’s the derangement subsuming every institution.
Can’t ever have too many knives, Karl. Nor
caltropsLego bricks for cockpit security at night.“Snopes”
“The sky is blue”
PAAAARP! Mostly false.
What’s true:
A clear sky during daytime is mainly blue.
What’s false:
Clouds often make the sky grey, or partly white. At night, the sky, especially in urban areas, can be completely black. In the evening, skies can be red, orange, or even, occasionally, green.
Snopes is a f#@*!n’ joke. But the British broadcasting regulator Ofcom is pleased to cite it as an authoritative source. They might as well link to Viz Comic’s “Top Tips”.
PAAAARP!
[ Pries open window, fetches can of Oust. ]
It seems lately that most of the people that I do care about now are people whom in my younger years were frienemies at best.
I have of late come to the conclusion that one’s friends are not those who share one’s interests, but one’s values.
Koe yearned for a realization of theirself beyond the “shadow of their tribe.” This drive for a singular identity led Koe to leave the alt-Seattle scene to find the self that no one person or family could make for them
TL;DR: having discovered that being deliberately shocking and tediously rebellious in typical adolescent fashion does not garner much attention when everyone else around her was doing the same thing, Ms. “Creation” (not her real name) moved somewhere where it was easier to get the reaction she desires from normal people.
Although if I’m honest San Francisco seems like a lateral move.
Looks like polyamory isn’t great for kids.
I had to sever ties to a college friend of mine because he’s deeply involved in the kink/poly/BDSM community, believes that children as young as 13 can be capable of fully informed adult consent because he was at age 13[1] and is raising his twin daughters accordingly. He lives in the Castro.
[1] Narrator: He wasn’t
I have of late come to the conclusion that one’s friends are not those who share one’s interests, but one’s values.
True. But that’s the thing. I am now much closer friends with people with whom I had significant values differences 40 years ago. Hence, frenemies. They now have had 20 years or so of the School of Hard Knocks and now finally “get it”. But they get it coming from a much more rebellious start. My friends with whom I shared values of staying in school, keeping your nose (mostly) clean, respecting authority and such, it’s those (a big majority of people I’ve considered friends) who simply cannot wrap their heads around the idea that by thinking for oneself, one might possibly see things differently from them.
I have of late come to the conclusion that one’s friends are not those who share one’s interests, but one’s values.
True. But that’s the thing. I am now much closer friends with people with whom I had significant values differences 40 years ago.
In my case, I was somewhat liberal in my youth and then slowly “got it”–after which it became very difficult to remain on good terms with all those liberal friends and relatives who saw conservatives as being evil and stupid.
I’d recommend an AI that controls automatic guns with plentiful ammo when you are in the high seas. There is at least one case where the owners of such a vessel were alive while thrown over the side over very deep water while tied to an anchor.
Bah The text that follows is due to my anger over current affairs around the graveyard of empires. It doesn’t add anything to this blog.
If I had ever wanted to die like that, I would have joined the Navy versus the Army. Of course, there might have be a chance where I might have died in shallow water during an amphibious invasion. Given I was a tanker for most of my career, I would have been fine until one of the various ways tanks are “neutralized” would have ended me.
When I was a signal weasel in a division signal battalion, a small group of toddlers with pointy sticks would have taken out most of our signal nodes. When I was a signal weasel in an MLRS battalion, the nuke that would take out the missile launchers would probably have taken me out as well.
So it goes.
TomJ’s link at August 17, 2021 at 12:07 “In June, finding that gender-critical views were a protected belief, the employment appeals tribunal said only views akin to nazism or totalitarianism were unworthy of protections for rights of freedom of expression and thought under the Equality Act.”
So, Nazism which is a Socialist society which discriminates on the basis of race, i.e. skin colour, is banned as a belief.
Yet Critical Race Theory demands the adoption of a Socialist society which discriminates on the basis of race, i.e. skin colour, and is to be celebrated and supported instead of being banned.
Thanks Grauniad, and the Employment Appeals Tribunal. It does seem that all beliefs (animals) are equal, but some are indeed more equal than others. If belief in totalitarianism is also not protected, then every communist’s beliefs shoud be not protected; although a communist will tell you that there were problems with every implementation of communism so far then communism is not totalitarianism in and of itself. They would be wrong there too.
Given Ms Creation’s background and social media footprint, readers may wish to imagine the pre-school teacher job interview: “Bondage and sadomasochism, you say? Excellent. Just what we’re looking for. The parents will be thrilled…”
They only hire the best…
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1427842328878886914
Oh dearie me. Ms Creation, also known as Valkyrie Jacobson-Smith, is now upset that “the trolls” have found her public announcements and have not been sufficiently impressed by them. Insufficient enthusiasm – and any kind of demurral – apparently warrants the designation troll.

Presumably, the wider public – those outside of “polyamorous and kink communities” – should be thrilled to discover that pre-school children are being taught by a self-styled “expert” in bondage and sadomasochism, and being quizzed on their genitals, and being used as a basis for “intergenerational dialogue around relational identities (such as polyamory, sexuality… and kink).”
Because, hey, there’s nothing creepy or concerning about that at all.
Yes, dear reader, it’s terribly unfair when people fail to affirm your radicalism and subversiveness, with children aged three and four – a subversiveness of which you’re so proud – based on “moments when that rhetoric happened to come up in the classroom.”
It just happened, you see.
Ms Creation (or Jacobson-Smith) also has a YouTube channel, where she talks about herself and how fascinating she is.
It has seven subscribers.
She does seem genuinely upset in that tiktok video though which itself is pretty odd. As if the very idea that her act may not be universally venerated is a shock to her.