Not That Kind Of Diversity
Robby Soave on achieving “equity”:
The Vancouver School Board in British Columbia, Canada, is eliminating honours courses as part of a push to foster inclusivity and equity in the classroom. The board had previously eliminated the high school honours English programme, and maths and science will now get the axe as well. “By phasing out these courses, all students will have access to an inclusive model of education, and all students will be able to participate in the curriculum fulsomely,” said the school board in a statement.
By denying access, they are granting access, obviously. How terribly inclusive.
This is a spectacularly frank declaration: Education officials don’t like that some higher-achieving students are sorted into environments where they are more likely to succeed than their less-gifted peers, and would prefer to keep everyone officially at the same level to the greatest extent possible. The plan closely mirrors California’s recent efforts to discourage students who are proficient at math from taking calculus any earlier than their classmates; Canadian educators seem no less excited than their U.S. counterparts about naively pursuing equality of outcome at all costs.
Inevitably, the objections of students and parents were dismissed by educators, including Jennifer Katz, a professor of education at the University of British Columbia, as “nonsense” and perpetuating “systemic racism.” And so, the needs and prospects of gifted children will be sacrificed in the name of progressive piety. A piety that just happens to look like something else.
“fulsomely”
“You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.” It seems apparent that the members of this board definitely didn’t previously participate in any honours English programme.
“fulsomely”
Heh. Truth will out.
It seems apparent that the members of this board definitely didn’t previously participate in any honours English programme.
Though they may have intended to use it by the older definition from the Evil Days of Evil Maximum Evil Whiteness, the modern meaning is perfectly fitting to what they are actually doing.
“fulsomely”
That people entrusted with the education of children failed to register the obvious connotations – say, of insincerity, or of something “aesthetically, morally, or generally offensive” – doesn’t exactly bolster confidence in their abilities.
They don’t need our steenking confidence
They don’t need our steenking confidence
No, indeed. In a saner world, these creatures would be chased from the village. With nail guns.
With nail guns.
Harsh, but fair.
Harsh, but fair.
True, although it’s always a shame to miss an opportunity for tar and feathers.
I’ll see your elimination of honors courses, and raise you an elimination of reading writing, and math requirements, “with the goal of ensuring that the processes and outcomes related to the requirements for high school diplomas are equitable, accessible and inclusive.”
“equitable, accessible and inclusive.”
As noted in a recent thread, and many times before, if you rely on “disparate impact” as grounds for invoking “inequity” or “structural racism,” and demanding special favours and exemptions, where you end up can be alarming in its consequences and moral perversity.
And yet this, seemingly more than anything, currently animates our progressive betters.
The sole purpose of education is to ensure the solidarity of the cadres to the principles of revolution.
discourage students who are proficient at math from taking calculus any earlier than their classmates
In my high school, I knew a guy who read and digested math texts like they were pulp fiction. He went on to MIT and in 4 years had a BSc in Math, and Masters degrees in Math and Chemical Engineering. I have difficulty imagining how one could constrain the intellectual energy of such a person by making him study topics in lockstep with others which he can polish off in a weekend.
My sister’s ex studied electrical engineering as a hobby in high school. When he went to University he was bored by the prerequisite classes which he called “elementary review”. After dropping out before his second year, he invented a computerized blood analysis gizmo (this was WAAAY back in the 1960s), set up a manufacturing company and made himself wealthy.
How will the Political/Education Establishment prevent kids from learning outside of the lockstep classroom?
Pol Pot had a solution for the brainiacs of Cambodian society…
I have difficulty imagining how one could constrain the intellectual energy of such a person by making him study topics in lockstep with others which he can polish off in a weekend.
It’s actually quite easy to demoralise bright children, and the brighter they are, the easier it tends to be. Just bore them and frustrate them in an environment where precociousness is ideologically problematic and often results in social disapproval, from both peers and educators. Five days a week, for a few months, maybe less.
I’ll see your elimination of honors courses, and raise you an elimination of reading writing, and math requirements
And yet these “graduates” are supposedly able to reliably produce $15/hr work? Uneducated, undisciplined people being given $15/hr, and you can’t get rid of them if they don’t show up for work, or fail to perform the work satisfactorily. It’s almost like a thinly-disguised UBI.
I’m reminded of the movie Gattaca, but it might be another movie I’m thinking of, because in Gattacca, they solved the equity thing by genetically engineering (most) everyone for perfection. In the present world, it is impossible to bring everyone up to Michael Jordan’s abilities for playing basketball, but you can maim everyone in order to ensure equitable play at the lowest ability level. Why is it ok to allow those with physical gifts to pursue excellence in that field, while those with mental gifts are maimed in the name of equity? Are they saying that blacks can only excel at sports, but aren’t smart enough for honors courses, or in Oregon, any courses whatsoever? That seems like a pretty racist stereotype to me.
It’s like living in a time line where no one ever wrote the story Harrison Burgeron. Y’all have heard of it, yes? Or did I do one of those damn quantum leap things again?
How will the Political/Education Establishment prevent kids from learning outside of the lockstep classroom?
The handful of extremely bright may just end up skipping most of high school and go straight to STEM at university level. They are bored, too, by regular Advanced Placement classes.
But the bright who benefit from AP will be cut down via boredom and a relentless stream of disapproval from the Equity Squad.
It’s like living in a time line where no one ever wrote the story Harrison Burgeron.
I find myself referencing Diana Moon Glampers more than ever.
The handful of extremely bright may just end up skipping most of high school and go straight to STEM at university level.
Until STEM programs become so woke it will be impossible to learn anything practical without becoming complicit in the big lie.
‘Equity’ ≈ ‘lowest common denominator’
Not satisfied with screwing up most children’s education, they aim to be more inclusive in their malicious incompetence.
Though perhaps we should encourage this radical egalitarianism in education as an accelerationist evolution towards full Montessori. What could be more inclusive than all ages in the same classroom?
Harrison Bergeron
https://videa.hu/videok/nagyvilag/2081-2009-short-movie-full-kisfilm-mozi-B07R84IwGrud6oAe
‘Equity’ ≈ ‘lowest common denominator’
Or, “Equality of outcome regardless of inputs.”
I’ve enrolled my son in a Christian private school despite (1) not being Christian and (2) being a cheapskate. The decision was not easy and I’m concerned about a some of the things he will be exposed to, but crap like this that pops up nationally and locally every week only helps bolster that choice. I only wish more parents had the luxury of at least choosing the flavor of sh!t sandwich the education-industrial complex offers up.
Beyond parody. The tweeter is right, Hollywood is doomed, and as David says “leftists project”.
https://twitter.com/nayadontgiveaf/status/1407144220167606279?s=20
Beyond parody.
LOL, the confederate flag soap dispenser was a nice touch.
It was hilarious to see the Karen meme hit the stratosphere last year since it perfectly captured the spirit of our little enforcers of statist dogma. It was quickly co-opted by the black grievance mongers, of course, so Karens could safely scold one of their own sub-categories while maintaining their place atop the social hierarchy.
Yeah. You’re gonna wanna keep an eye on that Christian…”Christian” school as well there Sam. At least in the US they getting all Wokeywoke as well.
Thanks WTP, but the wokeness is the least concerning aspect of this school, hence my parting with money that should be spent on a sportscar. =)
Though one must always keep an eye on those entrusted with children’s well-being.
‘Equity’ ≈ ‘lowest common denominator’
This is completely OT but I have a real problem with the ‘lowest common denominator’ metaphor. Don’t forget that the lowest common denominator will necessarily be at least as high as the highest of the numbers that it’s divisible by.
It seems to me that ‘highest common factor’ fits the bill a lot better. But there’s obviously something about the vibe given off by the words ‘lowest’ and ‘common’ that makes ‘lowest common denominator’ sound appropriate…
Heinlein had an almost throw-away line in one of his novels, where, because those with Bachelor’s degrees earned more, everybody in California got a Bachelor’s degree.
I think it was set in one of his ‘Crazy Years’ novels.
Remember the ‘Al Gore or the Unabomber?’ quiz? How hard would it be to come up with a ‘Heinlein or Reality?’ version?
malicious incompetence.
Ms. Jennifer Katz certainly puts both elements on display when she asserts that honors programs perpetuate “systemic racism” while casually smearing the parents and students who defend them.
Malicious incompetence. Yep, that nails her contribution to the discussion.
It is not just black kids that set the bar low. You have low IQ kids of all races as well as hoodlums who simply do not want to do any work (yes, white ones too). I hung out with some back in the day. Lots of kids will not and cannot take physics or calculus in high school, therefore it all must be abolished. Just give them all a diploma at 15 and save everyone the money.
Just give them all a diploma at 15 and save everyone the money.
I’ll just leave this here, I think.
It’s like living in a time line where no one ever wrote the story Harrison Burgeron.
That must be what I was thinking of, not Gattaca. I knew there was something that I had read/heard/watched that was about forcibly making everyone equal. Equity – I am loathing that word more and more.
Just one weird data point I’ll leave here:
Child went through high school. Good school district. I sacrificed to get there.
He got A’s. He showed promise. During the end of his junior year, I started to realize just how much promise he held when Yale sent him a letter encouraging him to apply. This was a few years ago, understand, so I was much more impressed. Now, I realize they’re gaming the U.S. News ratings by seeking as many applications as possible to look exclusive.
But, still. His SAT score was 20 points below the max. His ACT score was 1 below the maximum. He took the ASVAB test the military gives, and it was so high he could have punched his own ticket.
For the next year, I worked to find a college for him. He seemed cool with it, and we went to various schools. We’re poor, but with his numbers he could get nearly a free ride, and get into a technical field that could pay well.
When we have visited the schools and made the applications, he had been accepted by a eight or nine of them, from state schools, to exclusive schools. We crunched the numbers, sought his input (he was oddly unenthusiastic, but that was his default behavior so we didn’t see it as a sign), and a school was chosen.
He lasted for less than one semester. Bombed out, at a school which prided itself on keeping kids engaged for the first school year.
Turned out he didn’t want to go to school. He did the work because he felt he had to. But once he was on his own, he stopped caring.
He’s back home now, working on a morning crew cleaning a factory. He writes computer code because he’s interested. He applied for an apprenticeship program through a union, scored high, but didn’t land one. He’s talking about going to community college and taking programming courses, and transferring to the local state school after a couple of years.
He seems happy, and that makes us happy, and while I wish he could have gone on, I’d rather he find work that he can do and will do rather than do something he hates (he knows this, too).
In the end, I wonder if genetics won out. He comes from a long line of blue-collar workers and farmers, people who go to work and when they’re done spend time doing what they want to do. I only hopes our culture will let him do that after we’re gone.
Heinlein had an almost throw-away line in one of his novels, where, because those with Bachelor’s degrees earned more, everybody in California got a Bachelor’s degree.
I think it was set in one of his ‘Crazy Years’ novels.
I’m pretty sure that was Friday.
Remember the ‘Al Gore or the Unabomber?’ quiz? How hard would it be to come up with a ‘Heinlein or Reality?’ version?
Depressingly easy, I think.
He’s talking about going to community college and taking programming courses, and transferring to the local state school after a couple of years.
All college kids have the same slate of general ed units they have to take, whether CC or University. A student may actually get better teachers at CC because they are usually actual professors rather than the Teacher’s Assistants that teach university freshmen & sophomores. And, besides it being easier to transfer to a 4 year in the junior year, there are a lot of professional/vocational careers that only want an AA prior to starting the specific program (e.g. nursing, radiological technology)
Robby Soave wrote these words:
“The board had previously eliminated the high school honors English program, and math and science will now get the ax as well.”
You purported to quote those words like this:
“The board had previously eliminated the high school honours English programme, and maths and science will now get the axe as well.”
Does your copy-and-paste function automatically add extraneous letters to American words, or do you do that manually?
…and as David says “leftists project”.
Projection, and/or reflecting life in the writers’ hamlets east of I95 and west of I5. Here in the deep South, in a tiny town, in an upper middle class neighborhood, a third – about the same as all of tiny town – of the homeowners here are black, and no one gives a good god damn, and damn near no one in the state does either. I am seriously tired of their BS notions about what goes on in real America.
Meanwhile, and totally unrelated, I am old enough to remember the topless bar at the O-Club at Ft. Benning and elsewhere, also old enough to remember when they were banned. Good news, everyone, the good times are back, for “morale, cohesion, and readiness”, don’t you know.
Does your copy-and-paste function automatically add extraneous letters to American words…?
I wish. It would save time. And having both British and American spellings in the same post would be a step too far.
And having both British and American spellings in the same post would be a step too far.
I managed to include both in my comment.
If you purport to quote something, you should quote it verbatim, not change it.
you should quote it verbatim, not change it.
This guy. Next you’ll criticize the complimentary lint hanging off the complimentary sausages I bet.
When did Americans lose the e in axe? I must be old, or read too many old British writers, or didn’t go to regular grade or high school, but I never spell axe without the e. It just looks…naked without it. Like the word forgot to put its pants on.
This whole equity business seems like it’s designed to perpetuate old racist stereotypes while pretending to be doing blacks a favor. The assumption seems to be they are too stupid to read, write, do math, show up on time, or do anything productive except for certain sports, but we can’s say that because it would be racist (which it is), but they are going to act and make policy as if those racist stereotypes are true.
These policies aren’t going to affect the wealthy of any color much – they’ll send their kids to private schools, or hire tutors to teach them at home, and it won’t affect those of any color with stable marriages/home lives who will just homeschool their kids or shuffle the budget for private schooling. I don’t see parents from competitive cultures sitting back and leaving their kids in these government daycare centers.
but they are going to act and make policy as if those racist stereotypes are true.
That.
I never spell axe without the e.
Same here.
This is how public education becomes increasingly irrelevant and any parents worth their salt find private alternatives that are still willing to educate their children.
I’m so ashamed to be a Canadian. I recall a study from some years ago one why kids leave school – while there were the typical reasons such as unstable families, lack of interest in school, bad behaviour, there were also a significant number of kids who were smart (super smart in some cases) but were just bored to tears with the curriculum, the teachers (in which the student knew more than the teacher and the teacher resented it). These were the kids that were attracted to IB, AP programs.
My niece was not a brilliant student, but smart – she was bored to tears with the regular curriculum and looked into the IB program at her high school with a focus on maths and sciences. Her guidance counsellor (the most useless position in the school) recommended against it because the homework would cut into her social life. She didn’t pay attention and was able to do the course work during her free periods in high school – rarely did she have to take work home. It gave her a huge step up at university and she graduated with a B.Sc in Computer Science and now works as a software developer for an international company. BUT she could have been one of the kids that dropped out.
“Next you’ll criticize the complimentary lint hanging off the complimentary sausages I bet.”
Oh. I’d always assumed they were just *very* large caterpillars, what with the way they move and so on.
This guy. Next you’ll criticize the complimentary lint hanging off the complimentary sausages I bet.
If he does, I’ll volunteer to set his coat on fire.
When did Americans lose the e in axe?
Start here.
When did Americans lose the e in axe?
Maybe when it turned into a verb; don’t axe me.
I never spell axe without the e.
Likewise. Although I have seen that alternate spelling on rare occasions.
Far more common in the US is “plow” instead of “plough”. The latter must surelly be the preferred English spelling, due to their fetish for the “ou” vowel combination. 🙂 More seriously, I understand that the original, medieval, pronunciation of “plough” matched that spelling.