Severely Educated

Two.
Lefties project…

Stereotype, what stereotype ?
That settles it, right?
Of course it does, Darleen.

Dianna E Anderson‏Verified account @diannaeanderson
Now now, your own insecurity about people studying gender doesn’t make it impractical or useless.

Also this.

I can’t tell if Dianna is a man or not (I’d say so because of its tweets, but I can’t tell by looking). Those hormone treatments must be getting more sophisticated.

An expert on all things erotic.
Yes, but apparently triggered by a child’s bib and pool floats that bear a passing resemblance to giant feminine hygiene products, but not so much fecal contamination at Starbucks.

Dianna E Anderson‏Verified account
Fecal matter is literally everywhere. If we’re gonna freak out about the ice, we should also freak out about the cups and the straws.

I would tell her to look up John Snow and the Broad Street pump, but I am sure as a master of gender studies, she know more than mere epidemiologists.

pool floats that bear a passing resemblance to giant feminine hygiene products,
Heh. It’s the stuff of nightmares.

What?

The rigor of Oxford’s Gender Studies
Any takers on whether by Oxford University she really means the University of Mississippi at Oxford gender studies ?

…if we disagree and prefer to choose our own partners, then we’re “upholding violent norms.”
I suppose it would be best for everyone if the Ministry of Gender Recognition and Reconciliation (MiniRec?) assigned our partners…
Note to “woke” lefist social justice warriors: Nineteen Eighty-Four was intended as a dire warning, not as an instruction manual.

That’s strange–the blood usually gets off at the 2nd floor.

Perhaps every male who identifies as “liberal” should be compelled to date a trans person, whether pre-op, post-op, or even tran-curious (if there is such a classification).
And yes, they have to put out. They’re down with the cause, aren’t they?
This way, liberal men get to parade their virtue and we get to point and laugh at them. Win/win.

I actually have a Master’s in gender studies from Oxford University.
Know your place.

If we can find 50 of those giant panty liners we may still have a chance to spare the upholstery.
The mystery of where all that blood is coming from appears to have been solved.

The mystery of where all that blood is coming from appears to have been solved.
Time for wine, I think.

What if upholding violent norms is what I find sexually arrousing? Are they not then obligated to engage in the behavior I desire? What would be a greater display of wokeness than tossing all their orthodoxy aside in order to broaden their horizons?
I mean, not Lander Lunar or whatever that amorphous non-bicycling mass is calling kerself. But surely somewhere in all the Gander Stammering courses out there there’s a chick I wouldn’t mind forcing to clean the kitchen floor before we have intercourse on it.
Doesn’t she owe it to me, and to herself, to experiment?

@Pogonip, and hideously O/T (sorry!)
Check out loratadine for hayfever. Works a treat for me, and it’s cheap.

Ask her whether she needs to check her privilege when talking to a trans-woman. I can’t say for sure what the response would be but there should be some mileage in it.
I’d do it myself but I seem to be blocked

I actually have a Master’s in gender studies from Oxford University.
Is that better or worse than a Master’s in astrology?

Is that better or worse than a Master’s in astrology?
Astrology: pseudoscience; centuries old and practiced world wide since ancient times; ardent believers are often made broke and/or miserable by practitioners; practice, however, can also provide hours of amusement at county fairs and a semi-honest living for practitioners; practitioners must have at least a rudimentary knowledge of celestial bodies and astronomy, a real science.
Gender Studies: pseudoscience; fairly new affectation exclusively of affluent western countries; ardent believers must by default be miserable and their affectations hinders gainful employment; practice provides amusement for normal people, although in the manner of geek shows of late, and practitioners rarely make honest livings but instead are wards of state run academies; knowledge of actual science is a disqualifier.
Advantage: astrology.

A John Thomas is an ornery beast, and does not take orders well. Appeals based on social justice concerns will almost certainly be futile.

And yes, they have to put out. They’re down with the cause, aren’t they?
I know several heterosexual women who dated other women in university and called themselves lesbians because they thought they had to to be considered good feminists.
Poe’s Law strikes again.
As I recall, at some point in Lefties: Angry Wimmin there is a lesbian recalling straight women announcing to her that she is required to sleep with them for the political benefits . . . with her reaction being something to the effect of Ah . . . No.

When responding to this creature it would be wise to keep in mind the old wisdom: ” Never try to teach a pig to sing, it wastes your time and annoys the pig”.

Slightly off topic, but still under the broad theme of leftist mentalism, why Cash in the Attic makes you a Nazi (h/t someone called Emma Pickens on twitter):
https://www.theguardian.com/global/commentisfree/2017/jul/03/why-labour-must-understand-older-people-daytime-television

A John Thomas is an ornery beast, and does not take orders well. Appeals based on social justice concerns will almost certainly be futile.
Well, as with Zinnia Jones in the previous thread, there’s a witless conceitedness. And hence the notion that people can be scolded into having the kind of sex approved of by dogmatic pinheads.
Being severely educated, Ms Anderson is happy, indeed eager, to patronise men, in ways that are wildly incoherent, and to imply that we as a class don’t know our own minds, even on matters of sexual appetite – presumably because, unlike her, few of us have degrees in gender studies. And she does this while invoking “toxic masculinity” in a glib, sweeping and condescending way. The kind of dismissal that, if aimed at women, would presumably leave her indignant. But insulting half the population and implying that they need fixing by their betters – people armed with degrees in gender studies – is, it seems, a perfectly righteous and uncontroversial thing to do, at least in her circles.
And when the inevitable blowback occurs, whether in the form of mockery or pithy logic, and while hastily blocking or ignoring anyone voicing a substantive rebuttal, and while ignoring transgender people who find her claims embarrassing and absurd, Ms Anderson somehow manages to construe each and every reply as a form of both personal and political validation.

That! 🙂
I wonder if it occurs to Ms Anderson and her fellow scolds that their vicarious online ‘activism’ may often be unhelpful to the people they claim to champion, and may actually lead people to assume that all transgender people, on whose behalf they claim to speak, must be equally absurd in their demands. Does it ever occur to our self-appointed chastising class that there may be quite a few transgender people, perhaps a majority, who find such demands a bizarre distortion of their own expectations and preferences?