Elsewhere (238)
Kyle Smith on what happens when you question the accuracy of a race-activist theatre production:
Steppenwolf Theatre Company charged [critic Hedy Weiss] with “deep-seated bigotry.” An actor named Bear Bellinger announced that he would not perform if Weiss showed up at a workshop production he was appearing in. An ad hoc coalition that might as well have dubbed itself the Blackball Hedy Movement (but is actually called the Chicago Theatre Accountability Coalition) launched a petition via change.org to organise the theatre world of Chicago against Weiss by denying her invitations to its plays. Several theatre organisations have publicly agreed to join the blackballing effort, and dozens have offered noncommittal statements of support. The group’s broadside against Weiss reads, “Over the last few years especially, we have joined together to make it clear that inappropriate language or behaviour does not have a place within our community, and that prejudice of any kind will not stand.”
I’ll let you find out for yourselves what was deemed to constitute “bigotry” and “inappropriate language.”
Tim Newman spots a pattern:
I suppose Nigeria and the UK are not the only countries where the wealthy and privileged get together and pretend they’re on the side of the downtrodden masses, but I am nevertheless surprised at how universal such delusions are.
Jim Goad catalogues more examples of leftist high-mindedness:
It happened amid an insane cultural climate where the day before James Hodgkinson’s rampage, a black male shooter in Indianapolis fired at a truck that was flying a “Make America Great Again” flag. Where on June 11, the Huffington Post ran an article that openly called for Donald Trump and “everyone assisting in his agenda” to be tried for treason and publicly executed. Where a successful TV producer can encourage Trump-haters to “pick up a goddamn brick,” and he doesn’t get fired. Where a college professor says that Republicans “should be lined up and shot,” and he doesn’t get fired, either… A climate where the left is so egregiously insane and bloodthirsty — all in the name of compassion, of course — that the incomparably wormy Jesse Benn, who has previously called for “white wounding” and for violence against Trump supporters, saw no problem with a fellow traveller “shooting a racist lawmaker in the hip” last Wednesday. It’s a climate where, after the shooting, an obese New Jersey Democrat openly calls for the murder of Republicans with the hashtags #HuntRepublicans and #HuntRepublicanCongressmen.
Oh, and trans activist and self-declared “insatiable researcher” Zinnia Jones struggles to apprehend certain aspects of reality:
Pretty sure they were trying to keep them from jumping.
As usual, feel free to share your own links and snippets, on any subject, in the comments.
The solution is in the article. She should go to every Steppenwolf performance with a bag of candies, unwrapping them throughout the show, belching loudly as she does so.
Pretty sure they were trying to keep them from jumping.
I was pretty sure ‘Zinnia Jones’ had to be a parody account.
I was wrong.
I was pretty sure ‘Zinnia Jones’ had to be a parody account. I was wrong.
Mythbusters’ Adam Savage often used the catchphrase, “I reject your reality and substitute my own.” I’m not sure whether this was meant to suggest edginess or self-mockery. But embraced as a philosophy, you can, and often do, end up with people like Zinnia Jones.
I’ll let you find out for yourselves what was deemed to constitute “bigotry” and “inappropriate language.”
Shut up, they explained.
Shut up, they explained.
Or, “If you say we rely on cartoonish and misleading arguments we will target you with cartoonish and misleading arguments.”
inappropriate language
Anything we disagree with.
Pretty sure they were trying to keep them from jumping.
From the twitter thread linked above, the stages of “social justice” wokeness:
“It isn’t a sadistic execution of people for being gay. It’s an entirely voluntary bungee-jumping mishap.”
Jim Goad catalogues more examples of leftist high-mindedness:
IOW, the left is reverting to form as it did in Russia, East Germany, North Korea, Cuba, China, Cambodia, and everywhere else they set up shop.
Hey, Zinnia Jones is giving Laurie Penny a real fight for Stupid Twat of the Year, you must admit.
“Gay people being thrown off of buildings? None of my precious concern!”
She’d probably stick her fingers in her ears whilst singing, “lalala,” were a living witness try to tell her about the executions.
Perception is reality. Mental health professionals have been trying to tell you objectivists (had to look that word up as I was afraid its definition may have changed) this for 30-40 years now. You just don’t get it.
Calling out Christian homophobia: ultra-courageous.
Calling out Muslim homophobia: ultra-bigoted.
What a morally wicked double standard.
Kyle Smith on what happens when you question the accuracy of a race-activist theatre production
The obvious solution is to not waste your time reviewing race-activist theatre productions.
Oh, and trans activist and self-declared “insatiable researcher” Zinnia Jones struggles to apprehend certain aspects of reality:
To revisit a topic previously touched upon, Zinnia has other aspects of reality he refuses to accept.
“Incredible numbers” attracted to women’s Johnsons. OK, sure. Personally I think any number greater than zero should be incredible, but there is always Rule 34.
Zinnia Jones, another cosplaying male railing at how hatey hatey straight men are for not wanting to have sex with him.
And is there some sort of dress code for these Victim Olympics participants?
Machete-chopped & dyed hair – check
Prominent tattoos – check
Black frame hipster glasses – check
Posing for photos with “ironic pout” – check
otry and Esperanto, respectively.
Taken in sum, I find that mental illness is widespread. Has it always been this prevalent or is it simply being manifesting itself more due to social media? Is there a cause/effect at work?
I also don’t believe the blanket claim of “straight men don’t want to be with someone who has a dick!”
If that someone is as ugly as Zinnia Jones is, I can believe it…
Being exclusionary of trans women partners should be an outlier and marginal position for straight men, not some commonplace expectation
I wonder if it occurs to activists like Zinnia Jones that acceptance of their trans nature – which I think of as an unfortunate developmental glitch, a copying error – is not necessarily helped by public fantasies about how vast swathes of humanity should, and secretly must, find them erotically magnetic. I mean, given a few moments to adjust and get past the inherent surrealism, I like to think I could interact with a trans person as I would anyone else, with civility and as an individual. But I doubt I could cope with the kind of dogmatic and self-flattering conspiracy theories seen above. That would be a much bigger ask.
Is there a cause/effect at work?
Social media is but one contributor (clearly, the lives of too many people are devoid of productive, meaningful, activity). Declining educational standards are another factor. Also fashion: being part of the “in crowd” has always had appeal. I’m not sure if this means mental illness is more widespread, or just that brain-dead blabbermouths now have more of a public platform.
Has it always been this prevalent or is it simply being manifesting itself more due to social media? Is there a cause/effect at work?
It appears more prevalent due to a few factors. The incidence appears to have increased, and social media is indeed a large part of that as it allows easy and wide spread self reporting, which in turn leads to the second order effect of band wagoning, which also increases both incidence and prevalence. This then raises the question of what part of both the incidence and prevalence are real, what is not really “gender dysphoria”, but merely attention seeking behavior as part of a personality or mood disorder, and what is pure faddishness. Regarding the latter items, the number of these cases are no doubt inflated by the contortions of late turning these people into “heroes”, e.g. Bruce Jenner named “Woman of the Year”, and both widespread social acceptance (in the West) and “trans” hucksterism.
I like to think I could interact with a trans person as I would anyone else, with civility and as an individual
I’ve actually gotten along nicely with a lot of people who, on certain subjects, I very much disagree with.
I find activists of any belief system who obsess on it to the point of being in my face about it, rude. Not to say I won’t discuss things politely, but when I say “no, thank you” and close the door, they should take the hint not attempt to pound the door.
Agree to disagree and MOVE ON.
Being exclusionary of trans women partners
Despite what the whinging Twitterati say, people are still free to make their own decisions! Choosing a partner is a very personal thing, not something to be done by quota and edict.
Choosing a partner is a very personal thing, not something to be done by quota and edict.
Bigot.
The far left has become so steeped in postmodernism that they have come to believe that everything — even reality — is subservient to political ideology.
Taken in sum, I find that mental illness is widespread. Has it always been this prevalent or is it simply being manifesting itself more due to social media?
I see it as a function of a society capable of generating such enormous wealth that there exist sufficient resources to indulge counterproductive, resource sucking stupidity. Which is the underpinning of the above explanations of social media, bandwagoning, etc. I fear that this idoicy will continue until we reach some market clearing point of Darwinian truth and a hard rain falls. Perhaps I’m just being optimistic.
Darleen, they do all look alike, don’t they?
I’m so old I remember when freak shows were deemed improper (forcing several hundred actual freaks out of circus employment).
“Some observations about death and dying.”
Crossposted from my response to that twitter thread: “There will probably be a few people to keep @ZJemptv from jumping off a building in the same way.”
“what part of both the incidence and prevalence are real”
Add to Farnsworth’s:
– people ridiculing ‘x’ , but who are taken seriously (Poe’s Law)
– people seeking to scandalize (agent provocateurs of malicious intent or just assholes). Which of course just diminishes public concern for people with non-phony issues
Evergreen – Mao’s Cultural Revolution among the pines…
Let the count down to calls for the doctor’s death begin.
http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/johns-hopkins-psychiatrist-transgendered-men-dont-become-women-they-become
Weinstein asked for an opportunity to defend himself, he was told that a faculty meeting was not the appropriate venue for such a defence. When he asked what the appropriate venue was, he was told that no such venue existed because he was a racist.
It does rather clarify one of the basic dilemmas of dealing with such people. Assuming the good faith of one’s accuser and then trying earnestly to avoid the accusation of racism (or whatever the sin may be), hoping to convince them, is ultimately a mistake, a waste of time and energy. There is no argument one could make, and no history of approved pieties that one could point to, that will alter the predestined outcome. Whatever you do, however many contortions you perform, they will slander you anyway, repeatedly and unfairly, because they wish to do you psychological harm.
Even-handedness and honesty pale in comparison with the thrill of malice.
See also Laurie Penny. “Where’s the harm?” says she.
Meanwhile, back in the mental wonderland of Zinnia Jones.
The Secret Teacher, in the Guardian.
This is about more than education. With our politics increasingly polarised, it saddens me to see my students being initiated – deliberately or not – into an essentially Manichaean view of politics, with a checklist of “goodies” (leftists, trade unions, Corbyn) and “baddies” (Tories, Brexiteers, anyone who uses the phrase British values without irony).
From Deborah’s link:
“But gird your loins if you would confront this matter,” warned Dr. McHugh. “Hell hath no fury like a vested interest masquerading as a moral principle.”
A mid-season contender for “Quote Of The Year”? Get your hands in your pockets, everyone- I am sure that Dr. McHugh would appreciate a bottle of fine single malt and a box of cigars.
Re: ‘Secret Teacher’
“I do not think it is unreasonable for teachers to share their political views,”
There’s your problem.
There’s your problem.
Again, note the implied vanity. Setting aside the assumed right of leftist educators to “share” their political preferences in class, it seems to me that if pupils can guess your political views with any degree of reliability, you may be falling short of the professional ideal.
Quite.
I’m at a loss to understand why the person teaching Maths, English, Geography, or even History should feel the need to ‘share’ their political views at all. If teachers can’t see this, and they obviously can’t, then it seems like all is lost – which it probably is but in the words of Alfred E. Neumann, Mad Magazine mascot, “What, me worry?”
There’s your problem.
Indeed- even though he/she was aiming to be conciliatory (I think), there was still far too much of the usual question-begging throughout. Some of the BTL comments are interesting, however and it seems to me that maybe, just maybe, even Guardianistas have begun to tire of the incessant spouting of bile. Hope springs eternal, and all that.
Possibly because Guardiansistas are socialists of the sandal-wearing tofu munching variety, surprised that they have spawned socialists of the red book waving car burning variety?
From way back in the archives, this seems apposite:
Nine years later, I doubt anyone could credibly claim that the situation has improved.
Apropos Evergreen and Prof. Weinstein, my initial thought was that he was likely to be a typical left-wing academic, possibly a Marxist, and therefore one of the agents of his own fate.
This was both wrong and unfair. In conversation with Gad Saad (see below) he comes over as not only a very decent fellow but a teacher at whose feet anyone learning biology would be eager to sit (I trained as a biologist myself and understood nearly all the technical stuff in the conversation). Yes, he leans further to the left than I myself deem sensible, but no, he is not interested in indoctrinating young people with communism, and his negative opinion of post-modernism is born of his commitment to science.
The students at Evergreen who have forced him out are not just bullies but idiots, and in a way pitiable for that.
One incidental but salient fact emerging from those videos is that Jordan Peterson has made a ton of money (presumably from YouTube) since taking his stand – which, no doubt, now makes him independent of the University of Toronto.
The Saad/Weinstein talk is in two parts:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWwm_xEwn1c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqQspXOvcB0
Meanwhile, back in the mental wonderland of Zinnia Jones.
He finds himself with lots of company in wonderland, it appears. NHS doctors support uterus transplants.
No, not woman to woman, that would almost make sense, woman to transwoman, AKA, a man.
Yes of course they do.
Yeah, speaking from personal experience, I am not seeing single men lining up to get pregnant.
Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. Kidney, liver, lung, heart transplants are all fairly straightforward as you are swapping one part for another. All the necessary vasculature, nerve supply, and support structures already exist. None of that is present sticking a uterus into a man, and even if we get past that issue by rerouting and grafting arteries, veins, and what not, there is still the issue of anti-rejection drugs, none of which are exactly what one would call good for fetal development, nor are feminizing hormone treatments for “transwomen” which would have to be stopped for the duration of the pregnancy (as is the case for “transmen” who have become pregnant).
The whole thing is another solution in search of a problem that diverts resources from real problems. The real question is how and why this whole “trans” thing has spiraled out of control in such a short time frame.
Farnsworth,
Let us not forget the child that issues forth from this Mengelesian nightmare. Ol’ Josef must be spinning that he didn’t think this nightmare up himself.
mental
Wha…? 4Chan /b/ Twitter invasion?
wonderland
Ah, the “okay” hand sign thing. 4Chan wins again. The Left are such gullible rubes.
Freberg’s students later admitted they’d known she was a “closet Republican” precisely because she didn’t use the classroom to air her political views.
Same thing happens with social media- when someone’s Facebook profile isn’t littered with links to Moonbat or Toynbee articles, shouty-bollocks stuff from “Another Angry Voice”, snippets of “wisdom” from Noahm Chomsky with the endorsement”Yes, Noamh”, or pictures of Michael Gove looking gormless then chances are they’re anything but a Leftie.
Incidentally, following an avalanche of derision, Zinnia Jones has attempted to clarify her remarks by conceding that “it could be either,” i.e., the images and videos could be sadistic murder by Islamic zealots, or it could be benign jihadis merely trying to hug suicidal gay people. With stones and rope. This has alternated with the claim that she’s heroically trying to spare All Muslims Everywhere™ by dismissing any unflattering impressions of the Muhammadan religion.
the claim that she’s heroically trying to spare All Muslims Everywhere™ by dismissing any unflattering impressions of the Muhammadan religion.
There’s a job that’ll never end.
It could lead others to demand transplants, including straight men, ‘allowing for couples to jointly share the reproductive burdens and joys of pregnancy’. And she says: ‘Homosexual couples may also wish to procreate in this fashion, while single men may opt for it to avoid surrogacy.’
Again, stupidity like this does not occur in nature. It must be synthesized through a process called “education”.
Also…not of the medical persuasion nor biologically inclined but I seem to recall something about people with XX chromosomes having wider hips/skeletal structure to accommodate child birth. People with XY chromosomes would lack the proper framework. Typing this out, I’m guessing what…C-sections all around?