She Wishes to Educate Us

Dear intersectional feminists, redefining all the words ≠ winning the argument.

Preferring women with long hair is sexist?

Where are their hands?
Hands are hard to draw.

“It isn’t bad when we do it.”
All of their sophistry and wriggling boils down to this.

nonetheless insists that “culture hates women” and that “men as a structure, men as a group hate women.”
Not women, just her.

Note that, so far, almost all of the retweets are gushingly positive.

“If you have always believed that everyone should play by the same rules and be judged by the same standards, that would have gotten you labeled a radical 50 years ago, a liberal 25 years ago and a racist today.” Thomas Sowell on the money, there.

This is real racism (/anti-intellectualism): http://gizmodo.com/this-teenager-was-arrested-for-making-a-clock-his-teach-1730977157
But you don’t fight it with passive-aggressive cartoons, you fight it by firing everyone involved.

“Jesus loves the little children of the world.”
We sang a similar one in primary school with the chorus:
If you want to paint a picture of everyone/you need every colour under the sun.
A lot has changed since then though. Sadly these days it’s more likely to be:
If you want to paint a picture of everyone/you’re disrespecting Muslims by flagrantly flouting Islamic idolatry laws.

It’s not racism when people of colour are prejudiced against white people.
Don’t underestimate the power of stupid statements to be eagerly accepted by the masses.
Anything that justifies not engaging in self-examination is like free candy: good luck persuading people to reject it because it will spoil their dinner. Soul. Whatever.

Geez, look at all the amputees Allie has drawn….
Girl can’t draw hands so I’m glad “comic artist” is in scare quotes.
And here I thought Ted Rall was the worst self-described “cartoonist” …

Don’t underestimate the power of stupid statements to be eagerly accepted by the masses.
“The uncontested absurdities of today, become the slogans of tomorrow.”

dinosaurs
I prefer the term hater. Or shitlord, at a push.

God, self-righteous AND a bad artist. She needs a big government grant, STAT!

Where are their hands?
Hands are hard to draw.
That joke is deeply offensive to the Amputee community, Mr. Gutter-mouth. I for one salute this brave young woman for her refusal to kneel to abled prejudices.

Meanwhile, in the Guardian:

The early capitalists once had to breathe the air that they polluted in pursuit of their wealth. Now, perhaps, they can escape it by leaving the planet.

The author of this fearsome insight is Jess Zimmerman, she of the unbecoming hair. Ms Zimmerman describes herself to readers as a “misandrist of note,” one whose interests include “metaphors, misandry and cogent cultural analysis.” (On Twitter she describes herself as a “misandrist witch” and “angry for a living.”)

And on a not entirely unrelated note, Tim Blair ponders the ruminations of leftwing “essayist” Elizabeth Farrelly:

Never have we been more in need of engaged, operational femaleness. Never has it been more necessary for receptive feminine thinking to poultice a planet ravaged by projectile maleness… Only a new religion can reinvent the paradigm.

“Ravaged by projectile maleness.”

It’s interesting how she and George Monbiot both seem keen to embrace a new religious fundamentalism to further their aims. Which is only odd in that I’d assumed they already had done.

Goolge image search “projectile maleness” turns up some interesting stuff
Colonised woman (SFW)
Flavour text:
In this state, we are colonised, occupied in every sense: men occupy us totally, it is a totalitarian regime in every possible aspect.

Hmm.
My granddad had to struggle against the people locking him up in a Nazi concentration camp but he is lucky he didn’t have to struggle against white privilege I suppose.

re Sexbots: Sheesh….It would seem to me that anything done through completely voluntary and noninvasive means to lessen the chances of corrupting the gene pool with the kind of people whose desires are fulfilled through sex with a robot would be a good thing. And this is a concern of people who don’t like the attention of men to begin with? Methinks she doth protest too much.

We laugh at them, we shake our heads in disbelief at their idiocy and blatant hypocrisy . . .
. . . but they’re winning. They are the ones who educate our children. They are the ones who make and break people’s careers based on Twitter comments. They are the ones who control the discourse of our society.
It’s all very well to laugh at the sillies with their silly uniforms and their silly armbands and their leader with the silly mustache, until you hear a knock on the door at night and realize nobody thinks they’re silly any more.

thank you
Welcome aboard, Deborah. Help yourself to liquor and nibbles.

. . . but they’re winning.
Indeed. And they’re winning because they fight dirty and fight relentlessly. From that same Sultan Knish article quoted by PiperPaul:

The left will destroy the things you care about, because you care about them. It will destroy them because that gives them power over you. It will destroy them because these things stand in the way of its power. It will destroy them because a good deal of its militant activists need things to destroy and if they can’t attack you, they’ll turn on the left in a frenzy of ideologically incestuous purges.

They are a swarm of devouring locusts, the nightmarish horde of nanobots that consumes everything in its path while reproducing exponentially with what it consumes.
Is it possible to stop such a determined, innumerate, mindless force? I really don’t know. I can resist assimilation into their mindset, but as for stopping them devouring the Republic, I am at a total loss.
Locusts move on when there’s nothing left to eat. How devastated must we be before there’s nothing left to destroy?
What might stop the Left is Muslim conquest: the only force currently more brutal, more numerous, and more determined than they to annihilate the West and salt its earth.

Is it possible to stop such a determined, innumerate, mindless force?
There’s always serendipity.

“Is it possible to stop such a determined, innumerate, mindless force?”
It is always comforting to remind oneself that all the alpha males are on the right.

Oh, that Witchwind person is just plain nuts, the poor thing. And Charlotte Proudman–I can’t be the only person who thinks she looks like a pudding that wears lipstick, can I?

This is real racism (/anti-intellectualism): http://gizmodo.com/this-teenager-was-arrested-for-making-a-clock-his-teach-1730977157
But you don’t fight it with passive-aggressive cartoons, you fight it by firing everyone involved.
Posted by: Simon | September 16, 2015 at 15:15
David:
But you don’t fight it with passive-aggressive cartoons, you fight it by firing everyone involved.
Blimey. I don’t know about racism, but there’s certainly a generous helping of dumb. It’s almost – almost – funny. Though not, I think, amusing for young Mr Mohamed.

Something smelled funny about this “inventing a clock” story and it is now coming out. After, of course, invitations to the White House, Mark Zuckerberg, and MIT. There was no “inventing”. It’s a disassembled cheap digital clock thrown into a case. As usual the real overreaction is the overreaction to the slight-yet-justifiable intial overreaction. That his father has twice run for president of one of the most f’d up muslim countries in the world (Sudan), of course is completely irrelevant. The intent being…?
http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2015/09/17/reverse-engineering-ahmed-mohameds-clock-and-ourselves/