They’re Having A Cultural Moment
“I’ve had people saying to me, ‘You just want to fuck about!’” says 29-year-old Calum James, who identifies as a heteroflexible pansexual solo polyamorous relationship anarchist.
Tim Newman is reading the Guardian.
“I’ve had people saying to me, ‘You just want to fuck about!’” says 29-year-old Calum James, who identifies as a heteroflexible pansexual solo polyamorous relationship anarchist.
29-year-old Calum James, who identifies as a heteroflexible pansexual solo polyamorous relationship anarchist.
Solo polyamorous?
Solo polyamorous?
Ah, but Mr James, our “relationship anarchist,” regards any intimate relationship, were he to actually have one, theoretically, as being “no more important” than any other kind of relationship – say, with friends, colleagues, fellow bus passengers, etc. Because these things are, we’re told, “the same.” And somehow, amazingly, this chap isn’t surrounded by adoring, devoted women (or indeed devoted men) and instead remains single. And spends his evenings defining himself.
I’m reminded of Laurie Penny, who boasted that, being so radically polyamorous, any suitors she might have are of no more importance than her collection of books.
Calum James, who identifies as a heteroflexible pansexual solo polyamorous relationship anarchist.
Is the Grauniad trolling its own readers now?
29-year-old Calum James, who identifies as a heteroflexible pansexual solo polyamorous relationship anarchist.
That’s an awfully long-winded way of saying “pretentious wanker”.
Is the Grauniad trolling its own readers now?
Given the default level of absurdity, I’m not sure how we’d know.
solo polyamorous
Ambidextrous.
Now, now Arthur!
🙂
No idea what that little snippet means but the inclusion of solo makes it sound like he can’t get laid.
No idea what that little snippet means but the inclusion of solo makes it sound like he can’t get laid.
I think he’s letting us know that he’s much more complicated and fascinating than we are.
At some point, these people will wake up one morning and realize they’re 50+ years old and are likely to die alone. Will The Guardian be coming around to do the “These People Discovered There’s No Such Thing as Perpetual Adolescence” follow-ups?
Chiara Giovanni, 24, is in a relationship with two people. Her partner Aditya Sharad, 23, is monogamous
I’d note that even you think you’re being monogamous, if your partner is not, then you’re fooling around with more than one person, by proxy. And with whoever they’re fooling around with.
solo polyamorous relationship anarchist.
Talk about fishing without bait…
Talk about fishing without bait…
That’s the thing, I suppose. It’s not just the gratuitously complicated arrangements and the likelihood of jealousy, insecurity, resentment, etc. It’s also the fact that polyamory seems to attract exactly the kinds of people you’d do well to avoid.
That’s the thing, I suppose…you’d do well to avoid…
The world should be grateful to the polys. The more partners entwined together in a melange of disordered personalities, the less there are hanging about waiting to screw up people who want normal relationships.
The world should be grateful to the polys. The more partners entwined together in a melange of disordered personalities, the less there are hanging about waiting to screw up people who want normal relationships.
That’s all well and good until one of them gets an STD and spreads it around the whole group instantly.
“What I love about polyamory is that I’m my own person and no one owns me. I don’t own any of you, either. We’re all free.”
Pretentious bullsh*t that was old in the 1960’s.
I second Captain Nemo. Pretentious wanker indeed!
And they all have to announce and tell everybody about it. I wish they’d just be themselves, whatever that is today, and leave the rest of us out of it. But nooooo.
It’s almost like that long-winded word salad of a title is just daring someone to get fed up with the whole bit and roll their eyes or something, so that the pretentious wanker can then scream “BIGOT! Something something soothing-phobe -ist!!” in self righteous, spittle-flecked rage.
I swear, the Graun (or any number of online “publications”) reminds me of the old adverts for a brand of cassette tapes: “Is it live, or is it Memorex?” Except in these cases, it’s more like, “Is this real, or is it a Poe?”
(Starting to feel old now, for some reason. I’ll just have another drink, barman.)
[ Slides bizarrely elaborate cocktail along bar, followed by a curly straw. ]
Slides bizarrely elaborate cocktail along bar, followed by a curly straw
Good thing this establishment isn’t in California, or our proprietor would be in the dock already.
Don’t worry, the straws are ivory, not plastic.
who identifies as a heteroflexible pansexual solo polyamorous relationship anarchist.
But in fact his true identity is me me me me me me.
Calum James, who identifies as a heteroflexible pansexual solo polyamorous relationship anarchist.
Is the Grauniad trolling its own readers now?
Poe’s law is an adage of Internet culture stating that, without a clear indicator of the author’s intent, it is impossible to create a parody of extreme views so obviously exaggerated that it cannot be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of the parodied views.
Or “James is insecure and indecisive. He has trouble settling down in a secure relationship with persons of the opposite sex. He lacks self-insight and uses intellectualization to hide from his anxieties.”
They’re gleefully sawing off the branch of the tree they are sitting on.
“I’ve had people saying to me, ‘You just want to fuck about!’”
And they would be right!
Mr. James’ dating profile has been found:
Me: Polyamorist incel.
You: Not important.
You: Not important.
The claims of uniquely deep and meaningful relationships, supposedly arrived at via polyamory, don’t sit terribly well with the signature narcissism and selfishness, or the simultaneous claims of being “free” from conventional intimacies, which are, we’re told, burdensome and “no more important” than relationships with workmates or neighbours.
It sounds like a repertoire of shifting rationalisations.
“… who identifies as a heteroflexible pansexual solo polyamorous relationship anarchist.”
Well, that’s nice for him.
“Will The Guardian be coming around to do the “These People Discovered There’s No Such Thing as Perpetual Adolescence” follow-ups?”
But they won’t come to that realisation. It’ll be everyone else’s fault, as usual.
“Pretentious bullsh*t that was old in the 1960’s.”
The 1920s, more like.
Good thing this establishment isn’t in California, or our proprietor would be in the dock already
Oh, banning straws in the US is so last month.
This month the insane group-think zealot crowd is trying to ban Brett Kavanaugh.
The claims of uniquely deep and meaningful relationships, supposedly arrived at via polyamory…
I once knew a boots-and-jeans-wearing lesbian who would talk about her one night stands. She’d pick a woman up in a bar, take her home for sex and never see her again. She insisted, between drags on her cigarette, that these were deep and meaningful interactions.
The claims of uniquely deep and meaningful relationships, supposedly arrived at via polyamory, don’t sit terribly well with the signature narcissism and selfishness
As a general rule, if you tune out what people say and pay attention to what they actually do, you won’t be distracted by their excuses and rationalizations.
I second Captain Nemo.
Barkeep, a drink for the lady. This one’s on me.
I’m with Daniel on this one. Watch what they do. What they say isn’t any guide at all.
I’ve got a friend that votes Green, but flies around the world every year. It’s no use arguing with him about it — his conscience is clear.
He lacks self-insight and uses intellectualization to hide from his anxieties
Dinsdale?
This one’s on me.
One crushed ice and Night Nurse coming up.
Chester, don’t his arms get tired? 😊
‘Away from the footy field and on the handball court, Mouncey said, she is just like everyone else.’
Somewhat related, although Mr Mouncey isn’t like everybody else. Being 6 2 and 100kgs on the footy field with petite young lasses sort of makes you stand out on the ground. So much so that Mr Mouncey was ruled ineligible for the women’s football. Back to handball for Mr Mouncey. With the ladies of course.
https://www.google.com.au/amp/amp.abc.net.au/article/9801956