Great Subtlety of Mind
Our new guardians of morality flex their mental muscles:
University of Iowa (UI) students, faculty, and administrators are speaking out in support of the censorship of a statue created and displayed on campus by visiting professor Serhat Tanyolacar that they say constitutes “hate speech.” Tanyolacar’s piece comprised a seven foot tall sculpture of a Ku Klux Klan member whose robes are crafted from newspaper articles about racial violence. Many members of the UI community, however, ignored the intended anti-racist message of the piece and instead demanded that the university take action against what they perceive as a racist display — and the university is complying.
The statue, which survived unmolested for a mere four hours, can be seen here. Yes, it’s crummy, but not, I think, a basis for fainting with rage.
Tanyolacar erected the statue last week on an area of campus called the Pentacrest with hopes to “facilitate a dialogue with a community on a college campus,” responding to the controversy over the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. But students judged the piece to be racist and offensive, and within hours, university police instructed Tanyolacar to take his piece down.
The article, by Susan Kruth, notes the similarity with a bizarre and sorry episode from 2008, in which a janitor and part-time student named Keith John Sampson was found guilty of “extremely poor judgment” and “racial harassment” – and threatened with “serious disciplinary action” – for quietly reading a history book in his own time. The book in question, which is available in the university’s own library, is an account of a notable defeat of the Ku Klux Klan in 1924. If Mr Sampson’s treatment by the university’s Affirmative Action Office doesn’t sound sufficiently Kafkaesque – a reminder that the absurd and the sinister aren’t mutually exclusive – take a few minutes to watch the video. If it makes you a little angry, maybe that’s no bad thing. And remember, these are the mental horizons of our self-imagined betters. A model for us all.
Update:
More on the farce at the University of Iowa from Elizabeth Nolan Brown at Reason:
David Ryfe, director of UI’s School of Journalism and Mass Communication, has different ideas, however. “If it was up to me, and me alone,” he told The Daily Iowan, “I would follow the lead of every European nation and ban this type of speech.”
By “speech” Mr Ryfe presumably means Professor Tanyolacar’s unimpressive artwork – and by implication any number of other things that he may find uncongenial. And note, this is the view of the director of the university’s journalism school.
Update 2:
The psychodrama rumbles on unimpeded by reality or a sense of proportion. Apparently, students and faculty aren’t feeling “respected and safe.” Some are “traumatised.” Because of all the art. The campus is now abuzz with pretentious apologies, meetings, demands for more committees, more meetings, a “detailed plan of action” and enhanced sensitivity training. Counselling is of course being offered to “anyone negatively affected by the incident.”
Counselling is of course being offered to “anyone negatively affected by the incident.”
Nice little earner there for the counsellers. Of course to ensure full employment they need a continuous supply of emotional cripples which the administrative invertebrates will be happy to create.
The emotionally incontinent … Jack Monroe is presumably no longer poor
Theophrastus,
And in addition to her living arrangements, there are the various articles for The Guardian and Huff Po and others she writes for, a book contract with Penguin and (at one time at least) a publicity deal with Sainsbury’s …
Yes, I think it’s safe to say that this latter day Oliver Twist has been safely removed from the depths and delivered into the loving embrace of a thoroughly bourgeois Metropolitan lifestyle.
Though on the reasonable assumption that she is someone who thoroughly disapproves of said bourgeois Metropolitan lifestyle on moral grounds, tears and trauma from it all must surely be just around the corner.
I wonder who long we will have to wait before she starts penning articles entitled:
Preparing avocado and walnut canapés for dinner parties has left me unable to open my own front door
or
Interviewing Romanian nannies for my son has left me unable to open my own front door
From Elizabeth Nolan Brown’s piece:
… this case provides a good reference point for why we shouldn’t curtail freedom of expression even when it comes from despicable groups like the Klu Klux Klan.
I find so very often that this is the heart of the matter and that it is always completely missed – whether through ignorance, accident or design – by the ever-swelling ranks of the Totalitarian Left.
More than once now, I have tried to make a very similar argument (online) with supporters of the No More Page Three campaign, when they have been attempting to force local authorities to remove The Sun newspaper from the periodicals section of public libraries.
I don’t read The Sun but I find this campaign to be so wrong-headed and in so many ways that it’s almost hard to know where to start. But the suggestion that The Sun ought to be removed from library shelves because of the continued presence of a naked woman on page 3 (i.e. inside the paper, not on the front cover) immediately runs into the problem of the campaigners being hoist by their own petard – yet they refuse to even acknowledge this seemingly obvious fact.
Art News, Flash Art and other journals of contemporary art – also often on display in public libraries – frequently contain within their pages, images of naked men and women sometimes doing such eye-popping things as ‘laying’ eggs from their vaginas, wiping their own asses with soft toy stuffed animals, knitting scarves naked, using wool that’s been secreted in their vaginas and more recently charging phones … while naked … using their vaginas.
I cannot conceive of how any library policy could be crafted cunningly enough so as to target The Sun for page 3, but which could not equally be applied to a whole range of other periodicals and books – and not just ones on art.
No matter what anyone personally thinks about the The Sun‘s output, the fact remains that it is the best-selling newspaper in the UK and by a considerable margin.
How then could any public library justify stocking The Morning Star or Red Pepper, say, both of which have tiny circulations, but not the most popular tabloid in the country?
And in terms of their potential for morally corrupting the young and credulous, the Morning Star and Red Pepper are streets ahead.
Or a good plague. Total societal collapse. Another confounding of the languages like at Babel.
Well, here’s a thought. Instead of only preaching to the choir, which don’t get me wrong is a very important thing that needs to be done, go into enemy territory and present alternative view points. Yeah, maybe you will get banned. Nothing you can do about it. Move on elsewhere. There’s plenty of targets of opportunity out there.
(K)nitting scarves…
That’s something you wouldn’t want for Christmas. Sweet Jesus, have you seen the state of her fingernails?
Meanwhile, the enthusiasm for bans and censorship is thriving at the University of Essex
“Safe Space” = the university as a pan-sexual convent.
Is anybody else concerned that the totalitarian Safe Space policy will eventually seep out of universities and into everyday life once a sufficient amount of these lunatics graduate?
One must worry about the mind of a person that seeks to ban a political party from campaigning on the basis that it negatively impact on Union Member’s feelings, but is happy to take to Facebook to declare bloody tories, we need to get rid of them all now! #sendthemtothegulags #buildabonfire #fullcommunismnow as if it’s the most normal thing in the world.
This, incidentally, appears to be George Johnson, the great progressive thinker behind the UKIP ban.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAdeLgvN5pE
Meanwhile, the enthusiasm for bans and censorship is thriving at the University of Essex
I know it’s rather trite to make references to 1984, but quite honestly to deploy the phrase Safe Space in the service of banning freedom of expression really is one of those times when “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength” comes quite forcibly to mind.
Incidentally, while I’m no fan of UKIP and won’t be voting for them any time soon (if indeed, ever) I am starting to become very tired of the constant barrage of insults and accusations any time Farage opens his mouth, while his proposals and policies go untouched.
On that topic, I thought this, from columnist Grace Dent, was actually worth a look.
One must worry about the mind of a person that seeks to ban a political party from campaigning on the basis that it negatively impact on Union Member’s feelings, but is happy to take to Facebook to declare bloody tories, we need to get rid of them all now!
Right or left wing extremists do right or left wing extremism.
By contrast, we conservatives who are thus bookended by the right wing and left wing are the ones who actually take the time and effort to go and sort through the issues.
For the extremists, reality isn’t the issue, it’s all about the agenda.
Aside from general current events that keep reenforcing the above, in the UK at the moment specifically, the idea of jumping from Labour to Ukip does come to mind . . .
di,
Witness this ongoing Twitterspat and the tedious question-begging.
I see it didn’t take long for Matty Iglesias to throw the considerable weight of his leaden intellect into the “debate”.