Elsewhere (137)
Daniel Greenfield learns of more racism that’s invisible to the sane:
Are there not enough black people who build ships in bottles? There must be something racist about it. It couldn’t possibly be that black people aren’t as interested in building ships in bottles.
Remember this?
Roger Kimball on that pernicious little tool in the White House:
Just yesterday, the president of the United States… stood before the United Nations and heaped praise on Sheikh Abdallah Bin Bayyah, a Muslim cleric who has endorsed a fatwa calling for the murder of U.S. soldiers. Yep, Bin Bayyah is Obama’s candidate of the week for the prize of being a “moderate Muslim.”
And Heather Wilhelm weeps at the suffering of “Goodwill Ambassador for U.N. Women,” Ms Emma Watson:
While Watson, to her credit, did give a few shout-outs to actual oppression around the globe — child brides and uneducated girls in Africa, specifically, along with an admission that “not all women have received the same rights I have” — her speech [to the U.N.] was an unfortunate reflection of the “we’re all victims,” zero-sense-of-proportion mishmash that makes up modern Western feminism. If you don’t believe me, here is what Emma Watson, Hollywood actress, actually complained about before a body of 192 member states, some which have more terrifying dictatorships than others: 1. She was called “bossy” as a child; 2. She was sexualised by the media as a young movie star; 3. Many of her girlfriends quit their sports teams because they didn’t want to grow muscles.
Now, if, for instance, Ms Watson had directly addressed the representative of each member country in which women really are treated appallingly – and listed that country’s sins in graphic detail – I’d have been more than happy to applaud. But that didn’t happen, and was never going to happen. What we got instead was a piece of flimsy theatre that we’re expected to applaud anyway. It’s the U.N., after all. But it seems to me that if you’re going to use a U.N. gathering to shame backward cultures and their various representatives – shame them into change – it’s best not to appear clownish and morally frivolous while you’re attempting it. And if you want to highlight real oppression in the world – say, women being disfigured by Muhammadan savages – it’s probably best to avoid moaning about having once been called “bossy.”*
Ms Watson’s feminist credentials have been noted here previously.
*Added via the comments. Feel free to share your own links and snippets below.
First! (I’ve waited so long …)
National Geographic headline: “More diversity among bird-watchers is in everyone’s best interest.”
Translation: “This is a non-problem that no one cares about.”
I didn’t know anyone who ever sexualised Hermione Granger in Harry Potter, not even in the later installments.
Also, the Guardian is having a field day with this so much, they’ve already posted their 5th article with their usual over the top dramatics, panicking about sexist men and the patriarchy. It’s Miley Cyrus all over again.
First! (I’ve waited so long…)
Only just, mind.
“This is a non-problem that no one cares about.”
They do seem to be trying to build an issue out of dust motes.
“What happened to the environment the last time people with radically anti-capitalist views had access to real power?”
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/388801/capitalism-cleaner-kevin-d-williamson
She’s a child, we should cut her some slack.
The real villains are the fashionable fools who let her speak in such as way at such an assembly.
They are the people who deserve our contempt and ire.
What do we expect from the Grievance Industrial Complex? Most of us would conclude that that the “War Against Racism” has pretty much been won, when all you can fret about is bird-watcher demographics.
Ditto Emma Watson and being called “bossy.” As for being “sexualised,” perhaps the 4 inch high heels and revealing dresses she wore had something to do with that. But then, I always rush to blame the “victim,” especially those victims who have earned more before they’ve attained the age of thirty, than the GDP of any number of small countries.
That’s The Man for you, keeping down the bird-fancying brothers..
“If I were king for a day, I would ban Coca-Cola.”
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/26/king-for-day-ban-coca-cola-alan-johnson
Those good old Labour values, eh?
Those good old Labour values, eh?
He claims that Coca-Cola doesn’t quench a person’s thirst. Ever. Even briefly. Under any circumstances.
Emma Watson is a good actress (which, of course, doesn’t mean she’s necessarily good at anything else) and, to be fair, she means well, “not all women have received the same rights I have.” How true.
DT blog favorite Laurie Penny will be speaking this evening at a bookstore in town. Any suggestions from the League of Evil?
Freeze ray or lions. Either should spare you from Laurie’s “searing political analysis.”
DT blog favorite Laurie Penny will be speaking this evening at a bookstore in town. Any suggestions from the League of Evil?
Yes Franklin: You and everyone you know must attend while very actively and openly portraying Henry Higgins.
http://www.bartleby.com/138/1.html
Updated list of things that are racist:
Morris dancers – http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10777858/Racist-No-our-black-face-dance-is-a-proud-tradition.html
Snowmen – http://m.theweek.com/article/index/210058/the-appalling-ku-klux-klan-snowman
Thomas the Tank Engine – http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/22/thomas-the-tank-engine-children-parents
Thundercats –
http://middleclassfury.com/2013/05/29/racist-thundercats/
Popeye – http://somethingsensitive.com/Smileys/default/ixFOjGPRjIdFT.gif
The M62 – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-14632930
The Smiths – http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1308935/Morrissey-branded-racist-calling-Chinese-subspecies-treatment-circus-animals.html
Cyclists – http://www.birminghampost.co.uk/news/regional-affairs/cycle-city-birmingham-scheme-blasted-7750763?ptnr_rid=150659&icid=Untitled9
Clowns – http://ianthe.tumblr.com/post/51089906140/the-racist-origins-of-modern-clown-makeup-or-just-one
Not racist (so far): tropical fishkeeping.
Not racist (so far): tropical fishkeeping.
Thank God for that, as there’s a tropical fish tank a few feet away from me.
Clown make-up I can probably avoid.
Why is it when non-white people do hitherto white activity* X it’s “inclusive” but when white people do hitherto non-white thing Y it’s “cultural appropriation”?
* whatever that means
Updated list of things that are racist:
Snowmen
Calvin And Hobbes
A Penny for you thoughts, lads?
That should be *your
BTW, what is it with these tired twats in the Guardian always complaining about something they don’t like and wanting to do away it at the expense of others be it cupcakes or a brand of soda? I thought it was Conservatives/Republicans/Right Wringers who were suppose to be the control freaks? I also speak as someone who enjoys the brand. I guess have no agency and I’m just empty vessel with no real thoughts of my own and need a individual like the author to know what’s best for me.
Check out this comment:
http://discussion.theguardian.com/comment-permalink/41445214
Yes here is some nice mockery of Emma Watson’s speech – in which you get to see excerpts of it.
The bit where she talks about being called bossy as a child: this of course relates to a string of tedious logical fallacies and the claim that the word “bossy” might be applied to women more than to men, as part of the global conspiracy of patriarchy blad-di-blah
Never mind all that, and never mind the fact that the world will shortly be run on these barmy principles – let us briefly note that Ms Watson is only standing infront of representatives of the nations in the world telling everyone how to behave, what to think, what to say, and what to fight for. All based on the most tenuous rhetoric imaginable
It really is a mystery how this diffident, unassuming girl ever came to be called bossy..
Emma Watson may actually prove to be an inspired choice … if this is the competition she had to face for that appointment.
“Emma Watson is a good actress…and, to be fair, she means well”
The world is full of “well meaning” people who need a dope slap.
The bit where she talks about being called bossy as a child
What irks is the woolliness of the thinking and the implied equivalence. If you want to highlight real oppression in the world – say, women being disfigured by Muhammadan savages – it’s best to avoid moaning about having once been called “bossy.” Ms Watson’s melange of supposed injustices experienced first-hand – her First World Problems – makes her sound much too precious and rather comical, especially given the mismatch, noted earlier, of her professed values and how she actually lives.
If Ms Watson had, for instance, directly addressed the representative of each member country in which women really are treated appallingly – and listed that country’s sins in graphic detail – I’d have been more than happy to applaud. But that didn’t happen, and was never going to happen. What we got was a piece of flimsy theatre that we’re expected to applaud anyway. It’s the U.N., after all. But it seems to me that if you’re going to use a U.N. gathering to shame backward cultures and their various representatives – shame them into change – it’s best not to appear clownish and morally frivolous while you’re attempting it.
Ron got shafted. Equal pay for equal work. I demand it.
“The school protects against anything that could be offensive to anyone.”
“2. She was sexualised by the media as a young movie star;”
I’m always baffled when people treat this as a feminist issue, given that the feminist movement has done more to promote female sexualisation than any number of lads’ mags. This is, after all, the movement that keeps telling us that casual, consequence-free sex whenever you want it is some kind of inalienable human right (cf. the HHS mandate, “abortion rights” rhetoric), so is it really any surprise when men start acting like they’ve got a human right to casual, consequence-free sex whenever they want it?
Basically, feminism in its current state is an attempt to avoid the consequences of human actions: feminists want to be able to act like back-alley prostitutes whilst being given the respect due to a chaste Victorian matron. It’s no wonder so many leftists are drawn to it, then, given that “attempting to avoid the consequences of human actions” is the left’s chief distinguishing feature.
When I saw the headline “Most bird-watchers are white. If that can change, it would be in everyone’s best interest.” at Kaching I thought it was a parody. Then I searched for the source to find it was from the once venerable National Geographic.
Last year they had a headline “U.S. Life Expectancy Map: The Gender Gap” with the subhead “Ladies Last.” “[the study] reveals a troubling trend. Though men’s life spans have increased by 4.6 years since 1989, women have gained only 2.7 years…” so men now live only 5 years less than women while 20 years ago it was 7 years less. The post includes a map showing nowhere in the US where men outlive women. The question remains whether the “troubling trend” is that female life expectancy exceeds male life expectancy by an insufficient amount or simply that men’s life expectancy has increased.
I understand some birdwatchers (like those who want to take a unique photo) but those who spend days and days so they can catch a glimpse of some bird and check it off their birds of the northeast US checklist is inscrutable. Perhaps the question shouldn’t be why so few minorities but why so many white folks are birdwatchers.
“93 percent of American birders were white… women now occupy more than half the leadership positions in the organizations studied—but ethnic minorities still occupy less than 12 percent of leadership positions.”
Since the author doesn’t mention what percentage of birdwatchers are female that makes me suspect it is a mostly male hobby and “more than half” is disproportionate. Somehow, I was under the impression that things not being proportionate was a bad thing.
Then I searched for the source to find it was from the once venerable National Geographic.
Perhaps we’re supposed to believe that local bird-watching groups (or astronomy clubs or whatever) are secretly turning away women and people with brown skin. You know, the kinds of niche clubs and societies that are usually desperate for new members and subscriptions to keep them afloat.
She was called “bossy”? Typecasting! And now she really is a boss. This will not end well for us.
“Not racist (so far): tropical fishkeeping.”
Thank God for that, as there’s a tropical fish tank a few feet away from me.
Why do you hate sub-tropical fish?
Henry said…
Yes here is some nice mockery of Emma Watson’s speech – in which you get to see excerpts of it.
The bit where she talks about being called bossy as a child: this of course relates to a string of tedious logical fallacies and the claim that the word “bossy” might be applied to women more than to men, as part of the global conspiracy of patriarchy blad-di-blah…
She is the lipstick on the pig.
Oh no…..phones are racist too…..probably own slaves:
“So, sure. . . Apple’s “problem” is that they are run by a bunch of old white guys. I guess that’s why the default color for an i-phone is white. Racists.”
Yahoo Liberals Bemoan the “Racism” of Apple
http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/michaelschaus/2014/09/28/yahoo-liberals-bemoan-the-racisim-of-apple-n1897723
Just—Yes!
https://twitter.com/iowahawkblog/status/515880179017588736
“This is a non-problem that no one cares about.”
But the author, Martha Hamilton, feels obliged to air the standard conceit – i.e., that every conceivable identity group should – must – be “represented” proportionally in every possible human activity, regardless of the interests and preferences of the people who make up those notional groups: “We need more Chinese people on our basketball teams. And heterosexual men working as dress designers. And there are nowhere near enough gay men playing golf. And put some Somalis over there, or Liberians at least. Someone brown, anyway.”
Stafan Molyneux on Emma Watson’s speech.
http://youtu.be/8o0euhM6bjg
Just an idea, but I would enjoy a thread dedicated to predicting future headlines of the political/academic left uncovering hidden “racism.” example:
*Why does money have white letters?!
*Tetris’s hidden chilling effect on black teenagers!
*Dogs with darker color coats have a X% lower chance of being adopoted!
*What white shirts and black suits tells us about societies racism!!
*Are all fish racist?
*Its 20XX time to stop all toilet paper being white!
“Women of Britain, let’s form our own feminist party”
Read it and weep: http://tinyurl.com/pdgppoq
Thanks for that, Guardian.