And A Boob Job Would Be Nice
In hardships-of-prison news:
But in 2024, the clinic discontinued access to the private room, and told transgender inmates they would have to use the device in their own cell. Caldwell deems this unacceptable, writing: “My cell door has a window where any male inmate or officer can see inside my cell and watch me use the device on my maturing female body.”
His maturing female body.
If the above doesn’t sound sufficiently unhinged, I should add that the inmate in question, the one suing the Department of Corrections and invoking his human rights, Mr Michael R Caldwell, is a rapist of children.
Mr Caldwell, who prefers to be referred to as Skeggi Hildof Katrinssonr or “Hildi,” isn’t alone, of course. His fellow transgender complainants are,
Pride, baby.
Mr Caldwell, our transgender rapist, insists that his alleged hardships constitute “sex discrimination,” and that the failure to provide a private salon for his twice-weekly laser hair removal sessions is impacting his mental health, such as it is. Indeed, the inmate has insisted that he will “not consent” to any perceived infringement of his womanly privacy. Stated sorrows include “elevating anxiety, depression, skipping meal times,” and frequent crying.
The invocation of consent may strike readers as somewhat ironic, just a little tone-deaf, given the criminal activities that resulted in Mr Caldwell’s current situation. Activities regarding which Mr Caldwell seems much less tearful, having blamed his crimes on the victims. And nothing suggests remorse like demands for fetishistic cosmetic procedures at someone else’s expense.
Not to be outdone, “non-binary” inmate Mr Hunter S Christian, our violator of dogs and enthusiast of child pornography, complains that he was denied access to Minoxidil treatments to correct his receding hairline – apparently, an unthinkable transgression – and likewise, testosterone supplements, supposedly to address his “shrinking testicle size.”
Hey, I’m just reading what it says here.
Mr Christian invokes “mental anguish… and a loss of the forward momentum in maintaining the delicate balance between my masculine and feminine sides.”
I’ll give you a moment to suppress all that sympathetic weeping.
Mr Andrew S Kennedy, the third complainant, and who is serving a 31-year sentence for the torture and murder of an eleven-month-old baby, claims to have been “repeatedly misgendered,” supposedly a violation of his human rights.
The trio’s additional demands, and they are numerous, include “body contouring services” and significant monetary compensation.
At which point I’m inclined to suggest we could just submerge the trio in hot concrete and get on with our lives.
Encouragement can be conveyed via the tip jar buttons below.
*votes for hot concrete*
Well, you have to wonder whether the poor souls who have to endure these formal complaints about a lack of body contouring services consider the possibility that the demands, the general nuisance-making, are an expression of the same fundamental dysfunction that resulted in the crimes for which the men doing the complaining are imprisoned.
A continuation of their malice.
I think that criminals who have sudden onset “gender dysphoria” the moment they’re arrested should be immediately scheduled for
sex changegender reassignmentgender confirmation surgery. Preferably with the lowest bidder. If they want to be “women,” make them “women.” I’m willing to bet the numbers would drop dramatically when they realize they’re going to lose their fun stick. I’m so sick of the pandering to these freaks.Why waste the concrete? Just throw them in Gen Pop and let their fellow inmates take a course of action.
“Fun stick”
This is my rifle
This is my gun
This is for shooting
This is for fun.
The hot concrete will fix that.
It would work for many things. It’s a miracle material.
Or throw them into a pen full of hungry hogs.
very hot concrete.
like, volcanic lava, a kinda natural form of concrete, right?
TBF, that is at least more creative than usual stripper names like Chardonnay Mystique or Precious Bliss.
Not seeing a downside for the rest of the population.
I am not a legal expert, not sure about the other stuff, but am reasonably sure that if you are a long term guest of the state, one’s “sovereignty” is a ship well over the horizon.
The fondness for stripper names does rather hint at the nature of the wider phenomenon. Or at least a very large part of it.
An 8x8x8 cell with no door would help him achieve that.
His consent is irrelevant.
In other news, the Rome season one rewatch concluded last night. A good use of time, I think. The finale is suitable lively and a solid illustration of just how quickly the day can turn to shit. Caesar’s death scene does rather linger in the mind.
Given their proclivities, maybe keep them away from animals. The hogs didn’t deserve this.
Preach, brother!
Can we get back to hanging 1% of each generation like we used to? I think we’d have to go up as high as 5% for a while to catch up…
I see no reason why legislatures shouldn’t put a stop to ALL non-essential medical procedures. Are the women prisoners getting laser hair removal for a clean bikini line? Then absolutely these criminal males should not be having their sexual fetish indulged in.
Any judge who orders this kind of medical procedure should be impeached (minimum).
It seems to me that by indulging such behaviour – the contrived nuisance-making, the pathological selfishness – prisons are rewarding much the same root impulse that led to the inmates’ crimes and subsequent incarceration.
And the issuing of such demands does rather undermine any hopes of remorse and rehabilitation.
I mean, if someone has been imprisoned for an atrocity – say, torturing and murdering a baby – and is consequently expecting to be provided with laser hair removal sessions and “body contouring services” at taxpayer expense, then it seems highly unlikely that they’re wracked with guilt or reflecting on their choices.
…it seems highly unlikely that they’re wracked with guilt or reflecting on their choices.
Exactly. It’s more of the shite test – after people saw how easy it was for men to be put in women’s prisons and provided with prey just for saying they were women, other men are now trying it on to see what else they can get for free at taxpayer expense. What’s that American military prisoner – Manning? person – in early days of the madness, something “affirming” was provided while in prison, if I remember right. These new guys are just seeing what special treatment they can get away with.
Incarceration should be punishment, or at least not pleasant. It’s funny – after the recent posts of the rantings of non-white, non-male persons against the evil white man, we get one of three white guys demanding (successfully, too, if the Left has its way) to be kowtowed to. Trans – making the white patriarchy great again!
That this should need saying – as if it were new information – is itself quite remarkable.
I have a Modest Proposal regarding the requested “body contouring services”.
<Admires recently honed object in kitchen…>
Stripper names: I mentioned once that some name was a “stripper name” and I was asked how did I know….
Saw a woman on a game show named “Shalom”—no, not a stripper name but quite odd.
🎯
And intense psychiatric therapy would be nice too
How about intense psychiatric therapy for those who push these insane policies?
“What is ‘elite overproduction’ and how does it manifest itself in academia?”
At one time had a bank officer with the given name ‘Freedom’.
Preferably administered with a blunt object.
Dr Chanda Prescod Weinstein has been mentioned here before.
A rogue’s gallery might not be amiss.
Though the comments section should be exempt.
Should I not have donated?
[ Seems there’s not
a wayan obvious way to delete an image ]X Corp is, I believe, within their rights.
It’s sad, though: I’ve used XCancel to send links to people without X accounts, hoping that they would find the links interesting enough to create accounts.
I’ve yet to find any link sufficiently interesting to let X invade my phone and there is no other way to create an account.
I’m not aware of security issues.
Sorry, but every time you virtue-signaled by linking to them instead of Twitter, the resulting link didn’t load in the background, but did one of those “checking to see this isn’t a bot” things until I opened the tab in the foreground. That’s no better than Twitter itself.
Irrelevant, mostly, to my refusal.
Did you have a script blocker enabled? It always worked for me.
Sounds like a browser issue. Never had a problem with the links loading.
Why assume it was ‘virtue-signaling’? I don’t want X on my phone, there’s no other way to get an X account, so I used a tool to allow myself and others to wholly view a tweet.
[T]he Transitive Property of Politically Aligned Entertainment […]
Sounds like category heading.
I am so old I can remember back a couple years when one could view and/or share nigh any public tweet and unless a browser was banjaxed somehow the videos would play.
Why this new horsecrap is unclear, the tweet still gets a click before one adds cancel so it is not as if there is a loss of ad revenue sending the company into bankruptcy. In fact the restrictions decrease engagement because there are plenty of us who have zero interest in having any kind of “social”drivel accounts, so we really can’t see thme and aren’t going to sign up, so further decreasing engagement, real or potential.
With all the plates he is juggling, I would not be surprised if Gospodin Musk has no idea this is going on. You can take X out of San Francisco, but it seems you can’t take San Francisco out of X.
I’ve got a tenner that says the ACLU et al. has forced prisons to accommodate “trans” inmates. They’re the ones who’ve been suing prison systems to force them to move males into female spaces.
Is that the protocol where they provide ECT but forget to turn it off?
“testosterone supplements, supposedly to address his “shrinking testicle size.””
I’ve a solution. Cut ’em off!
Heh. I vaguely recall seeing an interview in which that dynamic unfolded. As if the interviewer wanted to annex Ms Parton politically. To claim her as a trophy. Or as a stick with which to beat others.
I remember the interviewer’s visible irritation when she wouldn’t play ball.
I’ve mentioned before my own irritations with the X algorithm. It’s certainly politically freer now, and I do have an account, chiefly for research; but in practical terms, as a blogger, it’s become a negligible source of traffic.
This is seemingly by design – with the algorithm actively penalising posts with external links, throttling them into obscurity:
As a result, I now routinely find myself catching some vaguely interesting exchange about an unnamed article for which I can see no link, because such links are being suppressed by the algorithm, and of which only a two-sentence screengrab is readily available. Meaning I have to type out the sentences from the screengrab and do a search. Which most people simply won’t bother doing.
And so, on any given day, you can find people having quite heated arguments about an article that few, if any, of the participants have actually read. They’re arguing over an out-of-context snippet, or over someone’s paraphrasing of someone else’s paraphrasing. Which doesn’t seem ideal, really.
[ Slurps coffee, considers toast. ]
That’s pretty much how we got here in the first place, actually.
That’s pretty much what this blog is, isn’t it? A catalogue of ludicrous beings.
Comment section exempt, of course.