Sir, Why Do You Want Babies To Suck Your Nipples?
A terribly modern grievance, I think you’ll agree. Very now.
This is where we are, people. Everyone remember where we parked.
You see, Mr Buckley wanted to “have the experience of breastfeeding.” Hence the novelty breasts. Mr Buckley is also indignant that a woman, a mother of three and a breastfeeding counsellor, might regard such ambitions as a little odd, for a man, and not entirely in the interests of the newborn child.
And so,
And as we’re in the realm of squint-and-pretend:
The term lactation is, however, doing a lot of heavy lifting. Men who pretend to be women, and who take large doses of cross-sex hormones, subsequently developing facsimile breasts, are unlikely to lactate anything adequately nourishing for a child.
Given sufficiently high doses of female hormones, and given sufficiently zealous pumping, some men can be made to secrete a substance from their nipples, albeit unreliably and in very limited quantities – but the resulting discharge is of questionable value to a newborn baby:
As Dr Maja Bowen notes here,
Or, as lawyers for Ms Sussex put it,
At which point, it’s perhaps worth mentioning that the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal, where this very modern drama is unfolding, determined that Mr Buckley’s legal team “did not have to hand over medical evidence over the chemical makeup of the fluid” being forced upon his newborn child, and that such details, i.e., the facts of the matter, were “not of relevance” to claims of vilification.
Similarly “not of relevance,” it seems, are concerns that such secretions, induced by a cocktail of supposedly “gender-affirming” drugs, may have harmful effects on newborn babies, including possible heart problems and genital development.
And so, either we have a man who believes that he can secrete suitably nourishing fluids from his nipples, or a man who knows that he can’t in fact do this, but is determined to indulge his bizarre preoccupation anyway, despite the warnings of attending medical professionals, and regardless of the effect on a newborn baby:
Mr Buckley has also announced that “experiencing arousal while breastfeeding” is “nothing to be ashamed of.”
Which possibly tells us something about the motivations in play.
*drives away fast*
It’s all about him and his fetish.
Well, the disregard for medical warnings, and the general perversity of the endeavour, does suggest a certain… selfishness.
I struggle to imagine many parents being warned by doctors of the health risks for their new baby of doing Peculiar Thing X, and then, almost immediately, doing it anyway.
Anyone on a “Human Rights Commission” can be assumed to be hostis humani generis.
.
Uh, this guy is not alone in this – where is the baby’s mother? Why is she complacent about all this? Perhaps the child welfare authorities need to take a hard look at these “parents” to see if their child is cared for adequately.
Oh, I answered my own question after reading the archived Daily Mail article that was referenced.
Disgusting, the two of them.
The photo caption: “Ms Buckley (right)…”
Reminiscent of this wicked Wikipedia edit:
Sir, why do you want a baby to suck your nipples?
Oh, well, there you have it, because it was nice, nice is important in infant nutrition.
Who cares what a reactionary transphobe whose research is on or related to the topic “believes”, “Damn the
torpedoeshormones and drugs! Jouett, full speed!”Use every gender-affirming health-care worker after his desert, and who should ‘scape wood-chipping?
Consider you are talking about a polity more concerned with the fee-fees of a psychopath than the danger that psychopath is putting his child in.
How dare you mock gender experts, have you no shame?
Everyone remember where we parked.
No doubt to make a tire squealing getaway as necessary.
What an era to live in. Now not only will we have to call people who believe they are Napoleon “L’Empereur”, we must join the Grande Armee and march on Moscow with them. 🙄
Clue.
We do seem to be living in an episode of Family Guy.
Instalanche
[ Fetches tray of custard cream biscuits, arranges artfully. ]
Did you check the expiry date? They’re moving.
[ Hastily puts wrapper in bin, arranges biscuits even more artfully. ]
A bit of honey might stick them in place.
The truly dangerous thing here and in cases in Europe is that hate speech/vilification can be a legal charge at all but especially that facts do not matter to the case. That a child could be at risk in this case just makes it worse. Somewhere in Europe (Germany?) it was just ruled that even true statements could be “incitement to hatred”. The entire hate speech/hate crime is a travesty as currently used. Of course when whites or chinese or Jews are targeted, it can’t be a hate crime. FFS
what the hell happened to her eyes?
Animals are gay? Actually, animals (male) can be so horny they rape other species or males. They are generally not “gay” in the human sense, but even if so, what does that matter? I thought we crossed that bridge decades ago. What does the existence of gay animals have to do with cross dressing shows for kids or trans nursing a baby or men in women’s sports? Nothing of course.
Or anything else. Turtles humping helmets and shoes. Dogs humping anything.
But it’s not gayness, it’s (as you say) derangement caused by extreme horniness and also confusion due to imperfect cues that trigger badly directed behavior. Recall the baby birds that will bond to a puppet that is merely a sock with a bit of red.
On YouTube, occasionally I used to see videos titled something like, Dr Pimple, in which a dermatologist would deal with people’s horrifying skin ailments.
Some people like that kind of thing. I recoil in horrified disgust.
This article does the same thing.
Probably contact lenses that color all parts the same: sclera, iris, pupil.
And the consensus is that the tics are faked.
These men will starve in a potato famine, because they lactators.
[ Summons hounds, ugly mob. ]
A riot is an ugly thing.
Yup. Trans Breastfeeding seems to be an ongoing trans activist button to push; it falls under the category of trans activists seeking to prove that “trans women are women”, but because this stunt is involving children to prove it just makes it oh so distasteful.
A few years ago, there was a Canadian trans woman who adopted a baby and then immediately set out to induce lactation using hormones with the aim of breastfeeding their newly adopted infant son.
From my perspective, her actions felt more like a provocation more than anything else. The amount of breast milk produced was fairly minimal, but she did manage to breastfeed the baby at least partially, and yes, I have no idea what sort of hormone/chemical transfer was occurring within this artificial lactation –no one involved bothered to check.
At the time, I was trying to explain to her and her group diehards on Twitter why doing this had the real potential for long term health issues, and that they hadn’t considered the impact on the child. I also pointed out that her stunt was bound to backfire in terms of PR for the trans community at large because of the way they handled everything.
Surprising to no one, she and her cohort aggressively defended this stunt –you see, to them, the slogan “trans woman are women” was not a starting point for a rhetorical discussion, it was the literal, factual, and actual truth. –so anyone suggesting that the stunt was probably not a great idea was about to be faced with a Twitter pile-on and potential cancellation.
Also surprising to no one, I was cancelled for having the temerity to suggest they slow down and maybe approach their goals with a more rigorously scientific mindset . . . and for God’s sake, stop involving children.
Fast forward a few months: it turns out this trans woman who was adamant about being the best mother she could be was also in fact an aspiring “milk maid” on OnlyFans –she had a lactation fetish . . . go figure.
I’m not sure about the motives behind Beverly’s desire to breastfeed, maybe it’s genuine, but it really seems to be tracking about the same as the Canadian Milk Maid, yeah –not good. Not good at all.