World Of Womanliness
Three snippets on a theme.
First up, because we’ve been starved of irony, some news from Brazil:
Felipe Santos Silva, who has adopted the name Erika Hilton, told the Chamber of Deputies that the Committee should focus on women “without exception in their dignity and plurality,” and included transvestites in his definition.
Because when you think of the dignity of women, you immediately picture drag queens.
Mr Hilton, a member of the Socialism and Liberty Party, has responded to his critics – people suggesting that perhaps the president of a Women’s Rights Committee might be an actual, you know, woman – by denouncing them as “LGBTphobes” and “defenders of paedophilia.” Which may strike readers as a little rich, given statistical realities.
On which, more shortly.
Mr Hilton has filed a criminal complaint against one of his critics, via the Public Prosecutor’s Office of São Paulo – and demands for the equivalent of $1.9 million dollars – on grounds that said critic failed to perceive Mr Hilton as a woman. A failure to affirm, or indeed to hallucinate, that Mr Hilton has seen fit to construe as “violence.”
And because a cake needs icing,
Meanwhile, in the laugh-a-minute world of transgender Reddit moderators:
And from Rhode Island’s educational bureaucracy:
But remember, dear citizen, these are Things That Never Happen.
One for our file of Transvestite Tall Tales.
Oh, and he was looking all cute. Because he had to mention that, obviously.
Donald Trump, time traveler.
Oh, and the Thing That Never Happens has happened again.
But then, it had been several hours.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H838KccF7yY
Reddit knew that a Reddit moderator was a convicted child abuser, but protected his identity instead of expelling him.
If we call them ‘trans-coins’ will the harpies shut up?
A
St.Patrick’s Day message from the president of Ireland.Bad trade.
Cain’t be Ahrland. T’ere be sun an’ shadows and such.
It’s a flex, an act of hostility and anticipated dominion. It is, at the very least, enormously rude. And those who take part should not be here.
Third panel.
Indeed. John Cleese and the other Pythons claimed that they were not anti-Christianity, but only anti-bad-Christians. And yet they never portrayed Christians in a positive light. Note also that they never mocked and criticized their own subculture, Oxbridge wankers.
See also, “They’re not my ancestors, I don’t care.”
[ Fires up Marple episode By the Pricking of My Thumbs. ]
[ Is handed beer. ]
You’ve forgotten this.
Actual Oxbridge scholars not congruent with generic upper class twits.
Twits is twits.
Pigs is Pigs. (Probably is now illegal in the UK.)
But still very different sorts of twits.
Yep, and our very own version of Mayor Khan is imposing the same thing in Gotham’s Times Square, complete with the call to prayer, 20-some years after this same bunch blew two skyscrapers to smithereens.
Considering the number of hispanic migrants we have here, plus all the homegrown hoodlums, I wonder how they plan to reconcile all these vibrant diversities. Because I don’t foresee other cultures blithely kneeling in submission like the “good” wypipo do. Some of the homegrown hoodlums are getting restless with all the importation of and money spent on migrant diversities.
There was only one fat angry man in that story.
“excessive defense”
Yet another “migrant”.
27 is the new 355.
New & improved misogyny: all the miso, none of the gynē.
Given the audio, I couldn’t help noticing the slogan “women’s voices.”
And I would suggest that a “suspicion” of cross-dressing men – invoked, absurdly, as “misogyny” – has little to do with a dislike of, or prejudice against, women. But rather, a dislike of, or understanding of, cross-dressing men, and of what very often goes with that cross-dressing.
Queer Mafia?
Those linked statistics need to be posted here:
When even John Cleese starts talking about the BBC’s long history of malevolent dishonesty… (all links are Cleese’s retweets.)
Not unfair.