Regarding Tattoos
Some theories, in a sequence.
First up, Dr Daisy Dixon, a philosopher of art at Cardiff University:
my theory is that a reason these men don’t like tattoos on women is because it’s an outward sign of creative agency and self-ownership – it signals that the woman’s body is hers and no one else’s – it aesthetically undermines and rejects men’s felt entitlement to our bodies 🖤 https://t.co/EwlxW9oxHQ
— Dr Daisy Dixon (@daisyldixon) February 15, 2026
Then, a less lofty and perhaps more plausible take by Tim Newman:
For me it reflects poor decision-making which is downstream of poor judgement. Not something you really want in a relationship. https://t.co/9U2u4Y2OG0
— Tim Newman (@whitesundesert) February 16, 2026
And Devon Eriksen offers this, which you may want to read in full:
There is a sort of woman who is deeply and personally offended that Men don’t like Thing.
And she always has Theory.
Theory is about how Men don’t like Thing because they are Bad. All of this is explained by Story.
Story might be plausible, and make sense, but it’s one of… https://t.co/ROC5Bab0wR
— Devon Eriksen (@Devon_Eriksen_) February 15, 2026
I should add that there may in fact be more than one Daisy Dixon. But still.
And because you like footnotes.
Consider this an open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
“We need common-sense trans control.”
Crafted like that, it’s a slogan no liberal can object to.
Is that something that a lawyer or private investigator can determine easily and for a moderate fee?
Woman with professionally groomed hair, nails, and a seat where she earns serious money occupying … but BY GOLLY she lives every day … EVERY DAY, I tell you, having it worse than if she lived in ancient Rome.
I can’t even anymore.
Ooh, footnotes!
…. Damn it, David.
My mom used to periodically make me promise to not get a tattoo. As I was disinclined to get tatted up by my religion, my aesthetic sensibilities, and my fear of hepatitis, it was an easy enough promise to make. I don’t even like to look at the same pictures on the wall for more than a few months at a time.
But Mom was a nurse-midwife and had seen what happens when tattoos go south— and east and west— with time and pregnancy. I guess I can understand her fixation.
“This isn’t a good look for you”
I expected better of Australia.
Then again, I once expected better of the U.S.
Damn.
I keep seeing people like this in various threads. They appear quite predictably, saying “why do you even care about this thing that isn’t even real?” and they remind me of those people who show up after a shooting in the USA that has racial implications and make people say into the camera that there are no hard feelings.
What I mean is that they seem to be deliberately deployed.
And I want to know by whom.
Personallu, I’ve always fancied getting a tattoo – a small one, someehere unobtrusive. The reason I don’t? It’s apparently bloody painful!
*hits Amazon link above to preorder new Pokemon game*
The ‘Daily Mail’ asks the important questions of our time….
Heh. Well, again, you have to marvel at how Dr Dixon can look at the facially tattooed basket case in the photo and interpret this, or pretend to interpret this, as evidence of some creative and political empowerment. Rather than, as seems more obvious, damaged goods.
By the way, Dr Dixon – and she does insist on the Dr – also insists that expressing reservations about massive, indiscriminate immigration and consequent cultural degradation – say, things like this or this – is racist, seemingly by definition.
There being no other conceivable possibilities, you see.
And I’m just going to leave this here for no reason whatsoever.
Of course, if you’re trying to hide the fact you’re a knife-wielding psychopath, it’s a good idea to adopt the accent of a 14-yr-old girl.
Somewhat related to the post above.
Again, sending signals, the nature of which I doubt she comprehends.
Speaking of inconceivable possibilities.
TBF, San Francisco is only geographically part of the US.
Miss Dixon is not alone, and it is not only racist, but also terrorist ideology.
It’s not unfair to compare her to 1930’s Germans whinging about “the Jews”–especially since carrying this delusion as far as theft and violence is both common and accepted.
I wonder if Penn Jillette will ever realize how foolish he was.
At his moment of death, yes.
I wonder if Penn Jillette will ever realize how foolish he was.
Somebody forgot to tell Stalin.
You can’t put realism in advertising.
They’ve made it something close to illegal, certainly taboo.
The irony, one of many, is that the advert is part of a series aimed at commuters in London, in which those behaving criminally or antisocially are almost always depicted as white, with this rare exception, despite the everyday experience of London commuters, and despite the native white population now being a minority. From a majority of over 90% to around 35% today. All during my lifetime.
And which might give the credulous the impression that white people are a remarkably troublesome minority. Forever behaving in ways that are intrusive, degrading or threatening.
It’s an unhappy inversion of reality. I mean, if you’re being sexually harassed on London transport, the creeps doing the harassing are much more likely to be from Afghanistan or Somalia or Eritrea or Sudan. And by pretty much an order of magnitude.
You could get this one. Guaranteed painless.
‘Depraved indifference’ doesn’t quite cut it.
Perhaps she’s signaling her devotion to Celtic Christianity.
[ Schedules Friday’s Ephemera, titivates store-bought pizza. ]
Possibly, also possibly Cossack cosplay, most likely “this is what I do because I have no personality”.
If anyone is getting aroused by this thread…
[ Looks up titivate ]
…never mind.
An eruption was needed.
I’ve got several tattoos all with personal meaning to me (mostly military). I don’t get people getting ink just because they think it looks cool. As far as tattoos on women, very few look good on them just my opinion. Something small and unobtrusive is ok but the ones with tattoos all over or sleeves just look trashy.
Speaking of inconceivable possibilities.
This one reminds me of that mind boggling German community swimming pool sign with the enormous predatory redhead white woman groping a miniature vaguely middle eastern male who inexplicably is wearing his fake leg in the pool.
From the existence of this sign, and the no-no dance video (done by white women), it seems that newcomers to the country are not expected to learn or understand the language of the country, or the customs, so communications of Things We’d Rather You Not Do have to be done non-verbally.
So what’s a horny newcomer surrounded by pale, uncovered, infidel flesh supposed to think when looking at that sign? I’m in danger from the local females and therefore must defend myself? Watch the video and think it vaguely suggestive, what with the gyrations and pointing to various places on their bodies? These infidel women are asking for it!
How the heck do they think these pandering signs are going to do anything but virtue signal their hatred of white people and their love of all things not-white? Never mind, that’s all these signs are there for.
More likely the signs and adverts are not intended to inform the ‘migrants’ – it’s a mistake to think Western iconography translates – but to remind the native population of its subordinate status. The ‘migrants’ are already convinced of their superiority – why else would the natives abase themselves and provide tribute?
Lest we forget:
From the comments following this.
And thus.
The signs and adverts are crafted to allow the ruling class to say they “did something” about the rapes. Anyone who complains that they don’t address the real problem can be accused of “racism”.
Pool sign and migrants: they show the true racism because they do not expect migrants to be capable of behaving. Or reading.
Whereas around here, chinese immigrants are perfectly capable of doing all the things politely and peacefully.
No disagreement.
Conceivable.
What could possibly go wrong?
Then why do I know so many high-IQ people with execrable taste?
One other response (which I cannot find right now) to the tattoo covered women with “creative agency” went something like: they aren’t the creative ones as they are only offering themselves as a canvas for an artists work and to the extent they choose the designs are almost always choosing designs created by other people.
I have rediscovered pears.
That is all. Carry on.
As a second Renaissance it leaves something to be desired.
Au naturel or sliced in an alcoholic drink?
Just pear, sliced. ‘Tain’t the fanciest or most fashionable fruit, but I’d forgotten how they’re more than adequate.
Hey, I’m just sharing my day.
They’re even better in a glass of white wine.
I’m just sharing my knowledge. There is no truth to the claim that I work for la Fédération des exportateurs de vins & spiritueux de France.
Yeah, right, pull the autre one.
Poached in mulled wine served over homemade vanilla bean ice cream.
I know we’ve been discussing tats, but there’s something about nose rings that is a red flag the size of a bus.
Un dessert parfait pour un après-midi d’été.