An Audience For His Fetish
Readers may recall this chap here, a cross-dressing educator – the one who records classroom videos of himself faffing about with his wig while expecting applause for his feats of fake-hair management:
This clearly female teacher has a deep voice, do you think it’s from smoking? pic.twitter.com/CGoFhMXy1C
— Dr. Jebra Faushay (@JebraFaushay) May 15, 2025
As I said at the time,
Despite much higher rates of sexual offending, including offences against children, and similarly high rates of serious mental illness, people who identify as trans appear to be favoured in school hiring. Their numbers, and social-media prominence, does seem noteworthy. Among successful candidates, there is a certain triumphalism. A confident strutting.
Hence the numerous videos of such men vamping and cavorting in a classroom setting. Marking their territory with an arsenal of bad wigs and curiously oversized fake boobs.
Readers may also wish to ponder whether children should be imposed upon in this way and should be obliged to pretend, to be dishonest, on a daily basis. Which is to say, pretending not to see the pantomime, and being obliged to participate in the teacher’s psychodrama, for the teacher’s gratification.
While any children who demur, who acknowledge the obvious, even politely, run a risk of being disciplined and publicly denounced. It seems to me this is, at the very least, rude. Some might say abusive.
It is, I’d suggest, enormously presumptuous, and selfish, to coerce other people’s children into what amounts to a personal affirmation exercise. A gratuitous flex at their expense. While knowing that the parents of those children may not approve, and may be left to deal with whatever upset or confusion ensues. Any number of inapt or premature questions.
Well. Let’s catch up with the chap in question, Mr James Roman Stilipec, and his predictably emboldened activities:
Videos that his students could easily access. A coincidence, I’m sure.
I know. You’re intrigued. Here you go:
🤰 “I’m having twins!”
Trans teacher openly flaunts his pregnancy fetish online when he’s not in the classroom.
If you didn’t think perverts would exploit gender-identity policies in schools to gain access to impressionable children, look no further.
It’s already happening. pic.twitter.com/La6H5iZYAm
— Gays Against Groomers (@againstgrmrs) November 21, 2025
Yes, it positively screams ideal teacher material.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, parents expressed concern:
“Nobody can see my autogynephilia,” replied Mr Stilipec, with a confidence born of indulgence, and while making sure that any passers-by, including children, could see his colossal fake breasts and fake pregnancy.
Because fake boobs can’t ever be too big. For a certain kind of chap.
A relief to all parents, I’m sure. No hint of anything untoward there. And now that the doors of cross-dressing have been kicked wide open in the name of progress, including the doors to classrooms, I suppose anything goes. Having given away the store.
Our educator, Mr Stilipec, also tells us, “I was dysphoric about [not] having boobs, so I got them.” This prosthetic enhancement, all 36DDD of it, is, we learn, “just for my own self-gratification.” And hey, what’s self-gratification without a captive audience of other people’s children? Five days a week.
But of course.
And because a cake needs icing:
But remember, to be A Good Progressive Person, you must learn to disregard any and all warning signs. Those little flashing red lights.

“Good morning, class.”
Previously in the world of not-at-all-concerning cross-dressing educators, a three-part saga of sorts: One. Two. Three. Though the faint-of-heart may wish to proceed with caution.
This blog is kept afloat by the tip jar buttons below.





Ben’s Take on Britain.
Given the very wide range of cognitive wherewithal, you’d think it would be pretty obvious that if education is being done properly, then “gaps” will inevitably appear between the gifted and the lunk-headed. But madam seems to believe, in the face of all observable reality, that there should be no visible differentiation between the two demographics.
Ms Jefferson, “PhD,” is now busily blocking people for pointing out her bizarre assumptions.
It reminded me of Labour’s former Minister for Schools, Andrew Adonis, who claimed, based on bugger all, that, “There is no genetic or moral reason why the whole of society should not succeed to the degree that the children of the professional classes do today, virtually all getting five or more good GCSEs and staying on in education beyond 16.”
This is an extraordinary claim, a bizarre supposition unmoored from reality. Such that one might suppose that Mr Adonis, whose own education entailed boarding schools and Oxford, had never actually encountered the, shall we say, broad ability range to be found in pretty much any British comprehensive school. As if an IQ is something you can just pour into a head, any head.
At my state comprehensive, the span of ability ranged from a girl who’d memorised the entire periodic table, and could happily discuss it, to people who didn’t know their own postcodes and couldn’t be relied on to find out, or to retain the information until the following day. Their inability to do this, or other simple things, didn’t seem to have much to do with capitalism or “social privilege,” as Mr Adonis claimed.
And the conceit that these extremes are interchangeable, and that the latter group could easily be enthusing about the properties of iridium, or parsing Chaucer, is ludicrous.
And this, remember, was Labour’s Minister for Schools.
His priorities are very different than ours. And not benevolent.
In the case of Mr Adonis, you have to marvel at how an expensively educated man – supposedly a clever man, a man of the world – could have reached middle-age without registering one of the most basic facts about human society.