Concurring

The aggressive nature of such behavior has been noted many times in this blog.

For instance:

Setting aside the issues of exposing oneself to children, the impact on local businesses, etc., what’s objectionable is that random people are being made participants in the exhibitionists’ psychodrama, whether they wish to be or not. For many, if not most, of the ‘activists’, this isn’t even about an enjoyment of being naked per se. It’s about confronting other people with unsolicited nakedness. 

Being nude in private or among consenting nudists in dedicated bars, clubs, spas, on nature trails, at specialist beaches, etc – of which San Francisco has plenty – doesn’t give the ‘activists’ enough of a thrill because the people there are willing. Hence the demand to display their genitals in front of random passers-by. An audience is required in order to feel transgressive and it’s pretty obvious that’s what matters. They want to be naked near you.

If you read the post above, you’ll see just how brazen the inversion of reality can be. Such that, if you’re walking to the local shops and you’d rather not have your children exposed to sad old queens flapping their genitalia at you, then you’re “selfish,” “childish,” and a “control freak.” The sad old queens who impose themselves on random passers-by, including small children, somehow aren’t selfish, childish, or controlling, of course. 

Quite the feat. 

Who knew being a goth has so many rules?

I’d assumed it was just about eye-liner and dismal dress sense.