Have You Tried Less Tiresome Music?
I have questions, dear reader. Important, probing questions. Are you unenthused by hip-hop tracks about “police brutality and racialised oppression”? Does rapping about poverty and “the woes of Black Americans as artists” not render you giddy and enthralled? Do you not delight in endless repetition of the word nigga?
I ask because we’re told, by Dr Jeremy McCool and Dr Tyrone Smith, two devotees of “critical race theory,” that a failure to gush with enthusiasm is a result of “systemic bias and inherent prejudice,” and is suppressing such innovation. It is, they say,
The silencing of intellectuals in music.
This profound and damning revelation was uncovered by means of a “notional study” in which 310 participants, young adults, half of whom “self-identified” as black and the other half as white, were invited to listen to various tracks and read selected lyrics, before being asked whether they would be likely to skip said track if heard in the car, or would instead continue listening, mesmerised and ready to be educated.
In each instance, the white participants in the experiment rejected the messaging at a higher frequency than the Black participants.
Extrapolating with gusto – one might say wildly – our scholars promptly invoke “the silencing of Black narratives and perspectives.” It turns out that if a hundred or so white people are slightly less interested in rote racial narcissism expressed via the medium of rap, this could result in “artists who typically make thought-provoking music being shunned by the industry.” It’s all terribly unfair, you see. If true.
It remains unclear whether our mighty scholars considered the quality of the music as music, i.e., beyond any supposedly radical and “thought-provoking” content, those “deeper political implications.” Nor is it clear whether lyrical monotony, generic braggadocio and crass sexual references may have played a part in boring some more than others. To say nothing of many rappers’ own reliance on cartoonish racial stereotypes. Readers are, however, invited to ponder the intellectual heft of the following extract from one of the selected tracks, Da Baby’s Rockstar:
Brand new Lamborghini, fuck a cop car
With the pistol on my hip like I’m a cop (yeah, yeah, yeah)
Have you ever met a real nigga rockstar?
This ain’t no guitar, bitch, this a Glock (woo)
My Glock told me to promise you gon’ squeeze me (woo)
You better let me go the day you need me (woo)
Soon as you up me on that nigga, get to bustin’ (woo)
And if I ain’t enough, go get the chop
If you’ve somehow remained unmoved and have been so inadequate as to feel no moral and mental elevation, this can only be explained, it seems, by your “bias and cultural cluelessness.” How dare you silence this downtrodden intellectual, whose insights include, “I don’t even listen to [other] people’s music… I listen to me all day long,” and, “I definitely am the best rapper alive.” And whose estimated wealth is a mere $3 million.
Update, via the comments:
It occurs to me that if you’re getting your political consciousness from Da Baby, whose deep thoughts are quoted above, or Lil Baby, or J Cole, or Meek Mill, all “thought-provoking” artists selected by our scholars – if this is your measure of suppressed intellectuals – then there’s a fairly good chance that you’re a poseur, or an idiot, and your standards may require some drastic recalibration.
It’s also worth noting how one of the most hazardous of words to use – one that may result in a kicking or sudden unemployment, and from which All Decent Non-Racist People are expected to recoil – is simultaneously one to which All Decent Non-Racist People are supposed to be drawn, or at least happy to tolerate. Provided it’s being mouthed, endlessly, by idiots of a certain hue. And failing to have a taste for this experience is, we’re now told, evidence of racism.
Was there some canon I was supposed to dedicate hours of my life to…?
But of course, you filthy heathen! 😀
Please do not put too much trust in my 40-year-old memories, but I retain an impression that those fans were personally offended at the “invasion” of con culture by hordes of people who did not share the same…obsessions? (And I say that as someone who vastly prefers an afternoon reading Zelazny or Wolfe to an afternoon watching movies.)
But of course, you filthy heathen! 😀
A part of my on-going, one-man war with the fetishization of books and fiction in general. Currently in dubious battle elsewhere over literal interpretations of the Bible and the “necessity” of Christians (so-called) to better understand the ancient Greek (whatever that specifically means) and Hebrew (whatever century that specifically applies to) lest they not understand the literal meaning of the Bible and its literal truth…which of course would make them not be Christians as they understand it…or something. Interpretation of which is of course not literal because…reasons…but it is. Oh, and it’s the foundation of everything. So there.
…lest they not understand the literal meaning of the Bible and its literal truth…
So, no parables, metaphors, allegories, etc? Sigh.
“Allegories are only found on the banks of the Nile!”
Was there some canon…?
I always assumed it was Appendix N from the original Dungeon Master’s Guide…
I liked that sort of unsubtle pulp storytelling a lot better when I was a preteen.
These kinds of ideas seem much more momentous when they’re the first time you’ve ever encountered them, and have no life experience to compare to. I was well into adulthood and had seen Casablanca before I ever saw The City on the Edge of Forever, which is why I’ve never understood the fuss.
Is that the one where the protagonist literally creates the conditions of Maxwell’s Demon?
I don’t remember. I don’t think so; my recollection is that each of the Five Magics is a kind of proto-science (engineering, chemistry, statistics, etc.) that has been codified to the point of being (mostly) reliable.
I always assumed it was Appendix N from the original Dungeon Master’s Guide
Aside from the OSR weirdbeards, no one who plays D&D has ever read any of the books in Appendix N.
These kinds of ideas seem much more momentous when they’re the first time you’ve ever encountered them, and have no life experience to compare to.
W: When was the Golden Age of science fiction? The 1940’s? 50’s? 60’s?
A: No. The Golden Age is 12.
The Golden Age is 12.
Sounds about right. I know the number of classic SF books that don’t make me cringe has dwindled with each passing year as I re-read them. Rendezvous with Rama; most Chalker; Dune. I don’t have the same problem with fantasy; I suspect it’s because I both have lower expectations and it’s generally easier to write a competent Hero’s Journey than SF that isn’t cartoonishly pulp.
the number of classic SF books that don’t make me cringe has dwindled with each passing year
For me, too.
I suppose, to be fair, I should acknowledge that the Golden Age of many things is around 12, when all sorts of intellectual horizons begin to open up.
One last tilt at sci-fi books: I still reserve my ultimate hatred for a sci-fi tale to be found within the covers of the utterly woke “The long way to a small, angry planet” by one Becky Chambers. Described by some as “progressive” and also: “an immersive and optimistic science fiction novel which does exactly that: immerse” I found it stultifying, tedious but for those who are woke it ticks all the correct boxes (I won’t say right, because the left does not allow that word.) I won’t spoil it for those who love to read about wokery in a progressive future where only love of any stripe reigns, but I do note it is not ‘1984’ which, of course, the progressives have done their level best to make very real, so maybe this is fiction for them. So it goes.
the utterly woke “The long way to a small, angry planet” by one Becky Chambers.
I can’t say I’ve even heard of it, but it was published in 2014, by which time I had already greatly reduced my sf reading and involvement in sf culture.
Described by some as “progressive”
As I think has been discussed here before, Official Science Fiction went down the woke virtue-signaling toilet long ago. I don’t think it much matters, as the ability to self-publish on Amazon has destroyed any gatekeeping or prestige the legacy conventions might once have had.
As I think has been discussed here before, Official Science Fiction went down the woke virtue-signaling toilet long ago…
But, but, SFWA! Locus! File 770! Superannuated adolescent SMOFs! /sarcasm, obviously