Shatner, You Monster

[Starts boarding up windows and hiding anything remotely breakable.]
hahahaha! The years do seem to be harder on a woman, or maybe it’s that because men remain fertile into old age, we are programmed to find even old men attractive. Biology is not my main field.
But there are some women who are good looking into their dotage, and some men who age quite badly. And I am going to guess that politics more than age has affected how Kelly McGillis looks now. There’s an aging SJW whiff about that picture.

The years do seem to be harder on a woman, or maybe it’s that because men remain fertile into old age, we are programmed to find even old men attractive.
Sperm quality declines significantly as men age. However, pairing off with an older man gets a younger woman more security for her offspring, whose genetic material may be acquired elsewhere.

Governor Squid, a lot of people in India don’t bother with the latrine part.
A lot of people in San Fransisco don’t either.
Who is this Tom Cuise fellow?
The one with the better plastic surgeons.

Tain’t the people, it’s the hipst—err, the utterly insanely surreal number of dogs, and hipsters.
There are more of both in NYC, but as much of a soup sandwich DeBlasio is, he doesn’t have to come up with a plan to teach people not to crap on the streets, and if they do, how to clean it up, so yeah, it is the people.

Not sure how you get 89% out of 7 people (my math says 6/7 is 86%), but apparently even some of these delusionals aren’t willing to date their fellow nuts.
It would seem that even a bloke in a dress knows better than to stick “her” dick in crazy.
So is it still considered transphobia if they do it? Seriously – what’s their excuse for not wanting one of their own? They want to stick the normal people of one of the two standard mammal sexes with some -phobia or -ism because they prefer other normal people of one of the two standard mammal sexes. Are they gonna label themselves with the same -phobia and -ism?

as much of a soup sandwich DeBlasio is, he doesn’t have to come up with a plan to teach people not to crap on the streets, and if they do, how to clean it up, so yeah, it is the people.
Or, in actuality, what is stated there is . . .

But Breed laid the blame not at the feet of city policies, or at the feet of the homeless themselves, but with homeless advocacy organizations whom she believes aren’t doing enough to educate their clients when it comes to picking up poop.
“I work hard to make sure your programs are funded for the purposes of trying to get these individuals help, and what I am asking you to do is work with your clients and ask them to at least have respect for the community — at least, clean up after themselves and show respect to one another and people in the neighborhood,” Breed told NBC.

. . . and as noted for a noted particular area . . . .
And thus still as noted, for the rest of SF . . .

Whoever can solve the dogshit problem can be elected mayor of San Francisco, even president of the United States.
. . .
No comment, of course, from the cat lobby . . .

Dog crap is rare because our dog owners pick up after the dogs, and our outdoor cats are smart enough to bury theirs.
So, yeah, it is the people there. . . .
Uh huh. Yeahright.

There are an estimated 120,000 dogs in San Francisco, according to the city’s Animal Care and Control department. There are anywhere from 108,000 to 113,000 children, according to U.S. census figures from 2000 and 2005.

. . . and still as noted for a noted particular area, and still as noted all over for dogs . . .

There are an estimated 120,000 dogs in San Francisco…
Of the five boroughs, Manhattan alone is about half the area of San Fransisco, but has the highest population density of NYC’s 425,000 mutts, but absent any “Occupy ______________ (fill in the blank)” wackos crapping on cop cars, Manhattan isn’t awash with either human or dog crap on the streets. Therefore, regarding The Great Golden Gate Open Air Latrine, yeah, it is the people, but your staunch denial of reality and defense of the poopistes is truly a caution.

. . . but your staunch denial of reality and . . .
Ah yes, and reality.
Lessee.
San Francisco population, apparently about 870,887.
San Francisco dog numbers, as noted, apparently about 120,000.
Number of homeless in SF, apparently about 7,000.
And dogs are dogs.

let’s go with your screwball notion that it is just dogs . . .
Well, no, we can’t because we can see the actual statement and actually read it rather than where you, as it were, openly step in it by indulging in the same sort of wishful fantasy that’s been totally debunked.
Mayor Breed comments on the people who are involved, who are—go ahead and go look for it—that smaller number than the number of dogs, which number is still smaller than the number of, as you note, San Franciscans.
So the original observation remains completely accurate.
—Unless, of course, you’re merely signalling your piety, in which case you’re merely being one with your variety of mere declaimer.