Friday Ephemera
Tardis take-off caught on camera. || Cat love. (h/t, Damian) || When vortex rings collide. || Levitation. || When lava puts its foot down. || Alice and her pig. || The unexplained dancing plague and other epidemics. || In praise of sweatshops. || An archive of film posters. || On great films that you don’t actually like. Feel free to share your own. || Too many vitamins. || Old Earth. || Modern derp. || Why dogs don’t rule the Earth (yet). || Tulip ballet. || Burger in a can. A taste test ensues. || It’s an ordinary bolt; it’s a tiny hunting knife. || Being woke ain’t easy. || Fight the patriarchy. || The museum of forgotten art supplies. (h/t, Coudal) || And finally, three professional wrestlers in a tug-of-war with a lion cub.
The fast moving lava. Good God.
I just skimmed the timeline and maps at the Hawaii Volcano Observatory. Bottom line is that the eruption is continuing (“lava fountain up to 200′ high”) but the expansion of the flow over occupied land, at least, has slowed.
If you review the maps, pay close attention to the dates indicated on the “older” flows in the region. Then try to find the video clip of the local (probably a recent arrival) who complained that she didn’t expect, and wasn’t “warned”, about the possibility of eruption.
What’s really interesting is how the story has completely fallen off the news even here in California. “Ho, hum, volcano continues to volcano. No story.”
Alice and Pig. I hope Rocky doesn’t decide that Alice looks tasty some day.
Great movies that I hated: _Being John Malkovich_ (evil people who get what they want in the end [except the viewpoint character]) and _Election_ (hated everyone in it.
[pokes head in door, whistles]
I’ve been declared a “f*cking left-wing troll” because I thought Instapundit readers should be somewhat wary of taking the Daily Mail as “gospel truth”. Just thought you all should know.
[skips on my way]
In the Museum of Forgotten Art Supplies under photography they feature a number of Polaroid and view cameras. Contrary to popular belief they are not obsolete, or forgotten.
Several years ago, a number of investors bought the last Polaroid factory in The Netherlands and started The Impossible Project the goal of which was to reinvent SX-70 and other instant films. They have renamed themselves Polaroid Originals and they makes some pretty good film – a good functioning SX-70 will fetch a premium price, though, if you don’t have one in a closet.
As far as view cameras go, one can always purchase a digital back if you have enough money, if you don’t, there are sliding adapters that let one use a DSLR to stitch together a “large format” image from several smaller ones (works best with cameras with FX sensors).
“Great” films I hate:
Forrest Gump (don’t even go there)
The Piano (watching it reminded me of 1960’s dental treatment in England, in other words, excruciatingly painful)
It’s A Wonderful Life (no it ain’t)
And now for something completely different, “Great” films I love:
The Green Mile (everything about that film was amazing)
Jaws (the theme music still gives me goosebumps)
Schindler’s List (speaks for itself)
Cool Hand Luke (quite possibly my favourite film ever, Paul Newman…swoon)
When lava puts its foot down.
It’s like fast zombies. *shudder*
Being woke ain’t easy.
Being consistent is harder.
Morning, all.
“Great” films I hate
Back in the mid-Nineties, The Other Half and I sat down to watch Tarkovsky’s Solaris, which I thought might be entertaining, albeit for reasons that now escape me. Some 23 years later, he still hasn’t forgiven me. In fairness, this undying rage isn’t unwarranted. To say it’s a tedious and unrewarding film would be a catastrophic understatement. It actively repels engagement and mercilessly crushes any expectation of pleasure or suspense. As if any concession to pacing, drama and engaging characters would somehow be unsophisticated.
Also, as I think I’ve said before, Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner is massively overrated.
Being consistent is harder.
And will be punished.
“Great” films I hate:
Citizen Kane gets a lot of attention. I remember watching it as a student, and expecting something worthy, or clever, but unengaging, because that’s what “classics” normally feel like. I was pleasantly surprised that I actually enjoyed the story.
But…
Blade Runner. Good god that film is dull. Looks great, sure, but that’s “I came out humming the scenery”. The only really memorable moment, Roy’s death speech, was improvised by Rutger Hauer – imagine if he’d just stuck to the script, how boring the film would have been. I don’t think Ridley Scott figured out how to tell a story until Gladiator.
Pulp Fiction. quotable dialogue, but no actual story or point, and the characters are hip cardboard.
Burger in a can. A taste test ensues.
*orders one for wife’s birthday*
*orders one for wife’s birthday*
A lucky woman.
Solaris is painful, but I think I’d rather watch it again than Forrest Gump. If the world ever runs out of saccharine and stevia they can put that horrible thing on repeat.
Love Actually, which they play at Christmas in NZ, is another I simply abhor. If I met the characters from it in real life, and there are so many parts in it, I would loathe them. While I can get past that for some dramatic bathos or action with a smaller cast, I simply can’t when watching that film.
Back in the mid-Nineties, The Other Half and I sat down to watch Tarkovsky’s Solaris, which I thought might be entertaining, albeit for reasons that now escape me.
You were looking forward to the utterly riveting section of freeway driving sequences.
>On great films that you don’t actually like. Feel free to share your own
Most of them. In fact, most films are awful.
You were looking forward to the utterly riveting section of freeway driving sequences.
Heh. Yes, there’s nothing quite like watching a long car journey in which nothing much happens, filmed in what feels like real time.
Oh Lord, the horror is coming back to me.
Great films I hate:
Taxi Driver
Being There
Doctor Zhivago
Give me time and I think I could come up with more.
You were looking forward to the utterly riveting section of freeway driving sequences.
You’d think that a film about the discovery of a planet with a sentient, shape-shifting ocean that can divine human anxieties and desires, but which accidentally causes a kind of existential madness, wouldn’t be entirely without promise. But dear God, within minutes Tarkovsky manages to obliterate any interest in the premise, and indeed in life itself. The more recent Soderbergh version is much better, in that things actually happen, and is in some respects closer to the novel, but it’s still not a film I’d care to watch again. Though the soundtrack, by Cliff Martinez, is agreeable.
Great film I hate: 2001 Minutes of Space Idiocy
Saw it when it first came out. When my kids were still in high school, about 6 years ago, I rented it, and told them they were in for a real movie experience.
It didn’t take them long to decide I was completely nuts. To be fair, it didn’t take me long, either. Tedious pacing, wooden dialog, and cardboard characters are its high points. The Pretentious Guild of Movie Critics absolutely loves the thing. I no longer pay any attention to them.
The only member of the family to enjoy any of the movie was our Golden Retriever, Rusty the Alaskan Wilderness Adventure Dog. He really sat up and took notice of the ape scene.
Slept through the rest of it.
Tired of your low paying job ? Can’t advance because you only have a bachelors degree ? Well fret no more, for only two days a week, in just one year you too can get a high paying job in the Clown Quarter by getting a Masters Degree in Gender Without Borders !
Of course it does.
The three wrestlers versus the lion cub in a tug of war … have to say, my gut reaction is “yeah … no”.
Great film I respected and admired, but never wanted to watch again?
Raging Bull
You were looking forward to the utterly riveting section of freeway driving sequences
The love of so many intellectuals for such bilge slowly led me to question their judgement: are they stupid? Dishonest? Deranged?
But a professed love for such soporific material does call to mind jokes about fans of New Age “space music” being under sedation.
The only really memorable moment, Roy’s death speech, was improvised by Rutger Hauer
Do you have a link to what Ridley Scott had him saying?
I thought Instapundit readers should be somewhat wary of taking the Daily Mail as “gospel truth”.
Link? I’d like to see what they’re up to today.
Teal Deer (TL;DR) on Incels.
Long, but worth a listen.
The only really memorable moment, Roy’s death speech, was improvised by Rutger Hauer
For me, Blade Runner is a premise without enough dramatic flesh, and is nowhere near as good as, say, Alien. It’s often pretty to look at, but I can’t say I’ve actually enjoyed watching it. The script seems unfinished, the structure and pacing are poor and there’s very little sense of dramatic momentum. It doesn’t engage concern for any of the characters, except perhaps when J F Sebastian receives his visitors (and then ends up killed off-screen). For the most part, it just sort of drifts by, albeit handsomely.
I remember loving Forrest Gump, though I haven’t seen it for some years.
Blade Runner is like dining at a super fancy restaurant – enjoyable and memorable in parts, but on the whole I’d rather grill a steak in the less pretentious comfort of my home.
I continue to be flummoxed by the mass popularity of comic book movies, a genre I was tired of by the 3rd X-Men movie.
I’ve been declared a “f*cking left-wing troll” because I thought Instapundit readers should be somewhat wary of taking the Daily Mail as “gospel truth”.
Having tread those moronic waters a few times in the past I’ve learned that any – and I mean any – attempt at civil disagreement or nuanced discussion around tactical approaches invites chest-thumping theatrics from ~80% of the board. It’s only gotten worse now that they have their Obama in office.
Tulip ballet.
Lovely, until I realize that these are death throes, and we’re watching them in excruciating slo-mo detail…
It’s only gotten worse now that they have their Obama in office.
What strikes (and saddens) me is that Glenn and his merry band are not exactly banner-waving Trumppalos. Half the noise from the howler monkeys over there is just the same droolers throwing the same insults at the co-bloggers on every single post.
It’s another sad example of my least-favorite thing about being part of a political group that values actual tolerance — you find yourself forced to tolerate a lot of really tedious behavior that would be intolerable in other circumstances.
Still, it’s fun to wind them up from time to time.
Allegedly great film I can’t be doing with: Apocalypse Now. This and overblown, and that’s not referring to Brando.
Film that deserves all the love: The Princess Bride. Obvs.
For the most part, it just sort of drifts by, albeit handsomely.
I can’t find the link now, but I remember reading an article on Salon many years ago titled (roughly) “Why Are So Many Classic SF Films So Awful?” The short answer is that they tend to concern themselves with Big Ideas, and fans love them because they’re the only films dealing with those big ideas – and they’re willing to overlook the poor quality of everything else. Absent the poorly-developed notions of “what does it mean to be human” and some gorgeous set design, Blade Runner is a fairly average neo-noir crime film.
I continue to be flummoxed by the mass popularity of comic book movies
Really? I thought it was fairly obvious. They’ve replaced the cheesy action films of the 1980’s, and for the same reason. And since they’re simple Heroic Myth stories set in a simplified, fantastic setting that isn’t too US-specific, they bring in the big bucks in the foreign markets.
Absent the poorly-developed notions of “what does it mean to be human” and some gorgeous set design, Blade Runner is a fairly average neo-noir crime film.
Yes, that’s pretty much my view. It takes an interesting premise then does… almost nothing with it. The film does so little work establishing characters and motives, whether human or otherwise, that it’s hard to care about anyone’s fate, and as a result the big idea all but evaporates.
There are quite a few “great” films that are meh to me. And that link nailed several of them:
Citizen Kane, perhaps because I knew what Rosebud was about before watching
The Piano, that was the one with Harvey Kietel’s shlong in it, correct? I could have done without that. Hell, I’m not even crazy about his face. I do like some of his other movies/characters however.
Brazil, disappointing
Shawshank Redemption, though my wife really liked it
Superman, hate that guy so maybe I’m biased. Maybe.
Return of the Jedi, Lando Calreasean (or HTF you spell it) character seemed rather forced.
The Exorcist, I find most horror films rather lame. Halloween was abut the only one I liked…well that and Kill Pussycat, Kill Kill
Psycho, big Hitchcock fan but maybe knowing the story ahead of time put me off of it
As for “great” ones that I genuinely didn’t like:
Any Star Wars released after the 1980’s, with the exception of Rogue One.
The Matrix, oh shut up already. I did like the red/blue pill concept however.
Fight Club, except for the first rule of Fight Club being don’t talk about Fight Club. We have rules for a reason, people.
Lord of The Rings, pick one. At the end of one of these things some guy has a telephone pole through his chest and he JUST WOULDN’T DIE SO I COULD GO HOME.
Psycho, big Hitchcock fan but maybe knowing the story ahead of time put me off of it
I’ve always thought that the first act of Psycho, the theft, is better, and more tense, than anything that follows it.
“And finally, three professional wrestlers in a tug-of-war with a lion cub.”
I see arrested development has hit the feline world. A two and a half year old isn’t a cub, it’s pretty much a lion!
For your amusement, via Ace, one Miss Fern Riddell gets her knickers in a bunch on the twitters if you don’t call her “Doctor” because she is allegedly an expert in something.
It is interesting to note that her actual degree seems quite hidden, though it appears to be some sort of history of sex in Victorian music halls, though whether it is a history PhD or a Feminist Studies PhD is not stated (which makes one suspect the latter). The twitter thread is worth a read for the sycophants sucking up to her and for wisdom such as:
Right, all the Angry and Useless Studies have really contributed to human knowledge.
“Tarkovsky’s Solaris”
B… but it’s the “Soviet 2001: A Space Oddysey”!
Oh. Yeah. I see the problem.
“For the most part, [Blade Runner] just sort of drifts by, albeit handsomely.”
That’s why I enjoy it. Screw the plot and the Big Ideas. As a teenager, it was an embarassingly long time before I discovered that “dystopia” didn’t mean “cool future place where there’s all neon and androids and people with chips implanted in their heads and stuff”, and you weren’t supposed to like it.
“Most of them. In fact, most films are awful.”
Yeah. Truth is, I don’t really like films all that much at all. My attention span is too short, I think. I can just about hack a 50-minute TV show, but for me, the perfect film is seven minutes long and was directed by Bob Clampett or Robert McKimson.
“I’ve always thought that the first act of Psycho, the theft, is better, and more tense, than anything that follows it.”
I maintain that Psycho 3 is one of the finest comedies ever made. Read IMDB “goofs” page for some of its best gags.
Had to look. I just had to…it’s a sickness that I have…but you all know that by now…
http://www.fernriddell.com/
Oh. Yeah. I see the problem.
Well, at least Kubrick’s film is visually and thematically interesting, if not exactly pacey – and it has HAL. And while both films are long and ponderous, and both deal with cosmic communication problems, Kubrick and Clarke opted for a richer palette and a more hopeful ending. Tarkovsky’s film, like Lem’s novel, is much bleaker, in that communication with the alien lifeform is not only hazardous to almost everyone who attempts it, but seemingly futile.
Truth is, I don’t really like films all that much at all. My attention span is too short, I think. I can just about hack a 50-minute TV show, but for me, the perfect film is seven minutes long
Well, if you’re a real short film fan ya gotta love this classic from my youth. A bit longish, though…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAVYYe87b9w
Pst315: “Do you have a link to what Ridley Scott had him saying?”
The speech has its own Wikipedia article (final and clinching proof that Wikipedia has disappaeared up its own nerdy arse, but that’s another story). Apparently, the original line was:
Unlike David, I think Alien is nearly as bad. Fantastic production design, a couple of really good scenes… but the rest is disconnected and unengaging, only somewhat saved by the strength of Sigourney Weaver’s screen presence.
I think the issue with classic sci-fi films is less about being concerned with Big Ideas, more that science fiction fans take science fiction seriously and the movies generally don’t, so on the rare occasion that a serious sci-fi movie comes out the fans are so pleased it’s not totally cheesy like the usual fare they go all in for it, ignoring its storytelling flaws.
To say it’s a tedious and unrewarding film would be a catastrophic understatement.
It’s got an 8.1/10 rating on IMDB.
As they say, there’s no accounting for taste…
Great films I hate:
Midnight Cowboy (7.0/10 on IMDB…)
Midnight Cowboy (7.0/10 on IMDB…)
Opps…make that 7.9/10
I’m going to stick up for Tarkovsky’s “Solaris”. You have to remember that this was made on a shoestring in the Soview Union. The Tokyo freeway scenes look ridiculous to us, but they would have looked futuristic to a Soviet audience at the time, and they are used as a metaphor for the space journey.
Once Kris is on the space station, the film really gets going (in a glacial sort of way). The scenes where Kharis is repeatedly killed and resurrected are heartbreaking, the weightless scene is beautiful and the final reveal is mind-blowing.
Soderbergh fucked it up, I think.
I’m going to stick up for Tarkovsky’s “Solaris”.
Clearly, you’ve had way too much to drink. I’ll make some coffee.
Speaking of comic book films, it seems to me that one problem is all the bad guys are raving lunatics. None of them are attacking Earth for any comprehensible reason, but just because they like smashing stuff and killing people. You too, Thanos. Too many people and not enough resources? Wait a million years, a heartbeat in universe time, and both will be gone. Problem solved. The only thing Eath has that is at all rare is life, and they want to put a stop to it. Nutters, all of them.
None of them are attacking Earth for any comprehensible reason, but just because they like smashing stuff and killing people.
Basically galactic SJWs then ?