A Shower And A Hot Meal
Patrons are reminded that this rickety barge is kept afloat by the kindness of strangers. If you’d like to help it remain buoyant for a while longer, there’s an orange button below with which to monetise any love for this low establishment. Debit and credit cards are happily accepted. For those wishing to express their love regularly, there’s a monthly subscription option top left. Additionally, any Amazon shopping done via this link or the search widget top right, or for Amazon US via this link, results in a small fee for your host at no extra cost to you. Think of it as a way to turn that filthy consumerism into an act of piety.
For newcomers wishing to know more about what’s been going on here for – blimey – close to ten years, the reheated series is a pretty good place to start. There you’ll find, among other things, a guide to rationalising sub-optimal life choices in the most grandiose way possible, and a feminist intellectual who tells us that “a curfew for men” and “an end to masculinity” are necessary and “make sense.” Along with some exhilarating performance art involving hand dryers, an artistic release of gas, and an unpopular leftwing novelist explaining why unpopular leftwing novelists deserve nicer homes than yours.
If you can, do take a moment to poke through the discussion threads too. The posts are intended as starting points, not full stops, and the comments are where much of the good stuff is waiting to be found. And do please join in.
Again, thanks for the support, the comments, and the company.
*hits tip jar*
Should cover some soap and a sandwich.
Thanks for the laughs. Tip jar hit.
Leftist writer assumes that being kind, or at least sharing a photo of someone else being kind, will “annoy” conservatives.
what’s been going on here for – blimey – close to ten years,
I’m still trying to catch up on the reheated series. Your tip jar has been hit, David.
More joys of public transport.
https://twitter.com/jayckb/status/790610399083323392
(Also pinged.)
More joys of public transport.
There’s a boldness to his squalor. And now I’m wondering why there’s a large amount of some mysterious white powder around his feet.
Dandruff ?
an artistic release of gas
Very good. Tipped.
“New York University (NYU) has canceled a Milo Yiannopoulos speech, saying it presents ‘perils to [the] safety of our community’ because some students may ‘involuntarily’ stumble upon it.”
http://campusreform.org/?ID=8296
students may ‘involuntarily’ stumble upon it.
It reminded me of the line from Withnail & I, “We’ve gone on holiday by mistake.”
Well, we’ll see if we can make it through another fundraiser without the wife looking at the credit card statement.
without the wife looking at the credit card statement.
It should appear on your statement as a subscription to the International Journal of Eproctophilia. I’m sure the dear lady will understand.
*googles ‘eproctophilia’*
⊙_ʘ
⊙_ʘ
Apparently, it’s a thing.
Oh don’t look so innocent.
Apparently, it’s a thing.
Just a thought, but you may wish to review your marketing protocols.
New York University (NYU) has canceled a Milo Yiannopoulos speech
This stuff really is beginning to defy parody: http://bit.ly/29a8oXL I mean, spot the difference? Anyone?
I don’t have speakers on the work PC so can only imagine what will be said.
“I can’t do this because the parts aren’t there”
“Trans male Marcus has an anatomy more commonly associated with women so, in the bedroom with his cisgender girlfriend, things can get very frustrating for him.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04clf4h
The BBC video that I Sneeze linked to on transgender love … at the bottom it says “you may also like …”. Uhh … how do I put this?
The BBC video…
A) Could someone translate that last bit about whipping cakes off (?) into American please.
B) OK – Marcus is the gal with the red earring lip piercing, the dirigible with the stubby beard doesn’t exactly look like a “cisgender girlfriend” so who the hell is that ?
C) WTF is wrong with the alleged cisgender girlfriend – I may have missed that page in Everyday Feminism and Neurosis Affirmation, but if she (GF) knows she (Marcus) is missing the doo-dads but still wants to get it on, doesn’t that make her rather non-cis ? It is getting so you can’t tell the players without a scorecard.
Could someone translate that last bit about whipping cakes off (?) into American please.
Kecks, or keks, i.e., trousers.
“…doesn’t that make her rather non-cis ?”
Actually, that makes her a cis-gendered lesbian. I mean if you’re going to play the game, play it right. You may also like …
Thanks to all who’ve chipped in so far. It’s much appreciated and makes a big difference to how much time I can spend idling with you heathens.
Kecks, or keks, i.e., trousers.
Toda – and a small gratuity for helping my with my English lessons should be finding its way to you.
Actually, that makes her a cis-gendered lesbian.
Maybe yes, and maybe no – if she (GF) fancies Marcus as a girl then yes, a cis-lesbian (which is actually non-cis, but also non-trans), but if she (GF) fancies her (Marcus) as a guy then she (GF) would be just plain cis.
It would be easier if they just stuck to the script – Marcus apparently likes girls – OK, be a lesbian, it is not as if a surgically applied johnson is going to work like a real one.
OT, but (actually, there is no topic today, is there. So all you complainers can piss off.) :
Long article on public radio this AM about a ballot proposition in Colorado to create an entirely state tax-funded universal coverage medical program for all Colorado residents.
Two amusing facts I learned:
– The new tax would approximately equal the entire current state budget, about $30 billion, give or take. (Of course, that’s if you believe the proponents’ accounting. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?)
– The plan is to keep the budget under control by reducing payments to hospitals and doctors. This, it is stated, will not alter the availability of hospitals and doctors in Colorado.
– The plan will be funded by a new 10% payroll tax (which, it was somewhat fuzzily explained, will be paid by both employees and employers.) This, it was stated, will have no deleterious effect on the availability of taxpaying employees and employers in Colorado.
Colorado must be the best-run government on the planet. So there’s no risk, none at all, when handing the state bureaucracy another $30 billion, that any of that money will be stolen or wasted.
Loved the last line from a proponent: “If we lose, we’ll just try again, because it’s the right thing to do.” Winning, she did not need to state, is apparently irreversible.
The new Colorado plan will not only pay for that surgically applied johnson, it will ensure that it works better than any bog-standard home-grown johnson. Because, Government.
Single-payer legal care.
Because no lawyer does anything worth more than minimum wage.
Long article on public radio this AM about a ballot proposition in Colorado to create an entirely state tax-funded universal coverage medical program for all Colorado residents.
Why do Americans not think this cannot work? Canada, almost all of Europe, Australia etc have a universal funded medical coverage that manages to be cheaper than what the US pay. So it can work. The British NHS has serious issues, but the French system is fine.
In NZ, at least, we have a taxpayer funded medical system that isn’t quite free, the government correctly calculating that people do not value stuff that is totally free, but is cheap enough that insurance is not necessary. The basic coverage is sometimes supplemented by the wealthy or nervous with private insurance, but most people don’t bother. The result is we spend half the amount per person on health that the US does, for approximately the same results.
The fact that it is government run may mean waste, but so long as that waste is inside what would be profit margins inside a private system the actual cost is less. We save on 1) insurance company costs, because they aren’t involved, 2) employee costs linked to running schemes, because they don’t, 3) costs involved with hospitals competing and duplicating, because they don’t.
I understand that it cannot work in the US because of legacy issues, especially the ease of litigation, and a fear of government — but to ridicule it on the basis that it clearly is ridiculous ignores much of the Western world. It can work, and it can be cheaper.
The plan is to keep the budget under control by reducing payments to hospitals and doctors. This, it is stated, will not alter the availability of hospitals and doctors in Colorado.
And indeed it may not as kindly old Dr. Young, Hopkins and Mayo Clinic, says the hell with Colorado, and is replaced by young Dr. Olde, new graduate of the Patrice Lumumba Glorious Comrades Extension College of Medicine and Tractor Mechanics Number 47, Managua. All the hospitals will be there, but services will be curtailed as equipment breaks down and doesn’t get replaced, so, like Canadians going to the US for MRIs, Coloradoans will be going to neighboring states.
“If we lose, we’ll just try again…
Just because it hasn’t worked anywhere else in the world won’t deter us !
It can work, and it can be cheaper.
Other than the massively higher taxes, and the lower quality and lesser availability of services, you are absolutely right.
The fact that Canadiens cross the US border in droves to use our healthcare system tells me all I need to know about which system is better.
Why do Americans not think this cannot work? Canada, […] have a universal funded medical coverage that manages to be cheaper than what the US pay. So it can work.
Thanks to our host’s presence on a Canadian politics blog, there are several of us here from Her Majesty’s Dominion.
It may surprise you to learn that many Canadians do not consider our single-payer system to “work”.
Chester,
Speaking only for myself as an American, I have no solid opinion about whether or not such a thing can work in some location. There are interesting examples of different ways to handle provision and funding of medical care to be found around the world, and one would be a fool to dismiss them out of hand.
However.
I live in the US. I live in Silicon Valley, California, for god’s sake. I’ve been paying attention to the things the various bits of government around me do, and the things the electorate chooses to ask for, for something nigh on 55 years now.
[I was going to write a long explanation here, but I’ll spare you all.]
In my opinion, it CANNOT be made to work here, with anything like our current government structure and government employees.
Look at the fiasco of the PPACA (Obamacare), for the most recent example of how well this will be designed and implemented in the US.
Me? I believe P.J.O’Rourke: ‘If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free.’
“Why do Americans not think this cannot work?”
Because Americans basically pay for the majority of the rest of the world’s drug and medical device innovations. If the US went the way of Europe and Canada, medical innovation would screech to a halt. And if you say that European and Asian companies are making big advances in medical/pharmaceutical technology, that is mainly because they can reap enormous profits from the US market.
Not hugely well of myself at the mom but I’ve dropped a few bucks into the hat.
Just bought three Pat Metheny albums with your Amazon link and damn, do I feel pious.
Actually, that makes her a cis-gendered lesbian.
Maybe yes, and maybe no
It sounds like we’ve got a terminology problem, here.
“Cis-gendered” means that you identify with the sex that you were born with, i.e., if you were born with lady parts and you self-identify as female, you’re cis-gendered. Likewise if you were born with male plumbing and you self-identify as male.
If you were born with lady parts and you self-identify as male, you’re trans-gendered. Same if you were born with boy parts and self-identify as a woman.
It has nothing to do with sexual attraction. Zip. Nada. Niente.
Marcus is a trans-gender who was born female but self-identifies as male AND who is attracted to women. (Careful, I’ve got a co-worker who is in this same boat.)
Meaning that before Marcus transitioned, she was a lesbian. Most lesbians were born female and continue to self-identify as such. Marcus’s girlfriend is one such lesbian.
She is attracted to butch women. VERY butch women. It would not surprise me to learn that as a child she was sexually molested by a man, making her supremely mistrustful of men (trust being huge for women), but a trans-man is (a) man enough to appeal to her native heterosexuality but not (b) man enough to be a threat to her.
So it works for them, for now, and they both have a hard enough life as it is.
The result is we spend half the amount per person on health that the US does, for approximately the same results.
What are your survival rates for cancer?
How many MRI machines do you have per capita?
What kind of wait times do you have for different kinds of surgeries?
How many new drugs and procedures do you develop per annum?
On those metrics I highly doubt Kiwi healthcare compares favorably.
There’s no way you’re getting the same level of service at half the cost. And there’s no cost involved with competition, because competition drives prices down, not up.
Furthermore, our healthcare system is NOT a free-market system by any means or stretch of the imagination. Insurance companies have “networks” of providers who have agreed to accept X as a fee: if we go to an out-of-network provider, we may pay 100% out-of-pocket.
I don’t get to choose my insurance company: my employer does. I might have 2-3 plans to choose from but that’s it.
Doctors and hospitals don’t compete with each other in our system; they just cut deals with the insurance companies and then spend an enormous amount of resources trying to collect what they’re owed.
It’s a Frankenstein’s monster of cronyism, price-fixing, over-insuring, and treatment-dictating. Anything BUT a free-market system.
Careful, NZ is a small country. Competition would not drive price down because two flash MRIs which are not used to efficiency are just expensive waste.
Life expectancy in NZ is two years higher than the US. Infant mortality is terrible, but better than the US. We have a higher immigrant %. Things like “cancer survival rates” are meaningless, since they depend on the type etc, which depend on race, diet etc.
The NZ system isn’t that great, we’re little and less rich than most western countries, but is cheap. The French system is good, but expensive. The US pay at French rates, but get NZ outcomes.
And no it doesn’t drive our tax up. Our top rate is 33% and we have only national tax, 15% sales tax and low land taxes. We are low tax.
Competition also only drives price down if companies compete on price. US health providers compete on service, providing gold-plated product which gives the same end result.
Restaurants often don’t compete on price, which is why they are not driven out by McDonalds. But the nicest three star restaurant feeds you no more healthily than burgers.
Plenty of service providers don’t compete on price. It’s why the US has many of the world’s top ranked universities, but boy you pay to go to them!
US health providers compete on service, providing gold-plated product which gives the same end result
There are areas of medical service that is not covered by insurance, yet competition HAS brought the price down.
Want to have Lasik 20+ years ago? spend $8-10K or more. Now you can get Lasik or Lasek, with all manner of advanced equipment and about 2K.
All manner of cosmetic surgery & procedures have gotten better & less expensive over the years.
UC Berzerkley never fails to disappoint .
Left-wing students at the University of California, Berkeley are protesting again. This time, however, these students are calling for “safe spaces” for transgendered people, as well as “spaces of color” at the University (which they already have).
The protesters are also harassing white students trying to study, barring their path across a key bridge while allowing students of color safe passage.
The protest, which began last Friday, blocked Berkeley’s Sather Gate, disrupted studying students in the Student Union, and blocked traffic at the intersection of Telegraph and Bancroft in front of campus.
In video of the protest, the so-called anti-racism protesters were seen denying passage across the bridge to white students — shouting “go around” — while happily allowing students of color to pass through.
“Anti-racism” meant ironically, I can only assume.
Oh, and ping!.
There’s no way you’re getting the same level of service at half the cost.
I can see a potential way; for instance, New Zealand might have much fewer persons of a murderous persuasion running around knifing and shooting and batting each other. Thus, same level of service per injury, but half cost due to fewer injuries overall.
A Shower And A Hot Meal
Britsh Logic, aka twit @BritishLogic announces; Every pub meal is now served on a fucking chopping board
Do tell . . . I do remember reading something like this before . . .
UC Berzerkley never fails to disappoint .
Weeeeeelllllllll, yes, that lot does disappoint(1) . . . . . Unfortunately, Telegraph Avenue, aka the four block retail section that’s about 500something feet out from that shot of Sather Gate, has not been doing well in recent years. Where if wannabe grandstanders actually did want to have an effect on foot traffic, they’d have gone West towards Shattuck and the Bart station to set up a blockade there—as it is, rerouting around Sather gate is a piffle.
Oh, and being nowhere near Sather Gate, the Math and Stats departments are rather uphill, to the East and up past College Avenue, in Evans, and EECS is even further uphill and to the Northeast, in Cory and Soda.
(1) Oh^2, and I wanna see that lot even just try and match an actual protest at Berkeley, with numbers of participants to match . . . . . . .
UC Berzerkley never fails to disappoint.
See today’s post.
Pinged good and hard.
Doing some Christmas shopping via your Amazon thing. Keep up the good work.
but the French system is fine
It’s not, it’s bankrupt. But to be fair, nobody notices. So maybe it’s fine after all, provided the government can keep borrowing.
“…harassing white students trying to study, barring their path…”
Where are the football players when you need them? Oh yeah, right – protesting the Star Spangled Banner (or is it the flag? I just can’t keep up with the idiocy anymore).
Hal,
Via your links in a place called the Bold Italic
“The only thing worse than Telegraph never recovering is it becoming yet another gentrified strip of road.”
The author, Lexi Pandell, describes herself as a freelance writer who includes the obligatory ‘cookiness’ of “Will write for burritos” and the identifier @ucbsoj. Berzerkley, huh?
When deciding on which hot meal will accompany the shower, you may care to take this into account:
http://www.newshub.co.nz/nznews/beer-and-pie-diet—the-final-verdict-2016102619