When They Won’t Keep On Saying Just How Special You Are
From the pages of Metro, where Ms Rachel Meghan is talking about herself:
The barbecue is in Hell. Did I mention that?
Or, “I have badges too,” she said.
Oh calamity. All that specialness – dashed to pieces.
And yet correcting people – constantly – attempting to make them mouth absurdities, remains a go-to impulse. An irresistible temptation. Despite those claims of exhaustion. Funny, that. Whether other parties might be fatigued by this habit is, alas, not explored.
Well, given observable reality, that will happen.

“Everything came to a head after I became a mother,” says she. Pretensions of themness, the craving to seem special – perhaps more special than one is – would, I suppose become harder to sustain. Given the arrival of someone more important, someone whose needs tend to come first.
That’s the spirit.
Not sure whether that’s a fear or an aspiration.
As women so often do.
Specifically, a woman’s body.
As, like, totally spiritual people feel compelled to say.
A spirituality of self. How terribly innovative.
Again, self. And repeated descriptions thereof.
So many badges, and they’re all so shiny. Also, my truth.
Better start saving for those counselling sessions.
As two-year-olds do, of course. I can hear those eyebrows raising from here.
Having known the author as a girl and then as a woman, presumably. Not as some imaginary, unsexed being. One who’s had sex and consequently a child.
Imagine the fun. All those corrections and self-corrections. All that pointed effort. The evenings must fly by.
No laughing at the back.
How very dare they.
You see, in a sense, she’s always in the room, policing how her self is being perceived. On account of being so spiritual.
Update, via the comments:
What’s noteworthy, I think, is how closely these things follow a familiar, if unconvincing, pattern.
Say, the feeble, retrospective excuses for ongoing pretensions. Ms Meghan tells us of not wanting to get her nails done as a girl, and not wishing to straighten her hair, as if this were the very measure of things. Or the complaints of being exhausted by her own chosen contrivance, as if her attention-seeking were only being done reluctantly, as if she weren’t the author of it.
And the rather implausible claim of not influencing small children to make them mouth the expected absurdities. The demanded affirmation. In madam’s case, the claim that her two-year-old son “just clocked my queerness on his own,” unprompted, while simultaneously boasting of telling said two-year-old, “Mummy isn’t a woman.”
And of course the strange lack of concern for those on whom these tiresome dramas are being imposed. Including her own child.
Update 2:
John D quotes this,
And adds,
Well, indeed. It’s not unlike someone who’s five foot five insisting that they be perceived by everyone around them as being six foot four. And then getting all tearful and pissy when this doesn’t happen. It’s scarcely less absurd.
You don’t get to control how others perceive you. Emotional blackmail based on demands that others must use fabulist pronouns, even out of earshot, will not change that fact. It may, however, make you look obnoxious and deranged.
‘Every time you refer to me, whether I’m present or not, you first have to clap your hands three times.’
Same vibe.
Even if it were the case that Ms Meghan feels “misgendered” – which would be assuming quite a lot – she has not in fact been “misgendered” by use of the words she and her, or by any recognition of the fact that she’s obviously a woman. She has been referred to accurately, in accord with physical reality.
Her mental health problems – any feelings of being “misgendered” – are not the arbiter of what is.
We can see what is.
And it’s curious how patterns of behaviour that until very recently would have been recognised as manipulative, abusive, insufferable, etc., are now being indulged and actively encouraged. Not least in the pages of Metro, where this theatre of the self is pretty much a staple and served up routinely.
This rickety barge is kept afloat by the tip-jar buttons below.





If someone ever tells me “I’m non-binary” by way of introduction, I might or might not reply with “Oh, I would never have guessed. And so young too. But I hear the preliminary results from the latest clinical trial are very encouraging.”
Voltaire said (allowing for translation into English), “Certainly anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices.”
By deduction, what does that tell us about those who want us to believe absurdities?
Cf. socialism, communism, fascism, &c.
It was “youths” attempting to get into the fair without paying. So, shoving past ticket takers and fighting with the few cops stationed immediately at the entrance.
On claims that one should not stop thieves from thieving, that this is just being unfairly alarmist: people who make such claims clearly live in safe neighborhoods. If your things are stolen and you cannot afford to replace them, you are significantly worse off. Also, those breaking into homes may just shoot you because why not. Just watch a few episodes of Cops or 48 Hours to see this. Thugs break in, someone is home, they panic and shoot them. Surely nothing to get alarmed about. Surely just right wing bigots making an unjustified fuss.
Or they just find it more convenient to shoot them.
Or they just like shooting people.
Both are often true.
How about saying that thieving is bad for the soul, because you have to dehumanize your victims to better victimize them?
Or perhaps they’re putting their lives at risk because if they bust in on some redneck or a nervous mother with a pistol, they might get shot!
Or maybe point out that thievery creates a low-trust society, which is bad for everyone’s nerves?
No?
[ Post updated again. ]
[ Wipes sweat from brow. ]
<unendurable heat>
<bad hair>
“Green Party candidate.” Of course.
One more time.
Those arguments are based on logic and reason. That Rubicon was crossed a long time ago. Nothing will change until these people are met with public, direct mocking and derision, repeatedly and loudly. Because if that fails, what comes after is even more unpleasant.
Republican party candidate. What do you expect.