Issues Of Earth-Rumbling Import
Meanwhile, at Boston University, enormous thoughts are being had:
The she in question is Professor Megan Elias.
Oh, and she’s talking about food.
Obviously.
The question “what is queer food?” is, we’re told by Professor Elias, “a question that’s coming up a lot lately.” If only among academics desperate for an angle, an excuse for claiming a salary and wasting other people’s time. Academics much like Professor Elias.
Welcome to the bleeding edge of human mental activity.
Quite how one can edit “an illustrated guide to queer food,” complete with recipes, as Professor Ilias has, while simultaneously being unable to define what such a thing is, should it exist, is a question I leave to the reader.
Though a review of said book does offer a clue:
So “queer food,” it turns out, is not in fact a thing. It’s just whatever people who describe themselves as “queer” – a subset of insufferable misfits – happen to eat. While talking about themselves and how terribly “queer” they are.
Specifics of the professor’s course content are, as one might imagine, a little sketchy, beyond the obligatory claims of things being “disrupted” and “interrogated,” albeit in ways not altogether clear, or indeed convincing.
We are, however, informed that the credulous and self-absorbed will be invited to ponder what they might eat on a first date – because that’s totally worth those annual fees of $90,000 – and “how [their] food choice is representing [their] gender identity.” Which is a thing that food should do, apparently.
Oh, and the aforementioned,
On grounds that being, say, “polyamorous” – i.e., a neurotic slag – may, in ways unexplained, determine how much you like lasagne or carrots.
Such is the sophistication of our times.
Those so inclined – and with nothing better to do – are welcome to reflect on yesterday’s dinner, or this morning’s breakfast, and then explain to the rest of the class how those foodstuffs “represent” your “gender identity.”
I’ll award points for contrivance.
Readers may recall our adventures in “queered” history, which is like history, but less so. And, as above, much more self-involved.
This blog is kept afloat by the tip jar buttons below.





One of the little pleasures of transatlantic conversation is encountering all the unfamilar British expressions.
Just curious: Is there anybody at the Cato Institute who is not a morally obtuse, intellectually corrupt, dissembling creep?
Konrad Lorenz, Nobel Laureate & Ethologist Meets Actress Teyana Taylor (THE SAAD TRUTH_1980): Leftists following “woke” delusions are like ducklings following the first thing they saw when hatched. Neither can change but must continue on that course to the very end.
Context?
Scroll up to see what Alex from the Cato Institute is replying to.
I’ve encountered an awful lot of garbage from Cato people.
@David: is this tweet a misdemeanor or a felony?
Keir Starmer Ditches Plans for Mandatory Digital ID
Can we now mandate chipping and neutering of all Labourites?
Richard Fernandez comments.
Error posting link. Damn iPad
Are you sure it wasn’t the fault of the Link-o-Matic 9000?
Now we can add “supporting the Ayatollahs” to leftwing lunacy. I suppose Obama would approve, if anyone still cared what he thinks.
My friend’s parents just went back to Iran and he is very worried.
Hat da jemand Flaschenwurst gesagt?
Haven’t an account so not an option.
It’s the revenge of the Ukrainian rent boys.
Hat da jemand Flaschenwurst gesagt?
Justification if ever I saw it.
Ah, I keep forgetting about that possibility.
He is replying to this tweet.
And here is a screen shot of the exchange:
Thread.
— Minneapolis Isn’t a Movie
Aelf: you can change the x in the URL to xcancel, and then you’ll be able to see the entire thread and replies. In this case, for example, it’s https://xcancel.com/AlexNowrasteh/status/2011149169797529709 .
Too neat. Thanks, that’s going to save a lot of bother.
I don’t think Mr Nowrasteh, about whom I know little else, beyond his claim of being “a very careful scholar,” will fare terribly well in a longer exchange. He’s very close to illustrating, inadvertently, the phenomenon being discussed.
Poking through the related threads, the other tetchy and self-satisfied replies, I was rather struck by how readily some people will lie in order to ‘win’, as they see it. I mean, just blatantly, as if no-one will notice:
Though I did like this, from one of Mr Burkett’s replies,
That’s pretty good, and not inapt.
And so, the initial point being aired – that daring to disagree with progressive conceits is in itself often deemed misbehaviour, an act of wickedness – and by implication, a basis for punishment – is conveniently lost in the rush to make precisely those assumptions.
How about “a sometimes careful propagandist”?
Contrast him with a truly careful and conscientious scholar like Thomas Sowell, who will meticulously address contesting ideas.
He and his confreres at the Cato Institute seem to never take into account any contrary evidence or arguments, but rather omit them from their papers and blogging on whatever positions the Cato Institute favors. Thus, for example, the social problems of mass immigration are ignored or denied.
Compare him also to a scholar like Jordan Peterson who will actually listen to what interviewees and debate opponents say, attempt to search out their exact intended meaning, and respond accordingly. Nowrasteh and nearly everyone else on the left don’t actually listen in a spirit of honest interest in the truth, but instead rehearse their canned denunciations, defamations, and insults.
I, too, have been noticing that for some time now. As far back as the 70’s, but with steadily (exponentially?) increasing frequency. Some of the lies are jaw-droppingly astonishing in their bold blatantness.
@dicentra: Here is another “why do they always look like that” person.
I know virtually nothing about anime, but the recent reports of “localizers” removing dialog that the left dislikes while adding content the left does like are…interesting.
[ Starts compiling Friday’s Ephemera. ]
I may have found something that qualifies as uplifting.
The unspanked.
Do we need to stage an intervention?
It has happened before, several times, it’s just that each time it happens I’m slightly taken aback.
Don’t worry, I’ll make sure there’s other stuff that’s grim, squalid or revolting.
Street theatre indeed.
Almost exclusively yte wxmyn, imagine my surprise.
There was one video from a few years ago – now vanished, alas – showing a dog stranded at sea on a block of ice and efforts by sailors to rescue it. Brought a manly dampness to the eye.
I had to go next door and kick the neighbour’s puppy, just to balance things.
Extra-curricular.
The AWFL Truth:
So what makes white liberal women so uniquely terrible?
Turns out they’re miserable. The 2024 American Family Survey found that 37% of conservative women and 28% of moderate women between 18 and 40 reported being “completely satisfied” with their lives. For liberal women in the same age group, that figure collapses to just 12%. Liberal women are almost three times more likely than conservative women to experience loneliness multiple times a week, 29% compared to 11%.
(snip)
The ideological effect on young women’s happiness holds up even when you control for age, education, race, and income. Liberal young women… are lonelier, angrier, more negative, and disconnected from the very things that might actually make people happy.
The problem is that their unhappiness doesn’t stay internalized. It spills out into politics and social justice causes. That’s why people such as Renee Good felt justified in attacking an ICE officer. Was she thinking about her family? Her children? No. She was yet another unhappy liberal woman who took solace in her social justice causes over anything else
https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/01/10/white-liberal-women-really-are-bat-poop-crazy-and-this-proves-it-n4948130
Yep. One thing I do need to add: X links from Instapundit (and maybe other sites too) often have a lot of cruft after the post ID, and if you run such a link through XCancel, it’ll give you a 403 error. You then need to remove all of that, so the link looks similar to the one below (ending in status/ and the 19- or whatever-digit ID).
Yes. Basically, look for a question mark in the URL. It, and everything after it, should be removed. That part usually identifies where the link came from.
[ Strokes Link-O-Matic 9000, whispers human error. ]
Had to log in again…godknowswhy…first time in several weeks now…anyway…
Does anyone know what’s up with the “?s=61” bs that started being appended to x links somewhat recently? At first I thought it was like YT links that started you 61 seconds or whatever into the video. Odd that it doesn’t seem related to videos and it is almost always (for me any) s=61? I delete it out of OCD habit but wonder what relevance it has.
WordPress will ask you to log in periodically as a security feature. If it happens too frequently, it may be an expired cookie, a browser caching issue, or due to VPN use.
But we’re at the limits of what is laughingly referred to as my technical know-how.
Well at least it is less frequent. Guessing it’s a randomized thing that maybe they spread the range or moved the range window on recently. Now that I think of it, you’re likely the only person on WordPress that I follow. Not that that’s good or bad…
And in the follow domain, I sadly have about a half hour of emptiness in my mornings now that Scott Adams has passed. Not that I always agreed with him but I greatly respected and valued hearing his take on events of the day. Amazing that he was still posting forward-looking stuff until the day before he passed. I remember when Eric Sevaried died (CBS news editorialist, way back in the 1970’s) there was a political cartoon of a guy saying that since that event, he didn’t know what to think anymore. Not that I would outsource my thinking/opinions to that degree but it feels similar.
Heh. Not entirely sure who the Dutch woman is but curious if there’s a way to find out ahead of time if the UK considers one a threat of such degree that they won’t let them in? Hate to make arrangements with Cunard when one can just sneak in on any cheap ass boat. Asking for a friend of course.
[ Schedules Friday Ephemera (800). ]
Chuffing Nora. Eight hundred of these buggers.
That’s around 20,000 entries.
[ Dabs forehead with moistened towel, demands gin and tonic. ]
Bonnie Blue territory.
Will we be seeing you in The Spectator soon?
I mean, I don’t like to throw around the word heroic…
By the way, and since you ask, I’m on elite stage 26 of Rogue Defence.
[ Checks invoices. ]
I believe the reserve tank in the Lair of Evil’s bunker #2 still has over 3,000 gallons.
And the British Gin and Tonic Corporation thanks you.
[ Cue Sherry Drinking Vicar Monty Python sketch. ]
Which makes me glad we got to see Blighty in ’24 before all this nonsense started.
They instituted the Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) system where you get to pay 17 pounds to find out if you’re on their list.
Given my recent posting history on X, I suspect they’ll do the same to me now.